McBride (MCB) Competitors

Baltic Classifieds Group has a net margin of 57.67% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Baltic Classifieds Group's return on equity.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a beta of 1.091, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.446, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

49.4% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.8% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baltic Classifieds Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 309, indicating a potential upside of 58.31%. McBride has a consensus target price of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 25.00%. Given Baltic Classifieds Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Baltic Classifieds Group is more favorable than McBride.

Baltic Classifieds Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McBride. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baltic Classifieds Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Baltic Classifieds Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Baltic Classifieds Group pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. McBride is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, McBride had 6 more articles in the media than Baltic Classifieds Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for McBride and 0 mentions for Baltic Classifieds Group. Baltic Classifieds Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat McBride's score of 0.18 indicating that Baltic Classifieds Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Burford Capital pays out 44.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

McBride presently has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 25.00%. Burford Capital has a consensus target price of GBX 500, suggesting a potential upside of 24.69%. Given McBride's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe McBride is more favorable than Burford Capital.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.9% of Burford Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Burford Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has a beta of 1.446, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Burford Capital has a beta of 1.235, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Burford Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McBride. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Burford Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, McBride had 5 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for McBride and 1 mentions for Burford Capital. Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat McBride's score of 0.18 indicating that Burford Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, McBride had 6 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for McBride and 0 mentions for DFS Furniture. McBride's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat DFS Furniture's score of 0.00 indicating that McBride is being referred to more favorably in the media.

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat DFS Furniture's return on equity.

McBride has a beta of 1.446, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.471, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500.

McBride currently has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 25.00%. DFS Furniture has a consensus target price of GBX 222.50, suggesting a potential upside of 84.65%. Given DFS Furniture's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than McBride.

18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.1% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. 28.8% of McBride shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McBride has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McBride currently has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 25.00%. Given McBride's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe McBride is more favorable than Shanta Gold.

18.7% of McBride shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Shanta Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.8% of McBride shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Shanta Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has a beta of 1.446, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shanta Gold has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, McBride had 6 more articles in the media than Shanta Gold. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for McBride and 0 mentions for Shanta Gold. McBride's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Shanta Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that McBride is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Shanta Gold has a net margin of 8.96% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Shanta Gold's return on equity.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Shanta Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Shanta Gold pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. McBride is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Shanta Gold. Shanta Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.