Go Pro

RM (RM) Competitors

RM logo
GBX 96 -3.40 (-3.42%)
As of 08/5/2026

RM vs. IQG, CER, BIG, NET, and DOTD

Should you buy RM stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares RM with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with RM include IQGeo Group (IQG), Cerillion (CER), Big Technologies (BIG), Netcall (NET), and dotdigital Group (DOTD). These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does RM compare to IQGeo Group?

RM (LON:RM) and IQGeo Group (LON:IQG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.4% of IQGeo Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of IQGeo Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RM has a net margin of 2.20% compared to IQGeo Group's net margin of 0.01%. RM's return on equity of 11.11% beat IQGeo Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM2.20% 11.11% -1.51%
IQGeo Group 0.01%0.02%2.58%

IQGeo Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM£189.50M0.43-£47.32M-£55.02N/A
IQGeo Group£44.48M0.00-£1.17MN/AN/A

RM has a beta of 1.657, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IQGeo Group has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RM's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled IQGeo Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RM Neutral
IQGeo Group Neutral

Summary

RM beats IQGeo Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RM compare to Cerillion?

RM (LON:RM) and Cerillion (LON:CER) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Cerillion pays an annual dividend of GBX 15.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cerillion pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.6% of Cerillion shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.2% of Cerillion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cerillion has a net margin of 32.24% compared to RM's net margin of 2.20%. Cerillion's return on equity of 22.77% beat RM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM2.20% 11.11% -1.51%
Cerillion 32.24%22.77%19.33%

Cerillion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cerillion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM£189.50M0.43-£47.32M-£55.02N/A
Cerillion£42.46M6.58£14.14M£46.3020.42

In the previous week, RM's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cerillion'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RM Neutral
Cerillion Neutral

Cerillion has a consensus price target of GBX 1,934, suggesting a potential upside of 104.55%. Given Cerillion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cerillion is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cerillion
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

RM has a beta of 1.657, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cerillion has a beta of 0.497, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cerillion beats RM on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RM compare to Big Technologies?

Big Technologies (LON:BIG) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Big Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat RM's score of 0.00 indicating that Big Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Big Technologies Neutral
RM Neutral

Big Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. Big Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Big Technologies£49.73M5.69£12.39M-£8.00N/A
RM£189.50M0.43-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

Big Technologies has a beta of 0.946, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.657, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Big Technologies currently has a consensus price target of GBX 101.33, suggesting a potential upside of 4.58%. Given Big Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Big Technologies is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Big Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

RM has a net margin of 2.20% compared to Big Technologies' net margin of -46.62%. RM's return on equity of 11.11% beat Big Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Big Technologies-46.62% -26.32% 5.60%
RM 2.20%11.11%-1.51%

19.4% of Big Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. 27.9% of Big Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Big Technologies beats RM on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RM compare to Netcall?

RM (LON:RM) and Netcall (LON:NET) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

63.5% of RM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.5% of Netcall shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of RM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Netcall shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Netcall pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Netcall pays out 66.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Netcall has a consensus price target of GBX 162.50, suggesting a potential upside of 38.18%. Given Netcall's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Netcall is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Netcall
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Netcall has a net margin of 4.67% compared to RM's net margin of 2.20%. RM's return on equity of 11.11% beat Netcall's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RM2.20% 11.11% -1.51%
Netcall 4.67%5.23%4.62%

RM has a beta of 1.657, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Netcall has a beta of 0.117, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RM's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Netcall'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RM Neutral
Netcall Neutral

Netcall has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RM. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Netcall, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RM£189.50M0.43-£47.32M-£55.02N/A
Netcall£51.39M3.90£5.87M£1.4282.82

Summary

Netcall beats RM on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RM compare to dotdigital Group?

dotdigital Group (LON:DOTD) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

dotdigital Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to RM's net margin of 2.20%. RM's return on equity of 11.11% beat dotdigital Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
dotdigital Group10.76% 8.80% 8.64%
RM 2.20%11.11%-1.51%

dotdigital Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. RM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than dotdigital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
dotdigital Group£85.75M1.75£11.03M£2.9416.79
RM£189.50M0.43-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

dotdigital Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 122.50, indicating a potential upside of 148.23%. Given dotdigital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe dotdigital Group is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
dotdigital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

25.0% of dotdigital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.4% of dotdigital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

dotdigital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. RM pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. dotdigital Group pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RM pays out -14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, dotdigital Group had 1 more articles in the media than RM. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for dotdigital Group and 0 mentions for RM. dotdigital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat RM's score of 0.00 indicating that dotdigital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
dotdigital Group Neutral
RM Neutral

dotdigital Group has a beta of 1.447, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.657, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

dotdigital Group beats RM on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get RM News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RM vs. The Competition

MetricRMSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£81.09M£15.69B£29.68B£2.89B
Dividend Yield14.81%3.42%2.72%6.11%
P/E Ratio-1.74135.3080.13368.41
Price / Sales0.431,296.69598.1483,680.67
Price / Cash9.3745.4350.0827.89
Price / Book6.586.729.317.17
Net Income-£47.32M£436.18M£660.31M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.04%3.05%4.11%1.95%
1 Month Performance-1.03%0.64%-0.06%1.62%
1 Year Performance-4.00%8.03%176.77%74.53%

RM Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RM
RM
N/AGBX 96
-3.4%
N/A-4.0%£81.09M£189.50MN/A1,990
IQG
IQGeo Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£295.50M£44.48MN/A217
CER
Cerillion
3.3047 of 5 stars
GBX 978
+0.2%
GBX 1,934
+97.8%
-36.2%£288.91M£42.46M21.12321
BIG
Big Technologies
0.7129 of 5 stars
GBX 96.90
+0.9%
GBX 101.33
+4.6%
+4.0%£283.17M£49.73MN/A36,200
NET
Netcall
1.9479 of 5 stars
GBX 117.65
-0.3%
GBX 162.50
+38.1%
-1.5%£200.71M£51.39M82.853,220

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RM) was last updated on 8/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners