Go Pro

Emmerson (EML) Competitors

Emmerson logo
GBX 1.57 +0.07 (+4.67%)
As of 11:05 AM Eastern

EML vs. NWF, MBH, STCM, ECOB, and SKY

Should you buy Emmerson stock or one of its competitors? Emmerson's main competitors and comparable companies include NWF Group (NWF), Michelmersh Brick (MBH), Steppe Cement (STCM), Eco Buildings Group (ECOB), and SKY (SKY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Emmerson compare to NWF Group?

Emmerson (LON:EML) and NWF Group (LON:NWF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, NWF Group had 1 more articles in the media than Emmerson. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NWF Group and 0 mentions for Emmerson. Emmerson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NWF Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Emmerson Neutral
NWF Group Neutral

NWF Group has a consensus target price of GBX 214, suggesting a potential upside of 37.18%. Given NWF Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NWF Group is more favorable than Emmerson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Emmerson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
NWF Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

NWF Group has higher revenue and earnings than Emmerson. Emmerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NWF Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EmmersonN/AN/A-£4.50M-£0.12N/A
NWF Group£920.30M0.08£9.14M£18.308.52

6.6% of Emmerson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of NWF Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Emmerson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of NWF Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Emmerson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NWF Group has a beta of 0.233, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

NWF Group has a net margin of 1.00% compared to Emmerson's net margin of 0.00%. Emmerson's return on equity of 478.72% beat NWF Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EmmersonN/A 478.72% -7.75%
NWF Group 1.00%10.04%3.71%

Summary

NWF Group beats Emmerson on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Emmerson compare to Michelmersh Brick?

Michelmersh Brick (LON:MBH) and Emmerson (LON:EML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Michelmersh Brick had 1 more articles in the media than Emmerson. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Michelmersh Brick and 0 mentions for Emmerson. Michelmersh Brick's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Emmerson's score of 0.00 indicating that Michelmersh Brick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Michelmersh Brick Positive
Emmerson Neutral

Michelmersh Brick has a beta of 0.809, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Emmerson has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

5.5% of Michelmersh Brick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Emmerson shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.6% of Michelmersh Brick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Emmerson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Michelmersh Brick currently has a consensus price target of GBX 125, suggesting a potential upside of 69.61%. Given Michelmersh Brick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Michelmersh Brick is more favorable than Emmerson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Michelmersh Brick
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Emmerson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Michelmersh Brick has higher revenue and earnings than Emmerson. Emmerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Michelmersh Brick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Michelmersh Brick£65.55M1.03£8.05M£4.0718.11
EmmersonN/AN/A-£4.50M-£0.12N/A

Michelmersh Brick has a net margin of 5.66% compared to Emmerson's net margin of 0.00%. Emmerson's return on equity of 478.72% beat Michelmersh Brick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Michelmersh Brick5.66% 4.06% 5.16%
Emmerson N/A 478.72%-7.75%

Summary

Michelmersh Brick beats Emmerson on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Emmerson compare to Steppe Cement?

Emmerson (LON:EML) and Steppe Cement (LON:STCM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Steppe Cement has higher revenue and earnings than Emmerson. Emmerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steppe Cement, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EmmersonN/AN/A-£4.50M-£0.12N/A
Steppe Cement£121.65M0.47£1.21M£1.5117.19

In the previous week, Emmerson's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Steppe Cement'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Emmerson Neutral
Steppe Cement Neutral

6.6% of Emmerson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Steppe Cement shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.2% of Emmerson shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Steppe Cement shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Emmerson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steppe Cement has a beta of 0.712, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Steppe Cement has a net margin of 3.27% compared to Emmerson's net margin of 0.00%. Emmerson's return on equity of 478.72% beat Steppe Cement's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EmmersonN/A 478.72% -7.75%
Steppe Cement 3.27%5.77%-0.22%

Summary

Steppe Cement beats Emmerson on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Emmerson compare to Eco Buildings Group?

Eco Buildings Group (LON:ECOB) and Emmerson (LON:EML) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

0.4% of Eco Buildings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.6% of Emmerson shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.9% of Eco Buildings Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Emmerson shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eco Buildings Group had 2 more articles in the media than Emmerson. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Eco Buildings Group and 0 mentions for Emmerson. Eco Buildings Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Emmerson'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Eco Buildings Group Neutral
Emmerson Neutral

Eco Buildings Group has higher revenue and earnings than Emmerson. Emmerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eco Buildings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eco Buildings Group£2.37M6.18-£4.02M-£3.00N/A
EmmersonN/AN/A-£4.50M-£0.12N/A

Eco Buildings Group has a beta of 0.794, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Emmerson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Emmerson has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eco Buildings Group's net margin of -130.26%. Emmerson's return on equity of 478.72% beat Eco Buildings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eco Buildings Group-130.26% -34.90% -7.61%
Emmerson N/A 478.72%-7.75%

Summary

Eco Buildings Group beats Emmerson on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Emmerson compare to SKY?

SKY (LON:SKY) and Emmerson (LON:EML) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Emmerson's return on equity of 478.72% beat SKY's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SKYN/A N/A N/A
Emmerson N/A 478.72%-7.75%

In the previous week, SKY had 11 more articles in the media than Emmerson. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for SKY and 0 mentions for Emmerson. SKY's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Emmerson's score of 0.00 indicating that SKY is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SKY Neutral
Emmerson Neutral

6.6% of Emmerson shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Emmerson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SKYN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
EmmersonN/AN/A-£4.50M-£0.12N/A

Summary

SKY and Emmerson tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Emmerson News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EML and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EML vs. The Competition

MetricEmmersonConstruction Materials IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£20.98M£7.90B£4.82B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A2.50%4.70%6.26%
P/E Ratio-13.3114.0425.16366.50
Price / SalesN/A36.8617,465.5090,135.34
Price / Cash10.6830.5826.7627.89
Price / Book0.711.759.746.34
Net Income-£4.50M£631.92M£158.15M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.68%-2.62%-3.47%-0.17%
1 Month Performance-1.88%-4.10%-1.08%-0.48%
1 Year Performance-13.74%-3.58%71.68%20.13%

Emmerson Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EML
Emmerson
N/AGBX 1.57
+4.7%
N/A-11.8%£20.98MN/AN/A1,190
NWF
NWF Group
2.7369 of 5 stars
GBX 156
+0.6%
GBX 214
+37.2%
-9.8%£77.37M£920.30M8.521,339
MBH
Michelmersh Brick
3.8494 of 5 stars
GBX 74.15
-0.5%
GBX 125
+68.6%
-26.1%£68.04M£65.55M18.22346
STCM
Steppe Cement
N/AGBX 24.50
+14.0%
N/A+49.3%£53.66M£101.54M16.23799
ECOB
Eco Buildings Group
N/AGBX 10.50
+1.4%
N/A+144.4%£15.19M£2.37MN/A24

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:EML) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners