Franco-Nevada (FNV) Competitors

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 28 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 6 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Agnico Eagle Mines' score of 0.66 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Agnico Eagle Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines' net margin of 39.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of $273.40, suggesting a potential upside of 27.13%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $230.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.32%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Franco-Nevada is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of $273.40, suggesting a potential upside of 27.13%. Alamos Gold has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.51%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Alamos Gold's net margin of 51.24%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.10% beat Alamos Gold's return on equity.

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Alamos Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 15 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Alamos Gold and 6 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Alamos Gold's score of 1.14 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 35.99%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Kinross Gold pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Franco-Nevada is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of $37.31, indicating a potential upside of 56.41%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $273.40, indicating a potential upside of 27.13%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

In the previous week, Kinross Gold had 13 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Kinross Gold and 6 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Kinross Gold's score of 1.07 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Newmont's net margin of 33.36%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Franco-Nevada's return on equity.

Newmont presently has a consensus target price of $136.26, indicating a potential upside of 46.27%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $273.40, indicating a potential upside of 27.13%. Given Newmont's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Newmont is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Newmont has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

68.8% of Newmont shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Newmont shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newmont pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Newmont pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Newmont is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Newmont had 52 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Newmont and 6 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Newmont's score of 1.05 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Newmont is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.