Go Pro

Cirata (CRTA) Competitors

GBX 15.80 -1.73 (-9.84%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:52 PM Eastern

CRTA vs. RM, SPA, ACC, WAND, and IGP

Should you buy Cirata stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cirata with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cirata include RM (RM), 1Spatial (SPA), Access Intelligence (ACC), Cirata (WAND), and Intercede Group (IGP). These companies are all part of the "software - application" industry.

How does Cirata compare to RM?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and RM (LON:RM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

RM has a net margin of 1.35% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. RM's return on equity of 10.33% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
RM 1.35%10.33%-1.51%

In the previous week, RM had 5 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for RM and 0 mentions for Cirata. RM's average media sentiment score of 0.08 beat Cirata's score of 0.00 indicating that RM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
RM Neutral

Cirata presently has a consensus price target of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 178.48%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cirata is more favorable than RM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
RM
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Cirata has a beta of 1.612, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RM has a beta of 1.627, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Cirata has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RM. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.68-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
RM£189.50M0.41-£47.32M-£55.02N/A

0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.5% of RM shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of RM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

RM beats Cirata on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to 1Spatial?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and 1Spatial (LON:SPA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 1Spatial'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
1Spatial Neutral

1Spatial has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. 1Spatial's return on equity of 0.16% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
1Spatial 0.08%0.16%3.34%

Cirata has a beta of 1.612, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 1Spatial has a beta of 0.104, suggesting that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Cirata presently has a consensus price target of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 178.48%. 1Spatial has a consensus price target of GBX 73, suggesting a potential upside of 0.27%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cirata is more favorable than 1Spatial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
1Spatial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of 1Spatial shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of 1Spatial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

1Spatial has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.68-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
1Spatial£34.79M2.34£1.53MN/AN/A

Summary

1Spatial beats Cirata on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Access Intelligence?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Access Intelligence (LON:ACC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

Cirata has a beta of 1.612, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Access Intelligence has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of Access Intelligence shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Access Intelligence shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Access Intelligence'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Access Intelligence Neutral

Cirata presently has a consensus price target of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 178.48%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cirata is more favorable than Access Intelligence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Access Intelligence
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Access Intelligence has a net margin of -3.52% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Access Intelligence's return on equity of -4.02% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Access Intelligence -3.52%-4.02%-1.18%

Access Intelligence has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Access Intelligence, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.68-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Access Intelligence£64.26M0.00-£2.26M-£0.02N/A

Summary

Access Intelligence beats Cirata on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Cirata?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Cirata (LON:WAND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cirata'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Cirata Neutral

Cirata currently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 178.48%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cirata is more favorable than Cirata.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Cirata has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Cirata's return on equity of -90.39% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Cirata N/A -231.71%-76.89%

0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.0% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cirata has a beta of 1.612, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Cirata has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cirata, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.68-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Cirata£6.85M0.00-£45.17M-£0.54N/A

Summary

Cirata beats Cirata on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Intercede Group?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Intercede Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.68-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Intercede Group£17.16M3.54£5.86M£5.8017.41

Cirata currently has a consensus price target of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 178.48%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than Intercede Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Intercede Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Intercede Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intercede Group and 0 mentions for Cirata. Intercede Group's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Cirata's score of 0.00 indicating that Intercede Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Intercede Group Positive

Cirata has a beta of 1.612, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercede Group has a beta of 1.0449785, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Intercede Group has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 18.91% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Intercede Group 19.68%18.91%15.26%

0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.4% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 45.8% of Intercede Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Intercede Group beats Cirata on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cirata News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTA vs. The Competition

MetricCirataSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£19.97M£4.73B£37.85B£2.79B
Dividend YieldN/A4.07%3.31%6.16%
P/E Ratio-2.6325.9280.10366.66
Price / Sales1.68246.93624.6586,088.44
Price / CashN/A17.5346.0127.87
Price / Book1.104.269.507.79
Net Income-£44.87M£22.26M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-6.23%-0.43%-0.22%-0.61%
1 Month Performance-8.41%8.50%0.26%-1.14%
1 Year Performance-41.48%-11.22%155.60%65.93%

Cirata Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTA
Cirata
N/AGBX 15.80
-9.8%
GBX 44
+178.5%
-42.5%£19.97M£11.87MN/A112
RM
RM
N/AGBX 98
flat
N/A+9.5%£82.78M£189.50MN/A1,990
SPA
1Spatial
N/AGBX 72.80
flat
GBX 73
+0.3%
N/A£81.43M£34.79M500.00347
ACC
Access Intelligence
N/AN/AN/AN/A£77.90M£64.26MN/A1,101
WAND
Cirata
N/AN/AN/AN/A£72.96M£6.85MN/A127

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTA) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners