Go Pro

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3i Infrastructure logo
GBX 392.91 +1.91 (+0.49%)
As of 11:28 AM Eastern

3IN vs. SDR, MNG, PCT, PSH, and FCIT

Should you buy 3i Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares 3i Infrastructure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with 3i Infrastructure include Schroders (SDR), M&G (MNG), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), Pershing Square (PSH), and F&C Investment Trust (FCIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Schroders' return on equity of 12.35% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Schroders 16.44%12.35%1.86%

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 14.65%. Schroders has a consensus target price of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.90%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Schroders.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£301M12.03£347M£32.0012.27
Schroders£3.25B2.82£355.50M£33.6017.50

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.081, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Schroders'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure Neutral
Schroders Neutral

Summary

Schroders beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£21.71B0.39£166.98M£12.3028.97
3i Infrastructure£301M12.03£347M£32.0012.27

42.9% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

M&G currently has a consensus target price of GBX 677.86, indicating a potential upside of 90.25%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 14.65%. Given M&G's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe M&G is more favorable than 3i Infrastructure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, M&G had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for M&G and 0 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. M&G's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M&G Neutral
3i Infrastructure Neutral

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G1.73% 9.49% 0.40%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

M&G has a beta of 0.941, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M&G beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 249.53% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 55.87% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Technology Trust249.53% 55.87% 20.70%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.9269671, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Technology Trust£2.14B3.39£1.20B£188.583.48
3i Infrastructure£301M12.03£347M£32.0012.27

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 14.65%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polar Capital Technology Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

7.1% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Technology Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Polar Capital Technology Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Technology Trust Positive
3i Infrastructure Neutral

Summary

Polar Capital Technology Trust beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

Pershing Square (LON:PSH) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 94.13% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pershing Square94.13% 16.97% 11.83%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

Pershing Square has a beta of 0.8576274, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.65%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

5.8% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pershing Square£2.57B2.60£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.72
3i Infrastructure£301M12.03£347M£32.0012.27

In the previous week, Pershing Square's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pershing Square Neutral
3i Infrastructure Neutral

Summary

Pershing Square beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to F&C Investment Trust?

F&C Investment Trust (LON:FCIT) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

F&C Investment Trust has a beta of 0.7953292, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of F&C Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

F&C Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. F&C Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
F&C Investment Trust£683.36M9.39£935.32M£34.649.83
3i Infrastructure£301M12.03£347M£32.0012.27

3i Infrastructure has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 14.65%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than F&C Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
F&C Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, F&C Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled 3i Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
F&C Investment Trust Neutral
3i Infrastructure Neutral

F&C Investment Trust has a net margin of 105.66% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. F&C Investment Trust's return on equity of 11.28% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
F&C Investment Trust105.66% 11.28% 10.80%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

F&C Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 13.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. F&C Investment Trust pays out 11.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. 3i Infrastructure pays out 40.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

F&C Investment Trust beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3i Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for 3IN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 3IN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

3IN vs. The Competition

Metric3i InfrastructureAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.62B£2.46B£6.19B£2.83B
Dividend Yield3.44%6.03%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio12.2761.7529.57368.24
Price / Sales12.031,788.671,734.2684,363.76
Price / Cash98.1860.49111.1727.89
Price / Book1.081.326.607.46
Net Income£347M£265.96M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.15%-0.39%-0.24%0.47%
1 Month Performance5.65%-0.23%0.01%-0.57%
1 Year Performance13.93%7.22%14.18%62.79%

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
3IN
3i Infrastructure
N/AGBX 392.91
+0.5%
GBX 450
+14.5%
+11.4%£3.62B£301M12.28N/A
SDR
Schroders
N/AGBX 587.19
-0.1%
GBX 453.33
-22.8%
+45.9%£9.16B£3.25B17.486,438
MNG
M&G
3.9364 of 5 stars
GBX 352.20
+0.2%
GBX 677.86
+92.5%
+36.6%£8.39B£21.71B28.636,101
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 646
-2.3%
N/A+68.6%£7.15B£2.14B3.43120
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 3,900
+1.0%
N/A-9.9%£6.83B£2.57B2.77N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:3IN) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners