MaxLinear Competitors

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and NVIDIA, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $584.1944, suggesting a potential upside of 5.51%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than MaxLinear.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and NVIDIA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and NVIDIA's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. MaxLinear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

NVIDIA beats MaxLinear on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and Intel, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. Intel has a consensus target price of $61.7714, suggesting a potential downside of 1.76%. Given Intel's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intel is more favorable than MaxLinear.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Intel shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Intel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and Intel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and Intel's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MaxLinear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Intel beats MaxLinear on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and Broadcom, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $428.9231, suggesting a potential downside of 12.39%. Given MaxLinear's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe MaxLinear is more favorable than Broadcom.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Broadcom shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Broadcom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and Broadcom's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and Broadcom's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. Broadcom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MaxLinear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Broadcom beats MaxLinear on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and Texas Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. Texas Instruments has a consensus target price of $166.5185, suggesting a potential downside of 6.28%. Given Texas Instruments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Instruments is more favorable than MaxLinear.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Texas Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and Texas Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and Texas Instruments' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. Texas Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MaxLinear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats MaxLinear on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and Micron Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. Micron Technology has a consensus target price of $90.2727, suggesting a potential downside of 4.74%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than MaxLinear.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Micron Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and Micron Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and Micron Technology's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MaxLinear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Micron Technology beats MaxLinear on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

MaxLinear (NYSE:MXL) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.94, indicating that its share price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for MaxLinear and Analog Devices, as reported by MarketBeat.

MaxLinear presently has a consensus target price of $37.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 8.35%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $154.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.58%. Given Analog Devices' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than MaxLinear.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares MaxLinear and Analog Devices' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than MaxLinear. Analog Devices is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MaxLinear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares MaxLinear and Analog Devices' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.1% of MaxLinear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of MaxLinear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Analog Devices beats MaxLinear on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.