Which has stronger earnings & valuation, 3IN or SDR?

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio 3i Infrastructure £301M 11.89 £347M £32.00 12.13 Schroders £3.51B 2.62 £355.50M £43.50 13.54

Do analysts rate 3IN or PCT?

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score 3i Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Polar Capital Technology Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MNG or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio M&G £24.97B 0.29 £166.98M -£4.80 N/A 3i Infrastructure £301M 11.89 £347M £32.00 12.13

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets M&G -0.44% -3.86% 0.40% 3i Infrastructure 92.78% 10.77% 4.83%

Do analysts recommend PSH or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pershing Square 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 3i Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Do analysts prefer FCIT or 3IN?

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score F&C Investment Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 3i Infrastructure 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

GBX 390 +2.00 (+0.52%)

As of 11:50 AM Eastern

Compare

3IN vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy 3i Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? 3i Infrastructure's main competitors and comparable companies include Schroders (SDR), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), M&G (MNG), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 49.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.98%. Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 460, suggesting a potential downside of 21.89%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Schroders.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Schroders	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	11.89	£347M	£32.00	12.13
Schroders	£3.51B	2.62	£355.50M	£43.50	13.54

In the previous week, Schroders had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Schroders and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroders'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	Neutral
Schroders	Neutral

24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.9% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.076, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Schroders' net margin of 20.13%. Schroders' return on equity of 15.55% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Schroders	20.13%	15.55%	1.86%

Summary

Schroders beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.739, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
3i Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Polar Capital Technology Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%
Polar Capital Technology Trust	249.53%	55.87%	20.70%

24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure	£301M	11.89	£347M	£32.00	12.13
Polar Capital Technology Trust	£3.76B	2.06	£1.20B	£330.42	2.12

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure	Neutral
Polar Capital Technology Trust	Positive

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and earnings.

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. M&G pays out -427.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M&G is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M&G presently has a consensus price target of GBX 685, indicating a potential upside of 125.11%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 15.98%. Given M&G's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe M&G is more favorable than 3i Infrastructure.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M&G	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
3i Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

M&G has a beta of 0.949, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, M&G had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
M&G	Positive
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. M&G is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M&G	£24.97B	0.29	£166.98M	-£4.80	N/A
3i Infrastructure	£301M	11.89	£347M	£32.00	12.13

31.4% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of -0.44%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M&G	-0.44%	-3.86%	0.40%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

Summary

M&G beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 97.16% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat Pershing Square's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pershing Square	97.16%	-2.59%	11.83%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 69.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pershing Square pays out -9.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.842, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Pershing Square has higher earnings, but lower revenue than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square	-£1.26B	-5.21	£2.71B	-£752.00	N/A
3i Infrastructure	£301M	11.89	£347M	£32.00	12.13

In the previous week, Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square	Neutral
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pershing Square	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
3i Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Pershing Square on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 15.98%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
3i Infrastructure	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for F&C Investment Trust and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat F&C Investment Trust's score of -1.00 indicating that 3i Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust	Negative
3i Infrastructure	Neutral

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.736, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust	£1.46B	4.46	£935.32M	£75.80	4.63
3i Infrastructure	£301M	11.89	£347M	£32.00	12.13

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 103.67% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 22.14% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust	103.67%	22.14%	10.80%
3i Infrastructure	92.78%	10.77%	4.83%

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.19 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust and 3i Infrastructure tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3i Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 3IN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

3IN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	3i Infrastructure	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£3.60B	£5.17B	£13.45B	£2.81B
Dividend Yield	3.49%	7.61%	6.08%	6.27%
P/E Ratio	12.19	30.07	24.71	367.18
Price / Sales	11.95	1,141.93	483.57	88,398.87
Price / Cash	98.18	47.62	29.53	27.87
Price / Book	1.08	3.48	2.72	7.17
Net Income	£347M	£415.07M	£1.32B	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	0.78%	-0.16%	-0.48%	0.12%
1 Month Performance	0.91%	-1.79%	-2.60%	-0.40%
1 Year Performance	11.11%	9.64%	10.61%	22.74%

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
3IN 3i Infrastructure	N/A	GBX 390 +0.5%	GBX 450 +15.4%	+10.5%	£3.60B	£301M	12.19	N/A
SDR Schroders	1.3463 of 5 stars	GBX 588.94 0.0%	GBX 460 -21.9%	+48.9%	£9.18B	£3.51B	13.54	6,438	Short Interest Increase
PCT Polar Capital Technology Trust	N/A	GBX 705.50 -0.9%	N/A	+62.3%	£7.78B	£3.76B	2.14	120
MNG M&G	2.4208 of 5 stars	GBX 306.40 -0.5%	GBX 685 +123.6%	+19.4%	£7.30B	£24.97B	N/A	6,101	Positive News
PSH Pershing Square	N/A	GBX 3,734 -0.4%	N/A	-18.4%	£6.51B	-£1.26B	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:3IN) was last updated on 10/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, PSH, and FCIT

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3IN vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, PSH, and FCIT

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

Is 3IN or SDR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate 3IN or SDR?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, 3IN or SDR?

Does the media prefer 3IN or SDR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of 3IN or SDR?

Which has more volatility and risk, 3IN or SDR?

Is 3IN or SDR more profitable?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Which has more risk & volatility, 3IN or PCT?

Do analysts rate 3IN or PCT?

Is 3IN or PCT more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in 3IN or PCT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, 3IN or PCT?

Does the media refer more to 3IN or PCT?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

Is MNG or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate MNG or 3IN?

Which has more risk and volatility, MNG or 3IN?

Does the media favor MNG or 3IN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MNG or 3IN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MNG or 3IN?

Is MNG or 3IN more profitable?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Is PSH or 3IN more profitable?

Is PSH or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PSH or 3IN?

Which has more volatility and risk, PSH or 3IN?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PSH or 3IN?

Does the media refer more to PSH or 3IN?

Do analysts recommend PSH or 3IN?

Summary

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

Do analysts prefer FCIT or 3IN?

Does the media favor FCIT or 3IN?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FCIT or 3IN?

Which has more volatility & risk, FCIT or 3IN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FCIT or 3IN?

Is FCIT or 3IN more profitable?

Is FCIT or 3IN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

3IN vs. The Competition

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools