NYSE:KGC

Kinross Gold Competitors

$6.50
+0.14 (+2.20 %)
(As of 06/23/2021 11:25 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$6.46
$6.55
50-Day Range
$6.36
$8.26
52-Week Range
$6.10
$10.31
Volume612,117 shs
Average Volume15.10 million shs
Market Capitalization$8.20 billion
P/E Ratio6.02
Dividend Yield0.92%
Beta0.86

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) Vs. FNV, WPM, AEM, SBSW, KL, and GFI

Should you be buying KGC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Kinross Gold, including Franco-Nevada (FNV), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), and Gold Fields (GFI).

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.4% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03912.85
Franco-Nevada05602.55

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $169.5455, indicating a potential upside of 14.21%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%
Franco-Nevada54.79%10.64%10.38%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45
Franco-Nevada$1.02 billion28.00$326.20 million$2.7155.19

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Franco-Nevada on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.8% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03912.85
Wheaton Precious Metals021102.85

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of $59.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.00%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%
Wheaton Precious Metals49.33%9.95%9.29%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45
Wheaton Precious Metals$1.10 billion18.46$507.80 million$1.1240.15

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Wheaton Precious Metals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03912.85
Agnico Eagle Mines03602.67

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $88.2857, indicating a potential upside of 39.36%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%
Agnico Eagle Mines19.68%10.11%5.97%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45
Agnico Eagle Mines$3.14 billion4.94$511.61 million$1.8634.17

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Agnico Eagle Mines. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Agnico Eagle Mines on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater pays out 53.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03912.85
Sibanye Stillwater00403.00

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.02%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%
Sibanye StillwaterN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45
Sibanye Stillwater$7.74 billion1.63$1.79 billion$2.566.68

Sibanye Stillwater has higher revenue and earnings than Kinross Gold. Sibanye Stillwater is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%
Kirkland Lake Gold30.36%18.12%13.18%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45
Kirkland Lake Gold$2.46 billion4.38$787.71 million$3.4111.84

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Kirkland Lake Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kirkland Lake Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kinross Gold03912.85
Kirkland Lake Gold11702.67

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.22%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gold Fields pays out 34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kinross Gold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Gold Fields is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Gold Fields and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A
Kinross Gold31.69%16.56%9.81%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gold Fields and Kinross Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields$3.89 billion2.12$723 million$1.009.31
Kinross Gold$4.21 billion1.95$1.34 billion$0.778.45

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Gold Fields and Kinross Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gold Fields03102.25
Kinross Gold03912.85

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 33.30%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Risk & Volatility

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

33.1% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Gold Fields on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.


Kinross Gold Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Franco-Nevada logo
FNV
Franco-Nevada
2.0$149.56+0.7%$28.36 billion$1.02 billion47.78
Wheaton Precious Metals logo
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
1.9$44.97+1.4%$19.95 billion$1.10 billion35.13
Agnico Eagle Mines logo
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
2.0$63.55+0.3%$15.45 billion$3.14 billion23.19Unusual Options Activity
Sibanye Stillwater logo
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater
2.4$17.10+4.6%$12.06 billion$7.74 billion6.68Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
Kirkland Lake Gold logo
KL
Kirkland Lake Gold
2.0$40.36+0.4%$10.73 billion$2.46 billion14.89Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gold Fields logo
GFI
Gold Fields
2.0$9.31+2.7%$8.04 billion$3.89 billion9.31
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
1.8$19.08+1.9%$7.85 billion$4.43 billion8.02
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.1$29.39+2.2%$6.05 billion$1.34 billion25.12
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
2.8$4.47+1.8%$4.24 billion$1.56 billion19.43Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.3$16.27+2.9%$3.98 billion$363.88 million65.08
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
1.8$8.06+1.1%$3.13 billion$748.10 million15.50Unusual Options Activity
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
0.9$3.99+0.3%$2.45 billion$2.02 billion-39.90Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$9.48+2.3%$2.38 billion$785.46 million59.25
CGAU
Centerra Gold
1.3$8.01+1.2%$2.38 billion$1.69 billion0.00
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.0$14.30+1.5%$2.36 billion$163.93 million75.27
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
2.0$10.50+1.9%$1.88 billion$1.03 billion15.67
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
1.7$8.60+1.3%$1.65 billion$93.03 million57.33
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
2.0$3.16+1.9%$1.48 billion$1.24 billion15.80
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$18.47+1.9%$1.37 billionN/A-102.61
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.1$6.55+3.2%$1.08 billion$138.46 million36.39
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.4$5.86+2.0%$1.06 billion$278.97 million21.70
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$10.96+2.8%$920.79 million$269.51 million21.08News Coverage
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
2.1$5.43+0.2%$765.40 million$38.58 million20.11Analyst Upgrade
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.2$1.49+2.7%$665.82 million$104.79 million-9.31
PPTA
Perpetua Resources
1.7$8.75+1.4%$448.04 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
Corvus Gold logo
KOR
Corvus Gold
1.8$2.72+1.8%$339.03 millionN/A-20.92News Coverage
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$3.28+5.2%$186.29 million$47.04 million-0.86
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7N/AN/A$160.26 millionN/A-10.53Gap Up
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.20+0.8%$152.02 millionN/A-9.61Gap Up
Golden Minerals logo
AUMN
Golden Minerals
1.4$0.62+0.5%$115.13 million$5.64 million-10.41Gap Up
Golden Minerals logo
AUMN
Golden Minerals
1.4$0.62+4.8%$100.96 million$5.64 million-10.36High Trading Volume
Excellon Resources logo
EXN
Excellon Resources
0.7$2.36+2.5%$76.42 million$26.20 million-9.44Gap Up
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.43+1.4%$35.62 million$1.05 million0.00
This page was last updated on 6/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.