Strategic Education Competitors

Grand Canyon Education (NASDAQ:LOPE) and Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Grand Canyon Education and Strategic Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Grand Canyon Education has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.1% of Strategic Education shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Grand Canyon Education shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Grand Canyon Education and Strategic Education, as reported by MarketBeat.

Grand Canyon Education currently has a consensus price target of $120.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 32.74%. Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.63%. Given Grand Canyon Education's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grand Canyon Education is more favorable than Strategic Education.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Grand Canyon Education and Strategic Education's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Grand Canyon Education has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Strategic Education. Strategic Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grand Canyon Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Grand Canyon Education beats Strategic Education on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

GSX Techedu (NYSE:GOTU) and Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares GSX Techedu and Strategic Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

GSX Techedu has a beta of -1.19, indicating that its stock price is 219% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

40.2% of GSX Techedu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Strategic Education shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for GSX Techedu and Strategic Education, as reported by MarketBeat.

GSX Techedu currently has a consensus price target of $20.50, suggesting a potential upside of 31.92%. Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.63%. Given GSX Techedu's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe GSX Techedu is more favorable than Strategic Education.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GSX Techedu and Strategic Education's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Strategic Education has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GSX Techedu. GSX Techedu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Strategic Education beats GSX Techedu on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Graham (NYSE:GHC) and Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.2% of Graham shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Strategic Education shares are held by institutional investors. 19.7% of Graham shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Graham and Strategic Education's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Graham has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Education.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Graham and Strategic Education, as reported by MarketBeat.

Strategic Education has a consensus price target of $89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.63%. Given Strategic Education's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Strategic Education is more favorable than Graham.

Profitability

This table compares Graham and Strategic Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Graham has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Graham pays an annual dividend of $6.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Strategic Education pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Strategic Education pays out 35.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Graham has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Strategic Education has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Strategic Education beats Graham on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) and Youdao (NYSE:DAO) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of Strategic Education shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.9% of Youdao shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Strategic Education and Youdao's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Strategic Education has higher revenue and earnings than Youdao. Youdao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Strategic Education and Youdao, as reported by MarketBeat.

Strategic Education currently has a consensus price target of $89.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.63%. Youdao has a consensus price target of $35.6667, indicating a potential upside of 41.93%. Given Youdao's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Youdao is more favorable than Strategic Education.

Profitability

This table compares Strategic Education and Youdao's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Youdao has a beta of -0.66, indicating that its share price is 166% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Strategic Education beats Youdao on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) and Laureate Education (NASDAQ:LAUR) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of Strategic Education shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Laureate Education shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Laureate Education shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Strategic Education and Laureate Education's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Strategic Education has higher revenue and earnings than Laureate Education. Laureate Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Strategic Education and Laureate Education, as reported by MarketBeat.

Strategic Education currently has a consensus price target of $89.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.63%. Laureate Education has a consensus price target of $14.8750, indicating a potential downside of 3.60%. Given Strategic Education's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Strategic Education is more favorable than Laureate Education.

Profitability

This table compares Strategic Education and Laureate Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Laureate Education has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Strategic Education beats Laureate Education on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Strategic Education (NASDAQ:STRA) and Afya (NASDAQ:AFYA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

90.1% of Strategic Education shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.2% of Afya shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Strategic Education shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Strategic Education and Afya's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Strategic Education has higher revenue and earnings than Afya. Strategic Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Afya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Strategic Education and Afya, as reported by MarketBeat.

Strategic Education currently has a consensus price target of $89.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.63%. Afya has a consensus price target of $30.55, indicating a potential upside of 17.91%. Given Afya's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Afya is more favorable than Strategic Education.

Profitability

This table compares Strategic Education and Afya's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Strategic Education has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Afya has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Afya beats Strategic Education on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.