Royal Gold (RGLD) Competitors

Royal Gold logo
$206.61 -8.04 (-3.75%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

RGLD vs. AEM, AGI, AU, FNV, and KGC

Should you buy Royal Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Royal Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Royal Gold include Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Alamos Gold (AGI), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), Franco-Nevada (FNV), and Kinross Gold (KGC). These companies are all part of the "mining - gold" industry.

How does Royal Gold compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines' net margin of 39.46%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 21.09% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines39.46% 21.09% 15.27%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 5 more articles in the media than Royal Gold. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Royal Gold. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Royal Gold's score of 0.16 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Royal Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Royal Gold pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Royal Gold has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Agnico Eagle Mines is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Royal Gold. Agnico Eagle Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$13.54B6.01$4.46B$10.6415.07
Royal Gold$1.03B17.02$467.27M$8.3924.63

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $236.08, indicating a potential upside of 47.25%. Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $280.70, indicating a potential upside of 35.86%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Royal Gold on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Royal Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $53.00, suggesting a potential upside of 71.47%. Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $280.70, suggesting a potential upside of 35.86%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Alamos Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Royal Gold pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alamos Gold pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Royal Gold has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Royal Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 6 more articles in the media than Royal Gold. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Alamos Gold and 4 mentions for Royal Gold. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Alamos Gold's score of -0.41 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Royal Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 51.24% compared to Royal Gold's net margin of 48.59%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 18.03% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold51.24% 18.03% 12.42%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Royal Gold. Alamos Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold$1.81B7.16$885.80M$2.5112.31
Royal Gold$1.03B17.02$467.27M$8.3924.63

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Royal Gold on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Royal Gold compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Royal Gold pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 68.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Royal Gold has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years.

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

AngloGold Ashanti presently has a consensus price target of $114.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.43%. Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $280.70, suggesting a potential upside of 35.86%. Given AngloGold Ashanti's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AngloGold Ashanti is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AngloGold Ashanti
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

AngloGold Ashanti has higher revenue and earnings than Royal Gold. AngloGold Ashanti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AngloGold Ashanti$9.89B4.26$2.64B$6.8212.25
Royal Gold$1.03B17.02$467.27M$8.3924.63

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 2 more articles in the media than AngloGold Ashanti. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Royal Gold and 2 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Royal Gold's score of 0.16 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AngloGold Ashanti
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Royal Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to AngloGold Ashanti's net margin of 31.11%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 36.41% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AngloGold Ashanti31.11% 36.41% 23.85%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Summary

Royal Gold beats AngloGold Ashanti on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Royal Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Royal Gold. Royal Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada$1.82B22.60$1.11B$7.1030.09
Royal Gold$1.03B17.02$467.27M$8.3924.63

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Royal Gold and 2 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Royal Gold's score of 0.16 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Royal Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Royal Gold's net margin of 48.59%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.10% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada65.12% 18.10% 16.82%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Royal Gold pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Franco-Nevada pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Royal Gold has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Royal Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus target price of $271.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.85%. Royal Gold has a consensus target price of $280.70, suggesting a potential upside of 35.86%. Given Royal Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Royal Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Royal Gold on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Royal Gold compare to Kinross Gold?

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Royal Gold has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Royal Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$7.05B4.23$2.39B$2.3610.61
Royal Gold$1.03B17.02$467.27M$8.3924.63

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus price target of $38.81, suggesting a potential upside of 55.06%. Royal Gold has a consensus price target of $280.70, suggesting a potential upside of 35.86%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kinross Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Royal Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Royal Gold pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kinross Gold pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Gold pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Royal Gold has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Royal Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 2 more articles in the media than Kinross Gold. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Royal Gold and 2 mentions for Kinross Gold. Kinross Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Royal Gold's score of 0.16 indicating that Kinross Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kinross Gold
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Royal Gold
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

63.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Royal Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Kinross Gold's net margin of 35.99%. Kinross Gold's return on equity of 32.47% beat Royal Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kinross Gold35.99% 32.47% 22.37%
Royal Gold 48.59%12.63%9.99%

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Royal Gold on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Royal Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RGLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RGLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RGLD vs. The Competition

MetricRoyal GoldMINING IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$17.53B$11.31B$4.64B$12.14B
Dividend Yield0.88%1.53%5.00%5.81%
P/E Ratio24.6311.0922.8724.05
Price / Sales17.0214.855,912.93102.06
Price / Cash26.3913.0324.3037.84
Price / Book2.426.568.856.55
Net Income$467.27M$719.98M$157.26M$336.99M
7 Day Performance-6.73%-8.71%-3.63%-0.10%
1 Month Performance-6.21%-8.20%-4.12%0.90%
1 Year Performance12.86%51.18%52.06%31.76%

Royal Gold Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.5908 of 5 stars
$206.61
-3.7%
$280.70
+35.9%
+19.7%$17.53B$1.03B24.6330
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.7791 of 5 stars
$171.68
+5.6%
$236.08
+37.5%
+37.8%$81.40B$11.91B16.1418,216
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.8927 of 5 stars
$37.61
+6.8%
$50.67
+34.7%
+20.9%$14.76B$1.81B14.983,234
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
4.2731 of 5 stars
$92.39
+7.1%
$114.00
+23.4%
+80.3%$43.57B$9.89B13.5512,634
FNV
Franco-Nevada
4.3331 of 5 stars
$222.32
+6.1%
$271.00
+21.9%
+33.1%$40.40B$1.82B31.3140

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RGLD) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners