Do analysts recommend EPSN or GRNT?

Granite Ridge Resources has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.69%. Given Granite Ridge Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Granite Ridge Resources is more favorable than Epsilon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Epsilon Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Granite Ridge Resources 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts recommend EPSN or CLB?

Core Laboratories has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.54%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Epsilon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Epsilon Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Core Laboratories 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Do analysts recommend GPRK or EPSN?

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 24.59%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Epsilon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Geopark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Epsilon Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GPRK or EPSN?

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Geopark $492.52M 0.97 $49.67M $1.05 8.79 Epsilon Energy $51.59M 3.18 -$5.80M -$0.37 N/A

Do analysts prefer RNGR or EPSN?

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.60%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Epsilon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ranger Energy Services 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Epsilon Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Epsilon Energy (EPSN) Competitors

$5.42 +0.19 (+3.54%)

Closing price 06/26/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$5.35 -0.07 (-1.27%)

As of 06/26/2026 07:57 PM Eastern

Compare

EPSN vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, NOA, and RNGR

Should you buy Epsilon Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Epsilon Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Epsilon Energy include Granite Ridge Resources (GRNT), Core Laboratories (CLB), Geopark (GPRK), North American Construction Group (NOA), and Ranger Energy Services (RNGR). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) and Granite Ridge Resources (NYSE:GRNT) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Granite Ridge Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Granite Ridge Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Epsilon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Epsilon Energy	$51.59M	3.18	-$5.80M	-$0.37	N/A
Granite Ridge Resources	$450.31M	1.32	$24.35M	-$0.25	N/A

Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Granite Ridge Resources has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Granite Ridge Resources has a consensus target price of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 143.69%. Given Granite Ridge Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Granite Ridge Resources is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Epsilon Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Granite Ridge Resources	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Granite Ridge Resources has a net margin of -7.13% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat Granite Ridge Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Epsilon Energy	-13.33%	8.03%	5.12%
Granite Ridge Resources	-7.13%	4.99%	2.65%

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy and Epsilon Energy both had 1 articles in the media. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Granite Ridge Resources' score of 1.42 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Epsilon Energy	Very Positive
Granite Ridge Resources	Positive

Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Granite Ridge Resources pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.7%. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Granite Ridge Resources pays out -176.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Granite Ridge Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.6% of Granite Ridge Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Granite Ridge Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Granite Ridge Resources beats Epsilon Energy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Core Laboratories?

Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) and Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Core Laboratories pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.18, suggesting that its share price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Core Laboratories has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 5.94% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 11.52% beat Epsilon Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Epsilon Energy	-13.33%	8.03%	5.12%
Core Laboratories	5.94%	11.52%	5.32%

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Core Laboratories. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Epsilon Energy and 0 mentions for Core Laboratories. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.00 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Epsilon Energy	Very Positive
Core Laboratories	Neutral

Core Laboratories has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.54%. Given Core Laboratories' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Core Laboratories is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Epsilon Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Core Laboratories	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Core Laboratories shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Core Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Epsilon Energy	$51.59M	3.18	-$5.80M	-$0.37	N/A
Core Laboratories	$524.73M	0.96	$29.67M	$0.65	16.85

Summary

Core Laboratories beats Epsilon Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Geopark?

Geopark (NYSE:GPRK) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Geopark has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.18, indicating that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Geopark had 1 more articles in the media than Epsilon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Geopark and 1 mentions for Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Geopark's score of 0.00 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Geopark	Neutral
Epsilon Energy	Very Positive

Geopark has a net margin of 11.74% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Geopark's return on equity of 36.71% beat Epsilon Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Geopark	11.74%	36.71%	8.06%
Epsilon Energy	-13.33%	8.03%	5.12%

Geopark currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, suggesting a potential upside of 24.59%. Given Geopark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Geopark is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Geopark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Epsilon Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

68.2% of Geopark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Geopark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Geopark pays an annual dividend of $0.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Geopark pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Geopark has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Geopark has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Geopark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Geopark	$492.52M	0.97	$49.67M	$1.05	8.79
Epsilon Energy	$51.59M	3.18	-$5.80M	-$0.37	N/A

Summary

Geopark beats Epsilon Energy on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to North American Construction Group?

North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
North American Construction Group	$919.14M	0.41	$24.22M	$0.79	17.18
Epsilon Energy	$51.59M	3.18	-$5.80M	-$0.37	N/A

North American Construction Group presently has a consensus price target of $25.75, indicating a potential upside of 89.69%. Given North American Construction Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe North American Construction Group is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
North American Construction Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13
Epsilon Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. North American Construction Group pays out 44.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. North American Construction Group has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, North American Construction Group and North American Construction Group both had 1 articles in the media. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat North American Construction Group's score of 1.40 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
North American Construction Group	Positive
Epsilon Energy	Very Positive

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat North American Construction Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
North American Construction Group	2.64%	4.45%	1.12%
Epsilon Energy	-13.33%	8.03%	5.12%

North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its share price is 118% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Epsilon Energy on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Ranger Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Epsilon Energy. Epsilon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services	$546.90M	0.68	$12.30M	$0.63	24.88
Epsilon Energy	$51.59M	3.18	-$5.80M	-$0.37	N/A

In the previous week, Epsilon Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ranger Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Epsilon Energy and 0 mentions for Ranger Energy Services. Epsilon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Ranger Energy Services' score of 0.00 indicating that Epsilon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ranger Energy Services	Neutral
Epsilon Energy	Very Positive

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market.

Ranger Energy Services has a net margin of 2.58% compared to Epsilon Energy's net margin of -13.33%. Epsilon Energy's return on equity of 8.03% beat Ranger Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ranger Energy Services	2.58%	5.12%	3.60%
Epsilon Energy	-13.33%	8.03%	5.12%

Ranger Energy Services pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Epsilon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Ranger Energy Services pays out 38.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Epsilon Energy pays out -67.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ranger Energy Services has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Epsilon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

68.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.3% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.4% of Epsilon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.60%. Given Ranger Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ranger Energy Services is more favorable than Epsilon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ranger Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Epsilon Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats Epsilon Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Epsilon Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EPSN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EPSN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Epsilon Energy	OIL Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$163.95M	$15.48B	$9.76B	$12.18B
Dividend Yield	4.61%	2.58%	10.56%	6.24%
P/E Ratio	-14.64	24.31	18.96	24.17
Price / Sales	3.18	5.36	745.19	118.47
Price / Cash	6.10	17.28	37.72	55.62
Price / Book	1.30	2.41	4.07	6.36
Net Income	-$5.80M	$788.29M	$4.25B	$337.99M
7 Day Performance	2.27%	-0.54%	-2.44%	0.10%
1 Month Performance	-7.12%	-7.74%	-7.08%	-1.28%
1 Year Performance	-27.61%	6.49%	30.21%	27.68%

Epsilon Energy Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EPSN Epsilon Energy	0.6337 of 5 stars	$5.42 +3.5%	N/A	-27.6%	$163.95M	$51.59M	N/A	9	Positive News High Trading Volume
GRNT Granite Ridge Resources	4.897 of 5 stars	$4.57 +1.3%	$11.00 +140.7%	-31.1%	$594.85M	$450.31M	N/A	1	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade
CLB Core Laboratories	2.6509 of 5 stars	$11.70 -0.6%	$12.00 +2.6%	-6.5%	$542.56M	$526.52M	18.00	3,300	Analyst Downgrade
GPRK Geopark	2.7248 of 5 stars	$9.69 -2.0%	$11.50 +18.7%	+37.2%	$511.38M	$492.52M	9.23	460	News Coverage Positive News
NOA North American Construction Group	4.9511 of 5 stars	$13.50 -0.6%	$25.75 +90.7%	-15.8%	$380.02M	$1.26B	17.09	2,500	Positive News Short Interest Decrease

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:EPSN) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Epsilon Energy (EPSN) Competitors

EPSN vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, NOA, and RNGR

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Core Laboratories?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Geopark?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to North American Construction Group?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EPSN vs. The Competition

Epsilon Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Epsilon Energy (EPSN) Competitors

EPSN vs. GRNT, CLB, GPRK, NOA, and RNGR

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Granite Ridge Resources?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, EPSN or GRNT?

Which has more risk and volatility, EPSN or GRNT?

Do analysts recommend EPSN or GRNT?

Is EPSN or GRNT more profitable?

Does the media prefer EPSN or GRNT?

Is EPSN or GRNT a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EPSN or GRNT?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Core Laboratories?

Is EPSN or CLB a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPSN or CLB?

Is EPSN or CLB more profitable?

Does the media favor EPSN or CLB?

Do analysts recommend EPSN or CLB?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in EPSN or CLB?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, EPSN or CLB?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Geopark?

Which has more risk & volatility, GPRK or EPSN?

Does the media refer more to GPRK or EPSN?

Is GPRK or EPSN more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GPRK or EPSN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GPRK or EPSN?

Is GPRK or EPSN a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GPRK or EPSN?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to North American Construction Group?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NOA or EPSN?

Do analysts rate NOA or EPSN?

Is NOA or EPSN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NOA or EPSN?

Does the media prefer NOA or EPSN?

Is NOA or EPSN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, NOA or EPSN?

Summary

How does Epsilon Energy compare to Ranger Energy Services?

Which has better valuation & earnings, RNGR or EPSN?

Does the media prefer RNGR or EPSN?

Which has more volatility and risk, RNGR or EPSN?

Is RNGR or EPSN more profitable?

Is RNGR or EPSN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of RNGR or EPSN?

Do analysts prefer RNGR or EPSN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EPSN vs. The Competition

Epsilon Energy Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools