Do analysts rate SML or FAR?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Strategic Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strategic Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer SML or FAR?

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.41 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Strategic Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FAR or JLP?

Ferro-Alloy Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Jubilee Metals Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Jubilee Metals Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts rate EUA or FAR?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Eurasia Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Eurasia Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend AEXG or FAR?

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Amaroq Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Amaroq Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Ferro-Alloy Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR) Competitors

GBX 3.80 +0.00 (+0.03%)

As of 09:56 AM Eastern

Compare

FAR vs. SML, ATM, JLP, EUA, and AEXG

Should you buy Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ferro-Alloy Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ferro-Alloy Resources include Strategic Minerals (SML), Andrada Mining (ATM), Jubilee Metals Group (JLP), Eurasia Mining (EUA), and Amaroq Minerals (AEXG). These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Strategic Minerals?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

0.0% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals	£4.23M	27.32	-£13.68M	-£0.01	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.93	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Strategic Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strategic Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Strategic Minerals has a net margin of -3.23% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals	-3.23%	-2.03%	4.39%
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Strategic Minerals' score of 0.41 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.905, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Strategic Minerals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Andrada Mining?

Andrada Mining (LON:ATM) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

3.7% of Andrada Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Andrada Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Andrada Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 8, suggesting a potential upside of 101.01%. Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Andrada Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Andrada Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Andrada Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Andrada Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Andrada Mining	£25.16M	3.48	-£9.17M	-£0.61	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.93	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

Andrada Mining has a net margin of -38.02% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Andrada Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Andrada Mining	-38.02%	-38.87%	-8.95%
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Andrada Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Andrada Mining. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Andrada Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Andrada Mining	Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Positive

Andrada Mining has a beta of 1.104, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Andrada Mining and Ferro-Alloy Resources tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Jubilee Metals Group?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Jubilee Metals Group (LON:JLP) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Jubilee Metals Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jubilee Metals Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.93	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A
Jubilee Metals Group	£21.00M	4.29	£6.28M	-£1.41	N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Jubilee Metals Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Jubilee Metals Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Jubilee Metals Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Jubilee Metals Group. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Jubilee Metals Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Positive
Jubilee Metals Group	Neutral

Jubilee Metals Group has a net margin of 37.70% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Jubilee Metals Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%
Jubilee Metals Group	37.70%	-18.64%	1.86%

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jubilee Metals Group has a beta of 1.133, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources and Jubilee Metals Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Eurasia Mining?

Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eurasia Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Eurasia Mining has a beta of 0.477, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.841, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Eurasia Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eurasia Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eurasia Mining	£5.42M	12.71	-£422.17K	£0.15	15.57
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.93	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

0.0% of Eurasia Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 11.9% of Eurasia Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Eurasia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Eurasia Mining. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Eurasia Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Eurasia Mining	Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Positive

Eurasia Mining has a net margin of 82.10% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Eurasia Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eurasia Mining	82.10%	19.91%	-3.34%
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Eurasia Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Amaroq Minerals (LON:AEXG) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources and 0 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Amaroq Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Amaroq Minerals	Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources	Positive

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -185.72%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 283.86% beat Amaroq Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Amaroq Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	-185.72%	283.86%	-21.47%

Amaroq Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amaroq Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Amaroq Minerals	N/A	N/A	N/A	-£9.10	N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources	£4.53M	4.93	-£9.69M	-£1.70	N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 689.47%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Amaroq Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Amaroq Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Amaroq Minerals on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FAR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ferro-Alloy Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£22.34M	£3.81B	£4.87B	£2.88B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.21%	4.69%	6.11%
P/E Ratio	-2.24	22.78	20.98	368.39
Price / Sales	4.93	8,716.42	5,171.40	83,667.28
Price / Cash	149.00	26.52	24.63	27.89
Price / Book	3.36	10.38	8.79	7.24
Net Income	-£9.69M	£122.29M	£154.60M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.70%	8.53%	6.85%	1.60%
1 Month Performance	-15.37%	5.86%	5.18%	2.39%
1 Year Performance	-46.48%	54.19%	43.31%	74.98%

Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FAR Ferro-Alloy Resources	1.9577 of 5 stars	GBX 3.80 +0.0%	GBX 30 +689.5%	-46.5%	£22.34M	£4.53M	N/A	1,000
SML Strategic Minerals	N/A	GBX 3.50 -7.9%	N/A	+1,100.0%	£100.91M	£4.23M	N/A	11	Positive News Gap Down
ATM Andrada Mining	N/A	GBX 3.89 +1.0%	GBX 8 +105.7%	+28.4%	£84.88M	£25.16M	N/A	219
JLP Jubilee Metals Group	N/A	GBX 2.51 +4.6%	N/A	-16.7%	£77.54M	£21.00M	N/A	897	Gap Up
EUA Eurasia Mining	N/A	GBX 2.47 -1.3%	N/A	-53.1%	£76.00M	£5.42M	16.45	116	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:FAR) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR) Competitors

FAR vs. SML, ATM, JLP, EUA, and AEXG

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Strategic Minerals?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Andrada Mining?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Jubilee Metals Group?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Eurasia Mining?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAR vs. The Competition

Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR) Competitors

FAR vs. SML, ATM, JLP, EUA, and AEXG

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Strategic Minerals?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SML or FAR?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SML or FAR?

Do analysts rate SML or FAR?

Is SML or FAR more profitable?

Does the media prefer SML or FAR?

Which has more volatility and risk, SML or FAR?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Andrada Mining?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ATM or FAR?

Do analysts prefer ATM or FAR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ATM or FAR?

Is ATM or FAR more profitable?

Does the media refer more to ATM or FAR?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATM or FAR?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Jubilee Metals Group?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FAR or JLP?

Do analysts prefer FAR or JLP?

Does the media favor FAR or JLP?

Is FAR or JLP more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FAR or JLP?

Which has more risk & volatility, FAR or JLP?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Eurasia Mining?

Do analysts rate EUA or FAR?

Which has more volatility and risk, EUA or FAR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, EUA or FAR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of EUA or FAR?

Does the media refer more to EUA or FAR?

Is EUA or FAR more profitable?

Summary

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in AEXG or FAR?

Does the media refer more to AEXG or FAR?

Is AEXG or FAR more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, AEXG or FAR?

Do analysts recommend AEXG or FAR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FAR vs. The Competition

Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools