Log in

NYSE:KGCKinross Gold Competitors & Alternatives

$7.34
-0.29 (-3.80 %)
(As of 07/13/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.30
Now: $7.34
$7.86
50-Day Range
$6.16
MA: $6.74
$7.67
52-Week Range
$2.72
Now: $7.34
$7.86
Volume16.51 million shs
Average Volume16.07 million shs
Market Capitalization$9.23 billion
P/E Ratio11.84
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1

Competitors

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) Vs. FNV, WPM, AEM, AU, KL, and GFI

Should you be buying KGC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Kinross Gold, including Franco Nevada (FNV), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), and Gold Fields (GFI).

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Franco Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
Franco Nevada19.91%7.85%7.38%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Franco Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco Nevada's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
Franco Nevada$844.10 million32.18$344.10 million$1.8278.57

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco Nevada. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Kinross Gold and Franco Nevada, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
Franco Nevada17402.25

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Franco Nevada has a consensus target price of $146.2727, indicating a potential upside of 2.29%. Given Franco Nevada's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Franco Nevada is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Franco Nevada has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Franco Nevada on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
Wheaton Precious Metals13.88%5.59%4.69%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.0% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
Wheaton Precious Metals$861.33 million24.31$86.14 million$0.5683.29

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
Wheaton Precious Metals06502.45

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus target price of $41.8889, indicating a potential downside of 10.19%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Wheaton Precious Metals on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, suggesting that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
Agnico Eagle Mines$2.49 billion6.05$473.17 million$0.9764.27

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Agnico Eagle Mines. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
Agnico Eagle Mines03812.83

Kinross Gold currently has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $73.1745, indicating a potential upside of 17.38%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
Agnico Eagle Mines15.74%5.18%2.91%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Kinross Gold on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Kinross Gold and AngloGold Ashanti, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
AngloGold Ashanti02402.67

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus price target of $28.55, indicating a potential downside of 4.61%. Given AngloGold Ashanti's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AngloGold Ashanti is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
AngloGold AshantiN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.2% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
AngloGold Ashanti$3.53 billion3.52$-12,000,000.00$0.9132.89

Kinross Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AngloGold Ashanti, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats AngloGold Ashanti on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
Kirkland Lake Gold03802.73

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $50.6111, indicating a potential upside of 10.48%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
Kirkland Lake Gold40.05%28.04%20.26%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.0% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion9.20$560.08 million$2.7416.72

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Kirkland Lake Gold. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Kinross Gold on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold21.63%9.25%5.22%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Kinross Gold and Gold Fields, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03602.67
Gold Fields01202.67

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.04%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $11.30, indicating a potential upside of 7.93%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Gold Fields' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.64$718.60 million$0.3421.59
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.12$161.60 million$0.4224.93

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.0% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Gold Fields on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Franco Nevada logo
FNV
Franco Nevada
1.8$143.00-0.8%$27.16 billion$844.10 million148.96
Wheaton Precious Metals logo
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
1.5$46.64-0.2%$20.94 billion$861.33 million172.74
Agnico Eagle Mines logo
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
2.0$62.34-4.2%$15.73 billion$2.49 billion36.03
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
1.7$29.93-4.0%$12.90 billion$3.53 billion32.89Analyst Downgrade
Kirkland Lake Gold logo
KL
Kirkland Lake Gold
1.8$45.81-2.1%$12.70 billion$1.38 billion15.85
Gold Fields logo
GFI
Gold Fields
1.8$10.47-0.5%$9.25 billion$2.97 billion24.93
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
1.8$31.32-3.5%$6.81 billion$1.35 billion208.80
Sibanye Gold logo
SBGL
Sibanye Gold
1.0$9.49-1.3%$6.41 billion$5.04 billion-29.66
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
1.8$5.28-4.4%$5.25 billion$1.61 billion18.21
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
1.5$10.27-0.8%$4.02 billion$683.10 million60.41
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
1.2$5.82-5.3%$3.14 billion$1.87 billion41.57
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.1$10.41-1.6%$2.18 billion$363.94 million-28.92
Iamgold logo
IAG
Iamgold
1.5$4.28-4.9%$2.12 billion$1.07 billion-4.92
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
1.2$11.15-4.7%$1.87 billion$617.80 million17.15
Osisko gold royalties logo
OR
Osisko gold royalties
1.9$10.57-1.5%$1.75 billion$295.86 million-9.35
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.5$5.69-0.4%$1.39 billion$711.50 million-4.01
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.3$18.57-0.4%$1.23 billionN/A-142.85Heavy News Reporting
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.1$16.29-2.6%$1.12 billion$194.84 million203.63
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.2$5.03-0.8%$924.51 million$257.19 million45.73
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.8$4.33-1.6%$519.07 million$33.24 million-72.15
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.3$1.04-3.8%$432.43 million$117.02 million-2.67
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
0.9$2.61-4.6%$375.42 million$121.72 million-7.05Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
MTA
BRP Group
1.2$5.27-3.8%$185.14 millionN/A0.00
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.22-0.8%$30.39 million$1.86 million0.00
This page was last updated on 7/14/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.