Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free ATD Stock Alerts

Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD) Competitors

Alimentation Couche-Tard logo
C$81.91 -0.34 (-0.41%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

ATD vs. L, ATD.B, ATD.A, MRU, and EMP.A

Should you buy Alimentation Couche-Tard stock or one of its competitors? Alimentation Couche-Tard's main competitors and comparable companies include Loblaw Companies (L), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.B), Alimentation Couche-Tard (ATD.A), Metro (MRU), and Empire (EMP.A). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food retail" industry.

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to Loblaw Companies?

Loblaw Companies (TSE:L) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Loblaw Companies currently has a consensus price target of C$71.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.71%. Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of C$99.73, suggesting a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Loblaw Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Loblaw Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Loblaw Companies has a net margin of 4.32% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 3.95%. Loblaw Companies' return on equity of 25.25% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Loblaw Companies4.32% 25.25% 5.89%
Alimentation Couche-Tard 3.95%19.91%7.00%

19.9% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by institutional investors. 53.8% of Loblaw Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Loblaw Companies pays an annual dividend of C$0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Loblaw Companies pays out 24.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loblaw Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loblaw Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Loblaw CompaniesC$65.07B1.11C$2.23BC$2.3626.46
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B0.98C$1.79BC$3.3724.31

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 13 more articles in the media than Loblaw Companies. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 5 mentions for Loblaw Companies. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Loblaw Companies' score of 0.29 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Loblaw Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Loblaw Companies has a beta of 0.143525, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.670815, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Loblaw Companies on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.B) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alimentation Couche-Tard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B0.98C$1.79BC$3.3724.31

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 19.91% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-TardN/A N/A N/A
Alimentation Couche-Tard 3.95%19.91%7.00%

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus target price of C$99.73, indicating a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.28 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 18 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 0 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.00 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to Alimentation Couche-Tard?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD.A) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 0.00%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 19.91% beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-TardN/A N/A N/A
Alimentation Couche-Tard 3.95%19.91%7.00%

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alimentation Couche-Tard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$53.19B0.00C$3.30BC$3.10N/A
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B0.98C$1.79BC$3.3724.31

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of C$99.73, suggesting a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Alimentation Couche-Tard.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 12 more articles in the media than Alimentation Couche-Tard. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 6 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.46 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alimentation Couche-Tard
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by institutional investors. 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Alimentation Couche-Tard on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to Metro?

Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) and Metro (TSE:MRU) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Metro has a net margin of 4.00% compared to Alimentation Couche-Tard's net margin of 3.95%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 19.91% beat Metro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alimentation Couche-Tard3.95% 19.91% 7.00%
Metro 4.00%12.87%6.40%

Alimentation Couche-Tard currently has a consensus target price of C$99.73, indicating a potential upside of 21.76%. Metro has a consensus target price of C$102.33, indicating a potential upside of 14.10%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Metro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Metro
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 17 more articles in the media than Metro. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 1 mentions for Metro. Metro's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Alimentation Couche-Tard's score of 0.46 indicating that Metro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alimentation Couche-Tard Neutral
Metro Positive

Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Metro pays an annual dividend of C$1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Metro pays out 36.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.670815, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Metro has a beta of 0.178598, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of Metro shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Metro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher revenue and earnings than Metro. Metro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alimentation Couche-Tard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B0.98C$1.79BC$3.3724.31
MetroC$22.48B0.84C$957.36MC$4.2121.30

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Metro on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Alimentation Couche-Tard compare to Empire?

Empire (TSE:EMP.A) and Alimentation Couche-Tard (TSE:ATD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Alimentation Couche-Tard had 14 more articles in the media than Empire. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Alimentation Couche-Tard and 4 mentions for Empire. Alimentation Couche-Tard's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Empire's score of 0.03 indicating that Alimentation Couche-Tard is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Empire
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Alimentation Couche-Tard
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Empire has a beta of -0.204775, suggesting that its stock price is 120% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alimentation Couche-Tard has a beta of 0.670815, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Alimentation Couche-Tard has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Empire's net margin of 2.18%. Alimentation Couche-Tard's return on equity of 19.91% beat Empire's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Empire2.18% 12.94% 4.60%
Alimentation Couche-Tard 3.95%19.91%7.00%

Alimentation Couche-Tard has higher revenue and earnings than Empire. Alimentation Couche-Tard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Empire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EmpireC$31.95B0.34C$672MC$0.8655.60
Alimentation Couche-TardC$76.51B0.98C$1.79BC$3.3724.31

22.5% of Empire shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Empire shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.7% of Alimentation Couche-Tard shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Empire pays an annual dividend of C$0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays an annual dividend of C$0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Empire pays out 102.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Alimentation Couche-Tard pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Empire presently has a consensus price target of C$54.56, indicating a potential upside of 14.09%. Alimentation Couche-Tard has a consensus price target of C$99.73, indicating a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Alimentation Couche-Tard's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alimentation Couche-Tard is more favorable than Empire.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Empire
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Alimentation Couche-Tard
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Summary

Alimentation Couche-Tard beats Empire on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Alimentation Couche-Tard News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ATD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ATD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ATD vs. The Competition

Export
MetricAlimentation Couche-TardConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$75.19BC$26.94BC$15.89BC$12.53B
Dividend Yield1.03%3.50%3.21%6.25%
P/E Ratio24.3115.8913.5439.47
Price / Sales0.988.08262,948.859.83
Price / Cash25.3142.4957.2582.29
Price / Book4.483.894.594.71
Net IncomeC$1.79BC$884.06MC$836.00MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.79%-0.50%-0.77%-1.21%
1 Month Performance-10.00%-1.82%-0.22%4.89%
1 Year Performance11.32%-4.70%12.44%28.63%

Alimentation Couche-Tard Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ATD
Alimentation Couche-Tard
3.4795 of 5 stars		C$81.91
-0.4%		C$99.73
+21.8%		+18.8%C$75.19BC$76.51B24.31150,000
L
Loblaw Companies
2.8443 of 5 stars		C$60.38
-0.4%		C$71.00
+17.6%		+9.8%C$69.78BC$65.07B25.5812,000
ATD.B
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.83BC$53.19B16.01130,000
ATD.A
Alimentation Couche-Tard
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$52.79BC$53.19B15.99130,000
MRU
Metro
2.5985 of 5 stars		C$88.52
-0.6%		C$102.33
+15.6%		-8.9%C$18.52BC$22.48B21.0397,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:ATD) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel