Free Trial

Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR) Competitors

Ferro-Alloy Resources logo
GBX 5.08 +0.08 (+1.60%)
As of 06:14 AM Eastern

FAR vs. MNRG, JLP, ATM, 1SN, and KOD

Should you buy Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ferro-Alloy Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ferro-Alloy Resources include MetalNRG (MNRG), Jubilee Metals Group (JLP), Andrada Mining (ATM), First Tin (1SN), and Kodal Minerals (KOD). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to MetalNRG?

MetalNRG (LON:MNRG) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

MetalNRG has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of MetalNRG shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MetalNRG's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MetalNRG Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 490.55%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than MetalNRG.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MetalNRG
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

MetalNRG has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat MetalNRG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MetalNRGN/A -344.12% -121.96%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -162.57%264.51%-21.47%

MetalNRG has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetalNRG-£38.42K0.00-£2.32MN/AN/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.59-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats MetalNRG on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Jubilee Metals Group?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Jubilee Metals Group (LON:JLP) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Jubilee Metals Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jubilee Metals Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.59-£9.69M-£1.70N/A
Jubilee Metals Group£21.00M4.18£6.28M-£1.41N/A

Ferro-Alloy Resources presently has a consensus price target of GBX 30, indicating a potential upside of 490.55%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Jubilee Metals Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Jubilee Metals Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Jubilee Metals Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Jubilee Metals Group and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Jubilee Metals Group's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Jubilee Metals Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral
Jubilee Metals Group Positive

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jubilee Metals Group has a beta of 1.113, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Jubilee Metals Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jubilee Metals Group has a net margin of 37.70% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat Jubilee Metals Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources-162.57% 264.51% -21.47%
Jubilee Metals Group 37.70%-18.64%1.86%

Summary

Jubilee Metals Group beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Andrada Mining?

Andrada Mining (LON:ATM) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

Andrada Mining has a net margin of -38.02% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat Andrada Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Andrada Mining-38.02% -38.87% -8.95%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -162.57%264.51%-21.47%

Andrada Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Andrada Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Andrada Mining£25.16M3.35-£9.17M-£0.61N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.59-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

3.8% of Andrada Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Andrada Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Andrada Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 8, suggesting a potential upside of 108.44%. Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 490.55%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Andrada Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Andrada Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Andrada Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Andrada Mining Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Andrada Mining has a beta of 1.143, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Andrada Mining beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to First Tin?

First Tin (LON:1SN) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

First Tin has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. First Tin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First TinN/AN/A-£2.26M-£0.27N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.59-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

First Tin has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

5.8% of First Tin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of First Tin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, First Tin had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for First Tin and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. First Tin's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Ferro-Alloy Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that First Tin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Tin Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 490.55%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than First Tin.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Tin
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Tin has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat First Tin's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First TinN/A -5.59% -3.50%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -162.57%264.51%-21.47%

Summary

First Tin beats Ferro-Alloy Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ferro-Alloy Resources compare to Kodal Minerals?

Kodal Minerals (LON:KOD) and Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Kodal Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Kodal Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kodal MineralsN/AN/A£26.13K-£0.05N/A
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.59-£9.69M-£1.70N/A

In the previous week, Kodal Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Kodal Minerals and 0 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Kodal Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ferro-Alloy Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kodal Minerals Neutral
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral

Kodal Minerals presently has a consensus target price of GBX 1.20, suggesting a potential upside of 294.74%. Ferro-Alloy Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 490.55%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Kodal Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kodal Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Kodal Minerals has a beta of 0.269, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Kodal Minerals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat Kodal Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kodal MineralsN/A -21.95% -5.71%
Ferro-Alloy Resources -162.57%264.51%-21.47%

0.0% of Kodal Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Kodal Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Kodal Minerals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAR vs. The Competition

MetricFerro-Alloy ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£29.86M£1.66B£4.95B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.95%6.12%
P/E Ratio-2.9930.8023.42363.81
Price / Sales6.5959,162.217,047.5987,542.70
Price / Cash149.0024.6327.4327.85
Price / Book4.495.829.437.81
Net Income-£9.69M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.46%0.65%-0.45%0.09%
1 Month PerformanceN/AN/A17.05%N/A
1 Year Performance-41.61%112.93%68.79%74.59%

Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAR
Ferro-Alloy Resources
N/AGBX 5.08
+1.6%
GBX 30
+490.6%
-42.1%£29.86M£4.53MN/A1,000
MNRG
MetalNRG
N/AN/AN/AN/A£119.93M-£38.42KN/A6
JLP
Jubilee Metals Group
N/AGBX 2.80
+1.8%
N/A-26.3%£90.25M£21.00MN/A897
ATM
Andrada Mining
1.6013 of 5 stars
GBX 3.80
-1.3%
GBX 8
+110.5%
+51.8%£83.56M£25.16MN/A219
1SN
First Tin
N/AGBX 12.75
flat
N/A+118.6%£69.09MN/AN/A27

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FAR) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners