Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, community ranking, valuation, earnings and risk.

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GFR or TUSK?

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Do analysts recommend GFR or TUSK?

Greenfire Resources currently has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 51.38%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Greenfire Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Is GFR or TUSK more profitable?

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of 5.02% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -105.49%. Greenfire Resources' return on equity of 5.40% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources	5.02%	5.40%	3.13%
Mammoth Energy Services	-105.49%	-53.85%	-35.56%

Does the media favor GFR or TUSK?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 1 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.91 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 1.62 indicating that Greenfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Which has more risk and volatility, GFR or TUSK?

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community favor GFR or TUSK?

Mammoth Energy Services received 284 more outperform votes than Greenfire Resources when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 100.00% of users gave Greenfire Resources an outperform vote while only 67.22% of users gave Mammoth Energy Services an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Greenfire Resources	Outperform Votes 1 100.00%	Underperform Votes No Votes
Mammoth Energy Services	Outperform Votes 285 67.22%	Underperform Votes 139 32.78%

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GFR or TUSK?

Mammoth Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenfire Resources. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenfire Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources	$775.81M	0.62	-$100.50M	$0.35	19.82
Mammoth Energy Services	$309.49M	0.53	-$3.16M	-$4.12	-0.83

Summary

Greenfire Resources beats Mammoth Energy Services on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.