Go Pro

Greenfire Resources (GFR) Competitors

Greenfire Resources logo
$5.78 +0.20 (+3.49%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.80 +0.01 (+0.26%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GFR vs. GPOR, TALO, BKV, NOG, and VET

Should you buy Greenfire Resources stock or one of its competitors? Greenfire Resources's main competitors and comparable companies include Gulfport Energy (GPOR), Talos Energy (TALO), BKV (BKV), Northern Oil and Gas (NOG), and Vermilion Energy (VET). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Gulfport Energy?

Gulfport Energy (NYSE:GPOR) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Gulfport Energy presently has a consensus target price of $210.50, indicating a potential upside of 36.37%. Greenfire Resources has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 98.79%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Gulfport Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gulfport Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Gulfport Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gulfport Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulfport Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulfport Energy$1.42B1.92$427.81M$25.006.17
Greenfire Resources$601.85M1.21$34M-$0.28N/A

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 32.28% compared to Greenfire Resources' net margin of -6.36%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 21.87% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulfport Energy32.28% 21.87% 13.08%
Greenfire Resources -6.36%-3.50%-2.89%

In the previous week, Gulfport Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gulfport Energy and 2 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Gulfport Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.65 indicating that Gulfport Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gulfport Energy
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greenfire Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Gulfport Energy beats Greenfire Resources on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Talos Energy?

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Talos Energy has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Greenfire Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Talos Energy. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Talos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources$601.85M1.21$34M-$0.28N/A
Talos Energy$1.98B1.42-$494.29M-$2.38N/A

In the previous week, Greenfire Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Talos Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Greenfire Resources and 1 mentions for Talos Energy. Talos Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.65 indicating that Talos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Talos Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -6.36% compared to Talos Energy's net margin of -20.46%. Talos Energy's return on equity of -1.94% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources-6.36% -3.50% -2.89%
Talos Energy -20.46%-1.94%-0.75%

Greenfire Resources currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 98.79%. Talos Energy has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.24%. Given Greenfire Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Talos Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Talos Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Talos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Talos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Talos Energy beats Greenfire Resources on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to BKV?

BKV (NYSE:BKV) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

BKV currently has a consensus target price of $33.56, indicating a potential upside of 55.39%. Greenfire Resources has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 98.79%. Given Greenfire Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than BKV.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BKV
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, BKV had 7 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for BKV and 2 mentions for Greenfire Resources. BKV's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.65 indicating that BKV is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BKV
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Greenfire Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BKV has a net margin of 17.73% compared to Greenfire Resources' net margin of -6.36%. BKV's return on equity of 6.67% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BKV17.73% 6.67% 3.73%
Greenfire Resources -6.36%-3.50%-2.89%

BKV has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of BKV shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

BKV has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BKV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BKV$1.01B2.34$179.16M$2.747.88
Greenfire Resources$601.85M1.21$34M-$0.28N/A

Summary

BKV beats Greenfire Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Northern Oil and Gas?

Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE:NOG) and Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus target price of $31.00, indicating a potential upside of 29.86%. Greenfire Resources has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 98.79%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Northern Oil and Gas.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Northern Oil and Gas has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 1 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 2 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Northern Oil and Gas' score of 0.29 indicating that Greenfire Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Oil and Gas
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Greenfire Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -6.36% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Oil and Gas-25.35% 18.69% 6.85%
Greenfire Resources -6.36%-3.50%-2.89%

Northern Oil and Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Greenfire Resources. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Oil and Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Oil and Gas$2.48B1.03$38.76M-$5.18N/A
Greenfire Resources$601.85M1.21$34M-$0.28N/A

Summary

Northern Oil and Gas beats Greenfire Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Greenfire Resources compare to Vermilion Energy?

Greenfire Resources (NYSE:GFR) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Greenfire Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Greenfire Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. Greenfire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenfire Resources$601.85M1.21$34M-$0.28N/A
Vermilion Energy$1.30B1.37-$467.78M-$2.11N/A

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Greenfire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 2 mentions for Greenfire Resources. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Greenfire Resources' score of 0.65 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenfire Resources
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vermilion Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Greenfire Resources has a net margin of -6.36% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Vermilion Energy's return on equity of 5.26% beat Greenfire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenfire Resources-6.36% -3.50% -2.89%
Vermilion Energy -22.48%5.26%2.15%

88.9% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of Greenfire Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenfire Resources currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 98.79%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.48%. Given Greenfire Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Greenfire Resources is more favorable than Vermilion Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenfire Resources
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Vermilion Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Summary

Vermilion Energy beats Greenfire Resources on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Greenfire Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFR vs. The Competition

MetricGreenfire ResourcesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$701.03M$11.24B$9.80B$22.64B
Dividend YieldN/A10.24%10.70%3.73%
P/E Ratio-20.6617.3920.3927.75
Price / Sales1.21655.38533.9896.41
Price / Cash7.4340.9436.9338.88
Price / Book0.874.444.014.64
Net Income$34M$5.28B$4.35B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.57%-1.09%-1.12%-1.06%
1 Month Performance-6.69%-3.35%-3.44%-5.49%
1 Year Performance22.28%28.07%28.80%5.13%

Greenfire Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFR
Greenfire Resources
3.309 of 5 stars
$5.79
+3.5%
$11.50
+98.8%
+26.6%$701.03M$601.85MN/A197
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
3.9502 of 5 stars
$160.41
+1.2%
$217.50
+35.6%
-17.9%$2.84B$1.42B6.42245
TALO
Talos Energy
3.4871 of 5 stars
$16.57
+3.0%
$19.00
+14.7%
+77.5%$2.76B$1.78BN/A700
BKV
BKV
4.0084 of 5 stars
$23.48
+2.5%
$33.56
+42.9%
-8.3%$2.57B$1.01B8.56452
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
3.1677 of 5 stars
$23.20
+1.7%
$31.00
+33.6%
-1.0%$2.47B$2.48BN/A64

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GFR) was last updated on 10/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners