Go Pro
→ Buffett's Final Warning: 'The Dollar Is Going to Hell' (From Decentralized Masters) (Ad)tc pixel Free POW Stock Alerts

Power Metal Resources (POW) Competitors

Power Metal Resources logo
GBX 12.92 -0.08 (-0.60%)
As of 11:09 AM Eastern
Compare

POW vs. ALS, PAT, GEM, ARS, and POG

Should you buy Power Metal Resources stock or one of its competitors? Power Metal Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Altus Strategies (ALS), Panthera Resources (PAT), Gemfields Group (GEM), Asiamet Resources (ARS), and Petropavlovsk (POG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Altus Strategies?

Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) and Altus Strategies (LON:ALS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and profitability.

50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Power Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Altus Strategies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metal Resources Neutral
Altus Strategies Neutral

Altus Strategies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power Metal Resources£76K191.99N/A£3.054.24
Altus Strategies£661.50K0.00N/A-£7.90N/A

Altus Strategies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Power Metal Resources' net margin of -6,109.68%. Altus Strategies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Power Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power Metal Resources-6,109.68% -14.52% -12.56%
Altus Strategies N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Power Metal Resources and Altus Strategies tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Panthera Resources?

Panthera Resources (LON:PAT) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Panthera Resources. Panthera Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Panthera ResourcesN/AN/A-£3.28K-£1.23N/A
Power Metal Resources£76K191.99N/A£3.054.24

In the previous week, Panthera Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Power Metal Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Panthera Resources Neutral
Power Metal Resources Neutral

0.3% of Panthera Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Panthera Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Panthera Resources has a beta of 0.844, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.288, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Panthera Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Power Metal Resources' net margin of -6,109.68%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of -14.52% beat Panthera Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Panthera ResourcesN/A -32.61% -28.84%
Power Metal Resources -6,109.68%-14.52%-12.56%

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Panthera Resources on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Gemfields Group?

Gemfields Group (LON:GEM) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Gemfields Group had 1 more articles in the media than Power Metal Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gemfields Group and 0 mentions for Power Metal Resources. Gemfields Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Power Metal Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Gemfields Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gemfields Group Positive
Power Metal Resources Neutral

Gemfields Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 13, suggesting a potential upside of 371.01%. Given Gemfields Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gemfields Group is more favorable than Power Metal Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gemfields Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Power Metal Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gemfields Group has a beta of 0.198, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.288, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Gemfields Group has a net margin of -28.03% compared to Power Metal Resources' net margin of -6,109.68%. Gemfields Group's return on equity of -11.19% beat Power Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gemfields Group-28.03% -11.19% 2.46%
Power Metal Resources -6,109.68%-14.52%-12.56%

Power Metal Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gemfields Group. Gemfields Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gemfields Group£135.11M0.35-£15.03M-£2.60N/A
Power Metal Resources£76K191.99N/A£3.054.24

10.4% of Gemfields Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 47.6% of Gemfields Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gemfields Group beats Power Metal Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Asiamet Resources?

Asiamet Resources (LON:ARS) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Asiamet Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Power Metal Resources' net margin of -6,109.68%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of -14.52% beat Asiamet Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Asiamet ResourcesN/A -301.91% -129.94%
Power Metal Resources -6,109.68%-14.52%-12.56%

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Asiamet Resources. Asiamet Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Asiamet ResourcesN/AN/A-£7.70M-£0.16N/A
Power Metal Resources£76K191.99N/A£3.054.24

Asiamet Resources has a beta of 0.933, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.288, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Asiamet Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of Asiamet Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Asiamet Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Power Metal Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Asiamet Resources Neutral
Power Metal Resources Neutral

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Asiamet Resources on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Petropavlovsk?

Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) and Petropavlovsk (LON:POG) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 57.6% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Petropavlovsk has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Power Metal Resources' net margin of -6,109.68%. Petropavlovsk's return on equity of 0.00% beat Power Metal Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power Metal Resources-6,109.68% -14.52% -12.56%
Petropavlovsk N/A N/A N/A

Petropavlovsk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power Metal Resources£76K191.99N/A£3.054.24
Petropavlovsk£817.75M0.00N/A£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Power Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Petropavlovsk'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metal Resources Neutral
Petropavlovsk Neutral

Summary

Petropavlovsk beats Power Metal Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Power Metal Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for POW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding POW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

POW vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPower Metal ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.59M£3.77B£4.83B£2.89B
Dividend YieldN/A5.22%4.71%6.11%
P/E Ratio4.2423.4221.87368.70
Price / Sales191.997,586.314,510.3083,338.10
Price / Cash14.2029.7127.1327.89
Price / Book0.6710.478.887.18
Net IncomeN/A£122.18M£154.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance5.06%1.34%0.98%0.87%
1 Month Performance7.68%7.90%6.60%2.81%
1 Year Performance-7.70%56.12%44.37%69.35%

Power Metal Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
POW
Power Metal Resources
N/AGBX 12.92
-0.6%		N/A-13.9%£14.59M£76K4.2420
ALS
Altus Strategies
N/AN/AN/AN/A£53.97M£661.50KN/A54,500
PAT
Panthera Resources
N/AGBX 20.30
+2.5%		N/A+69.8%£52.64MN/AN/A11
GEM
Gemfields Group
3.1287 of 5 stars		GBX 2.98
+14.2%		GBX 13
+336.2%		-56.7%£51.38M£135.11MN/A3,474
ARS
Asiamet Resources
N/AGBX 1.48
-0.4%		N/A+65.2%£50.16MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:POW) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s New Currency Reset
Trump is launching a new $250 bill - but that may be a distraction. Behind the scenes, Executive Order 14241 i...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Wall Street is staring at the wrong AI trade
Anthropic just signed a 9.1 billion dollar, 20 year data center agreement covering 191 megawatts of capacity, ...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why I'm sending this one to my own family
Behind the Markets editor Kelly Maguire says she has never sent an email quite like this one. A sealed congres...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The Starlink of Energy
A portable energy unit - already used by the U.S. Navy for decades - is now drawing serious attention from Big...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran
For a moment… Forget about Trump’s ties to Israel. Forget about reports of Iran’s nuclear program. Be...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel