S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
Log in
NYSE:SA

Seabridge Gold Competitors

$16.42
-0.10 (-0.61 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.74
Now: $16.42
$16.75
50-Day Range
$16.52
MA: $18.84
$20.53
52-Week Range
$5.25
Now: $16.42
$22.86
Volume504,376 shs
Average Volume420,027 shs
Market Capitalization$1.22 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.95

Competitors

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) Vs. AUY, AG, AGI, HMY, CDE, and EGO

Should you be buying SA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Seabridge Gold, including Yamana Gold (AUY), First Majestic Silver (AG), Alamos Gold (AGI), Harmony Gold Mining (HMY), Coeur Mining (CDE), and Eldorado Gold (EGO).

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Yamana Gold and Seabridge Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.57$225.60 million$0.1333.08
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29

Yamana Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Seabridge Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Seabridge Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Seabridge Gold01102.50

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus target price of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 83.02%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Risk and Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats Seabridge Gold on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Seabridge Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million9.75$-40,470,000.00$0.04398.75
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29

Seabridge Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Majestic Silver. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Seabridge Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for First Majestic Silver and Seabridge Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
First Majestic Silver05102.17
Seabridge Gold01102.50

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus target price of $9.8125, indicating a potential downside of 38.48%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Given Seabridge Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Risk and Volatility

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats Seabridge Gold on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Alamos Gold (NYSE:AGI) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Alamos Gold and Seabridge Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alamos Gold$683.10 million4.42$96.10 million$0.2038.40
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29

Alamos Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamos Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

55.7% of Alamos Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Alamos Gold and Seabridge Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Alamos Gold14.88%4.74%3.66%
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Alamos Gold and Seabridge Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Alamos Gold24902.47
Seabridge Gold01102.50

Alamos Gold presently has a consensus target price of $13.3050, indicating a potential upside of 73.24%. Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Given Seabridge Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Alamos Gold.

Risk and Volatility

Alamos Gold has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Alamos Gold beats Seabridge Gold on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Harmony Gold Mining (NYSE:HMY) and Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Harmony Gold Mining and Seabridge Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Harmony Gold Mining10001.00
Seabridge Gold01102.50

Seabridge Gold has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Given Seabridge Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Harmony Gold Mining.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Harmony Gold Mining and Seabridge Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harmony Gold Mining$2.02 billion1.32$-56,540,000.00($0.10)-43.30
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29

Seabridge Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Harmony Gold Mining. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Harmony Gold Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Harmony Gold Mining has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

27.2% of Harmony Gold Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 16.0% of Harmony Gold Mining shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Harmony Gold Mining and Seabridge Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Harmony Gold MiningN/AN/AN/A
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%

Summary

Harmony Gold Mining beats Seabridge Gold on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Coeur Mining (NYSE:CDE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Seabridge Gold and Coeur Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Seabridge Gold01102.50
Coeur Mining04402.50

Seabridge Gold presently has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Coeur Mining has a consensus target price of $8.8125, indicating a potential upside of 0.48%. Given Seabridge Gold's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Coeur Mining.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Seabridge Gold and Coeur Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29
Coeur Mining$711.50 million3.00$-341,200,000.00($0.25)-35.08

Seabridge Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Coeur Mining. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coeur Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coeur Mining has a beta of 1.98, meaning that its share price is 98% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.3% of Coeur Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Coeur Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Seabridge Gold and Coeur Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%
Coeur Mining-34.20%5.56%2.69%

Summary

Coeur Mining beats Seabridge Gold on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Seabridge Gold (NYSE:SA) and Eldorado Gold (NYSE:EGO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Seabridge Gold and Eldorado Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Seabridge Gold01102.50
Eldorado Gold23502.30

Seabridge Gold presently has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 295.86%. Eldorado Gold has a consensus target price of $15.15, indicating a potential upside of 33.60%. Given Seabridge Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Seabridge Gold is more favorable than Eldorado Gold.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Seabridge Gold and Eldorado Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seabridge GoldN/AN/A$-8,750,000.00($0.14)-117.29
Eldorado Gold$617.80 million3.21$80.59 million$0.04283.50

Eldorado Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Seabridge Gold. Seabridge Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eldorado Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Seabridge Gold has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eldorado Gold has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

22.7% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.7% of Eldorado Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Seabridge Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Seabridge Gold and Eldorado Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Seabridge GoldN/A-1.16%-1.08%
Eldorado Gold18.40%3.76%2.77%

Summary

Eldorado Gold beats Seabridge Gold on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Seabridge Gold Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
2.6$4.30-0.7%$4.15 billion$1.61 billion33.08
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.1$15.95-0.8%$3.55 billion$363.94 million-63.80
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.5$7.68-1.8%$3.02 billion$683.10 million28.44
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
0.9$4.33-3.0%$2.67 billion$2.02 billion-43.30Gap Up
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$8.77-2.9%$2.14 billion$711.50 million-8.12Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
2.0$11.34-1.6%$1.98 billion$617.80 million11.01Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.4$10.72-3.5%$1.79 billion$295.86 million-14.49Dividend Increase
Analyst Downgrade
Gap Up
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.9$3.07-2.9%$1.46 billion$1.07 billion-3.84
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
2.1$6.35-3.9%$1.24 billion$89.43 million158.79Gap Up
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.4$6.68-1.0%$1.23 billion$257.19 million51.39Upcoming Earnings
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.5$5.45-0.0%$864.51 million$121.72 million-20.96Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.7$4.70-0.4%$660.15 million$33.24 million94.00
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$9.17-0.5%$629.89 million$269.51 million17.63Unusual Options Activity
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.4$1.08-0.0%$463.43 million$117.02 million-2.77
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$6.00-3.2%$358.46 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
KOR
Corvus Gold
0.1$1.77-0.0%$224.16 millionN/A-13.62
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.22-2.5%$143.75 millionN/A-10.70Gap Down
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.22-2.5%$143.75 millionN/A-10.70Gap Down
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.74-0.6%$43.35 million$1.86 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.