Go Pro

Geopark (GPRK) Competitors

Geopark logo
$9.76 +0.17 (+1.77%)
Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.74 -0.02 (-0.15%)
As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GPRK vs. CNQ, CVE, SU, XPRO, and VET

Should you buy Geopark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Geopark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Geopark include Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Suncor Energy (SU), Expro Group (XPRO), and Vermilion Energy (VET). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Geopark compare to Canadian Natural Resources?

Canadian Natural Resources (NYSE:CNQ) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.81 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 54.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Canadian Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Canadian Natural Resources$31.61B3.13$7.74B$3.3514.23
Geopark$492.52M1.02$49.67M$1.059.30

74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 16 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 3 mentions for Geopark. Canadian Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Canadian Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Canadian Natural Resources
15 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Geopark
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Canadian Natural Resources22.04% 17.49% 8.37%
Geopark 11.74%36.71%8.06%

Canadian Natural Resources presently has a consensus target price of $57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.57%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Given Canadian Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Canadian Natural Resources is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Canadian Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Canadian Natural Resources beats Geopark on 18 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Cenovus Energy?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Cenovus Energy has a consensus target price of $36.25, suggesting a potential upside of 20.29%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 28 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 3 mentions for Geopark. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Geopark
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cenovus Energy
22 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$492.52M1.02$49.67M$1.059.30
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.58$2.81B$2.6011.59

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Cenovus Energy has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Cenovus Energy 12.37%21.08%10.80%

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cenovus Energy pays out 24.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Geopark on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Suncor Energy?

Suncor Energy (NYSE:SU) and Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Suncor Energy currently has a consensus price target of $71.67, suggesting a potential upside of 6.61%. Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Given Geopark's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Suncor Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Suncor Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 14 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Suncor Energy and 3 mentions for Geopark. Suncor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Suncor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Suncor Energy
12 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Geopark
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Suncor Energy pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Suncor Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

67.4% of Suncor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Suncor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Suncor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Suncor Energy$35.29B2.25$4.24B$3.8117.64
Geopark$492.52M1.02$49.67M$1.059.30

Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Suncor Energy has a net margin of 12.29% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Suncor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Suncor Energy12.29% 13.96% 6.99%
Geopark 11.74%36.71%8.06%

Summary

Suncor Energy beats Geopark on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Expro Group?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Expro Group (NYSE:XPRO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Expro Group has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.54%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Expro Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Expro Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Expro Group has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expro Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$492.52M1.02$49.67M$1.059.30
Expro Group$1.61B1.12$51.69M$0.1888.86

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Expro Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Expro Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Expro Group's net margin of 1.33%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Expro Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Expro Group 1.33%3.27%2.19%

In the previous week, Expro Group had 11 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Expro Group and 3 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Expro Group's score of 0.39 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Geopark
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Expro Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Expro Group has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Expro Group beats Geopark on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Geopark compare to Vermilion Energy?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 15 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 3 mentions for Geopark. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Geopark's score of 1.15 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Geopark
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Vermilion Energy
11 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Vermilion Energy -22.48%5.17%2.14%

Geopark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$492.52M1.02$49.67M$1.059.30
Vermilion Energy$2.01B0.91-$467.78M-$2.11N/A

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.12%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Vermilion Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Geopark beats Vermilion Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Geopark News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GPRK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GPRK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GPRK vs. The Competition

MetricGeoparkOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$495.87M$11.05B$9.63B$23.72B
Dividend Yield0.96%11.26%11.54%4.20%
P/E Ratio9.3019.5719.3030.99
Price / Sales1.02424.25348.1813.91
Price / Cash2.4639.6536.1031.71
Price / Book2.054.403.984.62
Net Income$49.67M$5.28B$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.36%-0.44%-0.76%0.36%
1 Month Performance7.45%5.12%4.28%-0.19%
1 Year Performance52.74%34.51%35.86%19.11%

Geopark Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GPRK
Geopark
3.0057 of 5 stars
$9.76
+1.8%
$11.50
+17.8%
+51.6%$495.87M$492.52M9.30460
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources
4.802 of 5 stars
$44.33
-1.0%
$57.00
+28.6%
+50.3%$92.07B$44.17B13.2410,750
CVE
Cenovus Energy
4.1284 of 5 stars
$27.49
-2.0%
$35.25
+28.2%
+97.7%$51.22B$51.89B15.137,211
SU
Suncor Energy
4.3959 of 5 stars
$63.56
-0.7%
$71.67
+12.8%
+70.4%$75.05B$35.29B16.6815,424
XPRO
Expro Group
2.436 of 5 stars
$15.75
+0.5%
$18.33
+16.4%
+47.5%$1.79B$1.58B49.448,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GPRK) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners