Skip to main content
NYSE:GFI

Gold Fields Competitors

$11.73
+0.51 (+4.55 %)
(As of 05/17/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$11.31
$11.86
50-Day Range
$9.30
$11.22
52-Week Range
$6.97
$14.90
Volume7.97 million shs
Average Volume6.30 million shs
Market Capitalization$10.41 billion
P/E Ratio27.93
Dividend Yield3.03%
Beta0.48

Competitors

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) Vs. FNV, WPM, AEM, SBSW, KL, and AU

Should you be buying GFI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Gold Fields, including Franco-Nevada (FNV), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), and AngloGold Ashanti (AU).

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Gold Fields' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada$844.10 million34.67$344.10 million$1.8284.17
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Franco-Nevada has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franco-Nevada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.8% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Franco-Nevada and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Franco-Nevada26.99%9.17%8.92%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Franco-Nevada and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Franco-Nevada06502.45
Gold Fields03202.40

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus price target of $161.7273, indicating a potential upside of 5.57%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $13.1375, indicating a potential upside of 12.00%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Dividends

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Franco-Nevada pays out 42.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Franco-Nevada has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gold Fields is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Gold Fields' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals$861.33 million24.86$86.14 million$0.5684.95
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wheaton Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Wheaton Precious Metals and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals37.30%6.50%5.56%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

59.5% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Wheaton Precious Metals and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals041102.73
Gold Fields03202.40

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus target price of $57.7273, suggesting a potential upside of 21.35%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $13.1375, suggesting a potential upside of 12.00%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Gold Fields' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines$2.49 billion7.16$473.17 million$0.9775.52
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Agnico Eagle Mines and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines21.54%7.22%4.10%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.6% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Agnico Eagle Mines and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines03602.67
Gold Fields03202.40

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus target price of $87.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 19.94%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $13.1375, suggesting a potential upside of 12.00%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sibanye StillwaterN/AN/AN/A
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $1.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and Gold Fields' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sibanye Stillwater$5.04 billion2.82$4.30 millionN/AN/A
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Gold Fields has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sibanye Stillwater.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Sibanye Stillwater and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sibanye Stillwater00403.00
Gold Fields03202.40

Sibanye Stillwater presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.87%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $13.1375, indicating a potential upside of 12.00%. Given Sibanye Stillwater's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sibanye Stillwater is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Summary

Sibanye Stillwater beats Gold Fields on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion8.46$560.08 million$2.7415.95
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Kirkland Lake Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Volatility & Risk

Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Kirkland Lake Gold and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kirkland Lake Gold11802.70
Gold Fields03202.40

Kirkland Lake Gold presently has a consensus target price of $70.00, suggesting a potential upside of 60.18%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $13.1375, suggesting a potential upside of 12.00%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Dividends

Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Gold Fields has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Gold Fields on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 40.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gold Fields pays out 81.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. AngloGold Ashanti has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gold Fields is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AngloGold Ashanti$3.53 billion2.98$-12,000,000.00$0.9127.54
Gold Fields$2.97 billion3.51$161.60 million$0.4227.93

Gold Fields has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AngloGold Ashanti. AngloGold Ashanti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gold Fields, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

29.6% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AngloGold AshantiN/AN/AN/A
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AngloGold Ashanti04502.56
Gold Fields03202.40

AngloGold Ashanti presently has a consensus target price of $33.8225, suggesting a potential upside of 34.97%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $13.1375, suggesting a potential upside of 12.00%. Given AngloGold Ashanti's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe AngloGold Ashanti is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Risk & Volatility

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Gold Fields beats AngloGold Ashanti on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Gold Fields Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Franco-Nevada logo
FNV
Franco-Nevada
1.9$153.19+2.4%$29.26 billion$844.10 million110.21
Wheaton Precious Metals logo
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
2.0$47.57+5.0%$21.41 billion$861.33 million60.22
Agnico Eagle Mines logo
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
1.7$73.25+4.4%$17.86 billion$2.49 billion27.85
Sibanye Stillwater logo
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater
2.4$19.25+4.1%$14.22 billion$5.04 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Kirkland Lake Gold logo
KL
Kirkland Lake Gold
2.4$43.70+5.1%$11.67 billion$1.38 billion15.39
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
2.5$25.06+5.4%$10.52 billion$3.53 billion27.54Gap Up
Kinross Gold logo
KGC
Kinross Gold
2.2$8.26+5.8%$10.42 billion$3.50 billion9.72Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
2.0$33.77+8.4%$7.10 billion$1.35 billion116.45Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Yamana Gold logo
AUY
Yamana Gold
2.3$5.37+4.7%$5.19 billion$1.61 billion41.31
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.5$17.38+7.9%$4.37 billion$363.94 million-69.52Analyst Report
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.2$9.15+4.9%$3.59 billion$683.10 million33.89
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
1.3$5.53+9.8%$3.41 billion$2.02 billion-55.30High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$10.39+10.6%$2.53 billion$711.50 million-9.62Analyst Report
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.5$14.22+3.3%$2.38 billion$295.86 million-19.22Earnings Announcement
Dividend Increase
Analyst Revision
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
1.8$11.65+4.5%$2.12 billion$617.80 million11.31
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.7$3.59+6.7%$1.71 billion$1.07 billion-4.49
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
1.7$8.73+4.8%$1.70 billion$89.43 million218.30
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$18.94+4.6%$1.42 billionN/A-270.57Analyst Upgrade
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.4$6.70+5.7%$1.24 billion$257.19 million51.54
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.3$6.70+10.7%$1.10 billion$121.72 million-25.77Analyst Revision
Gap Up
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$12.20+6.7%$1.05 billion$269.51 million23.46High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.5$6.27+5.1%$885.04 million$33.24 million125.40Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.3$1.36+8.1%$624.49 million$117.02 million-3.49Analyst Report
Corvus Gold logo
KOR
Corvus Gold
1.8$2.85+4.2%$361.41 millionN/A-21.92
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$3.88+9.8%$232.42 millionN/A0.00Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Up
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4N/AN/A$160.26 millionN/A-11.84Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.35+5.9%$160.26 millionN/A-11.84News Coverage
Gap Up
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.38+5.8%$34.38 million$1.86 million0.00
This page was last updated on 5/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.