McBride (MCB) Competitors

McBride currently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 18.14%. Baltic Classifieds Group has a consensus price target of GBX 251, suggesting a potential upside of 39.37%. Given Baltic Classifieds Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Baltic Classifieds Group is more favorable than McBride.

McBride has a beta of 1.477, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baltic Classifieds Group has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a net margin of 57.55% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Baltic Classifieds Group's return on equity.

Baltic Classifieds Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McBride. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baltic Classifieds Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, McBride had 9 more articles in the media than Baltic Classifieds Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 7 mentions for Baltic Classifieds Group. Baltic Classifieds Group's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Baltic Classifieds Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.0% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Baltic Classifieds Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Baltic Classifieds Group pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

McBride presently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 18.14%. Burford Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 41.24%. Given Burford Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Burford Capital is more favorable than McBride.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Burford Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McBride. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Burford Capital pays out -1.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Burford Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

McBride has a beta of 1.477, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Burford Capital has a beta of 1.077, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McBride had 14 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 2 mentions for Burford Capital. Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Burford Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, McBride had 13 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 3 mentions for DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that DFS Furniture is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

McBride has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has a beta of 1.477, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.442, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

McBride currently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 18.14%. DFS Furniture has a consensus price target of GBX 222.50, suggesting a potential upside of 65.22%. Given DFS Furniture's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than McBride.

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat DFS Furniture's return on equity.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

19.2% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.026, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.477, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

McBride has a net margin of 3.20% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -294.48%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Invinity Energy Systems currently has a consensus target price of GBX 50, suggesting a potential upside of 75.44%. McBride has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 18.14%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than McBride.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 10 more articles in the media than McBride. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 16 mentions for McBride. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.