S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:TUSK

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors

$5.56
-0.80 (-12.58 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.00
Now: $5.56
$5.64
50-Day Range
$3.93
MA: $4.77
$6.81
52-Week Range
$0.56
Now: $5.56
$7.27
Volume616,324 shs
Average Volume223,032 shs
Market Capitalization$254.46 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.25

Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) Vs. NEX, HLX, WTTR, NOA, NGS, and USWS

Should you be buying TUSK stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Mammoth Energy Services, including NexTier Oilfield Solutions (NEX), Helix Energy Solutions Group (HLX), Select Energy Services (WTTR), North American Construction Group (NOA), Natural Gas Services Group (NGS), and U.S. Well Services (USWS).

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and NexTier Oilfield Solutions (NYSE:NEX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NexTier Oilfield Solutions has a beta of 3.52, suggesting that its share price is 252% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and NexTier Oilfield Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
NexTier Oilfield Solutions-24.38%-27.11%-13.75%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and NexTier Oilfield Solutions' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
NexTier Oilfield Solutions$1.82 billion0.55$-106,160,000.00($0.23)-20.22

Mammoth Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NexTier Oilfield Solutions.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and NexTier Oilfield Solutions, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
NexTier Oilfield Solutions03602.67

NexTier Oilfield Solutions has a consensus price target of $3.85, suggesting a potential downside of 17.20%. Given NexTier Oilfield Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NexTier Oilfield Solutions is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.9% of NexTier Oilfield Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of NexTier Oilfield Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NexTier Oilfield Solutions beats Mammoth Energy Services on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Helix Energy Solutions Group (NYSE:HLX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Helix Energy Solutions Group has a beta of 3.66, suggesting that its share price is 266% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Helix Energy Solutions Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
Helix Energy Solutions Group3.50%0.53%0.35%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Helix Energy Solutions Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
Helix Energy Solutions Group$751.91 million0.98$57.78 million$0.3812.89

Helix Energy Solutions Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and Helix Energy Solutions Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
Helix Energy Solutions Group01302.75

Helix Energy Solutions Group has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.04%. Given Helix Energy Solutions Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Helix Energy Solutions Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.8% of Helix Energy Solutions Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Helix Energy Solutions Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Helix Energy Solutions Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Select Energy Services (NYSE:WTTR) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Select Energy Services has a beta of 2.88, suggesting that its share price is 188% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Select Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
Select Energy Services-30.21%0.78%0.64%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Select Energy Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
Select Energy Services$1.29 billion0.50$2.78 million$0.1737.18

Select Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and Select Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
Select Energy Services13202.17

Select Energy Services has a consensus price target of $5.5286, suggesting a potential downside of 12.52%. Given Select Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Select Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Select Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Select Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Select Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and North American Construction Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
North American Construction Group8.50%23.22%5.93%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and North American Construction Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
North American Construction Group$541.89 million0.68$27.79 million$1.1310.58

North American Construction Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and North American Construction Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
North American Construction Group01702.88

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of $16.2857, suggesting a potential upside of 36.28%. Given North American Construction Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Natural Gas Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
Natural Gas Services Group2.79%-1.04%-0.87%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and Natural Gas Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
Natural Gas Services Group$78.44 million1.79$-13,860,000.00N/AN/A

Natural Gas Services Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and Natural Gas Services Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
Natural Gas Services Group00203.00

Natural Gas Services Group has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.62%. Given Natural Gas Services Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Natural Gas Services Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.0% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and U.S. Well Services (NASDAQ:USWS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Well Services has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its share price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and U.S. Well Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-52.94%-9.04%-6.20%
U.S. Well Services-83.03%-154.88%-21.32%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and U.S. Well Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.41$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
U.S. Well Services$514.76 million0.25$-93,910,000.00($1.72)-1.03

Mammoth Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than U.S. Well Services.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and U.S. Well Services, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
U.S. Well Services02002.00

U.S. Well Services has a consensus price target of $1.00, suggesting a potential downside of 43.50%. Given U.S. Well Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe U.S. Well Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

62.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.9% of U.S. Well Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of U.S. Well Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services beats U.S. Well Services on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ad Legacy Research
Man Gets Into a Tesla… What Happens Next Will Shock Everyone (Video)
"Hi, I'm Jeff Brown… I'm about to get in this Tesla and drive up to a location just a few miles from here to show you Elon Musk's next big project… What happens next will shock you…"

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
NexTier Oilfield Solutions logo
NEX
NexTier Oilfield Solutions
1.3$4.65-0.4%$996.80 million$1.82 billion-2.55Gap Up
Helix Energy Solutions Group logo
HLX
Helix Energy Solutions Group
1.3$4.90-0.8%$735.79 million$751.91 million30.63Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Select Energy Services logo
WTTR
Select Energy Services
1.0$6.32-1.1%$651.24 million$1.29 billion-1.84Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.6$11.95-3.1%$366.05 million$541.89 million10.13Dividend Increase
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.40-0.9%$140.08 million$78.44 million74.29Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.77-4.5%$131.10 million$514.76 million-0.40Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$14.99-6.3%$127.57 million$544 million-0.22Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Nine Energy Service logo
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$3.40-2.6%$107.31 million$832.94 million-0.18Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.94-4.1%$91.86 million$476.58 million-1.80Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
0.8$38.50-1.0%$90.86 million$205.49 million-1.32Upcoming Earnings
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.0$5.51-0.5%$84.83 million$336.90 million-6.72Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$2.18-2.3%$39.07 million$9.30 million0.00News Coverage
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.