Geopark (GPRK) Competitors

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.34%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.89%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy and Cenovus Energy both had 2 articles in the media. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Geopark's score of 0.33 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Suncor Energy presently has a consensus price target of $80.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.09%. Geopark has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.89%. Given Suncor Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Suncor Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Suncor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Suncor Energy and 2 mentions for Geopark. Suncor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Geopark's score of 0.33 indicating that Suncor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

67.4% of Suncor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Suncor Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Suncor Energy pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Suncor Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Suncor Energy's net margin of 15.62%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Suncor Energy's return on equity.

Geopark currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.89%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.64%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Geopark has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 2 mentions for Geopark. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Geopark's score of 0.33 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mach Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mach Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.4% of Mach Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 87.8% of Mach Natural Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.89%. Mach Natural Resources has a consensus target price of $16.33, indicating a potential upside of 59.51%. Given Mach Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mach Natural Resources is more favorable than Geopark.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Mach Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mach Natural Resources pays out 244.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Mach Natural Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Mach Natural Resources had 4 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mach Natural Resources and 2 mentions for Geopark. Mach Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Geopark's score of 0.33 indicating that Mach Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Mach Natural Resources' net margin of 7.44%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Mach Natural Resources' return on equity.

Geopark has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mach Natural Resources has a beta of -0.32, suggesting that its share price is 132% less volatile than the broader market.