Which has higher earnings and valuation, NEM or GFI?

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Newmont $22.67B 5.48 $7.09B $7.92 14.87 Gold Fields $8.75B 4.12 $3.57B N/A N/A

Is NEM or GFI more profitable?

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Newmont 33.36% 29.10% 17.68% Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to NEM or GFI?

In the previous week, Newmont had 41 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Newmont and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Newmont's score of 0.55 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Newmont 17 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gold Fields 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GFI or AEM?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 4.12 $3.57B N/A N/A Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 7.93 $4.46B $11.69 15.94

Does the media prefer GFI or AEM?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 28 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Agnico Eagle Mines 11 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GFI or WPM?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 4.12 $3.57B N/A N/A Wheaton Precious Metals $3.17B 19.22 $1.47B $4.51 29.77

Does the media prefer GFI or WPM?

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 14 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Wheaton Precious Metals 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FNV or GFI?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Franco-Nevada $1.82B 24.81 $1.11B $7.65 30.65 Gold Fields $8.75B 4.12 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media favor FNV or GFI?

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 19 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Franco-Nevada 14 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gold Fields 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, GFI or AU?

Gold Fields has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 4.12 $3.57B N/A N/A AngloGold Ashanti $9.89B 4.91 $2.64B $7.46 12.90

Does the media favor GFI or AU?

In the previous week, Gold Fields and Gold Fields both had 4 articles in the media. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive AngloGold Ashanti 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

$40.24 +0.71 (+1.79%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$40.32 +0.09 (+0.21%)

As of 07:57 PM Eastern

Compare

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, FNV, and AU

Should you buy Gold Fields stock or one of its competitors? Gold Fields's main competitors and comparable companies include Newmont (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), Franco-Nevada (FNV), and AngloGold Ashanti (AU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Newmont (NYSE:NEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Newmont	$22.67B	5.48	$7.09B	$7.92	14.87
Gold Fields	$8.75B	4.12	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

Newmont pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Newmont pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Newmont presently has a consensus target price of $132.59, indicating a potential upside of 12.56%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $47.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.67%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Newmont.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Newmont	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

Newmont has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

68.9% of Newmont shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Newmont shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Newmont	33.36%	29.10%	17.68%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Newmont had 41 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Newmont and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Newmont's score of 0.55 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Newmont	17 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gold Fields	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Newmont beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	4.12	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	7.93	$4.46B	$11.69	15.94

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 28 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Agnico Eagle Mines	11 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines	40.44%	22.04%	16.22%

Gold Fields presently has a consensus target price of $47.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.67%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus target price of $226.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.29%. Given Agnico Eagle Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Agnico Eagle Mines is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Agnico Eagle Mines	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 14 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wheaton Precious Metals	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 21.97% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Wheaton Precious Metals	64.66%	21.97%	19.83%

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	4.12	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Wheaton Precious Metals	$3.17B	19.22	$1.47B	$4.51	29.77

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $47.75, suggesting a potential upside of 18.67%. Wheaton Precious Metals has a consensus price target of $165.55, suggesting a potential upside of 23.31%. Given Wheaton Precious Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Wheaton Precious Metals is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Franco-Nevada currently has a consensus target price of $273.40, indicating a potential upside of 16.59%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $47.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.67%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 19 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada	14 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gold Fields	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada	$1.82B	24.81	$1.11B	$7.65	30.65
Gold Fields	$8.75B	4.12	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.79% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.58% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada	63.79%	18.58%	17.19%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gold Fields presently has a consensus target price of $47.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.67%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus target price of $110.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.81%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27
AngloGold Ashanti	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gold Fields and Gold Fields both had 4 articles in the media. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.60 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
AngloGold Ashanti	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

AngloGold Ashanti has a net margin of 32.19% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 39.54% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
AngloGold Ashanti	32.19%	39.54%	25.87%

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gold Fields has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	4.12	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
AngloGold Ashanti	$9.89B	4.91	$2.64B	$7.46	12.90

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Fields News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gold Fields	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$35.38B	$3.77B	$4.84B	$24.33B
Dividend Yield	3.04%	5.23%	4.71%	3.68%
P/E Ratio	N/A	23.41	21.92	30.78
Price / Sales	4.12	7,611.47	4,522.13	21.31
Price / Cash	10.12	29.62	27.05	32.80
Price / Book	4.15	10.38	8.82	6.82
Net Income	$3.57B	$122.18M	$154.16M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	-1.43%	1.36%	1.01%	0.55%
1 Month Performance	20.66%	7.90%	6.62%	3.13%
1 Year Performance	35.12%	56.00%	44.31%	18.71%

Gold Fields Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFI Gold Fields	4.3815 of 5 stars	$40.24 +1.8%	$47.75 +18.7%	+30.9%	$35.38B	$8.75B	N/A	6,628
NEM Newmont	4.6999 of 5 stars	$95.48 +1.9%	$132.11 +38.4%	+66.6%	$98.74B	$22.67B	12.05	17,500	Trending News Analyst Forecast Options Volume
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.273 of 5 stars	$147.63 +1.6%	$226.00 +53.1%	+35.2%	$73.62B	$11.91B	12.63	18,216	Trending News Analyst Revision
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	4.4702 of 5 stars	$111.94 +2.7%	$165.55 +47.9%	+38.8%	$49.52B	$2.31B	28.27	40	Positive News Analyst Revision
FNV Franco-Nevada	4.2404 of 5 stars	$215.31 +1.1%	$273.40 +27.0%	+29.2%	$41.06B	$1.82B	30.33	40	News Coverage Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GFI) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, FNV, and AU

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, FNV, and AU

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, NEM or GFI?

Is NEM or GFI a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend NEM or GFI?

Which has more risk & volatility, NEM or GFI?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NEM or GFI?

Is NEM or GFI more profitable?

Does the media refer more to NEM or GFI?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Is GFI or AEM a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GFI or AEM?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, GFI or AEM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GFI or AEM?

Does the media prefer GFI or AEM?

Is GFI or AEM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GFI or AEM?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GFI or WPM?

Does the media prefer GFI or WPM?

Is GFI or WPM a better dividend stock?

Is GFI or WPM more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, GFI or WPM?

Which has more risk & volatility, GFI or WPM?

Do analysts recommend GFI or WPM?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Do analysts prefer FNV or GFI?

Does the media favor FNV or GFI?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, FNV or GFI?

Is FNV or GFI more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FNV or GFI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of FNV or GFI?

Is FNV or GFI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Is GFI or AU a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend GFI or AU?

Which has more risk & volatility, GFI or AU?

Does the media favor GFI or AU?

Is GFI or AU more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GFI or AU?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GFI or AU?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools