Go Pro

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

Gold Fields logo
$40.81 -2.15 (-5.01%)
Closing price 09/23/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$40.91 +0.11 (+0.26%)
As of 05:28 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, AU, and FNV

Should you buy Gold Fields stock or one of its competitors? Gold Fields's main competitors and comparable companies include Newmont (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), and Franco-Nevada (FNV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Newmont (NYSE:NEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Newmont presently has a consensus target price of $133.07, indicating a potential upside of 7.69%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Newmont.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Newmont
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Newmont$22.67B5.74$7.09B$7.9215.60
Gold Fields$11.37B3.21$3.57BN/AN/A

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Newmont33.36% 29.10% 17.68%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

68.9% of Newmont shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Newmont shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newmont pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Newmont pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Newmont had 17 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Newmont and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Newmont's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.62 indicating that Newmont is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Newmont
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gold Fields
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Newmont has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Newmont beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields$11.37B3.21$3.57BN/AN/A
Agnico Eagle Mines$11.91B8.32$4.46B$11.6916.72

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold FieldsN/A N/A N/A
Agnico Eagle Mines 40.44%22.04%16.22%

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gold Fields currently has a consensus price target of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $227.15, indicating a potential upside of 16.20%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
Agnico Eagle Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 12 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.62 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Agnico Eagle Mines
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

70.3% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 21.97% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals64.66% 21.97% 19.83%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus price target of $166.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.03%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals$2.31B28.57$1.47B$4.5132.28
Gold Fields$11.37B3.21$3.57BN/AN/A

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 10 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.62 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals
13 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Gold Fields
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gold Fields currently has a consensus price target of $55.05, suggesting a potential upside of 34.91%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus price target of $113.14, suggesting a potential upside of 14.61%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
AngloGold Ashanti
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

In the previous week, AngloGold Ashanti had 3 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat AngloGold Ashanti's score of 0.19 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
AngloGold Ashanti
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gold Fields has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields$11.37B3.21$3.57BN/AN/A
AngloGold Ashanti$11.83B4.21$2.64B$7.4613.23

AngloGold Ashanti has a net margin of 32.19% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 38.77% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gold FieldsN/A N/A N/A
AngloGold Ashanti 32.19%38.77%25.72%

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Franco-Nevada had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Franco-Nevada and 3 mentions for Gold Fields. Franco-Nevada's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.62 indicating that Franco-Nevada is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Franco-Nevada
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gold Fields
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Franco-Nevada presently has a consensus target price of $274.90, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Franco-Nevada
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Gold Fields
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.79% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.58% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Franco-Nevada63.79% 18.58% 17.19%
Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Franco-Nevada$1.82B27.54$1.11B$7.6534.03
Gold Fields$11.37B3.21$3.57BN/AN/A

Summary

Franco-Nevada beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Fields News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFI vs. The Competition

MetricGold FieldsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$38.45B$3.96B$4.94B$23.09B
Dividend Yield3.78%5.21%4.71%3.61%
P/E RatioN/A25.7626.0928.10
Price / Sales3.2129,728.7317,643.2220.14
Price / Cash11.0029.4726.8938.68
Price / Book4.2112.1910.134.66
Net Income$3.57B$127.53M$158.14M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.81%0.79%0.47%-1.27%
1 Month Performance-13.65%-2.30%-2.21%-4.71%
1 Year Performance1.16%30.25%25.39%7.48%

Gold Fields Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFI
Gold Fields
4.7003 of 5 stars
$40.81
-5.0%
$55.05
+34.9%
-2.6%$38.45B$11.37BN/A6,628
NEM
Newmont
4.578 of 5 stars
$123.01
-3.0%
$132.11
+7.4%
+46.1%$133.62B$22.67B15.5317,500
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
3.8439 of 5 stars
$197.31
-1.5%
$226.00
+14.5%
+20.4%$101.56B$11.91B16.8818,216
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals
3.6175 of 5 stars
$149.56
-3.0%
$165.55
+10.7%
+35.2%$70.00B$2.31B33.1644
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
3.3518 of 5 stars
$100.32
-3.9%
$111.14
+10.8%
+42.1%$52.72B$11.83B13.4538,243

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GFI) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners