Go Pro

Phoenix Copper (PXC) Competitors

Phoenix Copper logo
GBX 0.56 -0.02 (-2.61%)
As of 12:14 PM Eastern

PXC vs. ANTO, TKO, ATYM, CAML, and GSCU

Should you buy Phoenix Copper stock or one of its competitors? Phoenix Copper's main competitors and comparable companies include Antofagasta (ANTO), Taseko Mines (TKO), Atalaya Mining (ATYM), Central Asia Metals (CAML), and Great Southern Copper (GSCU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Antofagasta?

Antofagasta (LON:ANTO) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Antofagasta has higher revenue and earnings than Phoenix Copper. Phoenix Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Antofagasta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Antofagasta£9.30B3.98£955.17M£167.8022.36
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antofagasta's score of -0.21 indicating that Phoenix Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Antofagasta Neutral
Phoenix Copper Neutral

Antofagasta currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,843.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.43%. Given Antofagasta's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Antofagasta is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Antofagasta
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88
Phoenix Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Antofagasta has a net margin of 17.79% compared to Phoenix Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Antofagasta's return on equity of 15.70% beat Phoenix Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Antofagasta17.79% 15.70% 5.23%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

Antofagasta has a beta of 1.405, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

27.1% of Antofagasta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Antofagasta shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Antofagasta beats Phoenix Copper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Taseko Mines?

Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Taseko Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Phoenix Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Taseko Mines Neutral
Phoenix Copper Neutral

Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.044, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Phoenix Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Taseko Mines' return on equity of 2.09% beat Phoenix Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Taseko Mines1.60% 2.09% 3.36%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

Taseko Mines presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, indicating a potential downside of 35.00%. Given Taseko Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Taseko Mines is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Taseko Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Phoenix Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Phoenix Copper. Phoenix Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Taseko Mines£985.32M2.23£148.77M£3.00200.00
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

24.0% of Taseko Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Taseko Mines beats Phoenix Copper on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Atalaya Mining?

Atalaya Mining (LON:ATYM) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Atalaya Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Phoenix Copper. Phoenix Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atalaya Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atalaya Mining£492.86M3.09£33.29M£70.5014.05
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

Atalaya Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,021.25, indicating a potential upside of 3.07%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atalaya Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Phoenix Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 22.01% compared to Phoenix Copper's net margin of 0.00%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 16.00% beat Phoenix Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atalaya Mining22.01% 16.00% 2.82%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

50.2% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.485, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Atalaya Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Phoenix Copper. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Atalaya Mining and 0 mentions for Phoenix Copper. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Phoenix Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Atalaya Mining Neutral
Phoenix Copper Neutral

Summary

Atalaya Mining beats Phoenix Copper on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Central Asia Metals?

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Phoenix Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Central Asia Metals' net margin of -16.88%. Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat Central Asia Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Central Asia Metals-16.88% -15.91% 9.30%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

Central Asia Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Phoenix Copper. Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Central Asia Metals£275.92M1.06£47.93M-£25.50N/A
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

In the previous week, Central Asia Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Phoenix Copper'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Central Asia Metals Neutral
Phoenix Copper Neutral

30.8% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Central Asia Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Central Asia Metals has a beta of 1.193, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 181.25, suggesting a potential upside of 5.87%. Given Central Asia Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Central Asia Metals is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Central Asia Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Phoenix Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Phoenix Copper on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Great Southern Copper?

Great Southern Copper (LON:GSCU) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat Great Southern Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern CopperN/A -74.17% -29.67%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

In the previous week, Great Southern Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Phoenix Copper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Great Southern Copper and 0 mentions for Phoenix Copper. Great Southern Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Phoenix Copper's score of 0.00 indicating that Great Southern Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Copper Neutral
Phoenix Copper Neutral

0.3% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Great Southern Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.2% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Copper has a beta of -0.41, meaning that its stock price is 141% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern CopperN/AN/A-£2.31B-£0.41N/A
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

Summary

Phoenix Copper beats Great Southern Copper on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phoenix Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PXC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PXC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PXC vs. The Competition

MetricPhoenix CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£4.71M£3.91B£4.90B£2.86B
Dividend YieldN/A5.16%4.67%6.22%
P/E Ratio-0.2926.6326.37366.45
Price / SalesN/A8,795.285,242.8483,880.78
Price / Cash3.0729.7827.1627.89
Price / Book0.0212.8110.616.43
Net Income-£2.86M£127.55M£158.35M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.44%-1.31%-1.18%17.15%
1 Month Performance6.67%10.11%7.40%0.13%
1 Year Performance-81.64%50.48%39.76%20.11%

Phoenix Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PXC
Phoenix Copper
N/AGBX 0.56
-2.6%
N/A-80.3%£4.71MN/AN/A18
ANTO
Antofagasta
1.3541 of 5 stars
GBX 4,039
flat
GBX 3,843.75
-4.8%
+82.2%£39.82B£9.30B29.967,753
TKO
Taseko Mines
0.1252 of 5 stars
GBX 716
+3.8%
GBX 390
-45.5%
+152.0%£2.61B£985.32M143.20N/A
ATYM
Atalaya Mining
1.37 of 5 stars
GBX 1,109
+0.8%
GBX 1,021.25
-7.9%
+85.0%£1.71B£469.50M19.87477
CAML
Central Asia Metals
N/AGBX 178
+2.1%
GBX 181.25
+1.8%
+2.9%£303.32M£275.92MN/A1,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PXC) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners