Go Pro

North American Construction Group (NOA) Competitors

North American Construction Group logo
$13.62 +0.41 (+3.11%)
Closing price 07/21/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.60 -0.03 (-0.19%)
As of 07/21/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NOA vs. VET, BORR, DMLP, PDS, and DEC

Should you buy North American Construction Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares North American Construction Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with North American Construction Group include Vermilion Energy (VET), Borr Drilling (BORR), Dorchester Minerals (DMLP), Precision Drilling (PDS), and Diversified Energy (DEC). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Vermilion Energy?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 5 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for North American Construction Group and 3 mentions for Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vermilion Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -43.49%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
North American Construction Group2.64% 4.45% 1.12%
Vermilion Energy -43.49%-2.40%-0.99%

North American Construction Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group$919.14M0.41$24.22M$0.7917.24
Vermilion Energy$1.30B1.20-$467.78M-$3.82N/A

North American Construction Group currently has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 89.05%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 46.84%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Vermilion Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
North American Construction Group
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Vermilion Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -10.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. North American Construction Group has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Vermilion Energy on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Borr Drilling?

Borr Drilling (NYSE:BORR) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Borr Drilling presently has a consensus target price of $4.88, indicating a potential upside of 16.97%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, indicating a potential upside of 89.05%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Borr Drilling.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Borr Drilling
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
North American Construction Group
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Borr Drilling pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Borr Drilling pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. North American Construction Group has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. North American Construction Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.1% of Borr Drilling shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 7.9% of Borr Drilling shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 5 more articles in the media than Borr Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for North American Construction Group and 3 mentions for Borr Drilling. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Borr Drilling's score of 0.48 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Borr Drilling
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
North American Construction Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Borr Drilling has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Borr Drilling has higher revenue and earnings than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Borr Drilling, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Borr Drilling$1.05B1.25$45M$0.1527.83
North American Construction Group$919.14M0.41$24.22M$0.7917.24

Borr Drilling has a net margin of 3.13% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Borr Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Borr Drilling3.13% 2.88% 0.92%
North American Construction Group 2.64%4.45%1.12%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Borr Drilling on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Dorchester Minerals?

Dorchester Minerals (NASDAQ:DMLP) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Dorchester Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Dorchester Minerals pays out 136.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Dorchester Minerals has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 7 more articles in the media than Dorchester Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for North American Construction Group and 1 mentions for Dorchester Minerals. Dorchester Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Dorchester Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dorchester Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
North American Construction Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of $25.75, indicating a potential upside of 89.05%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Dorchester Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dorchester Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
North American Construction Group
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Dorchester Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dorchester Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dorchester Minerals$152.83M8.62$55.25M$1.3919.64
North American Construction Group$919.14M0.41$24.22M$0.7917.24

Dorchester Minerals has a net margin of 40.85% compared to North American Construction Group's net margin of 2.64%. Dorchester Minerals' return on equity of 22.11% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dorchester Minerals40.85% 22.11% 21.73%
North American Construction Group 2.64%4.45%1.12%

19.2% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.9% of Dorchester Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Dorchester Minerals on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Precision Drilling?

Precision Drilling (NYSE:PDS) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

48.9% of Precision Drilling shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Precision Drilling shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Precision Drilling currently has a consensus target price of $122.33, suggesting a potential upside of 44.65%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 89.05%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Precision Drilling.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Precision Drilling
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
North American Construction Group
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Precision Drilling has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 6 more articles in the media than Precision Drilling. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for North American Construction Group and 2 mentions for Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.58 indicating that Precision Drilling is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Precision Drilling
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
North American Construction Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

North American Construction Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Precision Drilling. Precision Drilling is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Precision Drilling$1.32B0.82$1.32M-$0.94N/A
North American Construction Group$919.14M0.41$24.22M$0.7917.24

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Precision Drilling's net margin of -0.79%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Precision Drilling's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Precision Drilling-0.79% 3.16% 1.88%
North American Construction Group 2.64%4.45%1.12%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Precision Drilling on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does North American Construction Group compare to Diversified Energy?

Diversified Energy (NYSE:DEC) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Diversified Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Diversified Energy pays out 33.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. North American Construction Group has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Diversified Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

26.5% of Diversified Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Diversified Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Diversified Energy's net margin of 0.00%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 4.45% beat Diversified Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diversified EnergyN/A N/A N/A
North American Construction Group 2.64%4.45%1.12%

Diversified Energy currently has a consensus price target of $21.67, suggesting a potential upside of 62.50%. North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 89.05%. Given North American Construction Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Diversified Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diversified Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
North American Construction Group
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Diversified Energy has a beta of -0.4, indicating that its share price is 140% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Diversified Energy has higher revenue and earnings than North American Construction Group. Diversified Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diversified Energy$1.58B0.61$341.11M$3.523.79
North American Construction Group$919.14M0.41$24.22M$0.7917.24

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 6 more articles in the media than Diversified Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for North American Construction Group and 2 mentions for Diversified Energy. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Diversified Energy's score of -0.50 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diversified Energy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
North American Construction Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Diversified Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get North American Construction Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOA vs. The Competition

MetricNorth American Construction GroupOIL FLD MCH&EQP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$368.23M$1.61B$10.13B$23.27B
Dividend Yield2.63%3.81%11.31%4.17%
P/E Ratio17.2453.3519.6430.89
Price / Sales0.411.87390.4187.29
Price / Cash2.138.6836.7931.37
Price / Book1.211.644.124.76
Net Income$24.22M$36.19M$4.25B$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.57%0.36%0.99%0.19%
1 Month Performance0.21%0.85%-0.12%1.95%
1 Year Performance-11.25%51.74%30.57%16.40%

North American Construction Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOA
North American Construction Group
4.7242 of 5 stars
$13.62
+3.1%
$25.75
+89.0%
-11.4%$368.23M$919.14M17.242,500
VET
Vermilion Energy
3.344 of 5 stars
$9.81
+0.5%
$15.00
+53.0%
+31.5%$1.49B$1.30BN/A720
BORR
Borr Drilling
3.1524 of 5 stars
$4.43
-0.8%
$4.88
+10.3%
+125.1%$1.41B$1.02B29.512,784
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
2.8317 of 5 stars
$27.12
+1.2%
N/A+0.4%$1.29B$152.83M19.5130
PDS
Precision Drilling
4.2164 of 5 stars
$82.69
-0.9%
$122.33
+47.9%
+70.8%$1.08B$1.32BN/A5,245

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:NOA) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners