Do analysts rate TUSK or GRNT?

Granite Ridge Resources has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 119.06%. Given Granite Ridge Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Granite Ridge Resources is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Granite Ridge Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media refer more to TUSK or GRNT?

In the previous week, Granite Ridge Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Granite Ridge Resources and 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Granite Ridge Resources' score of 1.36 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Mammoth Energy Services 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Granite Ridge Resources 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate TUSK or CLB?

Core Laboratories has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.37%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Core Laboratories 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Do analysts recommend TUSK or GPRK?

Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Geopark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Do analysts prefer TUSK or RNGR?

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.30%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mammoth Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Ranger Energy Services 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

$2.80 -0.08 (-2.78%)

Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.80 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 07/10/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

TUSK vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, RNGR, and NOA

Should you buy Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mammoth Energy Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mammoth Energy Services include Granite Ridge Resources (GRNT), Core Laboratories (CLB), Geopark (GPRK), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and North American Construction Group (NOA). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Granite Ridge Resources (NYSE:GRNT) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Granite Ridge Resources' net margin of -7.13%. Granite Ridge Resources' return on equity of 4.99% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Granite Ridge Resources	-7.13%	4.99%	2.65%

Granite Ridge Resources has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 119.06%. Given Granite Ridge Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Granite Ridge Resources is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Granite Ridge Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Granite Ridge Resources has a beta of 0.21, meaning that its stock price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Granite Ridge Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Granite Ridge Resources and 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Granite Ridge Resources' score of 1.36 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Granite Ridge Resources	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Granite Ridge Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Granite Ridge Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Granite Ridge Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Granite Ridge Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.05	$4.60M	$0.21	13.33
Granite Ridge Resources	$450.31M	1.34	$24.35M	-$0.25	N/A

Summary

Granite Ridge Resources beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Core Laboratories has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.37%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Core Laboratories	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.05	$4.60M	$0.21	13.33
Core Laboratories	$526.52M	0.97	$29.67M	$0.65	17.04

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Core Laboratories' net margin of 5.94%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 11.52% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Core Laboratories	5.94%	11.52%	5.32%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than Core Laboratories. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for Core Laboratories. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Core Laboratories' score of -0.35 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
Core Laboratories	Neutral

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Mammoth Energy Services on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for Geopark. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Geopark's score of 0.63 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
Geopark	Positive

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mammoth Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.05	$4.60M	$0.21	13.33
Geopark	$483.54M	1.06	$49.67M	$1.05	9.44

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Geopark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Geopark	11.74%	36.71%	8.06%

Summary

Mammoth Energy Services and Geopark tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, indicating that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to Ranger Energy Services' net margin of 2.58%. Ranger Energy Services' return on equity of 5.12% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%
Ranger Energy Services	2.58%	5.12%	3.60%

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 3 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	Positive
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.05	$4.60M	$0.21	13.33
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.70	$12.30M	$0.63	25.54

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ranger Energy Services has a consensus price target of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.30%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Ranger Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Mammoth Energy Services has a net margin of 16.46% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%
Mammoth Energy Services	16.46%	-21.46%	-16.05%

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 2 mentions for North American Construction Group. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.79 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.41	$24.22M	$0.79	17.25
Mammoth Energy Services	$44.29M	3.05	$4.60M	$0.21	13.33

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 88.99%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TUSK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Mammoth Energy Services	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$134.88M	$8.67B	$9.99B	$12.66B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.55%	10.72%	8.00%
P/E Ratio	13.33	23.24	18.81	24.53
Price / Sales	3.05	1.74	628.68	96.17
Price / Cash	N/A	12.34	37.01	60.03
Price / Book	0.52	3.08	4.12	6.38
Net Income	$4.60M	$373.98M	$4.25B	$331.87M
7 Day Performance	-10.54%	3.31%	0.78%	0.37%
1 Month Performance	-14.89%	-5.65%	-5.43%	0.59%
1 Year Performance	5.26%	61.35%	27.35%	22.26%

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services	2.9942 of 5 stars	$2.80 -2.8%	N/A	+5.3%	$134.88M	$44.29M	13.33	1,040	News Coverage Short Interest Decrease
GRNT Granite Ridge Resources	4.9143 of 5 stars	$4.46 +3.6%	$11.00 +146.9%	-20.9%	$567.15M	$450.31M	N/A	1	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
CLB Core Laboratories	1.942 of 5 stars	$10.87 -2.0%	$12.00 +10.4%	-14.1%	$511.22M	$524.73M	16.72	3,300
GPRK Geopark	2.7906 of 5 stars	$9.63 +3.0%	$11.50 +19.4%	+39.2%	$483.46M	$492.52M	9.17	460
RNGR Ranger Energy Services	4.0911 of 5 stars	$15.61 +1.7%	$20.00 +28.1%	+30.6%	$364.74M	$546.90M	24.78	2,300

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, RNGR, and NOA

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

TUSK vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, RNGR, and NOA

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Is TUSK or GRNT more profitable?

Do analysts rate TUSK or GRNT?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or GRNT?

Does the media refer more to TUSK or GRNT?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or GRNT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TUSK or GRNT?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Core Laboratories?

Do analysts rate TUSK or CLB?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or CLB?

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or CLB?

Which has better earnings & valuation, TUSK or CLB?

Is TUSK or CLB more profitable?

Does the media prefer TUSK or CLB?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Geopark?

Does the media refer more to TUSK or GPRK?

Which has more volatility & risk, TUSK or GPRK?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TUSK or GPRK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in TUSK or GPRK?

Do analysts recommend TUSK or GPRK?

Is TUSK or GPRK more profitable?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Which has more risk & volatility, TUSK or RNGR?

Is TUSK or RNGR more profitable?

Does the media prefer TUSK or RNGR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TUSK or RNGR?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or RNGR?

Do analysts prefer TUSK or RNGR?

Summary

How does Mammoth Energy Services compare to North American Construction Group?

Is NOA or TUSK more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of NOA or TUSK?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOA or TUSK?

Does the media favor NOA or TUSK?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NOA or TUSK?

Do analysts rate NOA or TUSK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TUSK vs. The Competition

Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools