Free Trial

Epsilon Energy (EPSN) Competitors

Epsilon Energy logo
$6.16 -0.02 (-0.32%)
As of 09:32 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EPSN vs. TXO, CLB, GPRK, NOA, and RNGR

Should you buy Epsilon Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Epsilon Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Epsilon Energy include TXO Partners (TXO), Core Laboratories (CLB), Geopark (GPRK), North American Construction Group (NOA), and Ranger Energy Services (RNGR). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to TXO Partners?

TXO Partners (NYSE:TXO) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, TXO Partners had 6 more articles in the media than Epsilon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for TXO Partners and 7 mentions for Epsilon Energy. TXO Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Epsilon Energy's score of 1.00 indicating that TXO Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TXO Partners
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Epsilon Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

27.4% of TXO Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TXO Partners pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. TXO Partners pays out -78.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TXO Partners has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TXO Partners is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Epsilon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TXO Partners. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TXO Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TXO Partners$401.01M1.76-$21.62M-$1.84N/A
Epsilon Energy$51.59M3.61-$5.80M-$0.37N/A

TXO Partners has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

TXO Partners currently has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 44.94%. Given TXO Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TXO Partners is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TXO Partners
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Epsilon Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Epsilon Energy has a net margin of -13.33% compared to TXO Partners' net margin of -28.52%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat TXO Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TXO Partners-28.52% -14.13% -7.72%
Epsilon Energy -13.33%8.03%5.12%

Summary

TXO Partners beats Epsilon Energy on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Core Laboratories?

Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Core Laboratories pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Core Laboratories. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Epsilon Energy and 2 mentions for Core Laboratories. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.00 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Epsilon Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Core Laboratories
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 5.94% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 11.52% beat Epsilon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Epsilon Energy-13.33% 8.03% 5.12%
Core Laboratories 5.94%11.52%5.32%

60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Epsilon Energy$51.59M3.61-$5.80M-$0.37N/A
Core Laboratories$526.52M1.15$29.67M$0.6520.20

Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Core Laboratories has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.63%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Epsilon Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Core Laboratories
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Epsilon Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Geopark?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Epsilon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Geopark11.74% 36.71% 8.06%
Epsilon Energy -13.33%8.03%5.12%

Geopark has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.15, indicating that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Geopark presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.05%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Geopark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Epsilon Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Geopark pays out 11.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Geopark$492.52M1.01$49.67M$1.059.20
Epsilon Energy$51.59M3.61-$5.80M-$0.37N/A

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Geopark. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Epsilon Energy and 1 mentions for Geopark. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Geopark's score of 0.21 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Geopark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Epsilon Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Geopark beats Epsilon Energy on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to North American Construction Group?

Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Epsilon Energy-13.33% 8.03% 5.12%
North American Construction Group 2.64%4.45%1.12%

North American Construction Group has a consensus price target of $25.75, suggesting a potential upside of 70.59%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Epsilon Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
North American Construction Group
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Epsilon Energy$51.59M3.61-$5.80M-$0.37N/A
North American Construction Group$1.26B0.34$24.22M$0.7919.11

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 2 more articles in the media than Epsilon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for North American Construction Group and 7 mentions for Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.08 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Epsilon Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
North American Construction Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. North American Construction Group has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Epsilon Energy on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Ranger Energy Services pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ranger Energy Services has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy had 7 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Epsilon Energy and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services Neutral
Epsilon Energy Positive

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ranger Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.29%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Epsilon Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services$546.90M0.71$12.30M$0.6325.96
Epsilon Energy$51.59M3.61-$5.80M-$0.37N/A

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.58% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat Ranger Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services2.58% 5.12% 3.60%
Epsilon Energy -13.33%8.03%5.12%

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Epsilon Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Epsilon Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EPSN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EPSN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EPSN vs. The Competition

MetricEpsilon EnergyOIL IndustryEnergy SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$183.98M$17.60B$10.60B$12.29B
Dividend Yield4.05%2.27%10.21%5.30%
P/E Ratio-16.4426.0421.6925.26
Price / Sales3.615.681,032.9973.54
Price / Cash6.9518.5237.4437.27
Price / Book1.482.744.646.71
Net Income-$5.80M$788.29M$4.24B$336.00M
7 Day Performance3.01%1.93%1.01%-0.72%
1 Month Performance5.84%3.72%6.33%-0.09%
1 Year Performance-11.62%19.21%54.74%30.62%

Epsilon Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.5793 of 5 stars
$6.16
-0.3%
N/A-11.3%$183.98M$51.59MN/A9
TXO
TXO Partners
4.7341 of 5 stars
$12.52
+0.6%
$18.50
+47.8%
-14.1%$687.22M$401.01MN/A170
CLB
Core Laboratories
1.374 of 5 stars
$14.23
+3.3%
$12.50
-12.2%
+9.9%$635.21M$526.52M21.903,300
GPRK
Geopark
3.707 of 5 stars
$9.82
+0.9%
$11.50
+17.2%
+40.5%$503.11M$492.52M10.44460
NOA
North American Construction Group
4.8111 of 5 stars
$14.82
+1.9%
$24.50
+65.3%
-11.2%$413.44M$919.14M18.532,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:EPSN) was last updated on 5/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners