NYSE:AG

First Majestic Silver Competitors

$15.80
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 05/11/2021 10:04 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.16
$15.93
50-Day Range
$14.90
$17.56
52-Week Range
$7.20
$24.01
Volume74,397 shs
Average Volume8.18 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.97 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.25

Competitors

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) Vs. SBSW, KL, KGC, AU, GFI, and PAAS

Should you be buying AG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to First Majestic Silver, including Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), Kinross Gold (KGC), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), Gold Fields (GFI), and Pan American Silver (PAAS).

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%
Sibanye StillwaterN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Sibanye Stillwater's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00
Sibanye Stillwater$5.04 billion2.76$4.30 millionN/AN/A

Sibanye Stillwater has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for First Majestic Silver and Sibanye Stillwater, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
First Majestic Silver04102.20
Sibanye Stillwater00403.00

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus price target of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.51%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sibanye Stillwater beats First Majestic Silver on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.02$560.08 million$2.7415.13

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for First Majestic Silver and Kirkland Lake Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
First Majestic Silver04102.20
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus price target of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 70.94%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats First Majestic Silver on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%
Kinross Gold26.92%14.20%8.02%

Volatility & Risk

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for First Majestic Silver and Kinross Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
First Majestic Silver04102.20
Kinross Gold02912.92

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus price target of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.3542, suggesting a potential upside of 46.69%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Kinross Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.77$718.60 million$0.3422.59

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats First Majestic Silver on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.6% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for AngloGold Ashanti and First Majestic Silver, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AngloGold Ashanti04502.56
First Majestic Silver04102.20

AngloGold Ashanti presently has a consensus target price of $33.8225, suggesting a potential upside of 53.32%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Given AngloGold Ashanti's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe AngloGold Ashanti is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Profitability

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and First Majestic Silver's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AngloGold AshantiN/AN/AN/A
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%

Risk & Volatility

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and First Majestic Silver's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AngloGold Ashanti$3.53 billion2.68$-12,000,000.00$0.9124.71
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00

AngloGold Ashanti has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. AngloGold Ashanti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats First Majestic Silver on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Gold Fields and First Majestic Silver's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Gold Fields and First Majestic Silver's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.14$161.60 million$0.4225.02
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Gold Fields and First Majestic Silver, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gold Fields03202.40
First Majestic Silver04102.20

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $13.1375, suggesting a potential upside of 26.93%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus price target of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Given Gold Fields' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Summary

Gold Fields beats First Majestic Silver on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pan American Silver (NASDAQ:PAAS) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Pan American Silver and First Majestic Silver's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pan American Silver4.51%7.91%5.71%
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pan American Silver and First Majestic Silver's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pan American Silver$1.35 billion5.37$110.74 million$0.7844.19
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.91$-40,470,000.00$0.04395.00

Pan American Silver has higher revenue and earnings than First Majestic Silver. Pan American Silver is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Pan American Silver and First Majestic Silver, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pan American Silver03402.57
First Majestic Silver04102.20

Pan American Silver currently has a consensus target price of $32.6875, suggesting a potential downside of 5.17%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of $11.8125, suggesting a potential downside of 24.33%. Given Pan American Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Pan American Silver is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Risk & Volatility

Pan American Silver has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

48.1% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Pan American Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pan American Silver beats First Majestic Silver on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


First Majestic Silver Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Sibanye Stillwater logo
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater
2.5$18.82flat$14.04 billion$5.04 billion0.00
Kirkland Lake Gold logo
KL
Kirkland Lake Gold
2.6$41.45flat$10.94 billion$1.38 billion14.60Earnings Announcement
Kinross Gold logo
KGC
Kinross Gold
2.4$7.68flat$9.76 billion$3.50 billion9.04
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
2.5$22.49flat$9.50 billion$3.53 billion24.71Gap Down
Gold Fields logo
GFI
Gold Fields
2.1$10.51flat$9.20 billion$2.97 billion25.02Gap Up
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
1.8$34.47flat$7.25 billion$1.35 billion118.87Upcoming Earnings
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
2.5$5.06flat$4.89 billion$1.61 billion38.93
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.2$8.68flat$3.38 billion$683.10 million32.15
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
1.3$4.96flat$3.12 billion$2.02 billion-49.60
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.3$13.35flat$2.23 billion$295.86 million-18.04
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$9.21flat$2.22 billion$711.50 million-8.53Gap Up
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
1.8$11.01flat$2.00 billion$617.80 million10.69
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.7$3.27flat$1.56 billion$1.07 billion-4.09
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
1.7$7.77flat$1.52 billion$89.43 million194.30
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$17.70flat$1.32 billionN/A-252.86Upcoming Earnings
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.4$6.34flat$1.16 billion$257.19 million48.77Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.3$6.02flat$989.88 million$121.72 million-23.15Gap Up
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$10.70flat$913.87 million$269.51 million20.58Gap Up
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.7$5.83flat$804.58 million$33.24 million116.60
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.3$1.27flat$573.98 million$117.02 million-3.24Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Corvus Gold logo
KOR
Corvus Gold
1.8$2.60flat$329.71 millionN/A-20.00
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$3.84flat$230.02 millionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.30flat$160.26 millionN/A-11.40Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.30flat$160.26 millionN/A-11.40Gap Up
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.46flat$36.37 million$1.86 million0.00
This page was last updated on 5/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.