SSR Mining Competitors

Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) and SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Sibanye Stillwater and SSR Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sibanye Stillwater currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.36%. SSR Mining has a consensus target price of $32.20, suggesting a potential upside of 105.75%. Given SSR Mining's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and SSR Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sibanye Stillwater and SSR Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SSR Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sibanye Stillwater. SSR Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sibanye Stillwater, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of SSR Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SSR Mining beats Sibanye Stillwater on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.8% of The Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of SSR Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Mosaic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for The Mosaic and SSR Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The Mosaic currently has a consensus target price of $26.6389, suggesting a potential downside of 15.35%. SSR Mining has a consensus target price of $32.20, suggesting a potential upside of 105.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than The Mosaic.

Profitability

This table compares The Mosaic and SSR Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

The Mosaic has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Mosaic and SSR Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SSR Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Mosaic. SSR Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Mosaic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

SSR Mining beats The Mosaic on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vedanta (NYSE:VEDL) and SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

3.2% of Vedanta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of SSR Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 62.9% of Vedanta shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Vedanta and SSR Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.

SSR Mining has a consensus price target of $32.20, indicating a potential upside of 105.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Vedanta.

Risk & Volatility

Vedanta has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Vedanta and SSR Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Vedanta and SSR Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SSR Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vedanta.

Summary

SSR Mining beats Vedanta on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Westlake Chemical (NYSE:WLK) and SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

28.2% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of SSR Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.1% of Westlake Chemical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Westlake Chemical has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Westlake Chemical and SSR Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Westlake Chemical presently has a consensus target price of $76.8462, suggesting a potential downside of 14.09%. SSR Mining has a consensus target price of $32.20, suggesting a potential upside of 105.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Westlake Chemical.

Profitability

This table compares Westlake Chemical and SSR Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Westlake Chemical and SSR Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Westlake Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than SSR Mining. SSR Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westlake Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

SSR Mining beats Westlake Chemical on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) and Bunge (NYSE:BG) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SSR Mining and Bunge's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SSR Mining has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bunge. Bunge is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SSR Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

51.5% of SSR Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of Bunge shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Bunge shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SSR Mining and Bunge's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for SSR Mining and Bunge, as reported by MarketBeat.

SSR Mining presently has a consensus target price of $32.20, indicating a potential upside of 105.75%. Bunge has a consensus target price of $70.3333, indicating a potential downside of 11.47%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Bunge.

Volatility & Risk

SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bunge has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SSR Mining beats Bunge on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steel Dynamics (NASDAQ:STLD) and SSR Mining (NASDAQ:SSRM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Steel Dynamics and SSR Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.

Steel Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $39.2222, indicating a potential downside of 23.38%. SSR Mining has a consensus price target of $32.20, indicating a potential upside of 105.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Steel Dynamics.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.0% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.5% of SSR Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Steel Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Steel Dynamics and SSR Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Steel Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than SSR Mining. Steel Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SSR Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Steel Dynamics and SSR Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Steel Dynamics beats SSR Mining on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.