Free Trial

Severn Trent (SVT) Competitors

Severn Trent logo
GBX 2,970 -34.00 (-1.13%)
As of 12:13 PM Eastern

SVT vs. SHAW, ACA, CRH, NWF, and IGP

Should you buy Severn Trent stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Severn Trent with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Severn Trent include Shawbrook Group (SHAW), Acacia Mining (ACA), CRH (CRH), NWF Group (NWF), and Intercede Group (IGP). These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Severn Trent compare to Shawbrook Group?

Shawbrook Group (LON:SHAW) and Severn Trent (LON:SVT) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Shawbrook Group's net margin of 0.00%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 20.35% beat Shawbrook Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shawbrook GroupN/A N/A N/A
Severn Trent 13.10%20.35%2.35%

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than Shawbrook Group. Shawbrook Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shawbrook Group£688.30M2.40N/A£35.009.07
Severn Trent£2.83B3.16£177.90M£104.8028.34

Shawbrook Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 542.50, indicating a potential upside of 70.87%. Severn Trent has a consensus price target of GBX 3,075.57, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Given Shawbrook Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Shawbrook Group is more favorable than Severn Trent.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shawbrook Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Severn Trent
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Shawbrook Group and Shawbrook Group both had 2 articles in the media. Shawbrook Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Severn Trent's score of 0.00 indicating that Shawbrook Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Shawbrook Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Severn Trent
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

10.1% of Shawbrook Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.2% of Severn Trent shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Severn Trent beats Shawbrook Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Severn Trent compare to Acacia Mining?

Severn Trent (LON:SVT) and Acacia Mining (LON:ACA) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Severn Trent had 2 more articles in the media than Acacia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Severn Trent and 0 mentions for Acacia Mining. Severn Trent's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Acacia Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Severn Trent Neutral
Acacia Mining Neutral

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Acacia Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 20.35% beat Acacia Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Severn Trent13.10% 20.35% 2.35%
Acacia Mining N/A N/A N/A

Severn Trent currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,075.57, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Given Severn Trent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Severn Trent is more favorable than Acacia Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Severn Trent
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Acacia Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than Acacia Mining. Acacia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Severn Trent£2.83B3.16£177.90M£104.8028.34
Acacia Mining£645.41M0.00N/A£0.50N/A

Summary

Severn Trent beats Acacia Mining on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Severn Trent compare to CRH?

Severn Trent (LON:SVT) and CRH (LON:CRH) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Severn Trent currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,075.57, suggesting a potential upside of 3.55%. CRH has a consensus price target of £105.22, suggesting a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Severn Trent.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Severn Trent
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CRH
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Severn Trent has a beta of 0.556, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Severn Trent pays an annual dividend of GBX 121.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Severn Trent pays out 116.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 13.10% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.69%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 20.35% beat CRH's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Severn Trent13.10% 20.35% 2.35%
CRH 9.69%20.14%6.20%

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Severn Trent. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Severn Trent£2.83B3.16£177.90M£104.8028.34
CRH£38.06B0.02£4.69B£551.000.21

In the previous week, CRH had 2 more articles in the media than Severn Trent. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CRH and 2 mentions for Severn Trent. CRH's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Severn Trent's score of 0.00 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Severn Trent
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CRH
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

CRH beats Severn Trent on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Severn Trent compare to NWF Group?

NWF Group (LON:NWF) and Severn Trent (LON:SVT) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

NWF Group has a beta of 0.206, indicating that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Severn Trent has a beta of 0.556, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Severn Trent has a net margin of 13.10% compared to NWF Group's net margin of 0.60%. Severn Trent's return on equity of 20.35% beat NWF Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NWF Group0.60% 6.02% 3.71%
Severn Trent 13.10%20.35%2.35%

NWF Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 283, indicating a potential upside of 109.63%. Severn Trent has a consensus target price of GBX 3,075.57, indicating a potential upside of 3.55%. Given NWF Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NWF Group is more favorable than Severn Trent.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NWF Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Severn Trent
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Severn Trent had 1 more articles in the media than NWF Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Severn Trent and 1 mentions for NWF Group. NWF Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Severn Trent's score of 0.00 indicating that NWF Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NWF Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Severn Trent
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

NWF Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Severn Trent pays an annual dividend of GBX 121.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. NWF Group pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Severn Trent pays out 116.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. NWF Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than NWF Group. NWF Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NWF Group£883.40M0.08£9.14M£10.5012.86
Severn Trent£2.83B3.16£177.90M£104.8028.34

4.5% of NWF Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.2% of Severn Trent shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of NWF Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Severn Trent beats NWF Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Severn Trent compare to Intercede Group?

Severn Trent (LON:SVT) and Intercede Group (LON:IGP) are both construction materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Severn Trent has higher revenue and earnings than Intercede Group. Intercede Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Severn Trent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Severn Trent£2.83B3.16£177.90M£104.8028.34
Intercede Group£17.38M4.07£5.86M£5.8020.26

Intercede Group has a net margin of 20.89% compared to Severn Trent's net margin of 13.10%. Intercede Group's return on equity of 21.69% beat Severn Trent's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Severn Trent13.10% 20.35% 2.35%
Intercede Group 20.89%21.69%15.26%

In the previous week, Severn Trent had 2 more articles in the media than Intercede Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Severn Trent and 0 mentions for Intercede Group. Severn Trent's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intercede Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Severn Trent Neutral
Intercede Group Neutral

76.2% of Severn Trent shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.9% of Intercede Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Severn Trent shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 45.8% of Intercede Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Severn Trent has a beta of 0.556, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercede Group has a beta of 1.609, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Severn Trent presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,075.57, suggesting a potential upside of 3.55%. Given Severn Trent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Severn Trent is more favorable than Intercede Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Severn Trent
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Intercede Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Severn Trent beats Intercede Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Severn Trent News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SVT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SVT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SVT vs. The Competition

MetricSevern TrentUtilities IndustryUtilities SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.94B£4.43B£18.94B£2.81B
Dividend Yield4.05%5.05%3.84%6.06%
P/E Ratio28.3429.2820.37365.76
Price / Sales3.16199.8261.6587,755.03
Price / Cash18.1614.4219.5427.89
Price / Book3.812.972.187.79
Net Income£177.90M£78.15M£781.06M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-5.05%0.32%-0.18%0.87%
1 Month Performance-2.53%0.74%0.11%11.27%
1 Year Performance11.49%12.28%18.64%78.56%

Severn Trent Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SVT
Severn Trent
0.9484 of 5 stars
GBX 2,970
-1.1%
GBX 3,075.57
+3.6%
+10.4%£8.94B£2.83B28.34270
SHAW
Shawbrook Group
2.694 of 5 stars
GBX 298.71
-0.9%
GBX 542.50
+81.6%
N/A£1.55B£688.30M8.53N/A
ACA
Acacia Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/A£959.60M£645.41M468.005,230
CRH
CRH
3.8103 of 5 stars
GBX 114.91
+2.1%
£105.22
+9,056.7%
-98.3%£768.04M£38.06B0.2177,400
NWF
NWF Group
3.5146 of 5 stars
GBX 133.41
+0.6%
GBX 283
+112.1%
-19.0%£65.96M£883.40M12.711,339

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SVT) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners