S&P 500   3,752.47 (-1.76%)
DOW   30,784.83 (-1.55%)
QQQ   300.72 (-2.73%)
AAPL   118.84 (-2.64%)
MSFT   224.59 (-1.31%)
FB   254.36 (-0.41%)
GOOGL   2,021.78 (+0.52%)
TSLA   603.58 (-7.60%)
AMZN   2,950.03 (-1.83%)
NVDA   485.17 (-5.28%)
BABA   228.84 (-3.14%)
CGC   30.06 (-9.57%)
GE   13.21 (-1.71%)
MU   82.11 (-7.86%)
NIO   37.84 (-8.89%)
AMD   77.05 (-4.71%)
T   28.68 (-0.14%)
F   11.68 (-4.03%)
ACB   9.47 (-9.46%)
DIS   184.53 (-4.02%)
BA   219.38 (-4.02%)
NFLX   508.15 (-2.41%)
PFE   33.93 (-1.34%)
S&P 500   3,752.47 (-1.76%)
DOW   30,784.83 (-1.55%)
QQQ   300.72 (-2.73%)
AAPL   118.84 (-2.64%)
MSFT   224.59 (-1.31%)
FB   254.36 (-0.41%)
GOOGL   2,021.78 (+0.52%)
TSLA   603.58 (-7.60%)
AMZN   2,950.03 (-1.83%)
NVDA   485.17 (-5.28%)
BABA   228.84 (-3.14%)
CGC   30.06 (-9.57%)
GE   13.21 (-1.71%)
MU   82.11 (-7.86%)
NIO   37.84 (-8.89%)
AMD   77.05 (-4.71%)
T   28.68 (-0.14%)
F   11.68 (-4.03%)
ACB   9.47 (-9.46%)
DIS   184.53 (-4.02%)
BA   219.38 (-4.02%)
NFLX   508.15 (-2.41%)
PFE   33.93 (-1.34%)
S&P 500   3,752.47 (-1.76%)
DOW   30,784.83 (-1.55%)
QQQ   300.72 (-2.73%)
AAPL   118.84 (-2.64%)
MSFT   224.59 (-1.31%)
FB   254.36 (-0.41%)
GOOGL   2,021.78 (+0.52%)
TSLA   603.58 (-7.60%)
AMZN   2,950.03 (-1.83%)
NVDA   485.17 (-5.28%)
BABA   228.84 (-3.14%)
CGC   30.06 (-9.57%)
GE   13.21 (-1.71%)
MU   82.11 (-7.86%)
NIO   37.84 (-8.89%)
AMD   77.05 (-4.71%)
T   28.68 (-0.14%)
F   11.68 (-4.03%)
ACB   9.47 (-9.46%)
DIS   184.53 (-4.02%)
BA   219.38 (-4.02%)
NFLX   508.15 (-2.41%)
PFE   33.93 (-1.34%)
S&P 500   3,752.47 (-1.76%)
DOW   30,784.83 (-1.55%)
QQQ   300.72 (-2.73%)
AAPL   118.84 (-2.64%)
MSFT   224.59 (-1.31%)
FB   254.36 (-0.41%)
GOOGL   2,021.78 (+0.52%)
TSLA   603.58 (-7.60%)
AMZN   2,950.03 (-1.83%)
NVDA   485.17 (-5.28%)
BABA   228.84 (-3.14%)
CGC   30.06 (-9.57%)
GE   13.21 (-1.71%)
MU   82.11 (-7.86%)
NIO   37.84 (-8.89%)
AMD   77.05 (-4.71%)
T   28.68 (-0.14%)
F   11.68 (-4.03%)
ACB   9.47 (-9.46%)
DIS   184.53 (-4.02%)
BA   219.38 (-4.02%)
NFLX   508.15 (-2.41%)
PFE   33.93 (-1.34%)
Log in
NYSEAMERICAN:URG

Ur-Energy Competitors

$1.00
-0.13 (-11.50 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 02:03 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.00
Now: $1.00
$1.14
50-Day Range
$0.65
MA: $0.75
$0.90
52-Week Range
$0.27
Now: $1.00
$1.57
Volume134,960 shs
Average Volume5.95 million shs
Market Capitalization$188.31 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.75

Competitors

Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) Vs. MMX, DRD, MTA, TGB, MUX, and HYMC

Should you be buying URG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ur-Energy, including Maverix Metals (MMX), DRDGOLD (DRD), Metalla Royalty & Streaming (MTA), Taseko Mines (TGB), McEwen Mining (MUX), and Hycroft Mining (HYMC).

Maverix Metals (NYSE:MMX) and Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Maverix Metals02502.71
Ur-Energy00203.00

Maverix Metals currently has a consensus price target of $7.35, indicating a potential upside of 57.39%. Ur-Energy has a consensus price target of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%. Given Maverix Metals' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Maverix Metals is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Maverix Metals16.03%4.87%3.84%
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%

Risk and Volatility

Maverix Metals has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ur-Energy has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

11.5% of Maverix Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Maverix Metals and Ur-Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maverix Metals$33.24 million19.73$-7,670,000.00$0.0677.83
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00

Maverix Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maverix Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Maverix Metals beats Ur-Energy on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

DRDGOLD (NYSE:DRD) and Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for DRDGOLD and Ur-Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
DRDGOLD00103.00
Ur-Energy00203.00

DRDGOLD currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 114.21%. Ur-Energy has a consensus price target of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%. Given DRDGOLD's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe DRDGOLD is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Profitability

This table compares DRDGOLD and Ur-Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
DRDGOLDN/AN/AN/A
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

16.0% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of DRDGOLD shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares DRDGOLD and Ur-Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DRDGOLD$269.51 million2.26$40.89 million$0.5217.08
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00

DRDGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DRDGOLD, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

DRDGOLD has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ur-Energy has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

DRDGOLD beats Ur-Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) and Metalla Royalty & Streaming (NYSEMKT:MTA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ur-Energy and Metalla Royalty & Streaming, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ur-Energy00203.00
Metalla Royalty & Streaming02002.00

Ur-Energy presently has a consensus target price of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and Metalla Royalty & Streaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%
Metalla Royalty & Streaming-162.80%-9.89%-9.01%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of Metalla Royalty & Streaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ur-Energy and Metalla Royalty & Streaming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00
Metalla Royalty & Streaming$2.70 million0.00$-4,870,000.00($0.13)N/A

Metalla Royalty & Streaming has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ur-Energy. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Metalla Royalty & Streaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ur-Energy beats Metalla Royalty & Streaming on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) and Taseko Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:TGB) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ur-Energy and Taseko Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ur-Energy00203.00
Taseko Mines02302.60

Ur-Energy presently has a consensus target price of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%. Taseko Mines has a consensus target price of $2.3250, indicating a potential upside of 46.23%. Given Taseko Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Taseko Mines is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and Taseko Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%
Taseko Mines-11.61%-12.53%-4.03%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Taseko Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Taseko Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ur-Energy and Taseko Mines' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00
Taseko Mines$249.40 million1.73$-40,230,000.00($0.21)-7.29

Ur-Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Taseko Mines. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Taseko Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Ur-Energy has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Taseko Mines has a beta of 2.59, indicating that its share price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Taseko Mines beats Ur-Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) and McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ur-Energy and McEwen Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ur-Energy00203.00
McEwen Mining00303.00

Ur-Energy presently has a consensus target price of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%. McEwen Mining has a consensus target price of $2.8333, indicating a potential upside of 176.42%. Given McEwen Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McEwen Mining is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and McEwen Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%
McEwen Mining-140.63%-16.86%-12.95%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of McEwen Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ur-Energy and McEwen Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00
McEwen Mining$117.02 million3.67$-59,750,000.00($0.17)-5.88

Ur-Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than McEwen Mining. Ur-Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McEwen Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Ur-Energy has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McEwen Mining has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

McEwen Mining beats Ur-Energy on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ur-Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:URG) and Hycroft Mining (NASDAQ:HYMC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Ur-Energy and Hycroft Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ur-Energy-32.77%-18.27%-8.51%
Hycroft MiningN/A-930.72%-15.66%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ur-Energy and Hycroft Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ur-Energy00203.00
Hycroft Mining00203.00

Ur-Energy presently has a consensus target price of $1.40, indicating a potential upside of 35.92%. Hycroft Mining has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 141.94%. Given Hycroft Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hycroft Mining is more favorable than Ur-Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.6% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Hycroft Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.0% of Ur-Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ur-Energy and Hycroft Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ur-Energy$32.26 million5.84$-8,420,000.00($0.05)-20.00
Hycroft MiningN/AN/A$2.61 millionN/AN/A

Hycroft Mining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ur-Energy.


Ur-Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Maverix Metals logo
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.7$4.67-3.4%$678.41 million$33.24 million93.40
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$8.88-6.6%$650.49 million$269.51 million17.08Gap Up
MTA
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
0.0N/AN/A$480.84 million$2.70 million0.00Analyst Report
Taseko Mines logo
TGB
Taseko Mines
1.4$1.53-7.8%$466.39 million$249.40 million-12.75Analyst Report
Gap Up
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.4$1.00-7.0%$459.14 million$117.02 million-2.56
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$6.20-12.1%$415.21 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
Northern Dynasty Minerals logo
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals
1.5$0.61-18.8%$366.47 millionN/A-5.50Gap Up
Alexco Resource logo
AXU
Alexco Resource
1.1$2.36-7.6%$357.65 million$22.01 million-18.15Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
REEMF
Rare Element Resources
0.5$3.36-4.5%$350.68 millionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Golden Star Resources logo
GSS
Golden Star Resources
1.5$2.96-2.4%$337.28 million$264.74 million-2.67Analyst Report
News Coverage
Trilogy Metals logo
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.6$2.12-5.7%$322.98 millionN/A1.98Decrease in Short Interest
Platinum Group Metals logo
PLG
Platinum Group Metals
0.5$3.61-11.1%$296.06 millionN/A-22.56Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
KOR
Corvus Gold
0.1$1.73-7.5%$235.56 millionN/A-13.31Gap Up
Corvus Gold logo
CORVF
Corvus Gold
1.1$1.86-9.1%$230.62 millionN/A-23.25News Coverage
Gap Up
Gold Resource logo
GORO
Gold Resource
1.5$2.54-6.3%$200.99 million$135.37 million-253.75Dividend Announcement
News Coverage
Comstock Mining logo
LODE
Comstock Mining
1.0$3.73-28.4%$164.97 million$180,000.00-18.65Increase in Short Interest
CMCL
Caledonia Mining
0.9$13.55-3.1%$160.91 million$75.83 million7.88
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.21-9.1%$155.53 millionN/A-10.61
Fury Gold Mines logo
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.21-9.1%$155.53 millionN/A-10.61
GDRZF
Gold Reserve
0.5$1.47-2.7%$155.05 million$1.60 million-29.40
NSRCF
NextSource Materials
0.0$0.25-7.9%$152.33 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
TRX
Tanzanian Gold
1.2$0.58-15.5%$145.40 millionN/A-6.47Gap Up
Golden Minerals logo
AUMN
Golden Minerals
1.3$0.68-11.5%$123.20 million$7.73 million-13.60Gap Up
TGMGF
Theta Gold Mines
0.0$0.27-0.7%$117.91 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
ERLFF
Entrée Resources
0.4$0.54-0.7%$100.78 millionN/A-13.41
Vista Gold logo
VGZ
Vista Gold
1.2$0.90-7.1%$99.96 millionN/A45.15Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
LONCF
Loncor Resources
0.5$0.52-5.7%$64.57 millionN/A-17.40Decrease in Short Interest
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$1.72-12.2%$48.08 million$1.86 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
NJMC
New Jersey Mining
0.6$0.37-12.2%$44.71 million$6.12 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Down
FMNJ
Franklin Mining
0.0$0.02-0.0%$37.61 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
TLRS
Timberline Resources
0.4$0.30-0.5%$34.02 millionN/A-7.44Increase in Short Interest
PTTN
Patten Energy Solutions Group
0.0$0.00-0.0%$15.93 millionN/A0.00
RIINF
Braveheart Resources
0.0$0.08-0.0%$11.68 millionN/A-3.88
AIVN
American International Ventures
0.5$0.02-0.0%$8.38 million$40,000.000.00Gap Up
MXSG
Mexus Gold US
0.5$0.03-0.0%$5.04 millionN/A0.00
MXSGD
Mexus Gold US
0.0$0.03-0.0%$3.50 millionN/A0.00
FCGD
First Colombia Gold
0.5$0.00-0.0%$1.95 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Beadell Resources logo
BDREF
Beadell Resources
0.4$0.00-0.0%$247,000.00N/A0.00
GYPHQ
Gryphon Gold
0.0$0.02-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
MPML
MPM Technologies
0.2$0.05-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
MPML
MPM Technologies
0.2$0.05-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
PDGO
Paradigm Oil and Gas
0.0$0.00-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/4/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.