Do analysts recommend CLB or TUSK?

Core Laboratories currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.73%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Core Laboratories 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media refer more to CLB or TUSK?

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 3 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Core Laboratories and 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Core Laboratories' score of -0.23 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Core Laboratories 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Mammoth Energy Services 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GPRK or TUSK?

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Geopark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor GPRK or TUSK?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 2 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.88 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Geopark 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Mammoth Energy Services 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 3 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat North American Construction Group's score of -0.17 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive North American Construction Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer RNGR or TUSK?

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ranger Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend TUSK or PNRG?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 PrimeEnergy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

$3.03 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.02 0.00 (-0.17%)

As of 06/18/2026 07:07 PM Eastern

Compare

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

Should you buy Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mammoth Energy Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mammoth Energy Services include Core Laboratories (CLB), Geopark (GPRK), North American Construction Group (NOA), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and PrimeEnergy (PNRG). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Core Laboratories	$526.52M	1.02	$29.67M	$0.65	17.97
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.30	$4.60M	$0.21	14.43

In the previous week, Core Laboratories had 3 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Core Laboratories and 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Core Laboratories' score of -0.23 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Core Laboratories	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Core Laboratories has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Core Laboratories currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.73%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Core Laboratories	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Core Laboratories' net margin of 5.94%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 11.52% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Core Laboratories	5.94%	11.52%	5.32%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Geopark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Geopark has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Geopark	11.74%	36.71%	8.06%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 2 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.88 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Geopark	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Geopark	$492.52M	1.06	$49.67M	$1.05	9.63
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.30	$4.60M	$0.21	14.43

Summary

Geopark beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services and Mammoth Energy Services both had 3 articles in the media. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat North American Construction Group's score of -0.17 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.30	$4.60M	$0.21	14.43
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.41	$24.22M	$0.79	17.14

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 90.18%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.93%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Ranger Energy Services' net margin of 2.58%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 5.12% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.58%	5.12%	3.60%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.66	$12.30M	$0.63	24.25
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.30	$4.60M	$0.21	14.43

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and PrimeEnergy (NASDAQ:PNRG) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 65.3% of PrimeEnergy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than PrimeEnergy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for PrimeEnergy. PrimeEnergy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.88 indicating that PrimeEnergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
PrimeEnergy	Positive

PrimeEnergy has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PrimeEnergy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.30	$4.60M	$0.21	14.43
PrimeEnergy	$189.05M	1.50	$26.31M	$8.96	19.56

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PrimeEnergy has a beta of -0.24, meaning that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to PrimeEnergy's net margin of 12.06%. PrimeEnergy's return on equity of 10.10% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
PrimeEnergy	12.06%	10.10%	6.51%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
PrimeEnergy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

PrimeEnergy beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUSK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mammoth Energy Services	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$145.96M	$8.65B	$9.91B	$12.60B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.53%	10.53%	5.81%
P/E Ratio	14.43	22.37	19.26	24.42
Price / Sales	3.30	1.68	745.13	111.09
Price / Cash	N/A	11.23	37.26	37.84
Price / Book	0.57	2.79	4.14	6.60
Net Income	$4.60M	$373.98M	$4.25B	$337.10M
7 Day Performance	-7.90%	-7.00%	-3.22%	0.83%
1 Month Performance	-11.14%	-7.51%	-6.61%	2.25%
1 Year Performance	6.32%	48.76%	31.27%	36.14%

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services	2.1052 of 5 stars	$3.03 flat	N/A	+6.3%	$145.96M	$44.29M	14.43	1,040	News Coverage
CLB Core Laboratories	1.6295 of 5 stars	$12.16 -4.4%	$12.00 -1.3%	-6.0%	$586.35M	$526.52M	18.71	3,300	Analyst Upgrade Analyst Revision Gap Down
GPRK Geopark	3.3575 of 5 stars	$10.35 +1.6%	$11.50 +11.1%	+38.2%	$526.89M	$483.54M	9.86	460	News Coverage
NOA North American Construction Group	4.6412 of 5 stars	$13.46 -1.8%	$25.75 +91.3%	-22.8%	$383.66M	$919.14M	17.04	2,500
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	4.4077 of 5 stars	$15.15 -2.7%	$20.00 +32.0%	+21.6%	$370.21M	$570.80M	24.05	2,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. CLB, GPRK, NOA, RNGR, and PNRG

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CLB or TUSK?

Does the media refer more to CLB or TUSK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CLB or TUSK?

Which has more risk and volatility, CLB or TUSK?

Do analysts recommend CLB or TUSK?

Is CLB or TUSK more profitable?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GPRK or TUSK?

Do analysts prefer GPRK or TUSK?

Which has more volatility and risk, GPRK or TUSK?

Is GPRK or TUSK more profitable?

Does the media favor GPRK or TUSK?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GPRK or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

Does the media prefer TUSK or NOA?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TUSK or NOA?

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TUSK or NOA?

Do analysts rate TUSK or NOA?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in RNGR or TUSK?

Does the media favor RNGR or TUSK?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or TUSK?

Is RNGR or TUSK more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, RNGR or TUSK?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, RNGR or TUSK?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to PrimeEnergy?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or PNRG?

Does the media favor TUSK or PNRG?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TUSK or PNRG?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or PNRG?

Is TUSK or PNRG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend TUSK or PNRG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools