Does the media favor KRP or CHRD?

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Chord Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.93 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kimbell Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chord Energy 5 Very Positive mention(s) 7 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to KRP or FANG?

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 35 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.72 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kimbell Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Diamondback Energy 12 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer COP or KRP?

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 14 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.50 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ConocoPhillips 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Kimbell Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor KRP or CVE?

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.94 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kimbell Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Cenovus Energy 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, DVN or KRP?

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Devon Energy $17.19B 3.04 $2.64B $4.21 11.29 Kimbell Royalty $333.83M 4.96 $90.95M $0.84 17.18

Does the media refer more to DVN or KRP?

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Devon Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.94 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Devon Energy 12 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kimbell Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Kimbell Royalty (KRP) Competitors

$14.43 -0.19 (-1.30%)

As of 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

KRP vs. CHRD, FANG, COP, CVE, and DVN

Should you buy Kimbell Royalty stock or one of its competitors? Kimbell Royalty's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Cenovus Energy (CVE), and Devon Energy (DVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil, gas & consumable fuels" industry.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Chord Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $18.25, suggesting a potential upside of 26.47%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $165.92, suggesting a potential upside of 19.00%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Chord Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Chord Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.93 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chord Energy	5 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty	27.17%	14.95%	7.41%
Chord Energy	13.42%	10.18%	6.24%

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty	$333.83M	4.96	$90.95M	$0.84	17.18
Chord Energy	$4.88B	1.56	$44.46M	$14.92	9.35

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kimbell Royalty and Chord Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Diamondback Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 8.58%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty	27.17%	14.95%	7.41%
Diamondback Energy	8.58%	10.10%	6.16%

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty	$333.83M	4.96	$90.95M	$0.84	17.18
Diamondback Energy	$15.03B	3.53	$1.66B	$5.13	36.89

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy pays out 85.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $18.25, indicating a potential upside of 26.47%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $226.33, indicating a potential upside of 19.58%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Diamondback Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	4 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.96

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 35 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 0.72 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Diamondback Energy	12 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips	14.22%	14.72%	7.77%
Kimbell Royalty	27.17%	14.95%	7.41%

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $141.24, indicating a potential upside of 10.72%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus target price of $18.25, indicating a potential upside of 26.47%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ConocoPhillips	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Kimbell Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips	$61.55B	2.49	$7.99B	$7.56	16.87
Kimbell Royalty	$333.83M	4.96	$90.95M	$0.84	17.18

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 14 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.50 indicating that Kimbell Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Kimbell Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Kimbell Royalty on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Cenovus Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and risk.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty	$333.83M	4.96	$90.95M	$0.84	17.18
Cenovus Energy	$35.57B	1.64	$2.81B	$2.60	12.15

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.94 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Cenovus Energy	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 21.08% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty	27.17%	14.95%	7.41%
Cenovus Energy	12.37%	21.08%	10.80%

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $18.25, indicating a potential upside of 26.47%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus price target of $39.00, indicating a potential upside of 23.50%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Cenovus Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy	$17.19B	3.04	$2.64B	$4.21	11.29
Kimbell Royalty	$333.83M	4.96	$90.95M	$0.84	17.18

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Devon Energy and 2 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.94 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy	12 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kimbell Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $59.76, suggesting a potential upside of 25.74%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $18.25, suggesting a potential upside of 26.47%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Devon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Devon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Kimbell Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 223.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 27.17% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 16.67%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 14.95% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Devon Energy	16.67%	14.93%	7.91%
Kimbell Royalty	27.17%	14.95%	7.41%

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kimbell Royalty News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KRP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

KRP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Kimbell Royalty	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.68B	$11.49B	$10.02B	$23.07B
Dividend Yield	12.86%	10.11%	10.59%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	17.18	17.03	19.86	24.44
Price / Sales	4.96	607.22	496.58	20.66
Price / Cash	7.23	39.79	36.08	19.33
Price / Book	2.54	4.51	4.07	4.73
Net Income	$90.95M	$5.28B	$4.35B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.80%	-1.10%	-0.95%	-0.96%
1 Month Performance	-6.18%	0.44%	-0.09%	-4.02%
1 Year Performance	8.09%	34.38%	35.21%	8.68%

Kimbell Royalty Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
KRP Kimbell Royalty	4.2772 of 5 stars	$14.43 -1.3%	$18.25 +26.5%	+9.5%	$1.68B	$333.83M	17.18	29
CHRD Chord Energy	4.5276 of 5 stars	$151.22 -0.5%	$156.79 +3.7%	+44.0%	$8.27B	$6.32B	10.14	676	Analyst Forecast
FANG Diamondback Energy	3.8334 of 5 stars	$205.72 +0.4%	$224.55 +9.2%	+37.8%	$57.40B	$15.03B	40.10	1,762	Analyst Revision
COP ConocoPhillips	3.9483 of 5 stars	$136.52 -0.6%	$141.24 +3.5%	+43.4%	$165.00B	$63.35B	18.06	9,900
CVE Cenovus Energy	4.3383 of 5 stars	$33.27 +0.5%	$39.00 +17.2%	+91.9%	$61.00B	$58.03B	12.79	7,211	Positive News High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:KRP) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Kimbell Royalty (KRP) Competitors

KRP vs. CHRD, FANG, COP, CVE, and DVN

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Chord Energy?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Diamondback Energy?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to ConocoPhillips?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Cenovus Energy?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Devon Energy?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KRP vs. The Competition

Kimbell Royalty Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Kimbell Royalty (KRP) Competitors

KRP vs. CHRD, FANG, COP, CVE, and DVN

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Chord Energy?

Do analysts recommend KRP or CHRD?

Does the media favor KRP or CHRD?

Which has more volatility & risk, KRP or CHRD?

Is KRP or CHRD more profitable?

Is KRP or CHRD a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, KRP or CHRD?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KRP or CHRD?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Diamondback Energy?

Is KRP or FANG more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, KRP or FANG?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, KRP or FANG?

Is KRP or FANG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend KRP or FANG?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of KRP or FANG?

Does the media refer more to KRP or FANG?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to ConocoPhillips?

Is COP or KRP more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, COP or KRP?

Do analysts recommend COP or KRP?

Is COP or KRP a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in COP or KRP?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, COP or KRP?

Does the media prefer COP or KRP?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Cenovus Energy?

Which has better valuation & earnings, KRP or CVE?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in KRP or CVE?

Does the media favor KRP or CVE?

Is KRP or CVE more profitable?

Do analysts recommend KRP or CVE?

Which has more volatility & risk, KRP or CVE?

Is KRP or CVE a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Devon Energy?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, DVN or KRP?

Does the media refer more to DVN or KRP?

Do analysts recommend DVN or KRP?

Is DVN or KRP a better dividend stock?

Is DVN or KRP more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in DVN or KRP?

Which has more risk & volatility, DVN or KRP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

KRP vs. The Competition

Kimbell Royalty Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools