Which has better earnings & valuation, GFI or NEM?

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 3.68 $3.57B N/A N/A Newmont $22.67B 5.37 $7.09B $7.92 14.60

Is GFI or NEM more profitable?

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Gold Fields N/A N/A N/A Newmont 33.36% 29.10% 17.68%

Does the media refer more to GFI or NEM?

In the previous week, Newmont had 23 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Newmont and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Newmont's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Newmont is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Newmont 20 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AEM or GFI?

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Agnico Eagle Mines $11.91B 7.91 $4.46B $11.69 15.90 Gold Fields $8.75B 3.68 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to AEM or GFI?

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 6 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Agnico Eagle Mines 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gold Fields 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WPM or GFI?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wheaton Precious Metals $2.31B 26.70 $1.47B $4.51 30.17 Gold Fields $8.75B 3.68 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media favor WPM or GFI?

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wheaton Precious Metals 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gold Fields 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AU or GFI?

Gold Fields has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AngloGold Ashanti. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio AngloGold Ashanti $9.89B 4.67 $2.64B $7.46 12.27 Gold Fields $8.75B 3.68 $3.57B N/A N/A

Does the media favor AU or GFI?

In the previous week, AngloGold Ashanti had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AngloGold Ashanti 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Gold Fields 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation & earnings, GFI or FNV?

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gold Fields $8.75B 3.68 $3.57B N/A N/A Franco-Nevada $1.82B 25.80 $1.11B $7.65 31.87

Does the media prefer GFI or FNV?

In the previous week, Gold Fields had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gold Fields and 2 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.00 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gold Fields 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Franco-Nevada 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

$36.35 -0.41 (-1.12%)

Closing price 10/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$36.87 +0.52 (+1.44%)

As of 08:30 AM Eastern

Compare

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, AU, and FNV

Should you buy Gold Fields stock or one of its competitors? Gold Fields's main competitors and comparable companies include Newmont (NEM), Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), and Franco-Nevada (FNV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Newmont (NYSE:NEM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Newmont has a net margin of 33.36% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Newmont's return on equity of 29.10% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Newmont	33.36%	29.10%	17.68%

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newmont has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Newmont pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Newmont pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Newmont shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Newmont shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Newmont has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.68	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Newmont	$22.67B	5.37	$7.09B	$7.92	14.60

Gold Fields presently has a consensus target price of $55.05, suggesting a potential upside of 51.44%. Newmont has a consensus target price of $134.26, suggesting a potential upside of 16.13%. Given Gold Fields' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Newmont.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Newmont	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

In the previous week, Newmont had 23 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Newmont and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Newmont's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Newmont is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Newmont	20 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Newmont beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

68.3% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Agnico Eagle Mines has a net margin of 40.44% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Agnico Eagle Mines' return on equity of 22.04% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Agnico Eagle Mines	40.44%	22.04%	16.22%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

Agnico Eagle Mines presently has a consensus price target of $225.62, indicating a potential upside of 21.42%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 51.44%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Agnico Eagle Mines	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.76
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Gold Fields.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Agnico Eagle Mines	$11.91B	7.91	$4.46B	$11.69	15.90
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.68	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Agnico Eagle Mines had 6 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Agnico Eagle Mines and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Agnico Eagle Mines' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Agnico Eagle Mines is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Agnico Eagle Mines	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gold Fields	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 15.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Gold Fields on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Wheaton Precious Metals (NYSE:WPM) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Wheaton Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Wheaton Precious Metals pays out 17.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wheaton Precious Metals has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wheaton Precious Metals	$2.31B	26.70	$1.47B	$4.51	30.17
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.68	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Wheaton Precious Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Wheaton Precious Metals and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. Wheaton Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that Wheaton Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wheaton Precious Metals	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gold Fields	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Wheaton Precious Metals has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Wheaton Precious Metals presently has a consensus target price of $172.11, suggesting a potential upside of 26.47%. Gold Fields has a consensus target price of $55.05, suggesting a potential upside of 51.44%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Wheaton Precious Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wheaton Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

70.3% of Wheaton Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wheaton Precious Metals has a net margin of 64.66% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Wheaton Precious Metals' return on equity of 21.97% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wheaton Precious Metals	64.66%	21.97%	19.83%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Wheaton Precious Metals beats Gold Fields on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

36.1% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, AngloGold Ashanti had 2 more articles in the media than Gold Fields. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for AngloGold Ashanti and 4 mentions for Gold Fields. AngloGold Ashanti's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gold Fields' score of 0.02 indicating that AngloGold Ashanti is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AngloGold Ashanti	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gold Fields	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

AngloGold Ashanti currently has a consensus price target of $122.83, suggesting a potential upside of 34.16%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $55.05, suggesting a potential upside of 51.44%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AngloGold Ashanti	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38

AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

AngloGold Ashanti has a net margin of 32.19% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. AngloGold Ashanti's return on equity of 38.77% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AngloGold Ashanti	32.19%	38.77%	25.72%
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A

Gold Fields has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AngloGold Ashanti.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AngloGold Ashanti	$9.89B	4.67	$2.64B	$7.46	12.27
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.68	$3.57B	N/A	N/A

Summary

AngloGold Ashanti beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) and Franco-Nevada (NYSE:FNV) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Gold Fields has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franco-Nevada has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $1.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Franco-Nevada pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Franco-Nevada pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franco-Nevada has increased its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

Gold Fields presently has a consensus price target of $55.05, indicating a potential upside of 51.44%. Franco-Nevada has a consensus price target of $267.80, indicating a potential upside of 9.83%. Given Gold Fields' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Gold Fields is more favorable than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gold Fields	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Franco-Nevada	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

In the previous week, Gold Fields had 2 more articles in the media than Franco-Nevada. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gold Fields and 2 mentions for Franco-Nevada. Gold Fields' average media sentiment score of 0.02 beat Franco-Nevada's score of 0.00 indicating that Gold Fields is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gold Fields	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Franco-Nevada	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gold Fields has higher revenue and earnings than Franco-Nevada.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gold Fields	$8.75B	3.68	$3.57B	N/A	N/A
Franco-Nevada	$1.82B	25.80	$1.11B	$7.65	31.87

Franco-Nevada has a net margin of 63.79% compared to Gold Fields' net margin of 0.00%. Franco-Nevada's return on equity of 18.58% beat Gold Fields' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gold Fields	N/A	N/A	N/A
Franco-Nevada	63.79%	18.58%	17.19%

24.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by institutional investors. 36.8% of Gold Fields shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Franco-Nevada shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gold Fields beats Franco-Nevada on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gold Fields News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GFI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gold Fields	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$32.59B	$3.79B	$4.73B	$23.13B
Dividend Yield	4.32%	5.25%	4.78%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	N/A	22.21	22.06	23.17
Price / Sales	3.68	27,296.41	16,256.84	21.54
Price / Cash	9.41	27.01	24.88	37.05
Price / Book	3.75	11.75	9.77	4.73
Net Income	$3.57B	$127.18M	$159.17M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.81%	-0.96%	-0.84%	0.52%
1 Month Performance	-15.52%	77.47%	56.71%	-3.15%
1 Year Performance	-13.62%	12.36%	11.54%	6.80%

Gold Fields Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GFI Gold Fields	4.7906 of 5 stars	$36.35 -1.1%	$55.05 +51.4%	-16.8%	$32.59B	$8.75B	N/A	6,628
NEM Newmont	4.6945 of 5 stars	$115.93 +0.3%	$134.26 +15.8%	+29.4%	$121.76B	$25.77B	14.64	17,500
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines	4.3314 of 5 stars	$183.31 -0.2%	$227.15 +23.9%	+8.0%	$93.12B	$14.53B	15.68	18,216	Analyst Revision
WPM Wheaton Precious Metals	4.1922 of 5 stars	$136.37 +0.1%	$166.00 +21.7%	+24.8%	$61.90B	$3.17B	30.24	44	Positive News
AU AngloGold Ashanti	4.3193 of 5 stars	$94.53 -0.4%	$113.14 +19.7%	+23.0%	$47.92B	$9.89B	12.67	38,243	Positive News Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:GFI) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, AU, and FNV

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gold Fields (GFI) Competitors

GFI vs. NEM, AEM, WPM, AU, and FNV

How does Gold Fields compare to Newmont?

Is GFI or NEM more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, GFI or NEM?

Is GFI or NEM a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GFI or NEM?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GFI or NEM?

Do analysts recommend GFI or NEM?

Does the media refer more to GFI or NEM?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Agnico Eagle Mines?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in AEM or GFI?

Is AEM or GFI more profitable?

Do analysts rate AEM or GFI?

Which has more risk & volatility, AEM or GFI?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AEM or GFI?

Does the media refer more to AEM or GFI?

Is AEM or GFI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Wheaton Precious Metals?

Is WPM or GFI a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WPM or GFI?

Does the media favor WPM or GFI?

Which has more volatility & risk, WPM or GFI?

Do analysts recommend WPM or GFI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WPM or GFI?

Is WPM or GFI more profitable?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to AngloGold Ashanti?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AU or GFI?

Which has more risk & volatility, AU or GFI?

Does the media favor AU or GFI?

Do analysts rate AU or GFI?

Is AU or GFI a better dividend stock?

Is AU or GFI more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, AU or GFI?

Summary

How does Gold Fields compare to Franco-Nevada?

Which has more volatility & risk, GFI or FNV?

Is GFI or FNV a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer GFI or FNV?

Does the media prefer GFI or FNV?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GFI or FNV?

Is GFI or FNV more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in GFI or FNV?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GFI vs. The Competition

Gold Fields Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools