Do analysts rate GPRK or TUSK?

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.59%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Geopark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate TUSK or PNRG?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 PrimeEnergy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Do analysts prefer RNGR or TUSK?

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.03%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ranger Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate TUSK or GTE?

Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus price target of $9.73, suggesting a potential upside of 15.84%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Gran Tierra Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

$3.32 -0.04 (-1.04%)

As of 03:12 PM Eastern

Compare

TUSK vs. GPRK, PNRG, NOA, RNGR, and GTE

Should you buy Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mammoth Energy Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mammoth Energy Services include Geopark (GPRK), PrimeEnergy (PNRG), North American Construction Group (NOA), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and Gran Tierra Energy (GTE). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Geopark has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Geopark	$492.52M	1.18	$49.67M	$1.05	10.68
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.58	$4.60M	$0.21	15.69

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.59%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Geopark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Geopark	11.74%	36.71%	8.06%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 2 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 1 mentions for Geopark. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Geopark's score of 0.63 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Geopark	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive

Summary

Geopark and Mammoth Energy Services tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and PrimeEnergy (NASDAQ:PNRG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 3 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat PrimeEnergy's score of -0.28 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
PrimeEnergy	Neutral

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of PrimeEnergy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to PrimeEnergy's net margin of 12.06%. PrimeEnergy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
PrimeEnergy	12.06%	10.10%	6.51%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
PrimeEnergy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

PrimeEnergy has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrimeEnergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.58	$4.60M	$0.21	15.69
PrimeEnergy	$189.05M	1.51	$26.31M	$8.96	19.67

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PrimeEnergy has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PrimeEnergy beats Mammoth Energy Services on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for North American Construction Group. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Neutral
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.41	$24.22M	$0.79	17.59
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.58	$4.60M	$0.21	15.69

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of $25.75, indicating a potential upside of 85.25%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.03%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Ranger Energy Services' net margin of 2.58%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 5.12% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.58%	5.12%	3.60%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 2 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 1 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.95 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.67	$12.30M	$0.63	24.60
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.58	$4.60M	$0.21	15.69

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Gran Tierra Energy (NYSE:GTE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.7% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Gran Tierra Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gran Tierra Energy has a beta of 0.17, meaning that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 3 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Gran Tierra Energy's score of 0.46 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
Gran Tierra Energy	Neutral

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Gran Tierra Energy's net margin of 7.17%. Gran Tierra Energy's return on equity of 11.36% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Gran Tierra Energy	7.17%	11.36%	3.28%

Mammoth Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gran Tierra Energy. Gran Tierra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.58	$4.60M	$0.21	15.69
Gran Tierra Energy	$600.60M	0.49	-$6.29M	-$8.31	N/A

Gran Tierra Energy has a consensus price target of $9.73, suggesting a potential upside of 15.84%. Given Gran Tierra Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gran Tierra Energy is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Gran Tierra Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services and Gran Tierra Energy tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUSK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mammoth Energy Services	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$158.72M	$9.38B	$10.21B	$12.66B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.51%	10.42%	5.31%
P/E Ratio	15.69	23.84	20.22	26.75
Price / Sales	3.58	1.70	828.46	115.41
Price / Cash	N/A	11.23	37.36	37.60
Price / Book	0.61	2.84	4.34	6.92
Net Income	$4.60M	$373.98M	$4.23B	$336.84M
7 Day Performance	1.38%	-3.34%	-0.62%	4.31%
1 Month Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	-0.54%
1 Year Performance	25.76%	77.84%	52.77%	40.65%

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services	2.7375 of 5 stars	$3.32 -1.0%	N/A	+27.9%	$159.68M	$44.29M	15.79	1,040	Positive News
GPRK Geopark	2.4623 of 5 stars	$9.95 +2.3%	$11.50 +15.6%	+62.4%	$503.11M	$492.52M	9.48	460
PNRG PrimeEnergy	0.8239 of 5 stars	$249.49 -3.8%	N/A	-14.9%	$419.45M	$177.85M	27.84	110	News Coverage Analyst Downgrade
NOA North American Construction Group	4.7829 of 5 stars	$14.50 -2.0%	$25.75 +77.6%	-19.2%	$401.12M	$919.14M	18.35	2,500
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	4.6483 of 5 stars	$16.27 +0.4%	$20.00 +22.9%	+45.3%	$385.18M	$570.80M	25.83	2,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 6/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. GPRK, PNRG, NOA, RNGR, and GTE

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. GPRK, PNRG, NOA, RNGR, and GTE

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Which has more risk & volatility, GPRK or TUSK?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GPRK or TUSK?

Do analysts rate GPRK or TUSK?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GPRK or TUSK?

Is GPRK or TUSK more profitable?

Does the media prefer GPRK or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Does the media prefer TUSK or PNRG?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TUSK or PNRG?

Is TUSK or PNRG more profitable?

Do analysts rate TUSK or PNRG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TUSK or PNRG?

Which has more volatility and risk, TUSK or PNRG?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Is NOA or TUSK more profitable?

Does the media prefer NOA or TUSK?

Which has more risk & volatility, NOA or TUSK?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NOA or TUSK?

Do analysts recommend NOA or TUSK?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in NOA or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or TUSK?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in RNGR or TUSK?

Which has more volatility & risk, RNGR or TUSK?

Is RNGR or TUSK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to RNGR or TUSK?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RNGR or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Gran Tierra Energy?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TUSK or GTE?

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or GTE?

Does the media prefer TUSK or GTE?

Is TUSK or GTE more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TUSK or GTE?

Do analysts rate TUSK or GTE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools