Go Pro

Capital (CAPD) Competitors

Capital logo
GBX 118 -2.00 (-1.67%)
As of 08/21/2026 12:30 PM Eastern

CAPD vs. SOLG, TUN, AMRQ, CSH, and GFM

Should you buy Capital stock or one of its competitors? Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include SolGold (SOLG), Tungsten West (TUN), Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Civitas Social Housing (CSH), and Griffin Mining (GFM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Capital compare to SolGold?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and SolGold (LON:SOLG) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

52.5% of Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.5% of SolGold shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of SolGold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than SolGold. SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital£405.59M0.66£36.18M£33.983.47
SolGoldN/AN/A-£76.59M-£2.00N/A

In the previous week, Capital had 16 more articles in the media than SolGold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for SolGold. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat SolGold's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Neutral
SolGold Neutral

Capital has a beta of 0.685, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SolGold has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Capital has a net margin of 19.12% compared to SolGold's net margin of 0.00%. Capital's return on equity of 19.96% beat SolGold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital19.12% 19.96% 7.53%
SolGold N/A -23.06%-2.94%

Capital currently has a consensus target price of GBX 160, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. SolGold has a consensus target price of GBX 46, suggesting a potential upside of 64.58%. Given SolGold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SolGold is more favorable than Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SolGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Capital beats SolGold on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital compare to Tungsten West?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Capital has a net margin of 19.12% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital19.12% 19.96% 7.53%
Tungsten West -1,343.41%233.54%-20.17%

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital£405.59M0.66£36.18M£33.983.47
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A

In the previous week, Capital had 16 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for Tungsten West. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Neutral
Tungsten West Neutral

52.5% of Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital has a beta of 0.685, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital presently has a consensus price target of GBX 160, indicating a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capital is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Capital beats Tungsten West on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Capital currently has a consensus target price of GBX 160, indicating a potential upside of 35.59%. Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, indicating a potential upside of 27.40%. Given Capital's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital is more favorable than Amaroq Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Amaroq Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Capital has a net margin of 19.12% compared to Amaroq Minerals' net margin of 6.56%. Capital's return on equity of 19.96% beat Amaroq Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital19.12% 19.96% 7.53%
Amaroq Minerals 6.56%1.87%-9.95%

In the previous week, Capital had 16 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Amaroq Minerals' score of 0.30 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capital Neutral
Amaroq Minerals Neutral

52.5% of Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital£405.59M0.66£36.18M£33.983.47
Amaroq Minerals£16.28M29.78-£71.64M-£5.10N/A

Capital has a beta of 0.685, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.875, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capital beats Amaroq Minerals on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) and Capital (LON:CAPD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Capital's net margin of 19.12%. Capital's return on equity of 19.96% beat Civitas Social Housing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Civitas Social Housing129.46% 10.16% 2.39%
Capital 19.12%19.96%7.53%

In the previous week, Capital had 16 more articles in the media than Civitas Social Housing. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Capital and 0 mentions for Civitas Social Housing. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Civitas Social Housing's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Civitas Social Housing Neutral
Capital Neutral

Civitas Social Housing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capital. Civitas Social Housing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Civitas Social Housing£53.72M0.00£69.54M£0.11N/A
Capital£405.59M0.66£36.18M£33.983.47

79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.5% of Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Civitas Social Housing pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Civitas Social Housing pays out 5,454.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital pays out 7.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital has a consensus target price of GBX 160, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Given Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capital is more favorable than Civitas Social Housing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Civitas Social Housing
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital has a beta of 0.685, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capital beats Civitas Social Housing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital compare to Griffin Mining?

Capital (LON:CAPD) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

52.5% of Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 26.4% of Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Griffin Mining. Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capital£405.59M0.66£36.18M£33.983.47
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.45£25.84M£12.1023.31

Capital currently has a consensus price target of GBX 160, suggesting a potential upside of 35.59%. Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 300, suggesting a potential upside of 6.38%. Given Capital's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capital is more favorable than Griffin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Capital had 15 more articles in the media than Griffin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Capital and 1 mentions for Griffin Mining. Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Griffin Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capital
4 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Griffin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Capital has a beta of 0.685, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.502, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Capital's net margin of 19.12%. Capital's return on equity of 19.96% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capital19.12% 19.96% 7.53%
Griffin Mining 20.09%8.42%6.85%

Summary

Capital beats Griffin Mining on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAPD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAPD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAPD vs. The Competition

MetricCapitalMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£270.84M£4.11B£5.13B£2.54B
Dividend Yield1.60%5.19%4.69%6.17%
P/E Ratio3.4725.6526.61367.57
Price / Sales0.668,013.904,771.1183,481.74
Price / Cash2.6529.9427.3027.89
Price / Book0.8310.578.967.19
Net Income£36.18M£122.32M£154.93M£5.89B
7 Day Performance15.12%3.27%2.58%0.30%
1 Month Performance14.56%12.55%10.18%3.31%
1 Year Performance29.67%57.65%45.55%22.13%

Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAPD
Capital
4.7092 of 5 stars
GBX 118
-1.7%
GBX 160
+35.6%
+29.7%£270.84M£405.59M3.472,739
SOLG
SolGold
N/AGBX 27.95
flat
GBX 46
+64.6%
N/A£842.37MN/AN/A461
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 42.78
+1.9%
N/A+400.0%£533.76MN/AN/A15
AMRQ
Amaroq Minerals
1.6188 of 5 stars
GBX 106
0.0%
GBX 132.50
+25.0%
+52.9%£494.20M£16.28MN/AN/A
CSH
Civitas Social Housing
N/AN/AN/AN/A£483.90M£53.72M725.45N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CAPD) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners