Kenmare Resources Competitors

Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) and Hochschild Mining (LON:HOC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.

Kenmare Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Hochschild Mining has a consensus target price of GBX 209, indicating a potential upside of 0.97%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Hochschild Mining.

Profitability

This table compares Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kenmare Resources and Hochschild Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Kenmare Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hochschild Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Hochschild Mining pays an annual dividend of GBX 5 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Kenmare Resources pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hochschild Mining pays out 238.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Hochschild Mining on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Eurasia Mining (LON:EUA) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Eurasia Mining and Kenmare Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Given Kenmare Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Eurasia Mining.

Profitability

This table compares Eurasia Mining and Kenmare Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Eurasia Mining and Kenmare Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Eurasia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Eurasia Mining on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Civitas Social Housing and Kenmare Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Civitas Social Housing currently has a consensus price target of GBX 116.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.65%. Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Given Kenmare Resources' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Civitas Social Housing.

Profitability

This table compares Civitas Social Housing and Kenmare Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Civitas Social Housing and Kenmare Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Civitas Social Housing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Civitas Social Housing pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Civitas Social Housing pays out 1.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenmare Resources pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats Civitas Social Housing on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

SolGold (LON:SOLG) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares SolGold and Kenmare Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for SolGold and Kenmare Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SolGold currently has a consensus price target of GBX 39, indicating a potential upside of 28.71%. Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Given SolGold's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe SolGold is more favorable than Kenmare Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SolGold and Kenmare Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SolGold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kenmare Resources beats SolGold on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Central Asia Metals (LON:CAML) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

Central Asia Metals pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Central Asia Metals pays out 0.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenmare Resources pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Central Asia Metals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Central Asia Metals and Kenmare Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Central Asia Metals and Kenmare Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Central Asia Metals currently has a consensus price target of GBX 235, indicating a potential downside of 13.76%. Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Given Kenmare Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kenmare Resources is more favorable than Central Asia Metals.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Central Asia Metals and Kenmare Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Central Asia Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Central Asia Metals beats Kenmare Resources on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tharisa (LON:THS) and Kenmare Resources (LON:KMR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

Tharisa pays an annual dividend of GBX 0 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Kenmare Resources pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Tharisa pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenmare Resources pays out 0.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares Tharisa and Kenmare Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Tharisa and Kenmare Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Tharisa currently has a consensus price target of GBX 182.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.15%. Kenmare Resources has a consensus price target of GBX 470, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. Given Tharisa's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tharisa is more favorable than Kenmare Resources.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Tharisa and Kenmare Resources' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Tharisa is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kenmare Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Tharisa beats Kenmare Resources on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.