Kinross Gold Competitors

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.4% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada pays out 19.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $169.5455, indicating a potential upside of 14.21%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Franco-Nevada's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Franco-Nevada on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.8% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 19.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of $59.40, indicating a potential upside of 34.00%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Wheaton Precious Metals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Wheaton Precious Metals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 29.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Kinross Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $88.2857, indicating a potential upside of 39.36%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Agnico Eagle Mines. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Agnico Eagle Mines on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sibanye Stillwater pays out 53.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.9, suggesting that its stock price is 90% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.02%. Given Kinross Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sibanye Stillwater has higher revenue and earnings than Kinross Gold. Sibanye Stillwater is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinross Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Dividends

Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinross Gold has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Kirkland Lake Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Kirkland Lake Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kirkland Lake Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kinross Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kinross Gold presently has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $70.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.22%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Volatility and Risk

Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.7% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gold Fields pays out 34.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinross Gold pays out 7.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kinross Gold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Gold Fields is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Gold Fields and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gold Fields and Kinross Gold's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Gold Fields and Kinross Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 33.30%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.0208, indicating a potential upside of 73.28%. Given Kinross Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kinross Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Risk & Volatility

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

33.1% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Kinross Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Gold Fields on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.