Go Pro
→ A letter from Shannon Stansberry (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free FAR Stock Alerts

Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR) Competitors

Ferro-Alloy Resources logo
GBX 4.42 -0.08 (-1.73%)
As of 06:40 AM Eastern
Compare

FAR vs. ATM, JLP, KOD, AFRK, and 1SN

Should you buy Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ferro-Alloy Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ferro-Alloy Resources include Andrada Mining (ATM), Jubilee Metals Group (JLP), Kodal Minerals (KOD), Afarak Group (AFRK), and First Tin (1SN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Andrada Mining?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Andrada Mining (LON:ATM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Andrada Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral
Andrada Mining Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Andrada Mining has a beta of 1.104, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Ferro-Alloy Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 578.43%. Andrada Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 8, suggesting a potential upside of 93.24%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Andrada Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Andrada Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Andrada Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Andrada Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M5.74-£9.69M-£1.70N/A
Andrada Mining£25.16M3.62-£9.17M-£0.61N/A

Andrada Mining has a net margin of -38.02% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Andrada Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources-185.72% 283.86% -21.47%
Andrada Mining -38.02%-38.87%-8.95%

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.7% of Andrada Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Andrada Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Andrada Mining beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Jubilee Metals Group?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Jubilee Metals Group (LON:JLP) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Jubilee Metals Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jubilee Metals Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M5.74-£9.69M-£1.70N/A
Jubilee Metals Group£21.00M4.11£6.28M-£1.41N/A

Jubilee Metals Group has a net margin of 37.70% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Jubilee Metals Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources-185.72% 283.86% -21.47%
Jubilee Metals Group 37.70%-18.64%1.86%

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jubilee Metals Group has a beta of 1.133, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ferro-Alloy Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 578.43%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Jubilee Metals Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Jubilee Metals Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Jubilee Metals Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jubilee Metals Group and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jubilee Metals Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral
Jubilee Metals Group Neutral

Summary

Jubilee Metals Group beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Kodal Minerals?

Kodal Minerals (LON:KOD) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Kodal Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kodal Minerals Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Kodal Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Kodal Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kodal MineralsN/AN/A£26.13K-£0.05N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M5.74-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

Kodal Minerals has a beta of 0.183, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Kodal Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Kodal Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kodal Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Kodal Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kodal MineralsN/A -21.95% -5.71%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

Kodal Minerals presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1.20, indicating a potential upside of 300.00%. Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 578.43%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Kodal Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kodal Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Kodal Minerals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Afarak Group?

Afarak Group (LON:AFRK) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

0.1% of Afarak Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.8% of Afarak Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Afarak Group has a net margin of -0.49% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Afarak Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Afarak Group-0.49% 0.07% 1.11%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

In the previous week, Afarak Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Afarak Group Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Afarak Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Afarak Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Afarak Group£141.28M0.41£9.45M-£3.00N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M5.74-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

Afarak Group has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 578.43%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Afarak Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Afarak Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Afarak Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to First Tin?

First Tin (LON:1SN) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

5.8% of First Tin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of First Tin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Tin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. First Tin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First TinN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.27N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M5.74-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 578.43%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than First Tin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Tin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Tin has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Tin had 2 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for First Tin and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. First Tin's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that First Tin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Tin Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

First Tin has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat First Tin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First TinN/A -5.59% -3.50%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -185.72%283.86%-21.47%

Summary

First Tin beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAR vs. The Competition

Export
MetricFerro-Alloy ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£25.99M£1.50B£4.53B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.58%5.04%6.12%
P/E Ratio-2.6017.9721.15368.59
Price / Sales5.7452,317.226,294.1784,725.16
Price / Cash149.0024.6326.4627.87
Price / Book3.915.539.007.78
Net Income-£9.69M£70.60M£157.11M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-3.87%-0.21%0.51%1.30%
1 Month Performance-11.56%-7.79%-5.28%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-38.15%66.20%39.26%62.21%

Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
N/AGBX 4.42
-1.7%		GBX 30
+578.4%		-36.6%£25.99M£4.53MN/A1,000
ATM
Andrada Mining
1.4287 of 5 stars		GBX 3.65
+0.1%		GBX 8
+119.0%		+39.3%£80.26M£25.16MN/A219
JLP
Jubilee Metals Group
N/AGBX 2.50
+11.1%		N/A-23.5%£72.69M£21.00MN/A897
KOD
Kodal Minerals
1.213 of 5 stars		GBX 0.30
+2.8%		GBX 1.20
+302.7%		-13.0%£59.08MN/AN/A90
AFRK
Afarak Group
N/AGBX 22.40
flat		N/AN/A£58.55M£141.28MN/A588

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAR) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel