Which has better earnings and valuation, 3IN or SDR?

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio 3i Infrastructure £301M 12.12 £347M £32.00 12.36 Schroders £3.51B 2.59 £355.50M £43.50 13.43

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MNG or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio M&G £21.71B 0.39 £166.98M £12.30 28.54 3i Infrastructure £301M 12.12 £347M £32.00 12.36

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets M&G 1.73% 9.49% 0.40% 3i Infrastructure 92.78% 10.77% 4.83%

Do analysts prefer PCT or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Polar Capital Technology Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Do analysts prefer 3IN or PSH?

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Pershing Square 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, 3IN or PSH?

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio 3i Infrastructure £301M 12.12 £347M £32.00 12.36 Pershing Square £2.57B 2.67 £2.71B £1.41 thousand 2.79

Do analysts rate FCIT or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score F&C Investment Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 3i Infrastructure 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

GBX 395.50 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/28/2026 12:03 PM Eastern

Compare

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy 3i Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? 3i Infrastructure's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.077, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Schroders shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Schroders	20.13%	15.55%	1.86%

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 13.78%. Schroders has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, suggesting a potential downside of 22.37%. Given 3i Infrastructure's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Schroders.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.12	£347M	£32.00	12.36
Schroders	£3.51B	2.59	£355.50M	£43.50	13.43

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than Schroders. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Schroders. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroders'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	Neutral
Schroders	Neutral

Summary

Schroders beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

M&G has a beta of 0.953, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
M&G	Neutral
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M&G	1.73%	9.49%	0.40%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

37.1% of M&G shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M&G	£21.71B	0.39	£166.98M	£12.30	28.54
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.12	£347M	£32.00	12.36

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

M&G currently has a consensus price target of GBX 677.86, suggesting a potential upside of 93.12%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 13.78%. Given M&G's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than 3i Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

M&G beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£3.76B	1.93	£1.20B	£330.42	1.99
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.12	£347M	£32.00	12.36

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust	Neutral
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Polar Capital Technology Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats 3i Infrastructure on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Pershing Square	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Pershing Square	97.16%	-2.59%	11.83%

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.849, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.12	£347M	£32.00	12.36
Pershing Square	£2.57B	2.67	£2.71B	£1.41 thousand	2.79

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pershing Square'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	Neutral
Pershing Square	Neutral

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Pershing Square on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and profitability.

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust	103.67%	22.14%	10.80%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 13.78%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
3i Infrastructure	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than F&C Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for F&C Investment Trust. F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust	Neutral
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust	£683.36M	9.51	£935.32M	£75.80	4.55
3i Infrastructure	£301M	12.12	£347M	£32.00	12.36

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.749, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats F&C Investment Trust on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3i Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 3IN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

3IN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	3i Infrastructure	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£3.65B	£5.70B	£14.03B	£2.92B
Dividend Yield	3.40%	7.39%	5.89%	6.17%
P/E Ratio	12.36	32.61	26.68	367.33
Price / Sales	12.12	1,269.15	523.12	83,334.22
Price / Cash	98.18	48.15	30.40	27.89
Price / Book	1.09	3.61	2.78	6.99
Net Income	£347M	£418.14M	£1.31B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.13%	0.60%	0.07%	0.76%
1 Month Performance	4.08%	2.18%	2.33%	3.74%
1 Year Performance	15.98%	5.87%	10.56%	22.85%

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
3IN 3i Infrastructure	1.5047 of 5 stars	GBX 395.50 flat	GBX 450 +13.8%	+16.0%	£3.65B	£301M	12.36	N/A
SDR Schroders	N/A	GBX 583.50 flat	GBX 453.33 -22.3%	+53.7%	£9.10B	£3.51B	13.41	6,438
MNG M&G	1.9162 of 5 stars	GBX 348.70 -0.4%	GBX 677.86 +94.4%	+32.4%	£8.31B	£21.71B	28.35	6,101
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 653.50 +1.6%	N/A	+64.8%	£7.23B	£3.76B	1.98	120	High Trading Volume
PSH Pershing Square	N/A	GBX 3,908.20 -0.4%	N/A	-8.9%	£6.84B	£2.57B	2.78	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:3IN) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Which has more risk & volatility, 3IN or SDR?

Is 3IN or SDR a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of 3IN or SDR?

Is 3IN or SDR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer 3IN or SDR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, 3IN or SDR?

Does the media favor 3IN or SDR?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Which has more volatility and risk, MNG or 3IN?

Does the media refer more to MNG or 3IN?

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MNG or 3IN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MNG or 3IN?

Is MNG or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer MNG or 3IN?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Is PCT or 3IN more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PCT or 3IN?

Does the media prefer PCT or 3IN?

Which has more risk & volatility, PCT or 3IN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PCT or 3IN?

Do analysts prefer PCT or 3IN?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Do analysts prefer 3IN or PSH?

Is 3IN or PSH more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, 3IN or PSH?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in 3IN or PSH?

Which has better valuation & earnings, 3IN or PSH?

Does the media favor 3IN or PSH?

Is 3IN or PSH a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Is FCIT or 3IN more profitable?

Is FCIT or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate FCIT or 3IN?

Does the media prefer FCIT or 3IN?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FCIT or 3IN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FCIT or 3IN?

Which has more volatility and risk, FCIT or 3IN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools