Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free SBSI Stock Alerts

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (SBSI) Competitors

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust logo
GBX 78 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/14/2026
Compare

SBSI vs. CLIG, AUSC, CBP, ABD, and CCPG

Should you buy Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust stock or one of its competitors? Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include City of London Investment Group (CLIG), abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust (AUSC), Curtis Banks Group (CBP), abrdn New Dawn (ABD), and CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities (CCPG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to City of London Investment Group?

City of London Investment Group (LON:CLIG) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than City of London Investment Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for City of London Investment Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat City of London Investment Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
City of London Investment Group Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

City of London Investment Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 43.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.0%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. City of London Investment Group pays out 103.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. City of London Investment Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

City of London Investment Group has a beta of 0.317, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

City of London Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. City of London Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
City of London Investment Group£75.14M3.18£15.02M£42.1011.50
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.28£1.04M£2.1536.28

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to City of London Investment Group's net margin of 27.87%. City of London Investment Group's return on equity of 14.29% beat Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
City of London Investment Group27.87% 14.29% 7.65%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

12.7% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 44.0% of City of London Investment Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

City of London Investment Group beats Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust?

abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust (LON:AUSC) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust's net margin of -90.09%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust-90.09% -3.35% -4.68%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust has a beta of 1.516, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust pays out -109.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

7.0% of abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust. abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust-£4.07M-58.59£49.86M-£12.04N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.28£1.04M£2.1536.28

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to Curtis Banks Group?

Curtis Banks Group (LON:CBP) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

55.1% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 39.5% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to Curtis Banks Group's net margin of -9.86%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat Curtis Banks Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Curtis Banks Group-9.86% -8.89% 0.15%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Curtis Banks Group has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, meaning that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Curtis Banks Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 9 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Curtis Banks Group pays out -9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Curtis Banks Group. Curtis Banks Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Curtis Banks Group£68.06M0.00-£6.71M-£0.10N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.28£1.04M£2.1536.28

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Curtis Banks Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for Curtis Banks Group. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Curtis Banks Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Curtis Banks Group Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats Curtis Banks Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to abrdn New Dawn?

abrdn New Dawn (LON:ABD) and Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

abrdn New Dawn has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to abrdn New Dawn's net margin of 0.00%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat abrdn New Dawn's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn New DawnN/A -7.11% -3.80%
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust 51.03%2.12%1.08%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn New Dawn. abrdn New Dawn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn New Dawn-£19.43M0.00-£23.50M-£0.22N/A
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.28£1.04M£2.1536.28

66.8% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

abrdn New Dawn pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. abrdn New Dawn pays out -2,727.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn New Dawn. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for abrdn New Dawn. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat abrdn New Dawn's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
abrdn New Dawn Neutral
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats abrdn New Dawn on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust compare to CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities?

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust (LON:SBSI) and CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities (LON:CCPG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

10.8% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.06 per share. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust pays out 174.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has a net margin of 51.03% compared to CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' net margin of 0.00%. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's return on equity of 2.12% beat CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust51.03% 2.12% 1.08%
CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities N/A N/A N/A

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust£2.32M26.28£1.04M£2.1536.28
CVC Credit Partners European OpportunitiesN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust and 0 mentions for CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities. Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Very Positive
CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities Neutral

Summary

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust beats CVC Credit Partners European Opportunities on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSchroder BSC Social Impact TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£60.86M£5.75B£14.17B£2.88B
Dividend Yield4.82%7.38%5.87%6.11%
P/E Ratio36.2838.1229.34368.68
Price / Sales26.281,234.93514.9483,339.32
Price / Cash63.3348.3337.4927.89
Price / Book0.753.693.717.18
Net Income£1.04M£417.15M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.27%0.60%0.76%0.91%
1 Month Performance4.00%0.76%1.55%2.94%
1 Year Performance13.01%7.79%12.52%64.32%

Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBSI
Schroder BSC Social Impact Trust
N/AGBX 78
flat		N/A+12.7%£60.86M£2.32M36.28810
CLIG
City of London Investment Group
N/AGBX 485
-0.2%		N/A+30.5%£239.46M£75.14M11.52120
AUSC
abrdn UK Smaller Companies Growth Trust
N/AGBX 529.50
-0.1%		N/A+1.8%£237.92M-£4.07MN/AN/A
CBP
Curtis Banks Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£236.20M£68.06MN/A802
ABD
abrdn New Dawn
N/AN/AN/AN/A£235.97M-£19.43MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SBSI) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel