Do analysts recommend TUSK or CLB?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Core Laboratories 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Does the media refer more to TUSK or CLB?

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 18 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Core Laboratories and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.39 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Core Laboratories 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 9 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate TUSK or GPRK?

Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Geopark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media favor TUSK or GPRK?

In the previous week, Geopark had 2 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Geopark and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Geopark 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 1 articles in the media. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 1.50 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive North American Construction Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor RNGR or TUSK?

In the previous week, Ranger Energy Services had 12 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ranger Energy Services and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.54 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ranger Energy Services 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer PNRG or TUSK?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PrimeEnergy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

$2.65 +0.05 (+1.92%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.65 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:56 PM Eastern

Compare

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

Should you buy Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mammoth Energy Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mammoth Energy Services include Core Laboratories (CLB), Geopark (GPRK), North American Construction Group (NOA), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and PrimeEnergy (PNRG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 18 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Core Laboratories and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.39 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Core Laboratories	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Core Laboratories' net margin of 5.10%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 10.03% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Core Laboratories	5.10%	10.03%	4.71%

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	2.88	$4.60M	$0.21	12.62
Core Laboratories	$519.18M	0.95	$29.67M	$0.56	19.01

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Core Laboratories	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Geopark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Geopark had 2 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Geopark and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Geopark	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Geopark	11.74%	36.71%	8.06%

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	2.88	$4.60M	$0.21	12.62
Geopark	$492.52M	1.02	$49.67M	$1.05	9.30

Summary

Geopark beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	2.88	$4.60M	$0.21	12.62
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.41	$24.22M	$0.79	17.22

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 89.27%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 1 articles in the media. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 1.50 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.70	$12.30M	$0.43	37.30
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	2.88	$4.60M	$0.21	12.62

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ranger Energy Services had 12 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Ranger Energy Services and 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.54 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Ranger Energy Services' net margin of 2.36%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 4.87% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.36%	4.87%	3.33%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.69%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

PrimeEnergy (NASDAQ:PNRG) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

PrimeEnergy has a beta of -0.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PrimeEnergy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 65.3% of PrimeEnergy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than PrimeEnergy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for PrimeEnergy. PrimeEnergy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 1.50 indicating that PrimeEnergy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PrimeEnergy	Very Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to PrimeEnergy's net margin of 12.06%. PrimeEnergy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PrimeEnergy	12.06%	10.10%	6.51%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

PrimeEnergy has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrimeEnergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PrimeEnergy	$189.05M	1.58	$26.31M	$8.96	20.55
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	2.88	$4.60M	$0.21	12.62

Summary

PrimeEnergy beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUSK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mammoth Energy Services	Energy Equipment & Services Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$125.24M	$3.46B	$9.63B	$12.30B
Dividend Yield	N/A	13.45%	11.54%	9.45%
P/E Ratio	12.62	25.19	19.30	24.67
Price / Sales	2.88	31.55	348.18	110.49
Price / Cash	N/A	21.56	36.10	59.62
Price / Book	0.49	2.12	3.98	5.90
Net Income	$4.60M	$68.04M	$4.35B	$336.16M
7 Day Performance	-2.93%	-2.19%	-0.76%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	-15.87%	1.24%	4.28%	-5.67%
1 Year Performance	4.33%	44.90%	35.86%	18.82%

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services	2.7081 of 5 stars	$2.65 +1.9%	N/A	+1.9%	$125.24M	$44.29M	12.62	1,040	Positive News Upcoming Earnings
CLB Core Laboratories	2.5794 of 5 stars	$10.71 -4.6%	N/A	-2.7%	$517.67M	$524.73M	16.48	3,300	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Upgrade Short Interest Decrease
GPRK Geopark	3.0057 of 5 stars	$9.26 -2.4%	$11.50 +24.3%	+51.6%	$490.18M	$492.52M	8.81	460	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings Gap Up
NOA North American Construction Group	4.918 of 5 stars	$13.68 -1.3%	$25.75 +88.3%	-9.5%	$386.35M	$919.14M	17.31	2,500	Positive News
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	4.7504 of 5 stars	$14.52 -6.1%	$20.00 +37.7%	+20.2%	$367.59M	$546.90M	33.77	2,300	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Does the media refer more to TUSK or CLB?

Is TUSK or CLB more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TUSK or CLB?

Which has more volatility & risk, TUSK or CLB?

Do analysts recommend TUSK or CLB?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TUSK or CLB?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or GPRK?

Do analysts rate TUSK or GPRK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in TUSK or GPRK?

Does the media favor TUSK or GPRK?

Is TUSK or GPRK more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TUSK or GPRK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TUSK or NOA?

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Do analysts rate TUSK or NOA?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TUSK or NOA?

Does the media refer more to TUSK or NOA?

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Which has more volatility & risk, RNGR or TUSK?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, RNGR or TUSK?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of RNGR or TUSK?

Does the media favor RNGR or TUSK?

Is RNGR or TUSK more profitable?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Which has more volatility and risk, PNRG or TUSK?

Do analysts prefer PNRG or TUSK?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PNRG or TUSK?

Does the media prefer PNRG or TUSK?

Is PNRG or TUSK more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, PNRG or TUSK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools