Do analysts rate CSH or KMR?

Kenmare Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 352.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Civitas Social Housing. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Civitas Social Housing 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Kenmare Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts recommend KMR or AAZ?

Kenmare Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 352.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Anglo Asian Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Kenmare Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Anglo Asian Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts recommend TUN or KMR?

Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 352.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Tungsten West. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tungsten West 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Kenmare Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Kenmare Resources (KMR) Competitors

GBX 208.56 +4.56 (+2.24%)

As of 10:23 AM Eastern

Compare

KMR vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, AAZ, and TUN

Should you buy Kenmare Resources stock or one of its competitors? Kenmare Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Griffin Mining (GFM), Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), Civitas Social Housing (CSH), Anglo Asian Mining (AAZ), and Tungsten West (TUN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Griffin Mining?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Griffin Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 300, indicating a potential upside of 2.74%. Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 352.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Griffin Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Griffin Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Kenmare Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.509, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenmare Resources has a beta of 0.677, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 20.09% compared to Kenmare Resources' net margin of -99.03%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 8.42% beat Kenmare Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Griffin Mining	20.09%	8.42%	6.85%
Kenmare Resources	-99.03%	-34.92%	5.47%

Kenmare Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Griffin Mining. Kenmare Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining	£144.34M	3.57	£25.84M	£12.10	24.13
Kenmare Resources	£328.57M	0.56	£97.22M	-£364.00	N/A

In the previous week, Griffin Mining had 1 more articles in the media than Kenmare Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Griffin Mining and 0 mentions for Kenmare Resources. Griffin Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kenmare Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining	Neutral
Kenmare Resources	Neutral

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Kenmare Resources on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) and Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Kenmare Resources has a beta of 0.677, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.902, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Kenmare Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kenmare Resources	£328.57M	0.56	£97.22M	-£364.00	N/A
Amaroq Minerals	£16.28M	30.44	-£71.64M	-£5.10	N/A

In the previous week, Amaroq Minerals had 3 more articles in the media than Kenmare Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Amaroq Minerals and 0 mentions for Kenmare Resources. Amaroq Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Kenmare Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Amaroq Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Kenmare Resources	Neutral
Amaroq Minerals	Neutral

48.9% of Kenmare Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Kenmare Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of -25.38% compared to Kenmare Resources' net margin of -99.03%. Amaroq Minerals' return on equity of -4.22% beat Kenmare Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kenmare Resources	-99.03%	-34.92%	5.47%
Amaroq Minerals	-25.38%	-4.22%	-9.95%

Kenmare Resources currently has a consensus price target of GBX 352.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Amaroq Minerals has a consensus price target of GBX 142.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.05%. Given Kenmare Resources' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Amaroq Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kenmare Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Amaroq Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Amaroq Minerals beats Kenmare Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Kenmare Resources' net margin of -99.03%. Civitas Social Housing's return on equity of 10.16% beat Kenmare Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Civitas Social Housing	129.46%	10.16%	2.39%
Kenmare Resources	-99.03%	-34.92%	5.47%

In the previous week, Civitas Social Housing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kenmare Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Civitas Social Housing	Neutral
Kenmare Resources	Neutral

Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenmare Resources has a beta of 0.677, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Kenmare Resources has a consensus target price of GBX 352.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Civitas Social Housing.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Civitas Social Housing	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Kenmare Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Civitas Social Housing pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share. Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 27 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.9%. Civitas Social Housing pays out 5,454.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kenmare Resources pays out -7.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenmare Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kenmare Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Civitas Social Housing. Kenmare Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Civitas Social Housing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Civitas Social Housing	£53.72M	0.00	£69.54M	£0.11	N/A
Kenmare Resources	£328.57M	0.56	£97.22M	-£364.00	N/A

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Civitas Social Housing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) and Anglo Asian Mining (LON:AAZ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Kenmare Resources currently has a consensus target price of GBX 352.50, suggesting a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Anglo Asian Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kenmare Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Anglo Asian Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Kenmare Resources has a beta of 0.677, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Anglo Asian Mining has a beta of 1.378, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kenmare Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Anglo Asian Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Kenmare Resources	Neutral
Anglo Asian Mining	Neutral

Anglo Asian Mining has a net margin of 14.40% compared to Kenmare Resources' net margin of -99.03%. Anglo Asian Mining's return on equity of 22.56% beat Kenmare Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kenmare Resources	-99.03%	-34.92%	5.47%
Anglo Asian Mining	14.40%	22.56%	-12.11%

48.9% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.2% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.5% of Anglo Asian Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kenmare Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Anglo Asian Mining. Kenmare Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anglo Asian Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kenmare Resources	£328.57M	0.56	£97.22M	-£364.00	N/A
Anglo Asian Mining	£122.79M	3.83	-£34.33M	£15.40	26.67

Summary

Kenmare Resources and Anglo Asian Mining tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Tungsten West?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Kenmare Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Tungsten West. Tungsten West is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten West	N/A	N/A	-£10.80M	-£26.00	N/A
Kenmare Resources	£328.57M	0.56	£97.22M	-£364.00	N/A

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kenmare Resources has a beta of 0.677, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 352.50, indicating a potential upside of 69.01%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Tungsten West.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tungsten West	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Kenmare Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Tungsten West's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kenmare Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West	Neutral
Kenmare Resources	Neutral

3.5% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.9% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Tungsten West shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 25.2% of Kenmare Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kenmare Resources has a net margin of -99.03% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -1,343.41%. Tungsten West's return on equity of 233.54% beat Kenmare Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tungsten West	-1,343.41%	233.54%	-20.17%
Kenmare Resources	-99.03%	-34.92%	5.47%

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Tungsten West on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kenmare Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

KMR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Kenmare Resources	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£184.89M	£3.86B	£4.91B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	10.05%	5.22%	4.70%	6.09%
P/E Ratio	-0.57	23.33	21.37	368.36
Price / Sales	0.56	8,679.25	5,152.91	83,654.24
Price / Cash	12.97	26.52	24.63	27.89
Price / Book	0.18	10.50	8.88	7.39
Net Income	£97.22M	£122.29M	£154.60M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	4.39%	7.26%	5.76%	1.56%
1 Month Performance	5.23%	6.91%	6.01%	2.52%
1 Year Performance	-35.23%	55.72%	44.59%	73.98%

Kenmare Resources Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
KMR Kenmare Resources	2.8803 of 5 stars	GBX 208.56 +2.2%	GBX 352.50 +69.0%	-34.4%	£184.89M	£328.57M	N/A	1,687
GFM Griffin Mining	0.7632 of 5 stars	GBX 297.96 0.0%	GBX 300 +0.7%	+59.9%	£526.17M	£144.34M	24.62	448	News Coverage Gap Up
AMRQ Amaroq Minerals	1.9036 of 5 stars	GBX 105.27 +1.2%	GBX 142.50 +35.4%	+38.3%	£490.60M	£16.28M	N/A	N/A
CSH Civitas Social Housing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£483.90M	£53.72M	725.45	N/A
AAZ Anglo Asian Mining	N/A	GBX 414 +0.2%	N/A	+157.8%	£473.87M	£122.79M	26.88	950

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:KMR) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Kenmare Resources (KMR) Competitors

KMR vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, AAZ, and TUN

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Griffin Mining?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Tungsten West?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KMR vs. The Competition

Kenmare Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Kenmare Resources (KMR) Competitors

KMR vs. GFM, AMRQ, CSH, AAZ, and TUN

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Griffin Mining?

Do analysts prefer GFM or KMR?

Which has more risk & volatility, GFM or KMR?

Is GFM or KMR more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GFM or KMR?

Does the media prefer GFM or KMR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GFM or KMR?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Which has more risk and volatility, KMR or AMRQ?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, KMR or AMRQ?

Does the media prefer KMR or AMRQ?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of KMR or AMRQ?

Is KMR or AMRQ more profitable?

Do analysts rate KMR or AMRQ?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Is CSH or KMR more profitable?

Does the media prefer CSH or KMR?

Which has more risk and volatility, CSH or KMR?

Do analysts rate CSH or KMR?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CSH or KMR?

Is CSH or KMR a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CSH or KMR?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Anglo Asian Mining?

Do analysts recommend KMR or AAZ?

Which has more volatility & risk, KMR or AAZ?

Does the media prefer KMR or AAZ?

Is KMR or AAZ more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KMR or AAZ?

Which has better earnings and valuation, KMR or AAZ?

Summary

How does Kenmare Resources compare to Tungsten West?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TUN or KMR?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUN or KMR?

Do analysts recommend TUN or KMR?

Does the media prefer TUN or KMR?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TUN or KMR?

Is TUN or KMR more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KMR vs. The Competition

Kenmare Resources Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools