Go Pro

Seabridge Gold (SA) Competitors

Seabridge Gold logo
$26.49 +0.68 (+2.64%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$26.25 -0.24 (-0.91%)
As of 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SA vs. RGLD, AEM, AG, AGI, and FNV

Should you buy Seabridge Gold stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Seabridge Gold with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Seabridge Gold include Royal Gold (RGLD), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), and Franco-Nevada (FNV).

How does Seabridge Gold compare to Royal Gold?

Royal Gold (NASDAQ:RGLD) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Royal Gold had 14 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Royal Gold and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Royal Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Royal Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Royal Gold
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Royal Gold has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Royal Gold currently has a consensus target price of $280.27, suggesting a potential upside of 38.72%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.99%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Royal Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Royal Gold
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Royal Gold has a net margin of 48.59% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Royal Gold's return on equity of 12.63% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Royal Gold48.59% 12.63% 9.99%
Seabridge Gold N/A -6.38%-4.06%

Royal Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Royal Gold$1.03B16.64$467.27M$8.3924.08
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A

83.7% of Royal Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Royal Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Royal Gold beats Seabridge Gold on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seabridge Gold compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A -6.38% -4.06%
Agnico Eagle Mines 40.44%22.04%16.22%

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B6.28$4.46B$11.6912.63

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Seabridge Gold currently has a consensus price target of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 50.99%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $226.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.09%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Seabridge Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Agnico Eagle Mines
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 36 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Agnico Eagle Mines
20 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Seabridge Gold on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seabridge Gold compare to First Majestic Silver?

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

First Majestic Silver has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A
First Majestic Silver$1.26B6.15$164.92M$0.7122.10

In the previous week, First Majestic Silver had 18 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for First Majestic Silver and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. First Majestic Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that First Majestic Silver is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
First Majestic Silver
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Majestic Silver has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Seabridge Gold presently has a consensus target price of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 50.99%. First Majestic Silver has a consensus target price of $23.83, indicating a potential upside of 51.86%. Given First Majestic Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Majestic Silver is more favorable than Seabridge Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
First Majestic Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Majestic Silver has a net margin of 21.18% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. First Majestic Silver's return on equity of 13.36% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A -6.38% -4.06%
First Majestic Silver 21.18%13.36%9.20%

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats Seabridge Gold on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seabridge Gold compare to Alamos Gold?

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Alamos Gold currently has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 65.37%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus price target of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.99%. Given Alamos Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Alamos Gold is more favorable than Seabridge Gold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alamos Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Alamos Gold had 26 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Alamos Gold and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Alamos Gold's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Alamos Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alamos Gold
18 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold$1.81B6.65$885.80M$2.7710.37
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A

64.3% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Alamos Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alamos Gold has a net margin of 52.64% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Alamos Gold's return on equity of 19.28% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alamos Gold52.64% 19.28% 13.47%
Seabridge Gold N/A -6.38%-4.06%

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Seabridge Gold on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Seabridge Gold compare to Franco-Nevada?

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 7 more articles in the media than Seabridge Gold. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 2 mentions for Seabridge Gold. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.71 beat Seabridge Gold's score of 0.00 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Seabridge Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Franco-Nevada
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Franco-Nevada has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A-$38.06M-$0.48N/A
Franco-Nevada$1.82B22.78$1.11B$7.1030.33

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

34.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seabridge Gold presently has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 50.99%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus target price of $273.40, suggesting a potential upside of 26.98%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seabridge Gold
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Franco-Nevada
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 65.12% compared to Seabridge Gold's net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.10% beat Seabridge Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A -6.38% -4.06%
Franco-Nevada 65.12%18.10%16.82%

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Seabridge Gold on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Seabridge Gold News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SA vs. The Competition

MetricSeabridge GoldMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.85B$3.48B$4.55B$23.73B
Dividend YieldN/A5.29%4.76%4.22%
P/E Ratio-54.7321.3820.2231.49
Price / SalesN/A8,453.075,025.4220.23
Price / CashN/A26.2724.3518.72
Price / Book3.509.698.234.83
Net Income-$38.06M$122.62M$155.10M$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.03%-0.61%-0.32%0.84%
1 Month Performance-4.04%-4.25%-3.06%0.59%
1 Year Performance73.14%48.23%38.74%20.55%

Seabridge Gold Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.5148 of 5 stars
$26.49
+2.6%
$40.00
+51.0%
+68.5%$2.85BN/AN/A40
RGLD
Royal Gold
4.7902 of 5 stars
$198.58
-1.2%
$280.27
+41.1%
+29.9%$16.87B$1.31B23.7030
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
4.738 of 5 stars
$143.06
-2.0%
$225.69
+57.8%
+16.0%$72.60B$11.91B13.4418,216
AG
First Majestic Silver
4.7922 of 5 stars
$15.52
-4.3%
$23.50
+51.5%
+91.6%$7.67B$1.26B25.925,100
AGI
Alamos Gold
4.9796 of 5 stars
$28.87
-2.9%
$47.50
+64.5%
+12.1%$12.10B$1.81B11.513,234

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners