Free Trial

Griffin Mining (GFM) Competitors

Griffin Mining logo
GBX 309.76 -3.24 (-1.04%)
As of 05/15/2026 11:51 AM Eastern

GFM vs. ADT1, CUSN, SOLG, TUN, and ECOR

Should you buy Griffin Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Griffin Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Griffin Mining include Adriatic Metals (ADT1), Cornish Metals (CUSN), SolGold (SOLG), Tungsten West (TUN), and Ecora Resources (ECOR). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Adriatic Metals?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Adriatic Metals (LON:ADT1) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Adriatic Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Griffin Mining and 0 mentions for Adriatic Metals. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Adriatic Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
Adriatic Metals Neutral

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adriatic Metals has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Adriatic Metals' net margin of -226.54%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Adriatic Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Adriatic Metals -226.54%-48.31%-6.80%

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of Adriatic Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Adriatic Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 6.38%. Adriatic Metals has a consensus price target of GBX 277, suggesting a potential downside of 13.44%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Adriatic Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Adriatic Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Adriatic Metals. Adriatic Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£120.56M4.54£25.84M£4.9063.22
Adriatic Metals£27.59M40.08-£68.31M-£13.26N/A

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Adriatic Metals on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Cornish Metals?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Cornish Metals (LON:CUSN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Cornish Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Griffin Mining and 0 mentions for Cornish Metals. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Cornish Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
Cornish Metals Neutral

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cornish Metals has a beta of 2.48, meaning that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Cornish Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Cornish Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Cornish Metals N/A -6.96%-2.52%

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 6.38%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Cornish Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cornish Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Cornish Metals. Cornish Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£120.56M4.54£25.84M£4.9063.22
Cornish MetalsN/AN/A-£328.47K-£1.00N/A

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Cornish Metals on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to SolGold?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and SolGold (LON:SOLG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to SolGold's net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat SolGold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
SolGold N/A -26.90%-2.94%

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.5% of SolGold shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of SolGold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SolGold has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 1 more articles in the media than SolGold. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Griffin Mining and 1 mentions for SolGold. SolGold's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Griffin Mining's score of 0.33 indicating that SolGold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
SolGold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 6.38%. SolGold has a consensus target price of GBX 46, suggesting a potential upside of 64.58%. Given SolGold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SolGold is more favorable than Griffin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SolGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than SolGold. SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£120.56M4.54£25.84M£4.9063.22
SolGoldN/AN/A-£76.59M-£2.00N/A

Summary

Griffin Mining beats SolGold on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Tungsten West?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Tungsten West (LON:TUN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£120.56M4.54£25.84M£4.9063.22
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 6.38%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tungsten West has a beta of 0.288, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Tungsten West -1,343.41%233.54%-20.17%

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Griffin Mining and 1 mentions for Tungsten West. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.00 indicating that Griffin Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tungsten West
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Tungsten West on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Ecora Resources?

Ecora Resources (LON:ECOR) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Ecora Resources and Ecora Resources both had 2 articles in the media. Ecora Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Griffin Mining's score of 0.33 indicating that Ecora Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ecora Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Griffin Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ecora Resources has a beta of 0.469, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.542, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Ecora Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Griffin Mining. Ecora Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ecora Resources£55.90M6.41£28.84M£8.8816.17
Griffin Mining£120.56M4.54£25.84M£4.9063.22

Ecora Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 180, suggesting a potential upside of 25.35%. Griffin Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 6.38%. Given Ecora Resources' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ecora Resources is more favorable than Griffin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ecora Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Ecora Resources has a net margin of 39.81% compared to Griffin Mining's net margin of 20.09%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Ecora Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ecora Resources39.81% 4.99% 5.07%
Griffin Mining 20.09%8.42%6.85%

30.0% of Ecora Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Ecora Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ecora Resources beats Griffin Mining on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Griffin Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFM vs. The Competition

MetricGriffin MiningOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£540.37M£1.60B£4.84B£2.60B
Dividend Yield2.49%6.55%4.99%6.15%
P/E Ratio63.2230.7622.46365.91
Price / Sales4.5456,522.226,705.6588,030.08
Price / Cash4.8624.6327.1627.89
Price / Book2.165.976.987.74
Net Income£25.84M£70.60M£159.16M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.59%-0.68%-1.21%0.21%
1 Month Performance6.55%2.15%0.01%1.56%
1 Year Performance78.02%129.59%81.53%77.95%

Griffin Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFM
Griffin Mining
0.6574 of 5 stars
GBX 309.76
-1.0%
GBX 290
-6.4%
+81.1%£540.37M£120.56M63.22448
ADT1
Adriatic Metals
N/AGBX 320
flat
GBX 277
-13.4%
N/A£1.11B£27.59MN/A296
CUSN
Cornish Metals
N/AGBX 85.20
+1.4%
N/A+895.3%£1.07BN/AN/AN/A
SOLG
SolGold
2.3153 of 5 stars
GBX 27.95
flat
GBX 46
+64.6%
N/A£842.37MN/AN/A461
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 33
+3.1%
N/A+786.4%£411.73MN/AN/A15

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GFM) was last updated on 5/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners