Go Pro

Mkango Resources (MKA) Competitors

Mkango Resources logo
GBX 42 -1.50 (-3.45%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:38 PM Eastern

MKA vs. TUN, GFM, AMRQ, MTL, and THX

Should you buy Mkango Resources stock or one of its competitors? Mkango Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Tungsten West (TUN), Griffin Mining (GFM), Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Metals Exploration (MTL), and Thor Explorations (THX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Mkango Resources compare to Tungsten West?

Mkango Resources (LON:MKA) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Mkango Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Mkango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mkango Resources£51.62K3,164.62-£4.25M-£4.64N/A
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£12.00N/A

In the previous week, Mkango Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Tungsten West's score of -1.19 indicating that Mkango Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mkango Resources Neutral
Tungsten West Negative

Mkango Resources has a beta of 1.729, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Tungsten West has a net margin of -29,165.70% compared to Mkango Resources' net margin of -31,610.42%. Mkango Resources' return on equity of 5,692.08% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mkango Resources-31,610.42% 5,692.08% -35.11%
Tungsten West -29,165.70%-2,022.63%-20.17%

2.7% of Mkango Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Mkango Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Mkango Resources beats Tungsten West on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mkango Resources compare to Griffin Mining?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Mkango Resources (LON:MKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Mkango Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Mkango Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.497, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mkango Resources has a beta of 1.729, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Mkango Resources. Mkango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.43£25.84M£12.1023.14
Mkango Resources£51.62K3,164.62-£4.25M-£4.64N/A

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Mkango Resources. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Griffin Mining and 0 mentions for Mkango Resources. Mkango Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Griffin Mining's score of -0.14 indicating that Mkango Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
Mkango Resources Neutral

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Mkango Resources' net margin of -31,610.42%. Mkango Resources' return on equity of 5,692.08% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Mkango Resources -31,610.42%5,692.08%-35.11%

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, suggesting a potential upside of 3.57%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Mkango Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mkango Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Mkango Resources on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mkango Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Mkango Resources (LON:MKA) and Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Mkango Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Amaroq Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mkango Resources Neutral
Amaroq Minerals Neutral

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 6.56% compared to Mkango Resources' net margin of -31,610.42%. Mkango Resources' return on equity of 5,692.08% beat Amaroq Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mkango Resources-31,610.42% 5,692.08% -35.11%
Amaroq Minerals 6.56%1.87%-9.95%

2.7% of Mkango Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Mkango Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mkango Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mkango Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mkango Resources£51.62K3,164.62-£4.25M-£4.64N/A
Amaroq Minerals£16.28M32.35-£71.64M-£5.10N/A

Mkango Resources has a beta of 1.729, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.26%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Mkango Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mkango Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Amaroq Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Amaroq Minerals beats Mkango Resources on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mkango Resources compare to Metals Exploration?

Mkango Resources (LON:MKA) and Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Mkango Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Metals Exploration'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mkango Resources Neutral
Metals Exploration Neutral

Mkango Resources has a beta of 1.729, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metals Exploration has a beta of 1.105, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Metals Exploration has higher revenue and earnings than Mkango Resources. Mkango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mkango Resources£51.62K3,164.62-£4.25M-£4.64N/A
Metals Exploration£208.41M2.35£218.27M£0.9716.53

Metals Exploration has a net margin of 13.86% compared to Mkango Resources' net margin of -31,610.42%. Mkango Resources' return on equity of 5,692.08% beat Metals Exploration's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mkango Resources-31,610.42% 5,692.08% -35.11%
Metals Exploration 13.86%12.27%3.75%

2.7% of Mkango Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.2% of Metals Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Mkango Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.9% of Metals Exploration shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Metals Exploration beats Mkango Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mkango Resources compare to Thor Explorations?

Thor Explorations (LON:THX) and Mkango Resources (LON:MKA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Thor Explorations has higher revenue and earnings than Mkango Resources. Mkango Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Explorations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor Explorations£330.59M1.42£68.07M£31.402.25
Mkango Resources£51.62K3,164.62-£4.25M-£4.64N/A

In the previous week, Thor Explorations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mkango Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Explorations Neutral
Mkango Resources Neutral

Thor Explorations has a beta of 1.735, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mkango Resources has a beta of 1.729, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market.

Thor Explorations has a net margin of 62.17% compared to Mkango Resources' net margin of -31,610.42%. Mkango Resources' return on equity of 5,692.08% beat Thor Explorations' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor Explorations62.17% 52.14% 12.12%
Mkango Resources -31,610.42%5,692.08%-35.11%

12.2% of Thor Explorations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.7% of Mkango Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 12.6% of Thor Explorations shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Mkango Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thor Explorations presently has a consensus price target of GBX 130, suggesting a potential upside of 84.40%. Given Thor Explorations' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Thor Explorations is more favorable than Mkango Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thor Explorations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Mkango Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Thor Explorations beats Mkango Resources on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mkango Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MKA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MKA vs. The Competition

MetricMkango ResourcesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£163.36M£3.93B£4.92B£2.87B
Dividend YieldN/A5.17%4.68%6.23%
P/E Ratio-9.0526.2526.19366.83
Price / Sales3,164.628,047.474,792.6483,599.70
Price / Cash74.0029.5126.9227.89
Price / Book22.4212.3310.246.33
Net Income-£4.25M£127.55M£158.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.44%-1.43%-1.45%-0.69%
1 Month Performance-3.23%9.72%7.08%0.18%
1 Year Performance24.59%47.16%37.22%20.03%

Mkango Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MKA
Mkango Resources
N/AGBX 42
-3.4%
N/A+24.8%£163.36M£51.62KN/AN/A
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 48
+1.3%
N/A+442.6%£598.88MN/AN/A15
GFM
Griffin Mining
1.3456 of 5 stars
GBX 290
+5.8%
GBX 300
+3.4%
+41.4%£512.12M£144.34M23.97448
AMRQ
Amaroq Minerals
N/AGBX 108
-0.5%
GBX 132.50
+22.7%
+63.8%£503.54M£16.28MN/AN/A
MTL
Metals Exploration
N/AGBX 16.85
+1.5%
N/A+22.4%£503.17M£208.41M17.37791

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:MKA) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners