S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:NINE

Nine Energy Service Competitors

$3.37
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.10
Now: $3.37
$3.65
50-Day Range
$2.58
MA: $3.02
$3.84
52-Week Range
$0.38
Now: $3.37
$6.59
Volume292,597 shs
Average Volume204,162 shs
Market Capitalization$106.36 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.74

Competitors

Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) Vs. SLB, HAL, CLB, RES, LBRT, and OII

Should you be buying NINE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nine Energy Service, including Schlumberger (SLB), Halliburton (HAL), Core Laboratories (CLB), RPC (RES), Liberty Oilfield Services (LBRT), and Oceaneering International (OII).

Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) and Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Schlumberger and Nine Energy Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schlumberger-40.15%7.34%2.46%
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%

Risk and Volatility

Schlumberger has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, indicating that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

73.2% of Schlumberger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Schlumberger shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Schlumberger and Nine Energy Service, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schlumberger361702.54
Nine Energy Service18001.89

Schlumberger currently has a consensus price target of $23.6458, indicating a potential downside of 17.26%. Nine Energy Service has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.98%. Given Nine Energy Service's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Schlumberger.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Schlumberger and Nine Energy Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schlumberger$32.92 billion1.21$-10,137,000,000.00$1.4719.44
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53

Nine Energy Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schlumberger. Nine Energy Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schlumberger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Schlumberger beats Nine Energy Service on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) and Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Halliburton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%
Halliburton-26.60%11.10%3.08%

Volatility & Risk

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its share price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halliburton has a beta of 2.81, suggesting that its share price is 181% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Halliburton shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Halliburton shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Nine Energy Service and Halliburton, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Energy Service18001.89
Halliburton3111022.42

Nine Energy Service currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.98%. Halliburton has a consensus target price of $16.8190, indicating a potential downside of 23.83%. Given Nine Energy Service's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Halliburton.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Halliburton's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53
Halliburton$22.41 billion0.88$-1,131,000,000.00$1.2417.81

Nine Energy Service has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Halliburton. Nine Energy Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halliburton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Halliburton beats Nine Energy Service on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Core Laboratories' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%
Core Laboratories-19.02%45.39%6.74%

Volatility & Risk

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its share price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 3.38, suggesting that its share price is 238% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Nine Energy Service and Core Laboratories, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Energy Service18001.89
Core Laboratories19202.08

Nine Energy Service currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.98%. Core Laboratories has a consensus target price of $21.2222, indicating a potential downside of 39.24%. Given Nine Energy Service's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Core Laboratories.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Core Laboratories' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53
Core Laboratories$668.21 million2.33$101.98 million$1.7919.51

Core Laboratories has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nine Energy Service. Nine Energy Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Nine Energy Service on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) and RPC (NYSE:RES) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of RPC shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.6% of RPC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RPC has a beta of 2.13, suggesting that its stock price is 113% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Energy Service and RPC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%
RPC-32.86%-9.35%-7.44%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nine Energy Service and RPC's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53
RPC$1.22 billion1.16$-87,110,000.00($0.12)-54.58

RPC has higher revenue and earnings than Nine Energy Service. RPC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nine Energy Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Nine Energy Service and RPC, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Energy Service18001.89
RPC23101.83

Nine Energy Service currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.98%. RPC has a consensus target price of $3.1786, suggesting a potential downside of 51.47%. Given Nine Energy Service's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than RPC.

Summary

RPC beats Nine Energy Service on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) and Liberty Oilfield Services (NYSE:LBRT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Liberty Oilfield Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Liberty Oilfield Services has a beta of 3.31, suggesting that its stock price is 231% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Liberty Oilfield Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%
Liberty Oilfield Services-8.20%-11.01%-6.95%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nine Energy Service and Liberty Oilfield Services' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53
Liberty Oilfield Services$1.99 billion0.70$39 million$0.5323.43

Liberty Oilfield Services has higher revenue and earnings than Nine Energy Service. Nine Energy Service is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Liberty Oilfield Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Nine Energy Service and Liberty Oilfield Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Energy Service18001.89
Liberty Oilfield Services25502.25

Nine Energy Service currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.98%. Liberty Oilfield Services has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential downside of 13.45%. Given Nine Energy Service's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Liberty Oilfield Services.

Summary

Liberty Oilfield Services beats Nine Energy Service on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Oceaneering International (NYSE:OII) and Nine Energy Service (NYSE:NINE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Oceaneering International and Nine Energy Service, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oceaneering International09202.18
Nine Energy Service18001.89

Oceaneering International presently has a consensus target price of $8.9750, suggesting a potential downside of 28.37%. Nine Energy Service has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.98%. Given Nine Energy Service's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nine Energy Service is more favorable than Oceaneering International.

Risk and Volatility

Oceaneering International has a beta of 3.6, suggesting that its stock price is 260% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Energy Service has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Oceaneering International and Nine Energy Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oceaneering International-37.40%-3.56%-1.14%
Nine Energy Service-136.82%-65.52%-17.29%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Oceaneering International and Nine Energy Service's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceaneering International$2.05 billion0.61$-348,440,000.00($0.82)-15.28
Nine Energy Service$832.94 million0.13$-217,750,000.00$0.3210.53

Nine Energy Service has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oceaneering International. Oceaneering International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nine Energy Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.4% of Oceaneering International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.4% of Nine Energy Service shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Oceaneering International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Nine Energy Service shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oceaneering International beats Nine Energy Service on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nine Energy Service Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Schlumberger logo
SLB
Schlumberger
2.3$28.58flat$39.96 billion$32.92 billion-3.76Analyst Report
Halliburton logo
HAL
Halliburton
2.2$22.08flat$19.62 billion$22.41 billion-4.44Ex-Dividend
Core Laboratories logo
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.5$34.93flat$1.56 billion$668.21 million-15.39News Coverage
RPC logo
RES
RPC
1.2$6.55flat$1.41 billion$1.22 billion-6.12
Liberty Oilfield Services logo
LBRT
Liberty Oilfield Services
1.1$12.42flat$1.40 billion$1.99 billion-11.39Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
Oceaneering International logo
OII
Oceaneering International
1.0$12.53flat$1.24 billion$2.05 billion-1.69Analyst Report
ProPetro logo
PUMP
ProPetro
1.3$11.93flat$1.20 billion$2.05 billion-29.10Analyst Report
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited
1.6$12.89flat$1.12 billion$658.39 million30.69
Frank's International logo
FI
Frank's International
0.8$4.88flat$1.11 billion$579.92 million-3.49Analyst Downgrade
NexTier Oilfield Solutions logo
NEX
NexTier Oilfield Solutions
1.3$4.84flat$1.04 billion$1.82 billion-2.66
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.2$5.33flat$803.31 million$751.91 million33.31
Select Energy Services logo
WTTR
Select Energy Services
1.0$6.31flat$650.21 million$1.29 billion-1.84
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.6$12.06flat$369.45 million$541.89 million10.22
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$5.72flat$261.80 million$625.01 million-1.65
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.09flat$135.90 million$78.44 million72.07Increase in Short Interest
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$13.12flat$111.65 million$544 million-0.20Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.48flat$109.62 million$514.76 million-0.34Decrease in Short Interest
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.92flat$90.92 million$476.58 million-1.78Gap Down
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.0$5.75flat$88.52 million$336.90 million-7.01Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$33.34flat$78.68 million$205.49 million-1.14Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$2.20flat$39.43 million$9.30 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.