CTL vs. FAR, KP2, GSP, ARS, ARCM, PXC, MKA, KAV, 1SN, and POW
Should you be buying CleanTech Lithium stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CleanTech Lithium include Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR), Kore Potash (KP2), Gensource Potash (GSP), Asiamet Resources (ARS), Arc Minerals (ARCM), Phoenix Copper (PXC), Mkango Resources (MKA), Kavango Resources (KAV), First Tin (1SN), and Power Metal Resources (POW). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, community ranking, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.
CleanTech Lithium received 3 more outperform votes than Ferro-Alloy Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave CleanTech Lithium an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Ferro-Alloy Resources an outperform vote.
CleanTech Lithium currently has a consensus target price of GBX 295, suggesting a potential upside of 1,687.88%. Given CleanTech Lithium's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Ferro-Alloy Resources.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than CleanTech Lithium. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -90.26%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of -43.57% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.
12.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 21.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.78, indicating that its stock price is 178% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium and CleanTech Lithium both had 2 articles in the media. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.22 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
CleanTech Lithium beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get CleanTech Lithium News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CTL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CTL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
CleanTech Lithium Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
