Geopark (GPRK) Competitors

Canadian Natural Resources presently has a consensus target price of $57.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.13%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Canadian Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Canadian Natural Resources is more favorable than Geopark.

74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 10 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 2 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Canadian Natural Resources' score of 0.90 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.83 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 54.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Canadian Natural Resources has increased its dividend for 24 consecutive years and Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.04% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 2 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Cenovus Energy's score of 1.07 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cenovus Energy pays out 35.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 9.53%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Cenovus Energy currently has a consensus price target of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 40.16%. Geopark has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Cenovus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Cenovus Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Geopark currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.75%. Suncor Energy has a consensus price target of $71.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.49%. Given Suncor Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Suncor Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Geopark has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 3 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Suncor Energy and 2 mentions for Geopark. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Suncor Energy's score of 0.31 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Suncor Energy pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Suncor Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Suncor Energy has a net margin of 12.29% compared to Geopark's net margin of 11.74%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Suncor Energy's return on equity.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Suncor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Suncor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Suncor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Geopark has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProPetro has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 13.75%. ProPetro has a consensus target price of $16.63, suggesting a potential upside of 12.47%. Given Geopark's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than ProPetro.

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.7% of ProPetro shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of ProPetro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Geopark had 1 more articles in the media than ProPetro. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Geopark and 1 mentions for ProPetro. Geopark's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat ProPetro's score of 0.35 indicating that Geopark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Geopark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProPetro. ProPetro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to ProPetro's net margin of -1.05%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat ProPetro's return on equity.