Go Pro

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

Gold Fields logo
$48.28 +3.36 (+7.48%)
As of 09/3/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, AU, and FNV

Should you buy Gold Fields stock or one of its competitors? Gold Fields's main competitors and comparable companies include Newmont (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), and Franco-Nevada (FNV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Newmont (NYSE:NEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

Newmont currently has a consensus target price of $132.73, suggesting a potential upside of 1.64%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $54.05, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Newmont.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Newmont
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

In the previous week, Newmont had 40 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 50 mentions for Newmont and 10 mentions for Gold Fields. Newmont's average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.32 indicating that Newmont is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Newmont
43 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gold Fields
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

68.9% of Newmont shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Newmont shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Newmont has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmont$22.67B6.07$7.09B$7.9216.49
Gold Fields$8.75B4.94$3.57BN/AN/A

Newmont pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Newmont pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmont33.36% 29.10% 17.68%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Newmont beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines40.44% 22.04% 16.22%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Agnico Eagle Mines currently has a consensus price target of $226.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.05%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $54.05, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 22 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 10 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.32 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines
24 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gold Fields
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B8.82$4.46B$11.6917.73
Gold Fields$8.75B4.94$3.57BN/AN/A

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

70.3% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals currently has a consensus price target of $165.55, suggesting a potential upside of 5.20%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $54.05, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 21.97% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 21.97% 19.83%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals$2.31B30.88$1.47B$4.5134.89
Gold Fields$8.75B4.94$3.57BN/AN/A

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 13 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 10 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.32 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals
21 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Gold Fields
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

AngloGold Ashanti has a net margin of 32.19% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 38.77% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
AngloGold Ashanti32.19% 38.77% 25.72%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gold Fields had 4 more articles in the media than AngloGold Ashanti. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Gold Fields and 6 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.32 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
AngloGold Ashanti
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gold Fields
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

AngloGold Ashanti presently has a consensus target price of $110.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.28%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $54.05, suggesting a potential upside of 11.95%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
AngloGold Ashanti
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Gold Fields has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AngloGold Ashanti.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AngloGold Ashanti$9.89B5.71$2.64B$7.4615.00
Gold Fields$8.75B4.94$3.57BN/AN/A

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields$8.75B4.94$3.57BN/AN/A
Franco-Nevada$1.82B28.71$1.11B$7.6535.47

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.79% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.58% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold FieldsN/A N/A N/A
Franco-Nevada 63.79%18.58%17.19%

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 6 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 10 mentions for Gold Fields. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.32 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Franco-Nevada
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $54.05, indicating a potential upside of 11.95%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $273.40, indicating a potential upside of 0.77%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Fields News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFI vs. The Competition

MetricGold FieldsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$40.20B$4.05B$5.07B$23.50B
Dividend Yield2.67%5.17%4.67%3.73%
P/E RatioN/A25.5826.1829.39
Price / Sales4.948,893.195,289.9620.99
Price / Cash11.5029.6827.0932.15
Price / Book4.6812.7410.637.63
Net Income$3.57B$125.14M$156.32M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.87%-0.24%-0.28%-0.16%
1 Month Performance41.26%21.37%16.22%-0.46%
1 Year Performance44.55%57.36%45.06%13.09%

Gold Fields Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFI
Gold Fields
3.8454 of 5 stars
$48.28
+7.5%
$54.05
+12.0%
+38.0%$40.20B$8.75BN/A6,628
NEM
Newmont
4.0076 of 5 stars
$131.84
+0.2%
$132.73
+0.7%
+73.1%$138.64B$22.67B16.6517,500
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
3.5081 of 5 stars
$217.76
+0.8%
$226.00
+3.8%
+39.5%$109.52B$11.91B18.6318,216
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
3.0982 of 5 stars
$160.25
+1.6%
$165.55
+3.3%
+53.4%$71.66B$2.31B35.5340
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
2.7273 of 5 stars
$120.37
-0.7%
$110.50
-8.2%
+88.6%$61.20B$9.89B16.1412,634

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GFI) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners