Go Pro
→ New Chip takes minutes, not days (From Eagle Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free SBSI Stock Alerts

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI) Competitors

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust logo
GBX 78 -1.00 (-1.27%)
As of 03:14 AM Eastern
Compare

SBSI vs. WPC, JETI, STS, SCF, and CBP

Should you buy Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (WPC), JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (JETI), STS Global Income & Growth Trust (STS), Schroder Income Growth (SCF), and Curtis Banks Group (CBP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)?

Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) (LON:WPC) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s net margin of 0.00%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)N/A N/A N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L). Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)£6.74M0.00N/A£5.70N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.24£1.04M£2.1536.28

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) pays out 0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L) on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool?

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool (LON:JETI) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool pays out 0.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher revenue and earnings than JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/AN/AN/A£67.80N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.24£1.04M£2.1536.28

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 3 more articles in the media than JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income PoolN/A N/A N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to STS Global Income & Growth Trust?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LON:STS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.24£1.04M£2.1536.28
STS Global Income & Growth Trust-£10.37M-22.64£18.28M-£10.03N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.91 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. STS Global Income & Growth Trust pays out -98.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a net margin of 142.51% compared to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's net margin of 51.03%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat STS Global Income & Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
STS Global Income & Growth Trust 142.51%-4.38%2.28%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, STS Global Income & Growth Trust has a beta of 0.546, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.4% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of STS Global Income & Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 2 more articles in the media than STS Global Income & Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 1 mentions for STS Global Income & Growth Trust. STS Global Income & Growth Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.95 beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's score of 1.60 indicating that STS Global Income & Growth Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats STS Global Income & Growth Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Schroder Income Growth?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Schroder Income Growth (LON:SCF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Schroder Income Growth has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Schroder Income Growth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.24£1.04M£2.1536.28
Schroder Income Growth£54.92M4.19£37.42M£79.774.44

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Schroder Income Growth. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 1 mentions for Schroder Income Growth. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Schroder Income Growth's score of 1.26 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Schroder Income Growth
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Schroder Income Growth pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder Income Growth pays out 18.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.3% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schroder Income Growth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder Income Growth has a beta of 1.079, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroder Income Growth has a net margin of 94.75% compared to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's net margin of 51.03%. Schroder Income Growth's return on equity of 21.54% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Schroder Income Growth 94.75%21.54%4.32%

Summary

Schroder Income Growth beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Curtis Banks Group?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Curtis Banks Group (LON:CBP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Curtis Banks Group's net margin of -9.86%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Curtis Banks Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Curtis Banks Group -9.86%-8.89%0.15%

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Curtis Banks Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Curtis Banks Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Curtis Banks Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Curtis Banks Group Neutral

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Curtis Banks Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Curtis Banks Group pays out -9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtis Banks Group has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Curtis Banks Group. Curtis Banks Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.24£1.04M£2.1536.28
Curtis Banks Group£68.06M0.00-£6.71M-£0.10N/A

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.1% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Curtis Banks Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder BSC Social Impact TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£60.82M£5.14B£13.28B£2.80B
Dividend Yield4.76%7.55%6.03%6.18%
P/E Ratio36.2829.3324.46366.19
Price / Sales26.241,266.30507.0389,457.53
Price / Cash63.3347.7747.4527.89
Price / Book0.753.492.696.85
Net Income£1.04M£417.69M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.73%-1.06%-0.71%
1 Month Performance1.30%5.24%0.98%16.92%
1 Year Performance13.01%3.31%8.09%16.51%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 78
-1.3%		N/A+13.0%£60.82M£2.32M36.28810
WPC
Witan Pacific Investment Trust PLC (WPC.L)
N/AN/AN/AN/A£242.69M£6.74M69.65190
JETI
JPMorgan European Investment Trust Income Pool
N/AN/AN/AN/A£242.54MN/A2.28N/A
STS
STS Global Income & Growth Trust
N/AGBX 222.67
-0.6%		N/A-10.0%£240.70M-£10.37MN/A6
SCF
Schroder Income Growth
N/AGBX 369
+0.3%		N/A+7.6%£239.92M£54.92M4.63N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SBSI) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
A new kind of civil war is coming after election day?
Across America, AI-driven backlash is fueling protests, lawsuits, and moratoria that could reshape the politic...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
The rich already moved their money
By the time a crash hits the news, it's already too late to protect your money. Parkview Capital's free Mar...
Parkview Capital Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
My next big call (under $1)
Crypto traders have a name for this month... Uptober. Since 2013, Bitcoin has closed October higher in 10 of 1...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
New Chip takes minutes, not days
George Gilder believes today's AI data centers could become tomorrow's typewriters - replaced by a single wafe...
Eagle Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SEC Just Opened The Floodgates…
The SEC removed the 25 year old Pattern Day Trader rule in June 2026, cutting the minimum to open a trading ac...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel