Free Trial

Cirata (CRTA) Competitors

GBX 16.95 -0.55 (-3.14%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:18 PM Eastern

CRTA vs. ACSO, SPA, ACC, IGP, and WAND

Should you buy Cirata stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Cirata with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Cirata include accesso Technology Group (ACSO), 1Spatial (SPA), Access Intelligence (ACC), Intercede Group (IGP), and Cirata (WAND). These companies are all part of the "software - application" industry.

How does Cirata compare to accesso Technology Group?

accesso Technology Group (LON:ACSO) and Cirata (LON:CRTA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, accesso Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cirata'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
accesso Technology Group Neutral
Cirata Neutral

accesso Technology Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 520, suggesting a potential upside of 63.01%. Cirata has a consensus target price of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 159.59%. Given Cirata's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than accesso Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
accesso Technology Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

accesso Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than accesso Technology Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
accesso Technology Group£155.11M0.66£10.56M£27.0011.81
Cirata£11.87M1.80-£44.87M-£6.00N/A

22.4% of accesso Technology Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. 36.5% of accesso Technology Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Cirata shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

accesso Technology Group has a net margin of 7.09% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. accesso Technology Group's return on equity of 5.57% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
accesso Technology Group7.09% 5.57% 2.93%
Cirata -58.41%-90.39%-126.55%

accesso Technology Group has a beta of 0.615, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 1.589, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

accesso Technology Group beats Cirata on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to 1Spatial?

1Spatial (LON:SPA) and Cirata (LON:CRTA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

39.7% of 1Spatial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of 1Spatial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Cirata shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

1Spatial has a net margin of 0.08% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. 1Spatial's return on equity of 0.16% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
1Spatial0.08% 0.16% 3.34%
Cirata -58.41%-90.39%-126.55%

1Spatial currently has a consensus target price of GBX 73, indicating a potential upside of 0.27%. Cirata has a consensus target price of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 159.59%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than 1Spatial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
1Spatial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

1Spatial has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
1Spatial£34.79M2.34£1.53MN/AN/A
Cirata£11.87M1.80-£44.87M-£6.00N/A

1Spatial has a beta of 0.104, indicating that its stock price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 1.589, indicating that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 1Spatial's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cirata'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
1Spatial Neutral
Cirata Neutral

Summary

1Spatial beats Cirata on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Access Intelligence?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Access Intelligence (LON:ACC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Access Intelligence has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Access Intelligence, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.80-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Access Intelligence£64.26M0.00-£2.26M-£0.02N/A

Access Intelligence has a net margin of -3.52% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Access Intelligence's return on equity of -4.02% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Access Intelligence -3.52%-4.02%-1.18%

0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of Access Intelligence shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Access Intelligence shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cirata has a beta of 1.589, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Access Intelligence has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Access Intelligence'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Access Intelligence Neutral

Cirata presently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 159.59%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than Access Intelligence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Access Intelligence
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Access Intelligence beats Cirata on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Intercede Group?

Intercede Group (LON:IGP) and Cirata (LON:CRTA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Intercede Group has a net margin of 20.89% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 21.69% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intercede Group20.89% 21.69% 15.26%
Cirata -58.41%-90.39%-126.55%

Intercede Group has a beta of 1.609, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 1.589, meaning that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the broader market.

Cirata has a consensus price target of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 159.59%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cirata is more favorable than Intercede Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intercede Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Intercede Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cirata'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intercede Group Neutral
Cirata Neutral

13.9% of Intercede Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. 45.8% of Intercede Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Cirata shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intercede Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intercede Group£17.38M4.22£5.86M£5.8021.05
Cirata£11.87M1.80-£44.87M-£6.00N/A

Summary

Intercede Group beats Cirata on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cirata compare to Cirata?

Cirata (LON:CRTA) and Cirata (LON:WAND) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and valuation.

Cirata has higher revenue and earnings than Cirata. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cirata, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cirata£11.87M1.80-£44.87M-£6.00N/A
Cirata£6.85M0.00-£45.17M-£0.54N/A

0.9% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.0% of Cirata shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.7% of Cirata shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of Cirata shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cirata has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. Cirata's return on equity of -90.39% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cirata-58.41% -90.39% -126.55%
Cirata N/A -231.71%-76.89%

Cirata has a beta of 1.589, indicating that its share price is 59% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Cirata presently has a consensus target price of GBX 44, indicating a potential upside of 159.59%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than Cirata.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Cirata had 1 more articles in the media than Cirata. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cirata and 0 mentions for Cirata. Cirata's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Cirata's score of -0.63 indicating that Cirata is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cirata Neutral
Cirata Negative

Summary

Cirata beats Cirata on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cirata News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRTA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRTA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRTA vs. The Competition

MetricCirataSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£21.42M£5.24B£38.93B£2.50B
Dividend YieldN/A3.94%3.14%6.12%
P/E Ratio-2.8326.87171.35365.23
Price / Sales1.80248.32639.9587,121.98
Price / CashN/A17.4648.5927.85
Price / Book1.184.409.617.68
Net Income-£44.87M£22.26M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.83%0.08%-0.99%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-8.38%9.54%4.53%2.10%
1 Year Performance-41.61%-6.52%158.26%72.87%

Cirata Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRTA
Cirata
N/AGBX 16.95
-3.1%
GBX 44
+159.6%
-39.5%£21.42M£11.87MN/A112
ACSO
accesso Technology Group
3.4724 of 5 stars
GBX 263
-0.4%
GBX 520
+97.7%
-37.9%£85.01M£155.11M9.74672
SPA
1Spatial
1.5985 of 5 stars
GBX 72.80
flat
GBX 73
+0.3%
N/A£81.43M£34.79M500.00347
ACC
Access Intelligence
N/AN/AN/AN/A£77.90M£64.26MN/A1,101
IGP
Intercede Group
N/AGBX 129
+5.7%
N/A-28.6%£77.61M£17.38M22.2499

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CRTA) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners