Go Pro

Tungsten West (TUN) Competitors

Tungsten West logo
GBX 32 -1.80 (-5.33%)
As of 06/26/2026 12:26 PM Eastern

TUN vs. ADT1, CUSN, SOLG, GFM, and ECOR

Should you buy Tungsten West stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tungsten West with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tungsten West include Adriatic Metals (ADT1), Cornish Metals (CUSN), SolGold (SOLG), Griffin Mining (GFM), and Ecora Resources (ECOR). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Tungsten West compare to Adriatic Metals?

Adriatic Metals (LON:ADT1) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Tungsten West has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Adriatic Metals. Adriatic Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Adriatic Metals£27.59M40.08-£68.31M-£13.26N/A
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A

In the previous week, Adriatic Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tungsten West's score of -0.55 indicating that Adriatic Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Adriatic Metals Neutral
Tungsten West Negative

Adriatic Metals has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Adriatic Metals presently has a consensus target price of GBX 277, suggesting a potential downside of 13.44%. Given Adriatic Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Adriatic Metals is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Adriatic Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

1.1% of Adriatic Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of Adriatic Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Adriatic Metals has a net margin of -177.29% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Adriatic Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Adriatic Metals-177.29% -48.19% -6.80%
Tungsten West -1,343.41%233.54%-20.17%

Summary

Adriatic Metals beats Tungsten West on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Cornish Metals?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Cornish Metals (LON:CUSN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Cornish Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Cornish Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tungsten West-1,343.41% 233.54% -20.17%
Cornish Metals N/A -6.96%-2.52%

3.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cornish Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A
Cornish MetalsN/AN/A-£328.47K-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Cornish Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tungsten West's score of -0.55 indicating that Cornish Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West Negative
Cornish Metals Neutral

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cornish Metals has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cornish Metals beats Tungsten West on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to SolGold?

SolGold (LON:SOLG) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, SolGold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tungsten West's score of -0.55 indicating that SolGold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SolGold Neutral
Tungsten West Negative

SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SolGoldN/AN/A-£76.59M-£2.00N/A
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A

SolGold has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

11.5% of SolGold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.4% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of SolGold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SolGold has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat SolGold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SolGoldN/A -26.90% -2.94%
Tungsten West -1,343.41%233.54%-20.17%

SolGold currently has a consensus price target of GBX 46, indicating a potential upside of 64.58%. Given SolGold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SolGold is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SolGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

SolGold beats Tungsten West on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Griffin Mining?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Griffin Mining and 0 mentions for Tungsten West. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tungsten West's score of -0.55 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West Negative
Griffin Mining Neutral

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.551, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

3.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 300, suggesting a potential downside of 4.46%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.84£25.84M£12.1025.95

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tungsten West-1,343.41% 233.54% -20.17%
Griffin Mining 20.09%8.42%6.85%

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Tungsten West on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Ecora Resources?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Ecora Resources (LON:ECOR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Ecora Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 183.33, suggesting a potential upside of 31.33%. Given Ecora Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ecora Resources is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ecora Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Ecora Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ecora Resources and 0 mentions for Tungsten West. Ecora Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tungsten West's score of -0.55 indicating that Ecora Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West Negative
Ecora Resources Positive

3.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.3% of Ecora Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Ecora Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ecora Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecora Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A
Ecora Resources£55.90M6.23£28.84M£8.8815.72

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ecora Resources has a beta of 0.469, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Ecora Resources has a net margin of 38.89% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Ecora Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tungsten West-1,343.41% 233.54% -20.17%
Ecora Resources 38.89%4.87%5.07%

Summary

Ecora Resources beats Tungsten West on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tungsten West News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TUN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TUN vs. The Competition

MetricTungsten WestOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£399.26M£1.49B£4.63B£2.49B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%5.03%6.16%
P/E Ratio-1.2327.3022.91366.65
Price / SalesN/A46,620.375,657.6186,088.78
Price / Cash0.9024.6326.8327.87
Price / Book2.815.288.787.79
Net Income-£10.80M£70.60M£157.40M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-11.11%-4.72%-3.17%-0.58%
1 Month Performance-19.62%-8.23%-6.76%-1.02%
1 Year Performance151.97%81.10%48.51%65.87%

Tungsten West Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 32
-5.3%
N/A+152.0%£399.26MN/AN/A15
ADT1
Adriatic Metals
N/AGBX 320
flat
GBX 277
-13.4%
N/A£1.11B£27.59MN/A296
CUSN
Cornish Metals
N/AGBX 85.20
+1.4%
N/A+922.8%£1.07BN/AN/AN/A
SOLG
SolGold
N/AGBX 27.95
flat
GBX 46
+64.6%
N/A£842.37MN/AN/A461
GFM
Griffin Mining
0.4842 of 5 stars
GBX 315
-3.1%
GBX 290
-7.9%
+63.5%£556.27M£144.34M26.03448

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TUN) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners