Go Pro

Fortuna Mining (FSM) Competitors

Fortuna Mining logo
$8.04 -0.13 (-1.53%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.29 +0.26 (+3.19%)
As of 08:32 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FSM vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and EXK

Should you buy Fortuna Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortuna Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortuna Mining include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Endeavour Silver (EXK). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Royal Gold?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 10 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Royal Gold and 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.84 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Royal Gold
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.54$287.47M$1.067.58
Royal Gold$1.03B15.43$467.27M$8.3922.33

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.24%. Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $280.27, suggesting a potential upside of 49.59%. Given Fortuna Mining's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Royal Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Summary

Royal Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.24%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $233.62, suggesting a potential upside of 71.46%. Given Fortuna Mining's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Agnico Eagle Mines
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.54$287.47M$1.067.58
Agnico Eagle Mines$13.54B5.11$4.46B$10.6412.81

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46%21.09%15.27%

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 29 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.55 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Agnico Eagle Mines
17 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Fortuna Mining on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to First Majestic Silver?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Fortuna Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Majestic Silver. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.54$287.47M$1.067.58
First Majestic Silver$1.26B6.23$164.92M$0.6026.46

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
First Majestic Silver 19.51%11.19%7.77%

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 3 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.84 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Majestic Silver
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.24%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.03%. Given Fortuna Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
First Majestic Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats First Majestic Silver on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.24%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 68.71%. Given Fortuna Mining's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Alamos Gold and 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.84 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alamos Gold
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Alamos Gold 51.24%18.03%12.42%

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.54$287.47M$1.067.58
Alamos Gold$1.81B6.52$885.80M$2.5111.22

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Endeavour Silver?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Endeavour Silver (NYSE:EXK) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.24%. Endeavour Silver has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 93.18%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Endeavour Silver
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortuna Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M2.54$287.47M$1.067.58
Endeavour Silver$432.80M5.14-$119.10M-$0.08N/A

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Silver has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 2 more articles in the media than Endeavour Silver. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 3 mentions for Endeavour Silver. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Endeavour Silver's score of 0.61 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Endeavour Silver
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of -3.68%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Endeavour Silver -3.68%9.33%4.69%

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Endeavour Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats Endeavour Silver on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortuna Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSM vs. The Competition

MetricFortuna MiningMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.44B$8.47B$4.47B$23.42B
Dividend YieldN/A1.97%5.04%4.15%
P/E Ratio7.5813.1120.4430.65
Price / Sales2.54106.965,740.7920.32
Price / Cash6.3334.6624.0718.81
Price / Book1.423.458.484.74
Net Income$287.47M$312.64M$157.08M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.60%-6.67%-1.96%-0.46%
1 Month Performance-13.18%-17.51%-5.87%0.67%
1 Year Performance19.66%35.91%34.78%16.45%

Fortuna Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSM
Fortuna Mining
3.6737 of 5 stars
$8.04
-1.5%
$14.00
+74.2%
+27.7%$2.44B$947.06M7.584,294
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.9293 of 5 stars
$193.47
-1.7%
$282.55
+46.0%
+21.1%$16.70B$1.03B23.0630
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.5506 of 5 stars
$143.47
-2.3%
$238.31
+66.1%
+15.7%$74.55B$11.91B13.4818,216
AG
First Majestic Silver
4.8315 of 5 stars
$16.41
-3.2%
$23.67
+44.2%
+92.0%$8.36B$1.26B27.365,100
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.9973 of 5 stars
$28.85
-2.1%
$47.50
+64.7%
+13.3%$12.35B$2.07B11.493,234

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FSM) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners