FAR vs. CTL, GSP, ARCM, KP2, ARS, PXC, BMN, MKA, KAV, and 1SN
Should you be buying Ferro-Alloy Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ferro-Alloy Resources include CleanTech Lithium (CTL), Gensource Potash (GSP), Arc Minerals (ARCM), Kore Potash (KP2), Asiamet Resources (ARS), Phoenix Copper (PXC), Bushveld Minerals (BMN), Mkango Resources (MKA), Kavango Resources (KAV), and First Tin (1SN). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.
Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and CleanTech Lithium (LON:CTL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, community ranking, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.
In the previous week, CleanTech Lithium had 1 more articles in the media than Ferro-Alloy Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CleanTech Lithium and 1 mentions for Ferro-Alloy Resources. Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CleanTech Lithium's score of 0.59 indicating that Ferro-Alloy Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.
2.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 49.5% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.7% of CleanTech Lithium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
CleanTech Lithium received 3 more outperform votes than Ferro-Alloy Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 100.00% of users gave CleanTech Lithium an outperform vote while only 0.00% of users gave Ferro-Alloy Resources an outperform vote.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has higher revenue and earnings than CleanTech Lithium. Ferro-Alloy Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CleanTech Lithium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
CleanTech Lithium has a consensus price target of GBX 295, indicating a potential upside of 1,743.75%. Given CleanTech Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CleanTech Lithium is more favorable than Ferro-Alloy Resources.
Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CleanTech Lithium has a beta of -0.78, indicating that its share price is 178% less volatile than the S&P 500.
CleanTech Lithium has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -90.26%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of -43.57% beat CleanTech Lithium's return on equity.
Summary
Ferro-Alloy Resources and CleanTech Lithium tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ferro-Alloy Resources News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Ferro-Alloy Resources Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
