Do analysts rate TUSK or CLB?

Core Laboratories has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 66.53%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Core Laboratories 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer TUSK or CLB?

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 11 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Core Laboratories and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.46 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Core Laboratories 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend TUSK or OIS?

Oil States International has a consensus target price of $11.33, indicating a potential upside of 30.72%. Given Oil States International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oil States International is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Oil States International 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Do analysts prefer TUSK or NGS?

Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus target price of $50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.13%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Natural Gas Services Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Does the media favor TUSK or NGS?

In the previous week, Natural Gas Services Group had 4 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Natural Gas Services Group and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Natural Gas Services Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Natural Gas Services Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TUSK or RNGR?

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.69%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Ranger Energy Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media prefer TUSK or RNGR?

In the previous week, Ranger Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ranger Energy Services and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Ranger Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend SMHI or TUSK?

SEACOR Marine currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.40%. Given SEACOR Marine's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SEACOR Marine is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SEACOR Marine 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media prefer SMHI or TUSK?

In the previous week, SEACOR Marine had 10 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for SEACOR Marine and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat SEACOR Marine's score of 0.71 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SEACOR Marine 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

$3.06 -0.17 (-5.26%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TUSK vs. CLB, OIS, NGS, RNGR, and SMHI

Should you buy Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? Mammoth Energy Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Core Laboratories (CLB), Oil States International (OIS), Natural Gas Services Group (NGS), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and SEACOR Marine (SMHI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 5.10% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of 0.98%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 10.03% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	0.98%	-8.10%	-6.14%
Core Laboratories	5.10%	10.03%	4.71%

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Core Laboratories is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.33	$4.60M	$0.02	153.00
Core Laboratories	$526.52M	1.10	$29.67M	$0.56	22.52

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

Core Laboratories has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 66.53%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Core Laboratories	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 11 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Core Laboratories and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.46 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Core Laboratories	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Oil States International?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Oil States International (NYSE:OIS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oil States International has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 0.98% compared to Oil States International's net margin of -16.78%. Oil States International's return on equity of 4.28% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	0.98%	-8.10%	-6.14%
Oil States International	-16.78%	4.28%	2.87%

Mammoth Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oil States International. Oil States International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.33	$4.60M	$0.02	153.00
Oil States International	$668.99M	0.78	-$109.38M	-$1.89	N/A

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.4% of Oil States International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Oil States International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oil States International has a consensus target price of $11.33, indicating a potential upside of 30.72%. Given Oil States International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oil States International is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Oil States International	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Oil States International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for Oil States International. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Oil States International's score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Very Positive
Oil States International	Neutral

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services and Oil States International tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Natural Gas Services Group?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.6% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Natural Gas Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Natural Gas Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.33	$4.60M	$0.02	153.00
Natural Gas Services Group	$172.32M	2.66	$19.93M	$1.61	22.07

In the previous week, Natural Gas Services Group had 4 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Natural Gas Services Group and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Natural Gas Services Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Natural Gas Services Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus target price of $50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.13%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Natural Gas Services Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Natural Gas Services Group has a net margin of 10.81% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of 0.98%. Natural Gas Services Group's return on equity of 8.10% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	0.98%	-8.10%	-6.14%
Natural Gas Services Group	10.81%	8.10%	3.70%

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ranger Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ranger Energy Services and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Ranger Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.69%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Ranger Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.33	$4.60M	$0.02	153.00
Ranger Energy Services	$606.70M	0.66	$12.30M	$0.60	28.57

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of 0.98%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 4.87% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	0.98%	-8.10%	-6.14%
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to SEACOR Marine?

SEACOR Marine (NYSE:SMHI) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, SEACOR Marine had 10 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for SEACOR Marine and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat SEACOR Marine's score of 0.71 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SEACOR Marine	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SEACOR Marine. SEACOR Marine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SEACOR Marine	$210.44M	1.28	-$27.84M	-$0.71	N/A
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.33	$4.60M	$0.02	153.00

SEACOR Marine has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 0.98% compared to SEACOR Marine's net margin of -8.62%. Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity of -8.10% beat SEACOR Marine's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SEACOR Marine	-8.62%	-8.72%	-3.46%
Mammoth Energy Services	0.98%	-8.10%	-6.14%

SEACOR Marine currently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.40%. Given SEACOR Marine's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SEACOR Marine is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SEACOR Marine	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

59.0% of SEACOR Marine shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.8% of SEACOR Marine shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services beats SEACOR Marine on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUSK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mammoth Energy Services	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$147.28M	$3.74B	$10.02B	$12.81B
Dividend Yield	N/A	13.36%	11.64%	10.69%
P/E Ratio	153.00	44.08	20.56	24.23
Price / Sales	3.33	31.80	404.85	91.65
Price / Cash	N/A	21.25	36.20	53.57
Price / Book	0.56	2.24	3.02	6.37
Net Income	$4.60M	$67.81M	$4.33B	$347.74M
7 Day Performance	-7.83%	-1.43%	2.02%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	8.90%	3.08%	5.30%	2.13%
1 Year Performance	35.40%	52.71%	41.64%	20.64%

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services	1.9099 of 5 stars	$3.06 -5.3%	N/A	+42.9%	$147.28M	$44.29M	153.00	1,040	Positive News
CLB Core Laboratories	4.2485 of 5 stars	$12.45 +1.9%	N/A	+18.9%	$560.71M	$526.52M	22.24	3,300	Analyst Revision
OIS Oil States International	3.3921 of 5 stars	$8.85 -0.1%	$11.33 +28.1%	+72.2%	$533.85M	$668.99M	N/A	2,172
NGS Natural Gas Services Group	4.454 of 5 stars	$36.55 -1.1%	$50.50 +38.2%	+40.2%	$465.76M	$172.32M	22.70	250
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	3.9857 of 5 stars	$17.13 +3.3%	$20.00 +16.8%	+35.9%	$388.01M	$606.70M	28.54	2,300	Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, OIS, NGS, RNGR, and SMHI

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Oil States International?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Natural Gas Services Group?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to SEACOR Marine?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, OIS, NGS, RNGR, and SMHI

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Is TUSK or CLB more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TUSK or CLB?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or CLB?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or CLB?

Do analysts rate TUSK or CLB?

Does the media prefer TUSK or CLB?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Oil States International?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or OIS?

Is TUSK or OIS more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, TUSK or OIS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in TUSK or OIS?

Do analysts recommend TUSK or OIS?

Does the media prefer TUSK or OIS?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Natural Gas Services Group?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TUSK or NGS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TUSK or NGS?

Does the media favor TUSK or NGS?

Which has more volatility & risk, TUSK or NGS?

Do analysts prefer TUSK or NGS?

Is TUSK or NGS more profitable?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TUSK or RNGR?

Does the media prefer TUSK or RNGR?

Do analysts recommend TUSK or RNGR?

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or RNGR?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TUSK or RNGR?

Is TUSK or RNGR more profitable?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to SEACOR Marine?

Does the media prefer SMHI or TUSK?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SMHI or TUSK?

Which has more volatility and risk, SMHI or TUSK?

Is SMHI or TUSK more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SMHI or TUSK?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of SMHI or TUSK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools