Which has higher earnings and valuation, SDR or 3IN?

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Schroders £3.51B 2.62 £355.50M £43.50 13.53 3i Infrastructure £301M 12.07 £347M £32.00 12.31

Does the media prefer SDR or 3IN?

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.62 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Schroders 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive 3i Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, MNG or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio M&G £24.97B 0.32 £166.98M -£4.80 N/A 3i Infrastructure £301M 12.07 £347M £32.00 12.31

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets M&G -0.44% -3.86% 0.40% 3i Infrastructure 92.78% 10.77% 4.83%

Does the media refer more to MNG or 3IN?

In the previous week, M&G and M&G both had 2 articles in the media. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat M&G's score of 0.57 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment M&G 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive 3i Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate 3IN or PCT?

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Polar Capital Technology Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer 3IN or PCT?

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Polar Capital Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment 3i Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Polar Capital Technology Trust 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer FCIT or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score F&C Investment Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Do analysts prefer 3IN or PSH?

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Pershing Square 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media favor 3IN or PSH?

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment 3i Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pershing Square 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

GBX 393.89 +1.39 (+0.35%)

As of 05:36 AM Eastern

Compare

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, FCIT, and PSH

Should you buy 3i Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? 3i Infrastructure's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), F&C Investment Trust (FCIT), and Pershing Square (PSH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Schroders (LON:SDR) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Schroders presently has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 23.00%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Schroders.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Schroders has a beta of 1.076, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Schroders. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.62 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Schroders	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
3i Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Schroders	20.13%	15.55%	1.86%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Schroders	£3.51B	2.62	£355.50M	£43.50	13.53
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.07	£347M	£32.00	12.31

Summary

Schroders beats 3i Infrastructure on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

M&G has a beta of 0.949, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, M&G and M&G both had 2 articles in the media. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat M&G's score of 0.57 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
M&G	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
3i Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

42.9% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M&G	£24.97B	0.32	£166.98M	-£4.80	N/A
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.07	£347M	£32.00	12.31

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M&G	-0.44%	-3.86%	0.40%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

M&G currently has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 102.16%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 14.24%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than 3i Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

M&G beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Polar Capital Technology Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Polar Capital Technology Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Polar Capital Technology Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.07	£347M	£32.00	12.31
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£3.76B	2.02	£1.20B	£330.42	2.08

24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%

Summary

3i Infrastructure and Polar Capital Technology Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust	£1.46B	4.42	£935.32M	£75.80	4.56
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.07	£347M	£32.00	12.31

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.62 indicating that F&C Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust	Positive
3i Infrastructure	Positive

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust	103.67%	22.14%	10.80%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Pershing Square has lower revenue, but higher earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.07	£347M	£32.00	12.31
Pershing Square	-£1.26B	-5.10	£2.71B	-£752.00	N/A

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Pershing Square	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Pershing Square	97.16%	-2.59%	11.83%

24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Pershing Square. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Pershing Square's score of 0.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pershing Square	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Pershing Square on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3i Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 3IN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

3IN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	3i Infrastructure	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£3.63B	£5.36B	£13.79B	£2.89B
Dividend Yield	3.42%	7.50%	5.95%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	12.31	29.95	25.34	366.85
Price / Sales	12.07	1,236.86	515.22	90,241.42
Price / Cash	98.18	47.85	30.08	27.89
Price / Book	1.09	3.54	2.74	6.34
Net Income	£347M	£417.39M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	1.00%	1.26%	0.66%	1.17%
1 Month Performance	0.61%	-1.22%	0.04%	0.13%
1 Year Performance	12.38%	4.60%	9.24%	19.57%

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
3IN 3i Infrastructure	2.1907 of 5 stars	GBX 393.89 +0.4%	GBX 450 +14.2%	+11.8%	£3.63B	£301M	12.31	N/A	News Coverage
SDR Schroders	1.6086 of 5 stars	GBX 587 -0.1%	GBX 453.33 -22.8%	+55.0%	£9.15B	£3.51B	13.49	6,438
MNG M&G	2.299 of 5 stars	GBX 341 +1.3%	GBX 677.86 +98.8%	+29.1%	£8.12B	£24.97B	N/A	6,101
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 657 +2.1%	N/A	+56.9%	£7.27B	£3.76B	1.99	120	News Coverage
FCIT F&C Investment Trust	N/A	GBX 342.40 +1.1%	N/A	+16.0%	£6.41B	£1.46B	4.52	N/A	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:3IN) was last updated on 9/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, FCIT, and PSH

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, FCIT, and PSH

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Is SDR or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer SDR or 3IN?

Which has more risk and volatility, SDR or 3IN?

Does the media prefer SDR or 3IN?

Is SDR or 3IN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SDR or 3IN?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SDR or 3IN?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNG or 3IN?

Does the media refer more to MNG or 3IN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MNG or 3IN?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MNG or 3IN?

Is MNG or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

Do analysts rate MNG or 3IN?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Which has more risk and volatility, 3IN or PCT?

Do analysts rate 3IN or PCT?

Does the media prefer 3IN or PCT?

Which has better earnings & valuation, 3IN or PCT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of 3IN or PCT?

Is 3IN or PCT more profitable?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, FCIT or 3IN?

Do analysts prefer FCIT or 3IN?

Does the media prefer FCIT or 3IN?

Is FCIT or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in FCIT or 3IN?

Which has more volatility & risk, FCIT or 3IN?

Is FCIT or 3IN more profitable?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, 3IN or PSH?

Do analysts prefer 3IN or PSH?

Is 3IN or PSH more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in 3IN or PSH?

Does the media favor 3IN or PSH?

Which has more risk and volatility, 3IN or PSH?

Is 3IN or PSH a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools