Celsius Resources (CLA) Competitors

Celsius Resources logo
GBX 0.25 -0.03 (-9.09%)
As of 03:16 AM Eastern

CLA vs. BRES, KAV, EMH, KEN, and FAR

Should you buy Celsius Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Celsius Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Celsius Resources include Blencowe Resources (BRES), Kavango Resources (KAV), European Metals (EMH), Kendrick Resources (KEN), and Ferro-Alloy Resources (FAR). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Celsius Resources compare to Blencowe Resources?

Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) and Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blencowe Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Celsius Resources. Blencowe Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A
Celsius Resources£647.0014,382.56-£2.33M-£0.06N/A

Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blencowe ResourcesN/A -19.76% -13.34%
Celsius Resources N/A -7.35%-4.41%

Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Celsius Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Celsius Resources. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Celsius Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blencowe Resources Positive
Celsius Resources Neutral

Summary

Blencowe Resources beats Celsius Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius Resources compare to Kavango Resources?

Kavango Resources (LON:KAV) and Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of Kavango Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kavango Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Celsius Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kavango Resources Neutral
Celsius Resources Neutral

Kavango Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius Resources. Celsius Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kavango Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kavango Resources£1.72M17.81-£5.48K-£0.48N/A
Celsius Resources£647.0014,382.56-£2.33M-£0.06N/A

Celsius Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kavango Resources' net margin of -869.55%. Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat Kavango Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kavango Resources-869.55% -68.85% -14.06%
Celsius Resources N/A -7.35%-4.41%

Kavango Resources has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celsius Resources beats Kavango Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius Resources compare to European Metals?

Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) and European Metals (LON:EMH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, European Metals has a beta of 0.256, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market.

European Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Celsius Resources. Celsius Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius Resources£647.0014,382.56-£2.33M-£0.06N/A
European MetalsN/AN/A-£2.30M-£3.81N/A

0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of European Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of European Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to European Metals' net margin of -287.87%. Celsius Resources' return on equity of -7.35% beat European Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius ResourcesN/A -7.35% -4.41%
European Metals -287.87%-24.66%-2.47%

In the previous week, European Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Celsius Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for European Metals and 0 mentions for Celsius Resources. European Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Celsius Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that European Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celsius Resources Neutral
European Metals Neutral

Summary

European Metals beats Celsius Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius Resources compare to Kendrick Resources?

Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) and Kendrick Resources (LON:KEN) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Kendrick Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Celsius Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Kendrick Resources and 0 mentions for Celsius Resources. Celsius Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Kendrick Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celsius Resources Neutral
Kendrick Resources Neutral

0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.5% of Kendrick Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kendrick Resources has a beta of 1.461, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Kendrick Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Celsius Resources. Kendrick Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius Resources£647.0014,382.56-£2.33M-£0.06N/A
Kendrick ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.15M-£0.91N/A

Celsius Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Kendrick Resources' net margin of -227,572.12%. Kendrick Resources' return on equity of 9,279.39% beat Celsius Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius ResourcesN/A -7.35% -4.41%
Kendrick Resources -227,572.12%9,279.39%-12.85%

Summary

Celsius Resources beats Kendrick Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius Resources compare to Ferro-Alloy Resources?

Ferro-Alloy Resources (LON:FAR) and Celsius Resources (LON:CLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

1.2% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Celsius Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Ferro-Alloy Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Celsius Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ferro-Alloy Resources' net margin of -162.57%. Ferro-Alloy Resources' return on equity of 264.51% beat Celsius Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ferro-Alloy Resources-162.57% 264.51% -21.47%
Celsius Resources N/A -7.35%-4.41%

Ferro-Alloy Resources has a beta of 0.835, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius Resources has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ferro-Alloy Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Celsius Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ferro-Alloy Resources Neutral
Celsius Resources Neutral

Ferro-Alloy Resources presently has a consensus target price of GBX 30, suggesting a potential upside of 500.00%. Given Ferro-Alloy Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ferro-Alloy Resources is more favorable than Celsius Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ferro-Alloy Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Celsius Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Celsius Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ferro-Alloy Resources. Celsius Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro-Alloy Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ferro-Alloy Resources£4.53M6.49-£9.69M-£1.70N/A
Celsius Resources£647.0014,382.56-£2.33M-£0.06N/A

Summary

Ferro-Alloy Resources beats Celsius Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celsius Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CLA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CLA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CLA vs. The Competition

MetricCelsius ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.31M£1.49B£4.59B£2.77B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%5.00%6.16%
P/E Ratio-4.1727.0622.59366.61
Price / Sales14,382.5644,965.815,473.8786,103.13
Price / CashN/A24.6327.0527.87
Price / Book0.255.258.717.85
Net Income-£2.33M£70.60M£157.26M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-11.66%-5.15%-4.57%-0.97%
1 Month Performance-41.31%-6.96%-5.60%-0.79%
1 Year Performance-23.08%85.16%48.81%68.88%

Celsius Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CLA
Celsius Resources
N/AGBX 0.25
-9.1%
N/A-13.5%£9.31M£647.00N/AN/A
BRES
Blencowe Resources
N/AGBX 8
+6.7%
N/A+111.0%£36.89MN/AN/A3
KAV
Kavango Resources
N/AGBX 0.80
-3.0%
N/A-16.2%£36.02M£1.72MN/A43
EMH
European Metals
N/AGBX 15.25
+1.0%
N/A+92.5%£35.87MN/AN/AN/A
KEN
Kendrick Resources
N/AGBX 7.99
+3.1%
N/A+2,657.7%£32.69MN/AN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CLA) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners