Go Pro

Blencowe Resources (BRES) Competitors

Blencowe Resources logo
GBX 7.20 -0.16 (-2.17%)
As of 04:01 AM Eastern

BRES vs. BSE, TRR, ALL, MNRG, and SML

Should you buy Blencowe Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Blencowe Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Blencowe Resources include Base Resources (BSE), Trident Royalties (TRR), Atlantic Lithium (ALL), MetalNRG (MNRG), and Strategic Minerals (SML). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Blencowe Resources compare to Base Resources?

Base Resources (LON:BSE) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Base Resources has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Blencowe Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Base Resources' net margin of -1.22%. Base Resources' return on equity of -0.60% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Base Resources-1.22% -0.60% 3.79%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Base Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Base Resources. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Base Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Base Resources Neutral
Blencowe Resources Positive

Base Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Blencowe Resources.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Base Resources£135.11M0.00-£1.25MN/AN/A
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

58.0% of Base Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.0% of Base Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Base Resources beats Blencowe Resources on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blencowe Resources compare to Trident Royalties?

Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) and Trident Royalties (LON:TRR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Trident Royalties has higher revenue and earnings than Blencowe Resources. Blencowe Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trident Royalties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A
Trident Royalties£9.52M0.00£2.39M£0.01N/A

0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.3% of Trident Royalties shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of Trident Royalties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trident Royalties has a net margin of 25.12% compared to Blencowe Resources' net margin of 0.00%. Trident Royalties' return on equity of 2.24% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blencowe ResourcesN/A -19.76% -13.34%
Trident Royalties 25.12%2.24%-0.47%

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Trident Royalties. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for Trident Royalties. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Trident Royalties' score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blencowe Resources Positive
Trident Royalties Neutral

Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trident Royalties has a beta of 0.4, meaning that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trident Royalties beats Blencowe Resources on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blencowe Resources compare to Atlantic Lithium?

Atlantic Lithium (LON:ALL) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Atlantic Lithium presently has a consensus price target of GBX 37, indicating a potential upside of 137.79%. Given Atlantic Lithium's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atlantic Lithium is more favorable than Blencowe Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atlantic Lithium
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Blencowe Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Atlantic Lithium has a beta of 0.369, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Atlantic Lithium and Atlantic Lithium both had 1 articles in the media. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Atlantic Lithium's score of -0.38 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Atlantic Lithium
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Blencowe Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Blencowe Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Atlantic Lithium. Atlantic Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blencowe Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atlantic Lithium£10.65K11,715.72-£27.20M-£1.00N/A
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

6.2% of Atlantic Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Atlantic Lithium shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Blencowe Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Atlantic Lithium's net margin of -2,532.15%. Atlantic Lithium's return on equity of -15.05% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atlantic Lithium-2,532.15% -15.05% -18.38%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

Summary

Blencowe Resources beats Atlantic Lithium on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blencowe Resources compare to MetalNRG?

MetalNRG (LON:MNRG) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Blencowe Resources has higher revenue and earnings than MetalNRG.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MetalNRG-£38.42K0.00-£2.32MN/AN/A
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

MetalNRG has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Blencowe Resources' return on equity of -19.76% beat MetalNRG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MetalNRGN/A -344.12% -121.96%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

In the previous week, Blencowe Resources had 1 more articles in the media than MetalNRG. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources and 0 mentions for MetalNRG. Blencowe Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat MetalNRG's score of 0.00 indicating that Blencowe Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MetalNRG Neutral
Blencowe Resources Positive

0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.7% of MetalNRG shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Blencowe Resources beats MetalNRG on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blencowe Resources compare to Strategic Minerals?

Strategic Minerals (LON:SML) and Blencowe Resources (LON:BRES) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Blencowe Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strategic Minerals. Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blencowe Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Minerals£4.23M29.98-£13.68M-£0.01N/A
Blencowe ResourcesN/AN/A-£1.28M-£0.76N/A

0.8% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Blencowe Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blencowe Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Strategic Minerals' net margin of -3.23%. Strategic Minerals' return on equity of -2.03% beat Blencowe Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Minerals-3.23% -2.03% 4.39%
Blencowe Resources N/A -19.76%-13.34%

In the previous week, Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Blencowe Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strategic Minerals and 1 mentions for Blencowe Resources. Strategic Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Blencowe Resources' score of 0.64 indicating that Strategic Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Strategic Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Blencowe Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Strategic Minerals has a beta of 0.912, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Blencowe Resources has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Strategic Minerals beats Blencowe Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blencowe Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BRES and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BRES and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BRES vs. The Competition

MetricBlencowe ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£35.42M£1.50B£4.59B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%5.03%6.14%
P/E Ratio-9.4726.9422.74366.58
Price / SalesN/A56,405.936,773.9086,559.92
Price / Cash7.6424.6326.7727.87
Price / Book2.625.278.547.63
Net Income-£1.28M£70.60M£157.33M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.37%0.29%0.23%-0.15%
1 Month Performance-14.89%-8.78%-7.46%-1.83%
1 Year Performance77.78%83.56%47.61%65.20%

Blencowe Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BRES
Blencowe Resources
N/AGBX 7.20
-2.2%
N/A+84.0%£35.42MN/AN/A3
BSE
Base Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£143.91M£135.11MN/A1,744
TRR
Trident Royalties
N/AN/AN/AN/A£142.44M£9.52M4,860.009
ALL
Atlantic Lithium
1.4139 of 5 stars
GBX 15.50
flat
GBX 37
+138.7%
+118.4%£124.23M£10.65KN/A54,500
MNRG
MetalNRG
N/AN/AN/AN/A£119.93M-£38.42KN/A6

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:BRES) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners