Free Trial

Fortuna Mining (FSM) Competitors

Fortuna Mining logo
$8.60 -0.18 (-2.00%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.57 -0.02 (-0.23%)
As of 07:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FSM vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and EXK

Should you buy Fortuna Mining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fortuna Mining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fortuna Mining include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Endeavour Silver (EXK). These companies are all part of the "basic materials" sector.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Royal Gold?

Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Royal Gold and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Royal Gold
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Royal Gold48.59% 12.63% 9.99%
Fortuna Mining 31.07%16.26%11.95%

Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Royal Gold$1.03B16.87$467.27M$8.3924.41
Fortuna Mining$1.09B2.38$287.47M$1.068.11

83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Royal Gold presently has a consensus target price of $273.64, indicating a potential upside of 33.62%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.98%. Given Royal Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Royal Gold is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Summary

Royal Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$1.09B2.38$287.47M$1.068.11
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B6.71$4.46B$10.6415.00

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.98%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 47.88%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 19 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Agnico Eagle Mines
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 39.46% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Agnico Eagle Mines 39.46%21.09%15.27%

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Fortuna Mining on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to First Majestic Silver?

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 2 more articles in the media than Fortuna Mining. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 1 mentions for Fortuna Mining. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Majestic Silver
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 19.51%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Majestic Silver19.51% 11.19% 7.77%
Fortuna Mining 31.07%16.26%11.95%

First Majestic Silver currently has a consensus target price of $25.25, suggesting a potential upside of 52.95%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.98%. Given First Majestic Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe First Majestic Silver is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Majestic Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Fortuna Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Majestic Silver. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$1.50B5.43$164.92M$0.6027.52
Fortuna Mining$1.09B2.38$287.47M$1.068.11

Summary

First Majestic Silver and Fortuna Mining tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $50.67, indicating a potential upside of 44.90%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.98%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold and Alamos Gold both had 1 articles in the media. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.07%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.24% 18.03% 12.42%
Fortuna Mining 31.07%16.26%11.95%

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold$2.07B7.09$885.80M$2.5113.93
Fortuna Mining$1.09B2.38$287.47M$1.068.11

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Endeavour Silver?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Endeavour Silver (NYSE:EXK) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Endeavour Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortuna Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$1.09B2.38$287.47M$1.068.11
Endeavour Silver$613.70M3.78-$119.10M-$0.08N/A

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining and Fortuna Mining both had 1 articles in the media. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Endeavour Silver'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Endeavour Silver
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Silver has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.07% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of -3.68%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 16.26% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.07% 16.26% 11.95%
Endeavour Silver -3.68%9.33%4.69%

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.98%. Endeavour Silver has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 85.07%. Given Endeavour Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Endeavour Silver
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats Endeavour Silver on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortuna Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSM vs. The Competition

MetricFortuna MiningMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.61B$9.46B$4.65B$23.08B
Dividend YieldN/A1.72%4.99%4.10%
P/E Ratio8.1114.5721.8730.59
Price / Sales2.38171.596,566.8512.90
Price / Cash6.7535.7924.1818.46
Price / Book1.524.038.834.65
Net Income$287.47M$319.20M$156.92M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-12.51%-15.27%-6.06%-0.71%
1 Month Performance-20.26%-15.65%-6.21%0.06%
1 Year Performance23.40%77.87%54.88%21.50%

Fortuna Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSM
Fortuna Mining
2.3975 of 5 stars
$8.60
-2.0%
$11.00
+28.0%
+22.8%$2.61B$1.09B8.114,294
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.7655 of 5 stars
$217.86
-2.9%
$273.64
+25.6%
+16.9%$19.05B$1.03B25.9730
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.818 of 5 stars
$176.66
-3.5%
$236.08
+33.6%
+37.4%$91.66B$13.54B16.6018,216
AG
First Majestic Silver
4.797 of 5 stars
$20.84
-1.2%
$25.25
+21.2%
+107.8%$10.41B$1.26B34.735,100
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.8619 of 5 stars
$39.61
-2.9%
$50.67
+27.9%
+34.3%$17.13B$1.81B15.783,234

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FSM) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners