Free Trial

Griffin Mining (GFM) Competitors

Griffin Mining logo
GBX 322 -2.00 (-0.62%)
As of 06/5/2026 12:00 PM Eastern

GFM vs. ADT1, CUSN, SOLG, TUN, and PRE

Should you buy Griffin Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Griffin Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Griffin Mining include Adriatic Metals (ADT1), Cornish Metals (CUSN), SolGold (SOLG), Tungsten West (TUN), and Pensana (PRE). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Adriatic Metals?

Adriatic Metals (LON:ADT1) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

Adriatic Metals currently has a consensus target price of GBX 277, indicating a potential downside of 13.44%. Griffin Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 290, indicating a potential downside of 9.94%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Adriatic Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Adriatic Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Adriatic Metals. Adriatic Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Adriatic Metals£27.59M40.08-£68.31M-£13.26N/A
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.94£25.84M£12.1026.61

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Adriatic Metals' net margin of -177.29%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Adriatic Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Adriatic Metals-177.29% -48.19% -6.80%
Griffin Mining 20.09%8.42%6.85%

Adriatic Metals has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 1.1569387, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Adriatic Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.5% of Adriatic Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Adriatic Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Griffin Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Adriatic Metals Neutral
Griffin Mining Neutral

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Adriatic Metals on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Cornish Metals?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Cornish Metals (LON:CUSN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

Griffin Mining has a beta of 1.1569387, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cornish Metals has a beta of 2.48, suggesting that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market.

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cornish Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Cornish Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Cornish Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Cornish Metals N/A -6.96%-2.52%

In the previous week, Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cornish Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
Cornish Metals Neutral

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus target price of GBX 290, indicating a potential downside of 9.94%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Cornish Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cornish Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Cornish Metals. Cornish Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.94£25.84M£12.1026.61
Cornish MetalsN/AN/A-£328.47K-£1.00N/A

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Cornish Metals on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to SolGold?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and SolGold (LON:SOLG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.5% of SolGold shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of SolGold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 290, indicating a potential downside of 9.94%. SolGold has a consensus price target of GBX 46, indicating a potential upside of 64.58%. Given SolGold's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SolGold is more favorable than Griffin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
SolGold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than SolGold. SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.94£25.84M£12.1026.61
SolGoldN/AN/A-£76.59M-£2.00N/A

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to SolGold's net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat SolGold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
SolGold N/A -26.90%-2.94%

In the previous week, Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SolGold'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
SolGold Neutral

Griffin Mining has a beta of 1.1569387, meaning that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SolGold has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Griffin Mining beats SolGold on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Tungsten West?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.275, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Griffin Mining has a beta of 1.1569387, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

0.3% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Griffin Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tungsten West-1,343.41% 233.54% -20.17%
Griffin Mining 20.09%8.42%6.85%

Griffin Mining has a consensus price target of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 9.94%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tungsten West
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Tungsten West's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Griffin Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West Neutral
Griffin Mining Neutral

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten WestN/AN/A-£10.80M-£26.00N/A
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.94£25.84M£12.1026.61

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Tungsten West on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Griffin Mining compare to Pensana?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Pensana (LON:PRE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Griffin Mining has a beta of 1.1569387, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pensana has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Griffin Mining20.09% 8.42% 6.85%
Pensana N/A -10.77%-4.97%

In the previous week, Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pensana'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining Neutral
Pensana Neutral

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Pensana. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining£144.34M3.94£25.84M£12.1026.61
PensanaN/AN/A-£6.26M-£4.02N/A

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Pensana shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Pensana shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining currently has a consensus price target of GBX 290, suggesting a potential downside of 9.94%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Pensana.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Griffin Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pensana
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Pensana on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Griffin Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFM vs. The Competition

MetricGriffin MiningOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£568.62M£1.61B£4.78B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.49%6.54%4.98%6.12%
P/E Ratio26.6129.0722.53365.23
Price / Sales3.9458,105.036,932.1387,121.98
Price / Cash4.8624.6326.8227.85
Price / Book2.255.579.127.68
Net Income£25.84M£70.60M£156.62M£5.89B
7 Day Performance2.22%-3.67%-4.48%-0.50%
1 Month Performance1.58%-2.22%-4.16%2.10%
1 Year Performance89.97%102.85%59.44%72.87%

Griffin Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFM
Griffin Mining
N/AGBX 322
-0.6%
GBX 290
-9.9%
+91.7%£568.62M£144.34M26.61448
ADT1
Adriatic Metals
N/AGBX 320
flat
GBX 277
-13.4%
N/A£1.11B£27.59MN/A296
CUSN
Cornish Metals
N/AGBX 85.20
+1.4%
N/A+992.3%£1.07BN/AN/AN/A
SOLG
SolGold
1.7198 of 5 stars
GBX 27.95
flat
GBX 46
+64.6%
N/A£842.37MN/AN/A461
TUN
Tungsten West
N/AGBX 39.45
-0.9%
N/A+413.7%£492.21MN/AN/A15

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GFM) was last updated on 6/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners