S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
S&P 500   3,829.34
DOW   31,402.01
QQQ   312.83
Log in
NYSE:KRP

Kimbell Royalty Partners Competitors

$10.35
+0.14 (+1.37 %)
(As of 02/25/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$10.10
Now: $10.35
$10.80
50-Day Range
$8.30
MA: $9.10
$10.21
52-Week Range
$3.51
Now: $10.35
$12.11
Volume319,406 shs
Average Volume201,054 shs
Market Capitalization$618.18 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield7.44%
Beta2.14

Competitors

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) Vs. MTDR, BSM, CPG, SM, KOS, and CRK

Should you be buying KRP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to Kimbell Royalty Partners, including Matador Resources (MTDR), Black Stone Minerals (BSM), Crescent Point Energy (CPG), SM Energy (SM), Kosmos Energy (KOS), and Comstock Resources (CRK).

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and Matador Resources (NYSE:MTDR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Matador Resources' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
Matador Resources$983.67 million2.39$87.78 million$1.2016.80

Matador Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty Partners. Kimbell Royalty Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matador Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matador Resources has a beta of 4.8, suggesting that its share price is 380% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Kimbell Royalty Partners and Matador Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
Matador Resources051102.69

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus price target of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Matador Resources has a consensus price target of $12.45, indicating a potential downside of 38.24%. Given Kimbell Royalty Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty Partners is more favorable than Matador Resources.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of Matador Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Matador Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Matador Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
Matador Resources-51.85%4.13%1.92%

Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners beats Matador Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Black Stone Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
Black Stone Minerals$487.82 million4.23$214.37 million$1.168.03

Black Stone Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty Partners. Kimbell Royalty Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Kimbell Royalty Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Kimbell Royalty Partners pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kimbell Royalty Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Black Stone Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Kimbell Royalty Partners and Black Stone Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
Black Stone Minerals01213.00

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus price target of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 12.66%. Given Black Stone Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Black Stone Minerals is more favorable than Kimbell Royalty Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Black Stone Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
Black Stone Minerals31.42%16.85%9.18%

Summary

Black Stone Minerals beats Kimbell Royalty Partners on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and Crescent Point Energy (NYSE:CPG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Crescent Point Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
Crescent Point Energy$2.51 billion0.81$-778,700,000.00$0.547.07

Kimbell Royalty Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crescent Point Energy. Kimbell Royalty Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crescent Point Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Kimbell Royalty Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. Crescent Point Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Kimbell Royalty Partners pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crescent Point Energy pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kimbell Royalty Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Crescent Point Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility and Risk

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crescent Point Energy has a beta of 2.89, meaning that its share price is 189% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Kimbell Royalty Partners and Crescent Point Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
Crescent Point Energy04702.64

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus price target of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Crescent Point Energy has a consensus price target of $5.6111, indicating a potential upside of 46.89%. Given Crescent Point Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crescent Point Energy is more favorable than Kimbell Royalty Partners.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Crescent Point Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Crescent Point Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
Crescent Point Energy-166.19%4.03%1.85%

Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners beats Crescent Point Energy on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Kimbell Royalty Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Kimbell Royalty Partners pays out 22.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out -4.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kimbell Royalty Partners has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kimbell Royalty Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and SM Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
SM Energy-55.76%-1.40%-0.60%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of SM Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of SM Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, meaning that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 6.6, meaning that its share price is 560% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and SM Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
SM Energy$1.59 billion1.00$-187,000,000.00($0.48)-28.79

Kimbell Royalty Partners has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Kimbell Royalty Partners and SM Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
SM Energy29602.24

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus price target of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $6.7857, indicating a potential downside of 50.90%. Given Kimbell Royalty Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty Partners is more favorable than SM Energy.

Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners beats SM Energy on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and Kosmos Energy (NYSE:KOS) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Kosmos Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
Kosmos Energy-45.99%-41.86%-5.97%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Kosmos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kosmos Energy has a beta of 3.77, suggesting that its stock price is 277% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Kosmos Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
Kosmos Energy$1.51 billion0.91$-55,780,000.00($0.05)-68.00

Kosmos Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty Partners. Kosmos Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Kimbell Royalty Partners and Kosmos Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
Kosmos Energy08302.27

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus target price of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Kosmos Energy has a consensus target price of $2.5988, indicating a potential downside of 23.57%. Given Kimbell Royalty Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty Partners is more favorable than Kosmos Energy.

Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners beats Kosmos Energy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kimbell Royalty Partners (NYSE:KRP) and Comstock Resources (NYSE:CRK) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Comstock Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Kimbell Royalty Partners-165.60%3.85%2.78%
Comstock Resources-9.08%7.58%1.99%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

22.7% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kimbell Royalty Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Comstock Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Kimbell Royalty Partners has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Comstock Resources has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kimbell Royalty Partners and Comstock Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty Partners$108.22 million5.71$-69,060,000.00$3.373.07
Comstock Resources$768.69 million1.76$96.89 million$0.777.55

Comstock Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty Partners. Kimbell Royalty Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Comstock Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Kimbell Royalty Partners and Comstock Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Kimbell Royalty Partners01613.00
Comstock Resources05802.62

Kimbell Royalty Partners currently has a consensus target price of $10.8750, indicating a potential upside of 5.07%. Comstock Resources has a consensus target price of $7.0667, indicating a potential upside of 21.63%. Given Comstock Resources' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Comstock Resources is more favorable than Kimbell Royalty Partners.

Summary

Kimbell Royalty Partners beats Comstock Resources on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Kimbell Royalty Partners Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Matador Resources logo
MTDR
Matador Resources
2.0$20.16+5.6%$2.36 billion$983.67 million-4.88Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Black Stone Minerals logo
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
1.7$9.32+6.3%$2.06 billion$487.82 million17.58Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Crescent Point Energy logo
CPG
Crescent Point Energy
1.8$3.82+6.8%$2.03 billion$2.51 billion-0.83Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
SM Energy logo
SM
SM Energy
1.4$13.82+5.6%$1.59 billion$1.59 billion-2.23
Kosmos Energy logo
KOS
Kosmos Energy
1.2$3.40+1.5%$1.38 billion$1.51 billion-3.04Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Comstock Resources logo
CRK
Comstock Resources
1.4$5.81+3.4%$1.35 billion$768.69 million-11.17
Enerplus logo
ERF
Enerplus
2.2$5.00+5.0%$1.28 billion$945.62 million-1.31
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
1.0$4.00+2.5%$1.11 billion$944.33 million-1.88Earnings Announcement
Vermilion Energy logo
VET
Vermilion Energy
1.4$6.51+4.0%$1.03 billion$1.27 billion-0.94Upcoming Earnings
Callon Petroleum logo
CPE
Callon Petroleum
1.7$25.65+2.1%$1.02 billion$671.57 million-0.49Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Gap Down
PARR
Par Pacific
1.0$18.13+1.4%$978.62 million$5.40 billion-4.00Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Up
GeoPark logo
GPRK
GeoPark
1.4$16.36+0.9%$973.81 million$628.91 million-8.70Upcoming Earnings
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.2$2.94+13.3%$971.56 million$28.77 million-3.00Earnings Announcement
MNRL
Brigham Minerals
1.9$14.80+8.9%$881.15 million$101.51 million-740.00Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
Talos Energy logo
TALO
Talos Energy
1.8$10.80+0.9%$877.82 million$927.62 million-63.53Gap Down
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
1.1$3.46+6.4%$839.28 million$1.21 billion28.84Earnings Announcement
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.2$31.81+3.5%$662.89 million$313.22 million16.31
Dorchester Minerals logo
DMLP
Dorchester Minerals
1.2$14.77+0.2%$512.22 million$78.80 million18.70News Coverage
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
1.1$3.32+1.2%$470.70 million$534.90 million3.25Upcoming Earnings
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
1.5$7.20+0.7%$469.58 million$191.26 million-28.80
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.1$5.09+3.7%$406.84 million$559.41 million-1.97Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Gap Down
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$33.46+4.6%$402.16 million$837.28 million-0.49Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$21.59+0.7%$389.23 million$848.30 million17.55High Trading Volume
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$4.04+5.9%$347.82 million$68.46 million40.40Upcoming Earnings
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$2.43+15.6%$346.54 million$750,000.00-12.15Gap Up
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.65+1.5%$333.84 million$1.04 billion-2.26News Coverage
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.71+2.6%$236.59 million$415.98 million-1.77Gap Down
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$15.22+3.4%$231.34 million$471.22 million-1.35
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$12.15+1.2%$196.88 millionN/A-1.12
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$5.27+2.5%$189.34 million$266.85 million-0.36Upcoming Earnings
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$3.07+6.5%$176.39 million$84.52 million-4.09
AMPY
Amplify Energy
1.0$3.04+9.2%$114.47 million$275.58 million-0.25News Coverage
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.45+9.0%$105.19 million$278.93 million-1.27News Coverage
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$8.16+2.1%$97.41 million$288.63 million-0.31Upcoming Earnings
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.97+2.5%$94.72 million$26.69 million66.18Gap Down
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$45.70+20.7%$91.13 million$104.82 million0.00News Coverage
Gap Up
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$3.66+6.6%$82.11 million$28.97 million-2.65
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.2$5.06+1.8%$61.58 million$10.44 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
0.9$3.04+1.6%$51.68 million$9.21 million5.63
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$4.32+1.4%$49.68 million$12.99 million4.65
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.46+4.8%$48.18 million$44.96 million6.64Gap Down
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$10.16+5.8%$43.74 million$452.66 million-0.04
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$4.33+4.6%$36.39 million$129.15 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.78+7.9%$21.30 million$6.57 million0.00
Sundance Energy logo
SNDE
Sundance Energy
0.9$2.62+9.2%$18.02 million$203.58 million-4.52
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.0$0.09+11.1%$14.47 million$1.35 billion0.00Gap Up
This page was last updated on 2/26/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.