Go Pro

Phoenix Copper (PXC) Competitors

Phoenix Copper logo
GBX 0.46 -0.02 (-4.17%)
As of 12:38 PM Eastern

PXC vs. CDL, CTL, ARV, GLR, and REE

Should you buy Phoenix Copper stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Phoenix Copper with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Phoenix Copper include Cloudbreak Discovery (CDL), CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Artemis Resources (ARV), Galileo Resources (GLR), and Altona Rare Earths (REE). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Cloudbreak Discovery?

Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) and Cloudbreak Discovery (LON:CDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cloudbreak Discovery has a beta of 1.408, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Cloudbreak Discovery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A
Cloudbreak DiscoveryN/AN/A-£2.87M-£0.14N/A

Phoenix Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudbreak Discovery's net margin of -842.88%. Cloudbreak Discovery's return on equity of 576.19% beat Phoenix Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix CopperN/A -10.97% -2.63%
Cloudbreak Discovery -842.88%576.19%-31.77%

0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Cloudbreak Discovery shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Cloudbreak Discovery. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for Cloudbreak Discovery. Cloudbreak Discovery's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Phoenix Copper's score of -0.68 indicating that Cloudbreak Discovery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Copper Negative
Cloudbreak Discovery Neutral

Summary

Phoenix Copper beats Cloudbreak Discovery on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to CleanTech Lithium?

CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

CleanTech Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CleanTech LithiumN/AN/A-£2.19M-£2.20N/A
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.79, meaning that its stock price is 179% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CleanTech LithiumN/A -16.51% -13.50%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

CleanTech Lithium presently has a consensus target price of GBX 17, suggesting a potential upside of 209.09%. Given CleanTech Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Phoenix Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CleanTech Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Phoenix Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 2 more articles in the media than CleanTech Lithium. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for CleanTech Lithium. CleanTech Lithium's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Phoenix Copper's score of -0.68 indicating that CleanTech Lithium is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CleanTech Lithium Neutral
Phoenix Copper Negative

0.6% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Phoenix Copper beats CleanTech Lithium on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Artemis Resources?

Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) and Artemis Resources (LON:ARV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Phoenix Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Artemis Resources. Artemis Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A
Artemis Resources£25.65K438.15-£43.80M-£0.29N/A

Phoenix Copper has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Artemis Resources' net margin of -2,296.17%. Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat Artemis Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix CopperN/A -10.97% -2.63%
Artemis Resources -2,296.17%-20.00%-1.79%

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Artemis Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for Artemis Resources. Artemis Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Phoenix Copper's score of -0.68 indicating that Artemis Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Copper Negative
Artemis Resources Neutral

Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artemis Resources has a beta of 0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.1% of Artemis Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Artemis Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Phoenix Copper and Artemis Resources tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Galileo Resources?

Galileo Resources (LON:GLR) and Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

1.0% of Galileo Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Galileo Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Phoenix Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Galileo Resources has a beta of 0.244, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Galileo Resources' return on equity of -10.01% beat Phoenix Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galileo ResourcesN/A -10.01% -4.51%
Phoenix Copper N/A -10.97%-2.63%

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Galileo Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for Galileo Resources. Galileo Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Phoenix Copper's score of -0.68 indicating that Galileo Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Galileo Resources Neutral
Phoenix Copper Negative

Galileo Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galileo ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.05M-£0.11N/A
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A

Summary

Galileo Resources beats Phoenix Copper on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Phoenix Copper compare to Altona Rare Earths?

Phoenix Copper (LON:PXC) and Altona Rare Earths (LON:REE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Phoenix Copper has a beta of 0.351, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Altona Rare Earths has a beta of 1.208, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

0.7% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.8% of Altona Rare Earths shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Phoenix Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Altona Rare Earths shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Phoenix Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Altona Rare Earths. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Phoenix Copper and 0 mentions for Altona Rare Earths. Altona Rare Earths' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Phoenix Copper's score of -0.68 indicating that Altona Rare Earths is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Phoenix Copper Negative
Altona Rare Earths Neutral

Phoenix Copper's return on equity of -10.97% beat Altona Rare Earths' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phoenix CopperN/A -10.97% -2.63%
Altona Rare Earths N/A -59.76%-47.19%

Altona Rare Earths is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phoenix Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phoenix CopperN/AN/A-£2.86M-£1.93N/A
Altona Rare EarthsN/AN/A-£1.51M-£0.42N/A

Summary

Altona Rare Earths beats Phoenix Copper on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phoenix Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PXC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PXC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PXC vs. The Competition

MetricPhoenix CopperOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.37M£1.41B£4.47B£2.76B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.01%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.2417.4720.64369.48
Price / SalesN/A49,713.385,993.7784,571.57
Price / Cash3.0724.6326.8627.87
Price / Book0.025.338.777.62
Net Income-£2.86M£70.60M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-58.93%-2.73%-1.31%-0.88%
1 Month Performance-58.63%-6.19%-4.02%-1.40%
1 Year Performance-89.55%72.04%41.75%61.52%

Phoenix Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PXC
Phoenix Copper
N/AGBX 0.46
-4.2%
N/A-88.4%£1.37MN/AN/A18
CDL
Cloudbreak Discovery
N/AGBX 0.58
+0.3%
N/A+198.9%£12.79MN/AN/A4
CTL
CleanTech Lithium
1.7883 of 5 stars
GBX 5.84
-0.2%
GBX 17
+191.1%
+3.6%£11.93MN/A6.2120
ARV
Artemis Resources
N/AGBX 0.30
-0.7%
N/A+2.1%£11.24M£25.65KN/AN/A
GLR
Galileo Resources
N/AGBX 0.81
+4.5%
N/A-2.0%£11.24MN/AN/A1

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PXC) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners