Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI) Competitors

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust logo
GBX 66 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/22/2026
Compare

SBSI vs. SHG, FIF, IES, RM, and CFX

Should you buy Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust include Shanta Gold (SHG), Finsbury Food Group (FIF), Invinity Energy Systems (IES), RM (RM), and Colefax Group (CFX). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Shanta Gold?

Shanta Gold (LON:SHG) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

80.4% of Shanta Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of Shanta Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Shanta Gold's net margin of 8.96%. Shanta Gold's return on equity of 8.47% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shanta Gold8.96% 8.47% 7.61%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Shanta Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Shanta Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shanta Gold£150.50M0.00£13.48M£0.01N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M22.42£1.04M£2.1530.70

Shanta Gold has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Shanta Gold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Shanta Gold pays out 25.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Shanta Gold. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Shanta Gold. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Shanta Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shanta Gold Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Summary

Shanta Gold beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Finsbury Food Group?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Finsbury Food Group (LON:FIF) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Finsbury Food Group's net margin of 2.60%. Finsbury Food Group's return on equity of 9.29% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Finsbury Food Group 2.60%9.29%5.12%

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.5% of Finsbury Food Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Finsbury Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Finsbury Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M22.42£1.04M£2.1530.70
Finsbury Food Group£413.74M0.00£10.77M£0.08N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Finsbury Food Group has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Finsbury Food Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Finsbury Food Group pays out 3,750.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Finsbury Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Finsbury Food Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Finsbury Food Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Finsbury Food Group Neutral

Summary

Finsbury Food Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Invinity Energy Systems?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Invinity Energy Systems (LON:IES) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Invinity Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Invinity Energy Systems' net margin of -595.51%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Invinity Energy Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Invinity Energy Systems -595.51%-35.65%-18.76%

Invinity Energy Systems has a consensus price target of GBX 35, suggesting a potential upside of 9.38%. Given Invinity Energy Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Invinity Energy Systems is more favorable than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Invinity Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Invinity Energy Systems. Invinity Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M22.42£1.04M£2.1530.70
Invinity Energy Systems£3.63M50.08-£37.71M-£4.40N/A

In the previous week, Invinity Energy Systems had 29 more articles in the media than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Invinity Energy Systems and 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Invinity Energy Systems' score of 1.73 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Invinity Energy Systems
25 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Invinity Energy Systems has a beta of 0.926, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Invinity Energy Systems beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to RM?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M22.42£1.04M£2.1530.70
RM£189.50M0.46-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to RM's net margin of 1.35%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
RM 1.35%10.33%-1.51%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, RM had 5 more articles in the media than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for RM and 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat RM's score of 0.52 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
RM
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

RM beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Colefax Group?

Colefax Group (LON:CFX) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Colefax Group's net margin of 6.13%. Colefax Group's return on equity of 20.89% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Colefax Group6.13% 20.89% 6.87%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Colefax Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Colefax Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Colefax Group£116.16M0.59£5.49M£121.7010.90
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M22.42£1.04M£2.1530.70

Colefax Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Colefax Group pays out 4.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Colefax Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Colefax Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Colefax Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Colefax Group Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Colefax Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 870, indicating a potential downside of 34.44%. Given Colefax Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Colefax Group is more favorable than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Colefax Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

29.1% of Colefax Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.8% of Colefax Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Colefax Group has a beta of 0.211, indicating that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Colefax Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder BSC Social Impact TrustAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£51.96M£2.41B£5.85B£2.79B
Dividend Yield5.70%5.94%5.22%6.10%
P/E Ratio30.7025.2815.89365.89
Price / Sales22.421,970.451,012.7787,843.39
Price / Cash63.3360.1792.8127.89
Price / Book0.641.386.577.69
Net Income£1.04M£265.53M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.22%0.81%0.79%1.56%
1 Month Performance3.13%1.98%1.89%3.18%
1 Year Performance-14.29%13.18%19.90%78.31%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 66
flat		N/A-14.3%£51.96M£2.32M30.70810
SHG
Shanta Gold
N/AN/AN/AN/A£154.98M£150.50M1,476.00190
FIF
Finsbury Food Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.42M£413.74M1,375.00206
IES
Invinity Energy Systems
1.5974 of 5 stars		GBX 22.33
-0.8%		GBX 33
+47.8%		+132.7%£127.01M£3.63MN/A140
RM
RM
N/AGBX 98.20
-0.8%		N/A+9.6%£82.95M£189.50MN/A1,990

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SBSI) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel