Go Pro

McBride (MCB) Competitors

McBride logo
GBX 160.25 -3.15 (-1.93%)
As of 07:55 AM Eastern

MCB vs. TRST, BCG, BUR, DFS, and IES

Should you buy McBride stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares McBride with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with McBride include Trustpilot Group (TRST), Baltic Classifieds Group (BCG), Burford Capital (BUR), DFS Furniture (DFS), and Invinity Energy Systems (IES). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does McBride compare to Trustpilot Group?

Trustpilot Group (LON:TRST) and McBride (LON:MCB) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Trustpilot Group. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trustpilot Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trustpilot Group£261.05M4.00£20.08M£1.80150.06
McBride£930.30M0.29£33.16M£16.909.48

49.5% of Trustpilot Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 13.5% of Trustpilot Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McBride has a net margin of 3.20% compared to Trustpilot Group's net margin of 2.97%. Trustpilot Group's return on equity of 64.11% beat McBride's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trustpilot Group2.97% 64.11% 1.45%
McBride 3.20%30.98%8.54%

In the previous week, McBride had 12 more articles in the media than Trustpilot Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 4 mentions for Trustpilot Group. Trustpilot Group's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Trustpilot Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trustpilot Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Trustpilot Group has a beta of 0.507, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.477, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Trustpilot Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 351.25, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. McBride has a consensus price target of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 18.57%. Given Trustpilot Group's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Trustpilot Group is more favorable than McBride.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trustpilot Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

McBride beats Trustpilot Group on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McBride compare to Baltic Classifieds Group?

Baltic Classifieds Group (LON:BCG) and McBride (LON:MCB) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Baltic Classifieds Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 251, suggesting a potential upside of 39.21%. McBride has a consensus price target of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 18.57%. Given Baltic Classifieds Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Baltic Classifieds Group is more favorable than McBride.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baltic Classifieds Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Baltic Classifieds Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.89 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Baltic Classifieds Group pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

59.0% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of Baltic Classifieds Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of McBride shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Baltic Classifieds Group has a net margin of 57.55% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Baltic Classifieds Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baltic Classifieds Group57.55% 15.59% 5.86%
McBride 3.20%30.98%8.54%

In the previous week, McBride had 9 more articles in the media than Baltic Classifieds Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 7 mentions for Baltic Classifieds Group. Baltic Classifieds Group's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Baltic Classifieds Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baltic Classifieds Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Baltic Classifieds Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McBride. McBride is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baltic Classifieds Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baltic Classifieds Group£88.49M8.91£45.57M£10.7016.85
McBride£930.30M0.29£33.16M£16.909.48

Baltic Classifieds Group has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.477, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Baltic Classifieds Group and McBride tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McBride compare to Burford Capital?

McBride (LON:MCB) and Burford Capital (LON:BUR) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

McBride pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Burford Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. McBride pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Burford Capital pays out -1.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Burford Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Burford Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than McBride. Burford Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McBride£930.30M0.29£33.16M£16.909.48
Burford Capital-£1.54B-0.45£193.30M-£732.00N/A

Burford Capital has a net margin of 17.12% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Burford Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McBride3.20% 30.98% 8.54%
Burford Capital 17.12%2.49%10.28%

18.7% of McBride shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Burford Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of McBride shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Burford Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has a beta of 1.477, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Burford Capital has a beta of 1.077, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, McBride had 14 more articles in the media than Burford Capital. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 2 mentions for Burford Capital. Burford Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Burford Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Burford Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

McBride currently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 18.57%. Burford Capital has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 41.14%. Given Burford Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Burford Capital is more favorable than McBride.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Burford Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

McBride and Burford Capital tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McBride compare to DFS Furniture?

DFS Furniture (LON:DFS) and McBride (LON:MCB) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, McBride had 13 more articles in the media than DFS Furniture. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for McBride and 3 mentions for DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that DFS Furniture is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DFS Furniture
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

DFS Furniture has a net margin of 3.27% compared to McBride's net margin of 3.20%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat DFS Furniture's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DFS Furniture3.27% 13.23% 3.00%
McBride 3.20%30.98%8.54%

66.3% of DFS Furniture shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of McBride shares are held by institutional investors. 38.9% of DFS Furniture shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.1% of McBride shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DFS Furniture. DFS Furniture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DFS Furniture£1.07B0.29-£4.30M£15.008.98
McBride£930.30M0.29£33.16M£16.909.48

DFS Furniture has a beta of 1.442, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, McBride has a beta of 1.477, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the broader market.

DFS Furniture presently has a consensus target price of GBX 222.50, suggesting a potential upside of 65.22%. McBride has a consensus target price of GBX 190, suggesting a potential upside of 18.57%. Given DFS Furniture's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DFS Furniture is more favorable than McBride.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DFS Furniture
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

McBride beats DFS Furniture on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does McBride compare to Invinity Energy Systems?

McBride (LON:MCB) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

McBride has higher revenue and earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McBride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McBride£930.30M0.29£33.16M£16.909.48
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M19.85-£37.71M-£5.10N/A

McBride has a beta of 1.477, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.026, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

18.7% of McBride shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.2% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.1% of McBride shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

McBride presently has a consensus price target of GBX 190, indicating a potential upside of 18.57%. Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus price target of GBX 50, indicating a potential upside of 75.13%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than McBride.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McBride
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 9 more articles in the media than McBride. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 16 mentions for McBride. Invinity Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat McBride's score of -0.02 indicating that Invinity Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McBride
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Invinity Energy Systems
23 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

McBride has a net margin of 3.20% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -294.48%. McBride's return on equity of 30.98% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McBride3.20% 30.98% 8.54%
Invinity Energy Systems -294.48%-39.44%-18.76%

Summary

McBride beats Invinity Energy Systems on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get McBride News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MCB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MCB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MCB vs. The Competition

MetricMcBrideHousehold & Personal Products IndustryDefensive SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£273.80M£12.47B£8.44B£2.83B
Dividend Yield1.84%2.66%3.15%6.15%
P/E Ratio9.4814.45891.64368.96
Price / Sales0.2910,305,976.88992,149.1786,067.36
Price / Cash7.6917.16140.9227.87
Price / Book4.352.599.757.78
Net Income£33.16M£912.33M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.12%0.41%0.30%0.97%
1 Month Performance-1.93%3.61%0.76%-0.34%
1 Year Performance4.74%-2.04%244.25%70.79%

McBride Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MCB
McBride
2.7036 of 5 stars
GBX 160.25
-1.9%
GBX 190
+18.6%
+6.8%£273.80M£930.30M9.48240
TRST
Trustpilot Group
3.7918 of 5 stars
GBX 228.80
-3.4%
GBX 351.25
+53.5%
+18.3%£884.83M£261.05M127.11820
BCG
Baltic Classifieds Group
3.9832 of 5 stars
GBX 182.40
-3.1%
GBX 308.75
+69.3%
-47.2%£797.41M£85.82M17.71130
BUR
Burford Capital
2.6591 of 5 stars
GBX 306.60
-1.7%
GBX 450
+46.8%
-67.6%£671.67M-£1.54BN/A140
DFS
DFS Furniture
3.7241 of 5 stars
GBX 141.20
+2.0%
GBX 222.50
+57.6%
-19.6%£326.91M£1.07B9.4120,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MCB) was last updated on 7/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners