Free Trial

Kimbell Royalty (KRP) Competitors

Kimbell Royalty logo
$15.37 +0.05 (+0.33%)
As of 10:07 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

KRP vs. CHRD, FANG, COP, CVE, and DVN

Should you buy Kimbell Royalty stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Kimbell Royalty with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Kimbell Royalty include Chord Energy (CHRD), Diamondback Energy (FANG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Cenovus Energy (CVE), and Devon Energy (DVN). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Chord Energy?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 11.70% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty22.76% 11.70% 5.78%
Chord Energy -1.25%7.06%4.39%

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $17.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $156.15, indicating a potential upside of 9.35%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Chord Energy and 9 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.24 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chord Energy
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kimbell Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$315.70M5.25$90.95M$0.4633.41
Chord Energy$4.88B1.65$44.46M-$1.13N/A

Summary

Kimbell Royalty and Chord Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Diamondback Energy?

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus price target of $218.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.18%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $17.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.77%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
5 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Kimbell Royalty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$15.03B3.74$1.66B$0.86232.45
Kimbell Royalty$315.70M5.25$90.95M$0.4633.41

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 20 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 9 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.24 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
15 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kimbell Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Kimbell Royalty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 11.70% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy1.87% 7.76% 4.67%
Kimbell Royalty 22.76%11.70%5.78%

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to ConocoPhillips?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Kimbell Royalty presently has a consensus price target of $17.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.77%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.84, suggesting a potential upside of 12.62%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than ConocoPhillips.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.14, indicating that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. Kimbell Royalty's return on equity of 11.70% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty22.76% 11.70% 5.78%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$315.70M5.25$90.95M$0.4633.41
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.33$7.99B$5.8920.03

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 21 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 9 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.24 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ConocoPhillips
19 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Kimbell Royalty on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Cenovus Energy?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Cenovus Energy's return on equity of 15.29% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy9.53% 15.29% 7.83%
Kimbell Royalty 22.76%11.70%5.78%

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.58$2.81B$1.8216.43
Kimbell Royalty$315.70M5.25$90.95M$0.4633.41

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Cenovus Energy pays out 32.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 9 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.24 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy
6 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kimbell Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $31.25, suggesting a potential upside of 4.52%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $17.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.77%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Kimbell Royalty compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B1.69$2.64B$3.5913.03
Kimbell Royalty$315.70M5.25$90.95M$0.4633.41

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 13.71%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy13.71% 15.22% 7.39%
Kimbell Royalty 22.76%11.70%5.78%

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 26 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Devon Energy and 9 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.24 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
25 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kimbell Royalty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Devon Energy currently has a consensus price target of $55.78, indicating a potential upside of 19.29%. Kimbell Royalty has a consensus price target of $17.33, indicating a potential upside of 12.77%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Kimbell Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Kimbell Royalty on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Kimbell Royalty News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for KRP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding KRP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

KRP vs. The Competition

MetricKimbell RoyaltyOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.66B$370.95M$10.49B$22.94B
Dividend Yield10.03%11.69%10.22%4.07%
P/E Ratio33.4714.1520.2828.34
Price / Sales5.251,333.351,066.0524.51
Price / Cash7.5517.6037.9325.11
Price / Book2.9130.974.384.74
Net Income$90.95M$17.93M$4.24B$1.06B
7 Day Performance5.71%2.04%1.01%-0.92%
1 Month Performance8.24%2.60%4.12%1.53%
1 Year Performance12.68%10.29%51.48%24.53%

Kimbell Royalty Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
KRP
Kimbell Royalty
3.0367 of 5 stars
$15.37
+0.3%
$17.33
+12.8%
+9.8%$1.66B$315.70M33.4730
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.6104 of 5 stars
$140.07
+2.7%
$156.15
+11.5%
+42.8%$7.68B$4.88BN/A530
FANG
Diamondback Energy
3.2444 of 5 stars
$196.15
+3.9%
$218.25
+11.3%
+37.6%$53.08B$15.03B228.081,762
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.0263 of 5 stars
$115.55
+1.5%
$133.04
+15.1%
+24.6%$138.73B$61.55B19.629,900
CVE
Cenovus Energy
4.0938 of 5 stars
$29.14
+2.6%
$29.67
+1.8%
+113.0%$53.25B$35.57B16.017,211

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:KRP) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners