Go Pro
→ Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now (From Awesomely) (Ad)tc pixel Free SBSI Stock Alerts

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI) Competitors

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust logo
GBX 78.90 +0.40 (+0.51%)
As of 03:14 AM Eastern
Compare

SBSI vs. EGL, CLIG, CBP, BGUK, and ABD

Should you buy Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (EGL), City of London Investment Group (CLIG), Curtis Banks Group (CBP), Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust (BGUK), and abrdn New Dawn (ABD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust (LON:EGL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.54£1.04M£2.1536.70
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust£68.02M3.55-£9.63M£64.923.99

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a net margin of 271.70% compared to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's net margin of 51.03%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's return on equity of 25.45% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust 271.70%25.45%-4.86%

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust Neutral

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust has a beta of 1.004, meaning that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.2% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust pays out 13.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to City of London Investment Group?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. City of London Investment Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. City of London Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.54£1.04M£2.1536.70
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.05£15.02M£42.1011.02

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
City of London Investment Group Neutral

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.327, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
City of London Investment Group 27.87%14.29%7.65%

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Curtis Banks Group?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and Curtis Banks Group (LON:CBP) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtis Banks Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Curtis Banks Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Curtis Banks Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Curtis Banks Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
Curtis Banks Group Neutral

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Curtis Banks Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Curtis Banks Group pays out -9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.1% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Curtis Banks Group's net margin of -9.86%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Curtis Banks Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
Curtis Banks Group -9.86%-8.89%0.15%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Curtis Banks Group. Curtis Banks Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.54£1.04M£2.1536.70
Curtis Banks Group£68.06M0.00-£6.71M-£0.10N/A

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Curtis Banks Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust?

Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust (LON:BGUK) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust has a net margin of 91.43% compared to Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's net margin of 51.03%. Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust's return on equity of 13.49% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust91.43% 13.49% 0.31%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

8.4% of Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 5.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust has a beta of 1.356, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust£35.41M6.40£53.08M£29.127.34
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.54£1.04M£2.1536.70

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to abrdn New Dawn?

abrdn New Dawn (LON:ABD) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

66.8% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn New Dawn pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. abrdn New Dawn pays out -2,727.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn New Dawn. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for abrdn New Dawn. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat abrdn New Dawn's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn New Dawn Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn New Dawn. abrdn New Dawn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn New Dawn-£19.43M0.00-£23.50M-£0.22N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.54£1.04M£2.1536.70

abrdn New Dawn has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to abrdn New Dawn's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat abrdn New Dawn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn New DawnN/A -7.11% -3.80%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats abrdn New Dawn on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder BSC Social Impact TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£61.52M£5.58B£14.05B£2.87B
Dividend Yield4.82%7.43%5.91%6.22%
P/E Ratio36.7031.0025.79366.61
Price / Sales26.541,191.40504.2183,890.70
Price / Cash63.3348.0340.7027.89
Price / Book0.763.562.766.43
Net Income£1.04M£419.48M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.25%6.43%2.43%17.58%
1 Month Performance2.40%-0.85%0.64%0.54%
1 Year Performance12.71%5.75%10.54%20.55%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 78.90
+0.5%		N/A+12.1%£61.52M£2.32M36.70810
EGL
Ecofin Global Utilities and Infrastructure Trust
N/AGBX 258
-0.4%		N/A+23.5%£238.68M£68.02M3.978,700
CLIG
City of London Investment Group
N/AGBX 482
-1.8%		N/A+22.7%£237.98M£75.14M11.45120
CBP
Curtis Banks Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£236.20M£68.06MN/A802
BGUK
Baillie Gifford UK Growth Trust
N/AGBX 222
-2.6%		N/A+5.9%£236.13M£35.41M7.62N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SBSI) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX pays a 10X launch penalty
SpaceX burns roughly $200,000 in fuel per Falcon 9 launch - about $20 million across 100 missions. One unde...
Freedom Financial | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce at $2 - now I see the same setup again
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce under $2 - a misunderstood aerospace name the market had wri...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
What Is A Roth Conversion, And How Do I Set One Up?
A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA or employer plan into a Roth IRA, triggering income tax t...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Jon Najarian's #1 Energy Trade for 2026
Jon Najarian says he's never been more excited about an energy opportunity. SpaceX just went public at over $2...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Gold majors have a big problem
Newmont spent 15 billion dollars acquiring Newcrest in 2023, the largest deal in gold mining history. Yet prod...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump goes "all-in" on Grand Canyon energy breakthrough
A drilling crew near the Grand Canyon uncovered a clean energy well producing nearly eight times the output of...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel