Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Power Metal Resources (POW) Competitors

Power Metal Resources logo
GBX 12.95 +0.13 (+0.97%)
As of 05/19/2026 11:52 AM Eastern

POW vs. ARS, 80M, BRES, EMH, and KDNC

Should you buy Power Metal Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Power Metal Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Power Metal Resources include Asiamet Resources (ARS), 80 Mile (80M), Blencowe Resources (BRES), European Metals (EMH), and Cadence Minerals (KDNC). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Asiamet Resources?

Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) and Asiamet Resources (LON:ARS) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Asiamet Resources. Asiamet Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power Metal Resources£526K27.80N/A£1.319.89
Asiamet ResourcesN/AN/A-£7.70M-£0.19N/A

In the previous week, Power Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Asiamet Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metal Resources Neutral
Asiamet Resources Neutral

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 576.43% compared to Asiamet Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 18.19% beat Asiamet Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power Metal Resources576.43% 18.19% -12.56%
Asiamet Resources N/A -481.24%-129.94%

50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.3% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.4% of Asiamet Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.326, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Asiamet Resources has a beta of 1.028, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Asiamet Resources on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to 80 Mile?

Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) and 80 Mile (LON:80M) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

80 Mile is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power Metal Resources£526K27.80N/A£1.319.89
80 MileN/AN/AN/A-£0.33N/A

In the previous week, Power Metal Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 80 Mile'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metal Resources Neutral
80 Mile Neutral

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 576.43% compared to 80 Mile's net margin of 0.00%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 18.19% beat 80 Mile's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power Metal Resources576.43% 18.19% -12.56%
80 Mile N/A N/A N/A

50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.3% of Power Metal Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of 80 Mile shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats 80 Mile on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Blencowe Resources?

Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 57.3% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Blencowe Resources. Blencowe Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Power Metal Resources£526K27.80N/A£1.319.89
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.54N/A

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 3 more articles in the media than Power Metal Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Power Metal Resources. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Power Metal Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Power Metal Resources Neutral
Blencowe Resources Neutral

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 576.43% compared to Blencowe Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 18.19% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Power Metal Resources576.43% 18.19% -12.56%
Blencowe Resources N/A -17.12%-13.34%

Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.326, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.397, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Blencowe Resources on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to European Metals?

European Metals (LON:EMH) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 576.43% compared to European Metals' net margin of -287.87%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 18.19% beat European Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Metals-287.87% -24.66% -2.47%
Power Metal Resources 576.43%18.19%-12.56%

1.9% of European Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of European Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.3% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than European Metals. European Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European MetalsN/AN/A-£2.30M-£3.81N/A
Power Metal Resources£526K27.80N/A£1.319.89

European Metals has a beta of 0.217, suggesting that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.326, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, European Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Power Metal Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Metals Neutral
Power Metal Resources Neutral

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats European Metals on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Power Metal Resources compare to Cadence Minerals?

Cadence Minerals (LON:KDNC) and Power Metal Resources (LON:POW) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

Power Metal Resources has a net margin of 576.43% compared to Cadence Minerals' net margin of 134.07%. Power Metal Resources' return on equity of 18.19% beat Cadence Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cadence Minerals134.07% -9.71% -3.99%
Power Metal Resources 576.43%18.19%-12.56%

0.0% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.8% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 8.8% of Cadence Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 57.3% of Power Metal Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Power Metal Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Cadence Minerals. Cadence Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Power Metal Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cadence MineralsN/AN/A-£5.72M-£0.55N/A
Power Metal Resources£526K27.80N/A£1.319.89

In the previous week, Cadence Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Power Metal Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cadence Minerals Neutral
Power Metal Resources Neutral

Cadence Minerals has a beta of 1.861, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Power Metal Resources has a beta of 0.326, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Power Metal Resources beats Cadence Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Power Metal Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for POW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding POW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

POW vs. The Competition

MetricPower Metal ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£14.68M£1.57B£4.75B£2.90B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.02%6.17%
P/E Ratio9.8930.2822.78365.16
Price / Sales27.8059,528.407,032.0187,648.92
Price / Cash14.2024.6327.1927.89
Price / Book0.675.776.647.62
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.91%-5.05%-4.76%-0.30%
1 Month Performance-0.61%-2.34%-3.49%0.42%
1 Year Performance-0.90%113.46%72.79%82.43%

Power Metal Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
POW
Power Metal Resources
N/AGBX 12.95
+1.0%
N/A+3.0%£14.68M£526K9.8920
ARS
Asiamet Resources
N/AGBX 1.52
-2.9%
N/A+70.4%£51.59MN/AN/AN/A
80M
80 Mile
N/AGBX 0.93
+2.1%
N/A+213.2%£45.39MN/AN/AN/A
BRES
Blencowe Resources
N/AGBX 7.70
-0.5%
N/A+157.7%£41.85MN/AN/A3
EMH
European Metals
N/AGBX 17.05
+4.0%
N/A+65.6%£40.51MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:POW) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners