SBSI vs. TENT, IVPG, GCL, FEN, CHI, CRS, VIP, BEMO, MIG4, and MATE
Should you be buying Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust include Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), Invesco Select Glo Eq (IVPG), Geiger Counter (GCL), Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), CT UK High Income (CHI), Crystal Amber Fund (CRS), Value and Indexed Property Income (VIP), Barings Emerging EMEA Opportunities (BEMO), Mobeus Income & Growth 4 VCT (MIG4), and JPMorgan Multi-Asset Growth & Income (MATE). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and community ranking.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 64.53% compared to Triple Point Energy Transition's net margin of 11.35%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 1.72% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its share price is 113% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and Triple Point Energy Transition both received 0 outperform votes by MarketBeat users.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Triple Point Energy Transition pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.1%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 10,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
72.1% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.2% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Triple Point Energy Transition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust.
In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Triple Point Energy Transition's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
