Go Pro

Greenfire Resources (GFR) Competitors

Greenfire Resources logo
$6.54 +0.39 (+6.36%)
As of 03:57 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GFR vs. GPOR, BKV, TALO, MNR, and NOG

Should you buy Greenfire Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Greenfire Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Greenfire Resources include Gulfport Energy (GPOR), BKV (BKV), Talos Energy (TALO), Mach Natural Resources (MNR), and Northern Oil and Gas (NOG). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Gulfport Energy?

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and Gulfport Energy (NYSE:GPOR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 32.28% compared to Greenfire Resources' net margin of -6.36%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 21.87% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources-6.36% -3.50% -2.89%
Gulfport Energy 32.28%21.87%13.08%

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Gulfport Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Greenfire Resources currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 75.81%. Gulfport Energy has a consensus target price of $223.11, suggesting a potential upside of 33.24%. Given Greenfire Resources' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Gulfport Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Gulfport Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

Gulfport Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulfport Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources$431.77M1.90$34M-$0.28N/A
Gulfport Energy$1.38B2.14$427.81M$25.006.70

In the previous week, Gulfport Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Gulfport Energy and 3 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Gulfport Energy's score of 0.53 indicating that Greenfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gulfport Energy
7 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Gulfport Energy beats Greenfire Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to BKV?

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and BKV (NYSE:BKV) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BKV has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Greenfire Resources currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 75.81%. BKV has a consensus price target of $33.75, indicating a potential upside of 31.45%. Given Greenfire Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than BKV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
BKV
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, BKV had 8 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for BKV and 3 mentions for Greenfire Resources. BKV's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.53 indicating that BKV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BKV
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BKV has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BKV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources$431.77M1.90$34M-$0.28N/A
BKV$1.01B2.78$173.13M$2.749.37

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of BKV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BKV has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Greenfire Resources' net margin of -6.36%. BKV's return on equity of 6.68% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources-6.36% -3.50% -2.89%
BKV 17.73%6.68%3.94%

Summary

BKV beats Greenfire Resources on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Talos Energy?

Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

89.4% of Talos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Talos Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Talos Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Talos Energy and 3 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Talos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.53 indicating that Talos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Talos Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greenfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Talos Energy presently has a consensus price target of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.97%. Greenfire Resources has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 75.81%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Talos Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Talos Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Greenfire Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Talos Energy. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Talos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Talos Energy$1.78B1.46-$494.29M-$2.38N/A
Greenfire Resources$431.77M1.90$34M-$0.28N/A

Talos Energy has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -6.36% compared to Talos Energy's net margin of -20.46%. Talos Energy's return on equity of -1.94% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Talos Energy-20.46% -1.94% -0.75%
Greenfire Resources -6.36%-3.50%-2.89%

Summary

Talos Energy beats Greenfire Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Mach Natural Resources?

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and Mach Natural Resources (NYSE:MNR) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Mach Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mach Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources$431.77M1.90$34M-$0.28N/A
Mach Natural Resources$1.23B1.79$142.98M$0.5922.28

In the previous week, Mach Natural Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Mach Natural Resources and 3 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Mach Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.53 indicating that Mach Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mach Natural Resources
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mach Natural Resources has a beta of -0.31, meaning that its share price is 131% less volatile than the broader market.

Greenfire Resources presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 75.81%. Mach Natural Resources has a consensus target price of $17.60, suggesting a potential upside of 33.91%. Given Greenfire Resources' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Mach Natural Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Mach Natural Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Mach Natural Resources has a net margin of 7.44% compared to Greenfire Resources' net margin of -6.36%. Mach Natural Resources' return on equity of 15.87% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources-6.36% -3.50% -2.89%
Mach Natural Resources 7.44%15.87%8.19%

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.4% of Mach Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 87.8% of Mach Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Mach Natural Resources beats Greenfire Resources on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Northern Oil and Gas?

Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE:NOG) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -6.36% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Oil and Gas-25.35% 18.69% 6.85%
Greenfire Resources -6.36%-3.50%-2.89%

Northern Oil and Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Oil and Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Oil and Gas$2.48B1.02$38.76M-$5.18N/A
Greenfire Resources$431.77M1.90$34M-$0.28N/A

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Northern Oil and Gas currently has a consensus target price of $30.63, indicating a potential upside of 31.30%. Greenfire Resources has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 75.81%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Northern Oil and Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 10 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 3 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.26 indicating that Greenfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greenfire Resources
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Northern Oil and Gas beats Greenfire Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greenfire Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFR vs. The Competition

MetricGreenfire ResourcesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$825.83M$10.96B$9.58B$24.19B
Dividend YieldN/A11.40%11.64%3.69%
P/E Ratio-23.5216.3817.5529.09
Price / Sales1.90430.82353.5913.85
Price / Cash8.1839.3935.7919.37
Price / Book0.984.363.964.91
Net Income$34M$5.27B$4.32B$1.06B
7 Day Performance6.62%1.47%1.84%1.33%
1 Month Performance17.50%4.45%4.08%2.33%
1 Year Performance47.32%33.87%36.67%20.14%

Greenfire Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFR
Greenfire Resources
3.3987 of 5 stars
$6.54
+6.4%
$11.50
+75.8%
+38.0%$825.83M$431.77MN/A165
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
4.0867 of 5 stars
$156.56
+0.5%
$226.56
+44.7%
-2.8%$2.81B$1.42B5.35210
BKV
BKV
4.3142 of 5 stars
$23.24
-0.5%
$33.88
+45.8%
+22.8%$2.54B$1.01B7.04356
TALO
Talos Energy
3.8713 of 5 stars
$14.41
+1.0%
$18.50
+28.3%
+84.1%$2.40B$1.78BN/A440
MNR
Mach Natural Resources
3.9482 of 5 stars
$13.21
-1.1%
$18.20
+37.8%
-10.5%$2.22B$1.18B17.13N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GFR) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners