Go Pro

Geopark (GPRK) Competitors

Geopark logo
$9.91 +0.09 (+0.92%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.90 -0.01 (-0.10%)
As of 07/10/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GPRK vs. CNQ, CVE, SU, XPRO, and KRP

Should you buy Geopark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Geopark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Geopark include Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Suncor Energy (SU), Expro Group (XPRO), and Kimbell Royalty (KRP). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Geopark compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Canadian Natural Resources 22.04%17.49%8.37%

Geopark currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.04%. Canadian Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $57.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.51%. Given Canadian Natural Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canadian Natural Resources is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Canadian Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 6 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 0 mentions for Geopark. Canadian Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Geopark's score of 0.63 indicating that Canadian Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Geopark Positive
Canadian Natural Resources Positive

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Canadian Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$483.54M1.06$49.67M$1.059.44
Canadian Natural Resources$31.61B2.74$7.74B$3.3512.46

Summary

Canadian Natural Resources beats Geopark on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Cenovus Energy?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Cenovus Energy 9.53%15.29%7.83%

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 0 mentions for Geopark. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Geopark's score of 0.63 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Geopark Positive
Cenovus Energy Positive

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$483.54M1.06$49.67M$1.059.44
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.38$2.81B$1.8214.49

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.04%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 33.65%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 35.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Geopark on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Suncor Energy?

Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and valuation.

Suncor Energy currently has a consensus price target of $71.67, indicating a potential upside of 21.03%. Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Suncor Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Suncor Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Suncor Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Suncor Energy and 0 mentions for Geopark. Suncor Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Geopark's score of 0.63 indicating that Suncor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Suncor Energy Positive
Geopark Positive

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Suncor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Suncor Energy$54.47B1.28$4.24B$3.8115.54
Geopark$483.54M1.06$49.67M$1.059.44

Suncor Energy has a net margin of 12.29% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Suncor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Suncor Energy12.29% 13.96% 6.99%
Geopark 11.74%36.71%8.06%

Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

67.4% of Suncor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Suncor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.73 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Suncor Energy pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Suncor Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Suncor Energy beats Geopark on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Expro Group?

Expro Group (NYSE:XPRO) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

92.1% of Expro Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Expro Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Expro Group has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expro Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Expro Group$1.61B1.09$51.69M$0.3248.30
Geopark$483.54M1.06$49.67M$1.059.44

Expro Group presently has a consensus price target of $19.33, suggesting a potential upside of 25.09%. Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Expro Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Expro Group is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Expro Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Expro Group had 1 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Expro Group and 0 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Expro Group's score of 0.50 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Expro Group Positive
Geopark Positive

Expro Group has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Expro Group's net margin of 2.32%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Expro Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Expro Group2.32% 3.91% 2.60%
Geopark 11.74%36.71%8.06%

Summary

Expro Group beats Geopark on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Kimbell Royalty?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Geopark's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty Neutral
Geopark Positive

Kimbell Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M4.74$90.95M$0.4631.95
Geopark$483.54M1.06$49.67M$1.059.44

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kimbell Royalty has a net margin of 22.76% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty22.76% 11.70% 5.78%
Geopark 11.74%36.71%8.06%

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.49%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 16.04%. Given Kimbell Royalty's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.2%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Summary

Geopark beats Kimbell Royalty on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Geopark News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GPRK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GPRK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GPRK vs. The Competition

MetricGeoparkOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$511.38M$8.13B$9.99B$23.47B
Dividend Yield0.94%4.96%10.72%4.02%
P/E Ratio9.4411.6718.8131.40
Price / Sales1.066.47628.6820.35
Price / Cash2.536.0137.0125.09
Price / Book2.091.884.124.77
Net Income$49.67M$585.47M$4.25B$1.07B
7 Day Performance9.20%1.79%0.78%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-11.43%-5.27%-5.43%0.06%
1 Year Performance39.19%10.51%27.35%17.02%

Geopark Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GPRK
Geopark
2.7906 of 5 stars
$9.91
+0.9%
$11.50
+16.0%
+39.2%$511.38M$483.54M9.44460
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources
4.8515 of 5 stars
$40.00
+1.6%
$57.00
+42.5%
+30.1%$82.86B$31.61B11.9210,750
CVE
Cenovus Energy
4.8012 of 5 stars
$24.92
+2.3%
$35.25
+41.5%
+79.8%$46.28B$35.57B13.677,211
SU
Suncor Energy
4.6736 of 5 stars
$56.09
+2.1%
$71.67
+27.8%
+47.7%$66.15B$35.29B14.7115,424
XPRO
Expro Group
3.4342 of 5 stars
$14.40
+2.7%
$19.33
+34.3%
+63.0%$1.63B$1.61B44.938,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GPRK) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners