Sibanye Stillwater Competitors

Barrick Gold (NYSE:GOLD) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Barrick Gold and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.

Barrick Gold presently has a consensus target price of $29.9687, indicating a potential upside of 25.50%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.65%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than Barrick Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Barrick Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Barrick Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Barrick Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Sibanye Stillwater.

Dividends

Barrick Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Barrick Gold pays out 47.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Barrick Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Barrick Gold has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

60.9% of Barrick Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barrick Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Franco-Nevada's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Franco-Nevada has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sibanye Stillwater.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Sibanye Stillwater and Franco-Nevada, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sibanye Stillwater presently has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.65%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $161.7273, indicating a potential upside of 8.19%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.8% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Franco-Nevada pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Sibanye Stillwater on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Wheaton Precious Metals and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of $57.7273, indicating a potential upside of 27.88%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.65%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Dividends

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.5% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Sibanye Stillwater's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Wheaton Precious Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Stillwater.

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Sibanye Stillwater's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Agnico Eagle Mines and Sibanye Stillwater, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus target price of $87.8571, indicating a potential upside of 25.91%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.65%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Volatility and Risk

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

61.6% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Sibanye Stillwater on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sibanye Stillwater currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.65%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.94%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Kirkland Lake Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kirkland Lake Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sibanye Stillwater.

Risk & Volatility

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and Sibanye Stillwater's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sibanye Stillwater has higher revenue and earnings than AngloGold Ashanti.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.6% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for AngloGold Ashanti and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

AngloGold Ashanti currently has a consensus price target of $33.8225, suggesting a potential upside of 42.83%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.65%. Given AngloGold Ashanti's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe AngloGold Ashanti is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 40.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. AngloGold Ashanti has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Sibanye Stillwater beats AngloGold Ashanti on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.