Free Trial
→ How to play the Biggest IPO in stock market history! (From InvestPub) (Ad)tc pixel Free SBSI Stock Alerts

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI) Competitors

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust logo
GBX 70 +0.50 (+0.72%)
As of 06/12/2026 04:17 AM Eastern
Compare

SBSI vs. IES, SHG, FIF, RM, and CFX

Should you buy Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust include Invinity Energy Systems (IES), Shanta Gold (SHG), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), RM (RM), and Colefax Group (CFX). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Invinity Energy Systems?

Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 24 more articles in the media than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Invinity Energy Systems' score of 1.74 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Invinity Energy Systems
22 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Invinity Energy Systems currently has a consensus price target of GBX 35, suggesting a potential upside of 12.90%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 1.056, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

19.2% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Invinity Energy Systems£8.18M21.55-£37.71M-£5.10N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.65£1.04M£2.1532.56

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -294.48%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Invinity Energy Systems-294.48% -39.44% -18.76%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Summary

Invinity Energy Systems and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Shanta Gold?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Shanta Gold (LON:SHG) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Shanta Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Shanta Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.65£1.04M£2.1532.56
Shanta Gold£150.50M0.00£13.48M£0.01N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shanta Gold has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Shanta Gold's net margin of 8.96%. Shanta Gold's return on equity of 8.47% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Shanta Gold 8.96%8.47%7.61%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Shanta Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Shanta Gold pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Shanta Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Shanta Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Shanta Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Shanta Gold. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Shanta Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Shanta Gold Neutral

Summary

Shanta Gold beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Finsbury Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Finsbury Food Group pays out 3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Finsbury Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Finsbury Food Group Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Finsbury Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.65£1.04M£2.1532.56

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Finsbury Food Group's net margin of 2.60%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Finsbury Food Group2.60% 9.29% 5.12%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to RM?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.627, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.65£1.04M£2.1532.56
RM£189.50M0.46-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to RM's net margin of 1.35%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
RM 1.35%10.33%-1.51%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, RM had 5 more articles in the media than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for RM and 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat RM's score of 0.64 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
RM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

RM beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Colefax Group?

Colefax Group (LON:CFX) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Colefax Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Colefax Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Colefax Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Colefax Group Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Colefax Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Colefax Group pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Colefax Group's net margin of 6.13%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colefax Group6.13% 20.89% 6.87%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Colefax Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 38.30%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

29.1% of Colefax Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Colefax Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colefax Group£116.16M0.63£5.49M£121.7011.59
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M23.65£1.04M£2.1532.56

Colefax Group has a beta of 0.203, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Colefax Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder BSC Social Impact TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£54.42M£2.50B£5.89B£3.00B
Dividend Yield5.41%6.05%5.29%6.18%
P/E Ratio32.5625.7916.36366.78
Price / Sales23.652,076.291,403.7586,623.82
Price / Cash63.3360.3348.7727.87
Price / Book0.681.376.577.85
Net Income£1.04M£265.36M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.94%0.32%1.17%-0.06%
1 Month Performance9.38%0.15%1.09%0.95%
1 Year Performance-6.67%11.01%20.39%75.33%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 70
+0.7%		N/A-6.7%£54.42M£2.32M32.56810
IES
Invinity Energy Systems
1.9412 of 5 stars		GBX 34.70
-12.2%		GBX 35
+0.9%		+88.9%£197.36M£8.18MN/A140
SHG
Shanta Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£154.98M£150.50M1,476.00190
FIF
Finsbury Food Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.42M£413.74M1,375.00206
RM
RM
N/AGBX 105
+0.5%		N/A-5.0%£88.69M£189.50MN/A1,990

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SBSI) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Is SpaceX really worth 1.78 Trillion?
With SpaceX approaching a near-$2 trillion valuation, most investors are focused on the IPO itself - but analy...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The number nobody's bragging about
SPCX - the largest IPO in history - was predicted to open at $175. It opened at $150. Insiders bought in at a ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
There’s a new type of capitalism
The U.S. government has taken direct equity positions in at least 10 companies - Intel, U.S. Steel, Westinghou...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
After “33X” call, Jon Najarian reveals NEW Tesla prediction…
Jon Najarian called Tesla a buy in 2014 before the stock climbed as high as 3,392%. He also called Palantir on...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your free guide attached (normally $29.97)
Bill Poulos is offering his 'Simple Options Trading For Beginners' guide at no cost - normally priced at $29.9...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BUY THIS: Claim a backdoor stake in SpaceX
There may be a way to claim pre-IPO exposure to SpaceX before it ever hits public markets - using a simple tra...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel