Geopark (GPRK) Competitors

In the previous week, Canadian Natural Resources had 10 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Canadian Natural Resources and 0 mentions for Geopark. Canadian Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Geopark's score of 0.00 indicating that Canadian Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Canadian Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canadian Natural Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Canadian Natural Resources has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Canadian Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.78 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Canadian Natural Resources pays out 44.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Canadian Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 24 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Canadian Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Canadian Natural Resources has a net margin of 22.78% compared to Geopark's net margin of 16.00%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Canadian Natural Resources' return on equity.

Canadian Natural Resources presently has a consensus target price of $57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.85%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.47%. Given Geopark's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Canadian Natural Resources.

74.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Canadian Natural Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 12.37%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Cenovus Energy pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Cenovus Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cenovus Energy presently has a consensus target price of $36.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.88%. Geopark has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.47%. Given Geopark's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 0 mentions for Geopark. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Geopark's score of 0.00 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Geopark has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Suncor Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Geopark. Geopark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Suncor Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Geopark presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.47%. Suncor Energy has a consensus price target of $80.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.22%. Given Geopark's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Geopark is more favorable than Suncor Energy.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Suncor Energy's net margin of 15.62%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Suncor Energy's return on equity.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Suncor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Suncor Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Suncor Energy had 22 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Suncor Energy and 0 mentions for Geopark. Suncor Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Geopark's score of 0.00 indicating that Suncor Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Suncor Energy has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Suncor Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Suncor Energy pays out 32.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Suncor Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Suncor Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Geopark currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.47%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.83%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than Geopark.

Geopark has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Geopark's return on equity of 31.33% beat Vermilion Energy's return on equity.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Geopark pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Vermilion Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 0 mentions for Geopark. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Geopark's score of 0.00 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Geopark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

68.2% of Geopark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vermilion Energy has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.