Do analysts prefer GFM or PRE?

Griffin Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 340, indicating a potential upside of 6.25%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Pensana. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Griffin Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Pensana 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is TUN or PRE more profitable?

Pensana has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Pensana's return on equity of -15.23% beat Tungsten West's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Tungsten West -29,165.70% -2,022.63% -20.17% Pensana N/A -15.23% -4.97%

Do analysts recommend PRE or AMRQ?

Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.19%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Pensana. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pensana 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Amaroq Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor PRE or AMRQ?

In the previous week, Pensana had 1 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 2 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Pensana's score of 0.27 indicating that Amaroq Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pensana 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Amaroq Minerals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Pensana (PRE) Competitors

GBX 43 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 11/13/2026 12:25 PM Eastern

Compare

PRE vs. GFM, TUN, CSH, AMRQ, and MTL

Should you buy Pensana stock or one of its competitors? Pensana's main competitors and comparable companies include Griffin Mining (GFM), Tungsten West (TUN), Civitas Social Housing (CSH), Amaroq Minerals (AMRQ), and Metals Exploration (MTL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Pensana compare to Griffin Mining?

Griffin Mining (LON:GFM) and Pensana (LON:PRE) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Griffin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Pensana. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Griffin Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Griffin Mining	£157.91M	3.51	£25.84M	£19.24	16.63
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.16	N/A

0.1% of Griffin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Pensana shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Griffin Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Pensana shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Griffin Mining has a beta of 0.497, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pensana has a beta of 1.141, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Griffin Mining has a net margin of 22.62% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Griffin Mining's return on equity of 11.90% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Griffin Mining	22.62%	11.90%	6.85%
Pensana	N/A	-15.23%	-4.97%

In the previous week, Pensana had 3 more articles in the media than Griffin Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 0 mentions for Griffin Mining. Pensana's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Griffin Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Pensana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Griffin Mining	Neutral
Pensana	Neutral

Griffin Mining presently has a consensus price target of GBX 340, indicating a potential upside of 6.25%. Given Griffin Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Griffin Mining is more favorable than Pensana.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Griffin Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pensana	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Griffin Mining beats Pensana on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pensana compare to Tungsten West?

Tungsten West (LON:TUN) and Pensana (LON:PRE) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

3.7% of Tungsten West shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Pensana shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tungsten West shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Pensana shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pensana has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tungsten West. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tungsten West, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tungsten West	£601.55K	836.62	-£10.80M	-£12.00	N/A
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.16	N/A

Pensana has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tungsten West's net margin of -29,165.70%. Pensana's return on equity of -15.23% beat Tungsten West's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tungsten West	-29,165.70%	-2,022.63%	-20.17%
Pensana	N/A	-15.23%	-4.97%

In the previous week, Pensana had 3 more articles in the media than Tungsten West. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 0 mentions for Tungsten West. Pensana's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Tungsten West's score of 0.00 indicating that Pensana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tungsten West	Neutral
Pensana	Neutral

Tungsten West has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pensana has a beta of 1.141, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pensana beats Tungsten West on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pensana compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Pensana (LON:PRE) and Civitas Social Housing (LON:CSH) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Civitas Social Housing has higher revenue and earnings than Pensana. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Civitas Social Housing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.16	N/A
Civitas Social Housing	£53.72M	0.00	£69.54M	£0.11	N/A

Civitas Social Housing has a net margin of 129.46% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Civitas Social Housing's return on equity of 10.16% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pensana	N/A	-15.23%	-4.97%
Civitas Social Housing	129.46%	10.16%	2.39%

In the previous week, Pensana had 3 more articles in the media than Civitas Social Housing. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 0 mentions for Civitas Social Housing. Pensana's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Civitas Social Housing's score of 0.00 indicating that Pensana is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pensana	Neutral
Civitas Social Housing	Neutral

Pensana has a beta of 1.141, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Civitas Social Housing has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

10.0% of Pensana shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Pensana shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Civitas Social Housing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Civitas Social Housing beats Pensana on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pensana compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Pensana (LON:PRE) and Amaroq Minerals (LON:AMRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Pensana has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pensana, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.16	N/A
Amaroq Minerals	£16.28M	28.93	-£71.64M	-£5.10	N/A

10.0% of Pensana shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.6% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Pensana shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Amaroq Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pensana has a beta of 1.141, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amaroq Minerals has a beta of 0.819, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pensana had 1 more articles in the media than Amaroq Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 2 mentions for Amaroq Minerals. Amaroq Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Pensana's score of 0.27 indicating that Amaroq Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pensana	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Amaroq Minerals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Amaroq Minerals has a consensus target price of GBX 132.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.19%. Given Amaroq Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amaroq Minerals is more favorable than Pensana.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pensana	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Amaroq Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Amaroq Minerals has a net margin of 26.51% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Amaroq Minerals' return on equity of 12.12% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pensana	N/A	-15.23%	-4.97%
Amaroq Minerals	26.51%	12.12%	-9.95%

Summary

Amaroq Minerals beats Pensana on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pensana compare to Metals Exploration?

Metals Exploration (LON:MTL) and Pensana (LON:PRE) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Metals Exploration has a beta of 1.084, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pensana has a beta of 1.141, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Metals Exploration has higher revenue and earnings than Pensana. Pensana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metals Exploration, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Metals Exploration	£208.41M	2.16	£218.27M	£0.97	15.09
Pensana	N/A	N/A	-£6.26M	-£4.16	N/A

2.2% of Metals Exploration shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.0% of Pensana shares are held by institutional investors. 91.9% of Metals Exploration shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Pensana shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pensana had 3 more articles in the media than Metals Exploration. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pensana and 0 mentions for Metals Exploration. Pensana's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Metals Exploration's score of 0.00 indicating that Pensana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Metals Exploration	Neutral
Pensana	Neutral

Metals Exploration has a net margin of 18.19% compared to Pensana's net margin of 0.00%. Metals Exploration's return on equity of 12.83% beat Pensana's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Metals Exploration	18.19%	12.83%	3.75%
Pensana	N/A	-15.23%	-4.97%

Summary

Metals Exploration beats Pensana on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pensana News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PRE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PRE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pensana	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£152.01M	£3.53B	£4.62B	£2.84B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.01%	4.31%	5.10%
P/E Ratio	-10.34	26.09	26.24	23.38
Price / Sales	N/A	8.78	5.85	5.04
Price / Cash	41.83	22.83	20.84	20.23
Price / Book	2.14	4.42	4.07	2.45
Net Income	-£6.26M	£127.64M	£159.56M	£5.88B
7 Day Performance	-9.47%	-2.23%	-1.72%	0.81%
1 Month Performance	-2.60%	-6.38%	-4.83%	-1.80%
1 Year Performance	-54.73%	8.41%	8.02%	7.76%

Pensana Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PRE Pensana	N/A	GBX 43 flat	N/A	-56.7%	£152.01M	N/A	N/A	1	News Coverage
GFM Griffin Mining	1.2511 of 5 stars	GBX 307.09 -0.9%	GBX 340 +10.7%	+68.9%	£537.19M	£157.91M	15.96	448	Gap Down
TUN Tungsten West	N/A	GBX 32 -4.5%	N/A	+160.0%	£519.40M	£601.55K	N/A	15
CSH Civitas Social Housing	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£483.90M	£53.72M	725.45	N/A
AMRQ Amaroq Minerals	1.7606 of 5 stars	GBX 104 flat	GBX 132.50 +27.4%	+7.2%	£463.59M	£16.28M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:PRE) was last updated on 11/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pensana (PRE) Competitors

PRE vs. GFM, TUN, CSH, AMRQ, and MTL

How does Pensana compare to Griffin Mining?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Tungsten West?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Metals Exploration?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRE vs. The Competition

Pensana Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pensana (PRE) Competitors

PRE vs. GFM, TUN, CSH, AMRQ, and MTL

How does Pensana compare to Griffin Mining?

Which has better valuation and earnings, GFM or PRE?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GFM or PRE?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFM or PRE?

Is GFM or PRE more profitable?

Does the media refer more to GFM or PRE?

Do analysts prefer GFM or PRE?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Tungsten West?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TUN or PRE?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, TUN or PRE?

Is TUN or PRE more profitable?

Does the media prefer TUN or PRE?

Which has more volatility & risk, TUN or PRE?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Civitas Social Housing?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, PRE or CSH?

Is PRE or CSH more profitable?

Does the media favor PRE or CSH?

Which has more volatility & risk, PRE or CSH?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PRE or CSH?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Amaroq Minerals?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PRE or AMRQ?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PRE or AMRQ?

Which has more volatility and risk, PRE or AMRQ?

Does the media favor PRE or AMRQ?

Do analysts recommend PRE or AMRQ?

Is PRE or AMRQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Pensana compare to Metals Exploration?

Which has more risk & volatility, MTL or PRE?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MTL or PRE?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MTL or PRE?

Does the media favor MTL or PRE?

Is MTL or PRE more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRE vs. The Competition

Pensana Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools