Free Trial

Fortuna Mining (FSM) Competitors

Fortuna Mining logo
$10.92 +0.31 (+2.87%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$10.90 -0.01 (-0.14%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:48 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FSM vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and EXK

Should you buy Fortuna Mining stock or one of its competitors? Fortuna Mining's main competitors and comparable companies include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Endeavour Silver (EXK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "metals & mining" industry.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Royal Gold?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.26%. Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $289.64, suggesting a potential upside of 22.61%. Given Fortuna Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Royal Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Royal Gold has a net margin of 47.74% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.99% 17.48% 12.88%
Royal Gold 47.74%12.06%9.41%

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M3.41$287.47M$1.189.25
Royal Gold$1.03B19.42$467.27M$9.1625.79

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Royal Gold. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 6 mentions for Royal Gold. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.47 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Royal Gold
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Royal Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines40.44% 22.04% 16.22%
Fortuna Mining 31.99%17.48%12.88%

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Agnico Eagle Mines. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 6 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Fortuna Mining's score of 0.47 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Mining
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B8.05$4.46B$11.6916.18
Fortuna Mining$947.06M3.41$287.47M$1.189.25

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $225.62, suggesting a potential upside of 19.25%. Fortuna Mining has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.26%. Given Fortuna Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortuna Mining is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Fortuna Mining on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to First Majestic Silver?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Fortuna Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Majestic Silver. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M3.41$287.47M$1.189.25
First Majestic Silver$1.26B6.78$164.92M$0.7124.35

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.99% compared to First Majestic Silver's net margin of 21.18%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat First Majestic Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.99% 17.48% 12.88%
First Majestic Silver 21.18%13.36%9.20%

Fortuna Mining presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.26%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.80%. Given First Majestic Silver's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe First Majestic Silver is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
First Majestic Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 6 more articles in the media than First Majestic Silver. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 5 mentions for First Majestic Silver. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat First Majestic Silver's score of -0.08 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
First Majestic Silver
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats First Majestic Silver on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Alamos Gold?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Mining. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M3.41$287.47M$1.189.25
Alamos Gold$1.81B7.62$885.80M$2.7711.89

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 7 more articles in the media than Alamos Gold. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 4 mentions for Alamos Gold. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Alamos Gold's score of 0.33 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Alamos Gold
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.26%. Alamos Gold has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Alamos Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Alamos Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Fortuna Mining's net margin of 31.99%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat Fortuna Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.99% 17.48% 12.88%
Alamos Gold 52.64%19.28%13.47%

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Fortuna Mining on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Mining compare to Endeavour Silver?

Fortuna Mining (NYSE:FSM) and Endeavour Silver (NYSE:EXK) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Fortuna Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Endeavour Silver. Fortuna Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endeavour Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Mining$947.06M3.41$287.47M$1.189.25
Endeavour Silver$432.80M5.94-$119.10M$0.2141.31

Fortuna Mining has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Endeavour Silver's net margin of 9.30%. Fortuna Mining's return on equity of 17.48% beat Endeavour Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Mining31.99% 17.48% 12.88%
Endeavour Silver 9.30%17.46%8.93%

Fortuna Mining has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Endeavour Silver has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fortuna Mining had 8 more articles in the media than Endeavour Silver. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Fortuna Mining and 3 mentions for Endeavour Silver. Fortuna Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Endeavour Silver's score of -0.45 indicating that Fortuna Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Mining
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Endeavour Silver
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Fortuna Mining currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.26%. Endeavour Silver has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 67.15%. Given Endeavour Silver's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Endeavour Silver is more favorable than Fortuna Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Endeavour Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

33.8% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Fortuna Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Endeavour Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fortuna Mining beats Endeavour Silver on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortuna Mining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FSM vs. The Competition

MetricFortuna MiningMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.23B$3.83B$4.77B$23.07B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.78%3.72%
P/E Ratio9.2524.7224.3928.58
Price / Sales3.4125,955.8515,482.3420.68
Price / Cash8.4827.1224.9738.93
Price / Book1.9311.849.854.72
Net Income$287.47M$127.34M$159.48M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.90%0.92%0.52%0.35%
1 Month Performance-8.85%-2.45%-2.74%-3.40%
1 Year Performance23.33%21.23%18.43%9.40%

Fortuna Mining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FSM
Fortuna Mining
4.0444 of 5 stars
$10.92
+2.9%
$14.00
+28.3%
+23.3%$3.23B$947.06M9.254,294
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.7089 of 5 stars
$234.36
+0.3%
$289.64
+23.6%
+21.5%$19.82B$1.55B25.5439
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.1168 of 5 stars
$183.98
+0.4%
$227.15
+23.5%
+15.2%$93.35B$14.53B15.7518,216
AG
First Majestic Silver
3.9768 of 5 stars
$17.40
-0.6%
$24.75
+42.2%
+30.5%$8.59B$1.26B24.555,100
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.857 of 5 stars
$32.49
+0.6%
$47.50
+46.2%
-0.3%$13.59B$1.81B11.733,234

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FSM) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners