North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

$12.92 -0.39 (-2.89%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$12.91 0.00 (-0.01%)

As of 06:01 PM Eastern

NOA vs. VET, SOC, BORR, DMLP, and ACDC

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares North American Construction Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with North American Construction Group include Vermilion Energy (VET), Sable Offshore (SOC), Borr Drilling (BORR), Dorchester Minerals (DMLP), and ProFrac (ACDC). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Construction Group and 0 mentions for Vermilion Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Vermilion Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vermilion Energy	Neutral
North American Construction Group	Positive

North American Construction Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vermilion Energy	$1.92B	0.73	-$467.78M	-$3.82	N/A
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.39	$24.22M	$0.79	16.35

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vermilion Energy	-43.49%	-2.40%	-0.99%
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and North American Construction Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.16%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 99.38%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Vermilion Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vermilion Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Vermilion Energy on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Sable Offshore?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and Sable Offshore (NYSE:SOC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Sable Offshore had 11 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Sable Offshore and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Sable Offshore's score of 0.02 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Sable Offshore	Neutral

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sable Offshore has a beta of -0.22, meaning that its share price is 122% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 99.38%. Sable Offshore has a consensus price target of $19.67, suggesting a potential upside of 351.59%. Given Sable Offshore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sable Offshore is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Sable Offshore	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sable Offshore. Sable Offshore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.39	$24.22M	$0.79	16.35
Sable Offshore	N/A	N/A	-$410.16M	-$4.27	N/A

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of Sable Offshore shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Sable Offshore shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Sable Offshore's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Sable Offshore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%
Sable Offshore	N/A	-107.55%	-27.31%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Sable Offshore on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Borr Drilling?

Borr Drilling (NYSE:BORR) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Borr Drilling presently has a consensus target price of $4.88, suggesting a potential upside of 12.60%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 99.38%. Given North American Construction Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Borr Drilling.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Borr Drilling	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

Borr Drilling has a net margin of 3.13% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Borr Drilling's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Borr Drilling	3.13%	2.88%	0.92%
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%

Borr Drilling has higher revenue and earnings than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Borr Drilling, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Borr Drilling	$1.02B	1.34	$45M	$0.15	28.91
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.39	$24.22M	$0.79	16.35

83.1% of Borr Drilling shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.9% of Borr Drilling shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Borr Drilling has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Borr Drilling had 3 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Borr Drilling and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Borr Drilling's score of 0.67 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Borr Drilling	Positive
North American Construction Group	Positive

Summary

Borr Drilling beats North American Construction Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Dorchester Minerals?

Dorchester Minerals (NASDAQ:DMLP) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Dorchester Minerals has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

Dorchester Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dorchester Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dorchester Minerals	$152.83M	8.01	$55.25M	$1.39	18.26
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.39	$24.22M	$0.79	16.35

Dorchester Minerals has a net margin of 40.85% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. Dorchester Minerals' return on equity of 22.11% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dorchester Minerals	40.85%	22.11%	21.73%
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%

North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 99.38%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Dorchester Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dorchester Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

19.2% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Dorchester Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dorchester Minerals and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. Dorchester Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat North American Construction Group's score of 1.00 indicating that Dorchester Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Dorchester Minerals	Positive
North American Construction Group	Positive

Dorchester Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Dorchester Minerals pays out 136.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

Dorchester Minerals beats North American Construction Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to ProFrac?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and ProFrac (NASDAQ:ACDC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of ProFrac shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of ProFrac shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ProFrac had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ProFrac and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat ProFrac's score of 0.94 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
ProFrac	Positive

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProFrac has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus price target of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 99.38%. ProFrac has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.29%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than ProFrac.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
ProFrac	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

North American Construction Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProFrac. ProFrac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.39	$24.22M	$0.79	16.35
ProFrac	$1.94B	0.51	-$369M	-$2.55	N/A

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to ProFrac's net margin of -24.25%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat ProFrac's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%
ProFrac	-24.25%	-44.39%	-14.24%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats ProFrac on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	North American Construction Group	OIL FLD MCH&EQP Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$361.36M	$1.52B	$9.66B	$23.32B
Dividend Yield	2.60%	3.77%	10.59%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	16.35	54.82	18.41	31.66
Price / Sales	0.39	1.64	736.75	21.91
Price / Cash	2.16	8.90	37.79	25.10
Price / Book	1.15	1.63	4.11	4.81
Net Income	$24.22M	$36.19M	$4.24B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.73%	1.83%	-0.31%	1.59%
1 Month Performance	-6.21%	-3.67%	-8.04%	2.81%
1 Year Performance	-19.66%	45.02%	30.36%	21.64%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOA North American Construction Group	4.9354 of 5 stars	$12.92 -2.9%	$25.75 +99.4%	-16.9%	$361.36M	$919.14M	16.35	2,500	Short Interest Decrease
VET Vermilion Energy	3.6855 of 5 stars	$9.83 -0.4%	$15.00 +52.6%	+28.1%	$1.51B	$1.30B	N/A	720
SOC Sable Offshore	3.5767 of 5 stars	$8.94 -4.6%	$22.00 +146.1%	-86.3%	$1.45B	N/A	N/A	2	Trending News Analyst Forecast Options Volume Gap Up
BORR Borr Drilling	1.8564 of 5 stars	$4.25 -2.1%	$4.33 +1.8%	+125.3%	$1.37B	$1.02B	28.33	2,784	Analyst Forecast
DMLP Dorchester Minerals	2.6047 of 5 stars	$26.21 +1.5%	N/A	-9.4%	$1.25B	$152.83M	18.86	30	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:NOA) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. VET, SOC, BORR, DMLP, and ACDC

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Sable Offshore?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Borr Drilling?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Dorchester Minerals?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to ProFrac?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

NOA vs. VET, SOC, BORR, DMLP, and ACDC

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in VET or NOA?

Does the media prefer VET or NOA?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, VET or NOA?

Is VET or NOA more profitable?

Is VET or NOA a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, VET or NOA?

Do analysts recommend VET or NOA?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Sable Offshore?

Does the media refer more to NOA or SOC?

Which has more risk and volatility, NOA or SOC?

Do analysts rate NOA or SOC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NOA or SOC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NOA or SOC?

Is NOA or SOC more profitable?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Borr Drilling?

Do analysts recommend BORR or NOA?

Is BORR or NOA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, BORR or NOA?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BORR or NOA?

Which has more risk & volatility, BORR or NOA?

Does the media favor BORR or NOA?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to Dorchester Minerals?

Which has more volatility and risk, DMLP or NOA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, DMLP or NOA?

Is DMLP or NOA more profitable?

Do analysts rate DMLP or NOA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in DMLP or NOA?

Does the media refer more to DMLP or NOA?

Is DMLP or NOA a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does North American Construction Group compare to ProFrac?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of NOA or ACDC?

Does the media prefer NOA or ACDC?

Which has more volatility and risk, NOA or ACDC?

Do analysts rate NOA or ACDC?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NOA or ACDC?

Is NOA or ACDC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOA vs. The Competition

North American Construction Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools