Go Pro
→ ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow! (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free IGP Stock Alerts

Intercede Group (IGP) Competitors

Intercede Group logo
GBX 115 +1.50 (+1.32%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:44 PM Eastern
Compare

IGP vs. CER, EPO, WNWD, MCGN, and SEE

Should you buy Intercede Group stock or one of its competitors? Intercede Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Cerillion (CER), Earthport (EPO), Windward (WNWD), Microgen (MCGN), and Seeing Machines (SEE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does Intercede Group compare to Cerillion?

Intercede Group (LON:IGP) and Cerillion (LON:CER) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Cerillion has a net margin of 32.24% compared to Intercede Group's net margin of 19.68%. Cerillion's return on equity of 22.77% beat Intercede Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intercede Group19.68% 18.91% 15.26%
Cerillion 32.24%22.77%19.33%

In the previous week, Intercede Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cerillion'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intercede Group Neutral
Cerillion Neutral

Cerillion has higher revenue and earnings than Intercede Group. Cerillion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intercede Group£17.18M4.06£5.86M£5.5020.91
Cerillion£42.46M6.65£14.14M£46.3020.65

10.5% of Intercede Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.6% of Cerillion shares are held by institutional investors. 46.2% of Intercede Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.2% of Cerillion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intercede Group has a beta of 1.623, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cerillion has a beta of 0.489, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Cerillion has a consensus price target of GBX 1,934, suggesting a potential upside of 102.30%. Given Cerillion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cerillion is more favorable than Intercede Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intercede Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cerillion
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Cerillion beats Intercede Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercede Group compare to Earthport?

Earthport (LON:EPO) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Intercede Group has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Earthport's net margin of 0.00%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 18.91% beat Earthport's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EarthportN/A N/A N/A
Intercede Group 19.68%18.91%15.26%

In the previous week, Earthport's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intercede Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Earthport Neutral
Intercede Group Neutral

Intercede Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Earthport. Earthport is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Earthport£32.56M0.00N/A-£1.80N/A
Intercede Group£17.18M4.06£5.86M£5.5020.91

10.5% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.2% of Intercede Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Intercede Group beats Earthport on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercede Group compare to Windward?

Windward (LON:WNWD) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Windward has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercede Group has a beta of 1.623, indicating that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Windward's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intercede Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Windward Neutral
Intercede Group Neutral

Intercede Group has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Windward's net margin of -31.74%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 18.91% beat Windward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Windward-31.74% -99.40% -14.48%
Intercede Group 19.68%18.91%15.26%

29.3% of Windward shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.8% of Windward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 46.2% of Intercede Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intercede Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Windward. Windward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Windward£43.06M0.00-£9.55M-£6.87N/A
Intercede Group£17.18M4.06£5.86M£5.5020.91

Summary

Intercede Group beats Windward on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercede Group compare to Microgen?

Microgen (LON:MCGN) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Intercede Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Microgen. Microgen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Microgen£70.29M0.00N/A£21.50N/A
Intercede Group£17.18M4.06£5.86M£5.5020.91

In the previous week, Microgen's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intercede Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Microgen Neutral
Intercede Group Neutral

Intercede Group has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Microgen's net margin of 0.00%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 18.91% beat Microgen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MicrogenN/A N/A N/A
Intercede Group 19.68%18.91%15.26%

10.5% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.2% of Intercede Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Intercede Group beats Microgen on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercede Group compare to Seeing Machines?

Seeing Machines (LON:SEE) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

4.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Intercede Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Seeing Machines shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 46.2% of Intercede Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Seeing Machines had 1 more articles in the media than Intercede Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seeing Machines and 0 mentions for Intercede Group. Seeing Machines' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Intercede Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Seeing Machines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seeing Machines Neutral
Intercede Group Neutral

Seeing Machines has a beta of 0.627, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercede Group has a beta of 1.623, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Intercede Group has a net margin of 19.68% compared to Seeing Machines' net margin of -49.30%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 18.91% beat Seeing Machines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seeing Machines-49.30% -91.82% -13.61%
Intercede Group 19.68%18.91%15.26%

Intercede Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Seeing Machines. Seeing Machines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intercede Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seeing Machines£59.92M3.72-£46.78M-£0.64N/A
Intercede Group£17.18M4.06£5.86M£5.5020.91

Summary

Intercede Group beats Seeing Machines on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intercede Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IGP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IGP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IGP vs. The Competition

Export
MetricIntercede GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£68.85M£15.67B£29.55B£2.54B
Dividend Yield10.14%3.42%2.75%6.17%
P/E Ratio20.91127.2673.35367.57
Price / Sales4.061,303.80598.9783,481.74
Price / Cash3.0948.1350.3527.89
Price / Book5.087.509.447.19
Net Income£5.86M£434.60M£679.74M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.88%1.62%-1.29%0.30%
1 Month Performance8.17%7.50%4.03%3.31%
1 Year Performance-32.35%5.00%189.70%22.13%

Intercede Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IGP
Intercede Group
N/AGBX 115
+1.3%		N/A-32.4%£68.85M£17.18M20.9199
CER
Cerillion
3.0931 of 5 stars		GBX 900
flat		GBX 1,934
+114.9%		-32.4%£265.87M£42.46M19.44321
EPO
Earthport
N/AN/AN/AN/A£240.49M£32.56MN/A214
WNWD
Windward
N/AN/AN/AN/A£233.00M£43.06MN/A170
MCGN
Microgen
N/AN/AN/AN/A£224.83M£70.29M17.09N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:IGP) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel