Do analysts recommend TUN or HOC?

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 753.75, indicating a potential upside of 43.98%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tungsten West 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Hochschild Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor TUN or HOC?

In the previous week, Tungsten West and Tungsten West both had 1 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tungsten West 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Hochschild Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend TUN or PAF?

Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 33.33%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Tungsten West. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tungsten West 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Pan African Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor TUN or PAF?

In the previous week, Tungsten West and Tungsten West both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tungsten West 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pan African Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate TKO or TUN?

Taseko Mines presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential downside of 40.91%. Given Taseko Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Taseko Mines is more favorable than Tungsten West. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Taseko Mines 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Tungsten West 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TKO or TUN?

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Taseko Mines £985.32M 2.45 £148.77M £3.00 220.00 Tungsten West £601.55K 1,022.71 -£10.80M -£12.00 N/A

Is TKO or TUN more profitable?

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Taseko Mines' return on equity of 2.09% beat Tungsten West's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Taseko Mines 1.60% 2.09% 3.36% Tungsten West -29,165.70% -2,022.63% -20.17%

Does the media refer more to TKO or TUN?

In the previous week, Taseko Mines and Taseko Mines both had 1 articles in the media. Tungsten West's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Taseko Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Tungsten West is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Taseko Mines 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Tungsten West 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CEY or TUN?

Centamin has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centamin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Centamin £930.75M 0.00 £84.67M £0.05 N/A Tungsten West £601.55K 1,022.71 -£10.80M -£12.00 N/A

Is CEY or TUN more profitable?

Centamin has a net margin of 9.10% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Centamin's return on equity of 14.16% beat Tungsten West's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Centamin 9.10% 14.16% 8.45% Tungsten West -29,165.70% -2,022.63% -20.17%

Do analysts prefer ATYM or TUN?

Atalaya Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,141.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.16%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Atalaya Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Tungsten West 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, ATYM or TUN?

Atalaya Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atalaya Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Atalaya Mining £492.86M 3.35 £33.29M £70.50 15.25 Tungsten West £601.55K 1,022.71 -£10.80M -£12.00 N/A

Does the media refer more to ATYM or TUN?

In the previous week, Atalaya Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Atalaya Mining and 1 mentions for Tungsten West. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Atalaya Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Atalaya Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Tungsten West 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Tungsten West (TUN) Competitors

GBX 37.18 -0.82 (-2.16%)

As of 08:21 AM Eastern

Compare

TUN vs. HOC, PAF, TKO, CEY, and ATYM

Should you buy Tungsten West stock or one of its competitors? Tungsten West's main competitors and comparable companies include Hochschild Mining (HOC), Pan African Resources (PAF), Taseko Mines (TKO), Centamin (CEY), and Atalaya Mining (ATYM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Tungsten West compare to Hochschild Mining?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Hochschild Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten West	£601.55K	1,022.71	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A
Hochschild Mining	£1.51B	1.79	£38.41M	£58.00	9.03

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hochschild Mining has a beta of 0.996, indicating that its share price is 0% less volatile than the broader market.

Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 753.75, indicating a potential upside of 43.98%. Given Hochschild Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hochschild Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tungsten West	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Hochschild Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Hochschild Mining has a net margin of 19.80% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Hochschild Mining's return on equity of 35.59% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%
Hochschild Mining	19.80%	35.59%	7.11%

5.9% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.6% of Hochschild Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tungsten West and Tungsten West both had 1 articles in the media. Hochschild Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.05 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Hochschild Mining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Hochschild Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Hochschild Mining beats Tungsten West on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Pan African Resources?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Pan African Resources (LON:PAF) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Pan African Resources has a net margin of 30.89% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Pan African Resources' return on equity of 61.74% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%
Pan African Resources	30.89%	61.74%	12.99%

5.9% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.7% of Pan African Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Pan African Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tungsten West and Tungsten West both had 1 articles in the media. Pan African Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Pan African Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pan African Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Pan African Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 156, suggesting a potential upside of 33.33%. Given Pan African Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pan African Resources is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tungsten West	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Pan African Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Pan African Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pan African Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten West	£601.55K	1,022.71	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A
Pan African Resources	£1.16B	2.15	£58.60M	£17.60	6.65

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pan African Resources has a beta of 0.744, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pan African Resources beats Tungsten West on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Taseko Mines?

Taseko Mines (LON:TKO) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.044, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Taseko Mines has a net margin of 1.60% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Taseko Mines' return on equity of 2.09% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Taseko Mines	1.60%	2.09%	3.36%
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%

Taseko Mines presently has a consensus price target of GBX 390, suggesting a potential downside of 40.91%. Given Taseko Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Taseko Mines is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Taseko Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Tungsten West	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Taseko Mines and Taseko Mines both had 1 articles in the media. Tungsten West's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Taseko Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Tungsten West is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Taseko Mines	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Tungsten West	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Taseko Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Taseko Mines	£985.32M	2.45	£148.77M	£3.00	220.00
Tungsten West	£601.55K	1,022.71	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A

24.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Tungsten West shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Taseko Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Taseko Mines beats Tungsten West on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Centamin?

Centamin (LON:CEY) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Centamin has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centamin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centamin	£930.75M	0.00	£84.67M	£0.05	N/A
Tungsten West	£601.55K	1,022.71	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A

Centamin has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

90.8% of Centamin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Centamin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Centamin has a net margin of 9.10% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Centamin's return on equity of 14.16% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centamin	9.10%	14.16%	8.45%
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%

In the previous week, Tungsten West had 1 more articles in the media than Centamin. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tungsten West and 0 mentions for Centamin. Tungsten West's average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Centamin's score of 0.00 indicating that Tungsten West is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Centamin	Neutral
Tungsten West	Neutral

Summary

Centamin beats Tungsten West on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tungsten West compare to Atalaya Mining?

Atalaya Mining (LON:ATYM) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

Atalaya Mining has a beta of 1.485, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Atalaya Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atalaya Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atalaya Mining	£492.86M	3.35	£33.29M	£70.50	15.25
Tungsten West	£601.55K	1,022.71	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A

Atalaya Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,141.25, suggesting a potential upside of 6.16%. Given Atalaya Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atalaya Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atalaya Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Tungsten West	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

50.9% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.4% of Atalaya Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Atalaya Mining has a net margin of 22.01% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Atalaya Mining's return on equity of 16.00% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atalaya Mining	22.01%	16.00%	2.82%
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%

In the previous week, Atalaya Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Atalaya Mining and 1 mentions for Tungsten West. Atalaya Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.02 indicating that Atalaya Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Atalaya Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Tungsten West	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Atalaya Mining beats Tungsten West on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tungsten West News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Tungsten West	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£599.73M	£3.82B	£4.76B	£2.83B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.25%	4.77%	6.26%
P/E Ratio	-3.10	24.64	24.31	367.19
Price / Sales	996.97	25,832.20	15,385.79	88,436.70
Price / Cash	0.90	26.34	24.35	27.87
Price / Book	3.26	11.81	9.82	7.04
Net Income	-£10.80M	£127.18M	£159.17M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-13.53%	0.54%	0.08%	0.07%
1 Month Performance	-27.10%	78.62%	57.49%	-0.40%
1 Year Performance	313.11%	18.59%	16.16%	22.88%

Tungsten West Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUN Tungsten West	N/A	GBX 37.18 -2.2%	N/A	+346.1%	£599.73M	£601.55K	N/A	15
HOC Hochschild Mining	4.2736 of 5 stars	GBX 542 +0.3%	GBX 671 +23.8%	+47.8%	£2.79B	£1.51B	9.34	3,199
PAF Pan African Resources	3.7723 of 5 stars	GBX 121.23 +0.1%	GBX 156 +28.7%	+31.5%	£2.46B	£1.16B	6.89	2,494
TKO Taseko Mines	0.1318 of 5 stars	GBX 660 +5.6%	GBX 390 -40.9%	+98.2%	£2.42B	£985.32M	220.00	N/A	Gap Up
CEY Centamin	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.69B	£930.75M	2,920.00	4,874

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:TUN) was last updated on 10/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Tungsten West (TUN) Competitors

TUN vs. HOC, PAF, TKO, CEY, and ATYM

How does Tungsten West compare to Hochschild Mining?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Pan African Resources?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Taseko Mines?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Centamin?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Atalaya Mining?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUN vs. The Competition

Tungsten West Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Tungsten West (TUN) Competitors

TUN vs. HOC, PAF, TKO, CEY, and ATYM

How does Tungsten West compare to Hochschild Mining?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TUN or HOC?

Which has more volatility & risk, TUN or HOC?

Do analysts recommend TUN or HOC?

Is TUN or HOC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TUN or HOC?

Does the media favor TUN or HOC?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Pan African Resources?

Is TUN or PAF more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TUN or PAF?

Does the media favor TUN or PAF?

Do analysts recommend TUN or PAF?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, TUN or PAF?

Which has more volatility and risk, TUN or PAF?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Taseko Mines?

Which has more volatility and risk, TKO or TUN?

Is TKO or TUN more profitable?

Do analysts rate TKO or TUN?

Does the media refer more to TKO or TUN?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TKO or TUN?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TKO or TUN?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Centamin?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CEY or TUN?

Which has more volatility & risk, CEY or TUN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CEY or TUN?

Is CEY or TUN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CEY or TUN?

Summary

How does Tungsten West compare to Atalaya Mining?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATYM or TUN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ATYM or TUN?

Do analysts prefer ATYM or TUN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ATYM or TUN?

Is ATYM or TUN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to ATYM or TUN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUN vs. The Competition

Tungsten West Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools