Go Pro

Kimbell Royalty (KRP) Competitors

Kimbell Royalty logo
$14.95 +0.04 (+0.27%)
Closing price 08/31/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.98 +0.03 (+0.17%)
As of 04:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

KRP vs. CHRD, FANG, COP, CVE, and DVN

Should you buy Kimbell Royalty stock or one of its competitors? Kimbell Royalty's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Cenovus Energy (CVE), and Devon Energy (DVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Chord Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Kimbell Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M5.14$90.95M$0.8417.80
Chord Energy$4.88B1.65$44.46M$14.929.86

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty27.17% 14.95% 7.41%
Chord Energy 13.42%10.18%6.24%

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.40%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $152.54, suggesting a potential upside of 3.69%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Chord Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Chord Energy and 6 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.62 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chord Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chord Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy8.58% 10.10% 6.16%
Kimbell Royalty 27.17%14.95%7.41%

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $222.21, indicating a potential upside of 10.84%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.40%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.96
Kimbell Royalty
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.74$1.66B$5.1339.08
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M5.14$90.95M$0.8417.80

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 28 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 6 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.62 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
30 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Kimbell Royalty
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.59$7.99B$7.5617.54
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M5.14$90.95M$0.8417.80

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
Kimbell Royalty 27.17%14.95%7.41%

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus price target of $140.29, indicating a potential upside of 5.78%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.40%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Kimbell Royalty
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 54 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 60 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 6 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.62 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
54 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kimbell Royalty
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Kimbell Royalty on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Cenovus Energy?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Cenovus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $36.25, indicating a potential upside of 12.68%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.40%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Kimbell Royalty
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy12.37% 21.08% 10.80%
Kimbell Royalty 27.17%14.95%7.41%

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.67$2.81B$2.6012.37
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M5.14$90.95M$0.8417.80

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 6 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.62 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Kimbell Royalty
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Devon Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 29 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Devon Energy and 6 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.62 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Devon Energy
34 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 16.67%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty27.17% 14.95% 7.41%
Devon Energy 16.67%14.93%7.91%

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M5.14$90.95M$0.8417.80
Devon Energy$17.19B3.11$2.64B$4.2111.54

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.40%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.23, indicating a potential upside of 21.93%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Kimbell Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Summary

Devon Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kimbell Royalty News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KRP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRP vs. The Competition

MetricKimbell RoyaltyOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.71B$11.26B$9.85B$24.17B
Dividend Yield12.61%11.23%11.49%3.72%
P/E Ratio17.8018.5121.6629.84
Price / Sales5.14552.46452.6820.68
Price / Cash7.3739.5935.9819.75
Price / Book2.634.494.074.82
Net Income$90.95M$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.55%0.97%1.06%-1.04%
1 Month Performance-0.17%5.48%5.20%1.56%
1 Year Performance6.95%34.39%36.19%12.92%

Kimbell Royalty Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRP
Kimbell Royalty
3.8403 of 5 stars
$14.95
+0.3%
$18.00
+20.4%
+6.9%$1.71B$333.83M17.8030
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.4879 of 5 stars
$144.67
-2.2%
$152.54
+5.4%
+33.9%$8.09B$6.32B9.70530
FANG
Diamondback Energy
4.1063 of 5 stars
$205.60
-2.4%
$222.21
+8.1%
+34.8%$59.01B$16.98B40.081,762
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.0677 of 5 stars
$133.37
-1.1%
$140.29
+5.2%
+33.9%$162.02B$61.55B17.649,900
CVE
Cenovus Energy
3.6926 of 5 stars
$32.17
-2.3%
$36.25
+12.7%
+93.4%$60.90B$35.57B12.377,211

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KRP) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners