Free Trial
Your $100 Credit Is Waiting! Get MarketBeat All Access Today
Lock In $149
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

3i Infrastructure (3IN) Competitors

3i Infrastructure logo
GBX 368.50 -1.50 (-0.41%)
As of 12:04 PM Eastern

3IN vs. SDR, PCT, MNG, PSH, and ICP

Should you buy 3i Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares 3i Infrastructure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with 3i Infrastructure include Schroders (SDR), Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT), M&G (MNG), Pershing Square (PSH), and Intermediate Capital Group (ICP). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Schroders?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Schroders (LON:SDR) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

23.8% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.1% of Schroders shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Schroders shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Schroders has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schroders, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£428M7.94£347M£45.808.05
Schroders£3.25B2.79£355.50M£33.6017.32

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Schroders' net margin of 16.44%. Schroders' return on equity of 12.35% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Schroders 16.44%12.35%1.86%

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Schroders has a beta of 1.075, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Schroders pays an annual dividend of GBX 21.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 27.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schroders pays out 64.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Schroders had 1 more articles in the media than 3i Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Schroders and 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure. Schroders' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Schroders is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Schroders
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 22.12%. Schroders has a consensus price target of GBX 453.33, indicating a potential downside of 22.11%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Schroders.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Schroders
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Schroders beats 3i Infrastructure on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Polar Capital Technology Trust?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (LON:PCT) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Polar Capital Technology Trust has a net margin of 294.06% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Polar Capital Technology Trust's return on equity of 43.14% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Polar Capital Technology Trust 294.06%43.14%20.70%

Polar Capital Technology Trust has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Polar Capital Technology Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£428M7.94£347M£45.808.05
Polar Capital Technology Trust£2.14B3.46£1.20B£188.583.52

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Polar Capital Technology Trust has a beta of 0.91290385, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Polar Capital Technology Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Polar Capital Technology Trust. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Polar Capital Technology Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure Neutral
Polar Capital Technology Trust Neutral

3i Infrastructure currently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 22.12%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Polar Capital Technology Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Polar Capital Technology Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

23.8% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Polar Capital Technology Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Polar Capital Technology Trust on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to M&G?

M&G (LON:MNG) and 3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

M&G pays an annual dividend of GBX 20.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. 3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. M&G pays out 164.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3i Infrastructure pays out 27.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

M&G has a beta of 0.967, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to M&G's net margin of 1.73%. 3i Infrastructure's return on equity of 10.77% beat M&G's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
M&G1.73% 9.49% 0.40%
3i Infrastructure 92.78%10.77%4.83%

3i Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than M&G. 3i Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than M&G, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
M&G£21.71B0.35£166.98M£12.3025.60
3i Infrastructure£428M7.94£347M£45.808.05

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than M&G. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for M&G. M&G's average media sentiment score of 1.66 beat 3i Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that M&G is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
M&G Very Positive
3i Infrastructure Neutral

M&G presently has a consensus price target of GBX 297.57, suggesting a potential downside of 5.49%. 3i Infrastructure has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 22.12%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than M&G.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
M&G
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

58.2% of M&G shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.8% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of M&G shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats M&G on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Pershing Square?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Pershing Square (LON:PSH) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Pershing Square has a net margin of 94.13% compared to 3i Infrastructure's net margin of 92.78%. Pershing Square's return on equity of 16.97% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Pershing Square 94.13%16.97%11.83%

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus price target of GBX 450, suggesting a potential upside of 22.12%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Pershing Square.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Pershing Square
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Pershing Square. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Pershing Square. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pershing Square'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure Neutral
Pershing Square Neutral

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pershing Square pays an annual dividend of GBX 65.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. 3i Infrastructure pays out 27.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pershing Square pays out 4.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

23.8% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.9% of Pershing Square shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Pershing Square shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pershing Square has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Pershing Square is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£428M7.94£347M£45.808.05
Pershing Square£2.57B2.76£2.71B£1.41 thousand2.89

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pershing Square has a beta of 0.85510576, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pershing Square beats 3i Infrastructure on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3i Infrastructure compare to Intermediate Capital Group?

3i Infrastructure (LON:3IN) and Intermediate Capital Group (LON:ICP) are both mid-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, 3i Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Intermediate Capital Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for 3i Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Intermediate Capital Group. 3i Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Intermediate Capital Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
3i Infrastructure Neutral
Intermediate Capital Group Neutral

3i Infrastructure presently has a consensus target price of GBX 450, indicating a potential upside of 22.12%. Given 3i Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe 3i Infrastructure is more favorable than Intermediate Capital Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3i Infrastructure
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Intermediate Capital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3i Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Intermediate Capital Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 78 per share. 3i Infrastructure pays out 27.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Intermediate Capital Group pays out 10,129.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. 3i Infrastructure is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

3i Infrastructure has a net margin of 92.78% compared to Intermediate Capital Group's net margin of 56.78%. Intermediate Capital Group's return on equity of 20.09% beat 3i Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3i Infrastructure92.78% 10.77% 4.83%
Intermediate Capital Group 56.78%20.09%4.57%

3i Infrastructure has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intermediate Capital Group has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Intermediate Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than 3i Infrastructure. Intermediate Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3i Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3i Infrastructure£428M7.94£347M£45.808.05
Intermediate Capital Group£831.60M0.00£409.10M£0.77N/A

23.8% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of 3i Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Intermediate Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3i Infrastructure beats Intermediate Capital Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3i Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for 3IN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding 3IN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

3IN vs. The Competition

Metric3i InfrastructureAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.40B£2.35B£5.83B£2.79B
Dividend Yield3.74%5.97%5.25%6.16%
P/E Ratio8.0525.2615.88365.60
Price / Sales7.941,999.691,259.6987,567.35
Price / Cash98.1860.1791.7827.89
Price / Book1.021.366.587.63
Net Income£347M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.73%-0.34%-0.01%-0.02%
1 Month Performance1.66%1.47%1.27%1.06%
1 Year Performance14.26%12.31%18.99%85.15%

3i Infrastructure Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
3IN
3i Infrastructure
2.4178 of 5 stars
GBX 368.50
-0.4%
GBX 450
+22.1%
+12.4%£3.40B£428M8.05N/A
SDR
Schroders
1.64 of 5 stars
GBX 581
flat
GBX 453.33
-22.0%
+67.2%£9.06B£3.25B17.296,438
PCT
Polar Capital Technology Trust
N/AGBX 685.50
+1.7%
N/A+102.9%£7.64B£2.14B3.64120
MNG
M&G
2.0374 of 5 stars
GBX 308.60
+0.9%
GBX 297.57
-3.6%
+41.3%£7.35B£21.71B25.096,101
PSH
Pershing Square
N/AGBX 4,060
-1.6%
N/A+8.8%£7.11B£2.57B2.88N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:3IN) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners