Go Pro

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP.UN) Competitors

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners logo
C$54.90 +0.42 (+0.77%)
As of 07/16/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

BIP.UN vs. TFII, CXR, GWR, HEP, and NM

Should you buy Brookfield Infrastructure Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brookfield Infrastructure Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brookfield Infrastructure Partners include TFI International (TFII), Concordia International (CXR), Global Water Resources (GWR), Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (HEP), and Northern Empire Resources (NM). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to TFI International?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) and TFI International (TSE:TFII) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. TFI International pays an annual dividend of C$1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TFI International pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

41.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.5% of TFI International shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of TFI International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TFI International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. TFI International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure PartnersC$24.01B1.05-C$57MC$0.6683.18
TFI InternationalC$7.87B2.30C$331.18MC$3.5961.41

TFI International has a consensus target price of C$179.60, indicating a potential downside of 18.53%. Given TFI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TFI International is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
TFI International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, TFI International had 5 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for TFI International and 0 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. TFI International's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that TFI International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Neutral
TFI International Neutral

TFI International has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. TFI International's return on equity of 11.18% beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners-0.09% 5.21% 3.18%
TFI International 3.79%11.18%7.20%

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 2.120907, indicating that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TFI International has a beta of 1.767019, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

TFI International beats Brookfield Infrastructure Partners on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Concordia International?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) and Concordia International (TSE:CXR) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

41.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Concordia International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Concordia International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure PartnersC$24.01B1.05-C$57MC$0.6683.18
Concordia InternationalC$569.62M0.00C$17.20BC$351.68N/A

Concordia International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Concordia International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners-0.09% 5.21% 3.18%
Concordia International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Concordia International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Neutral
Concordia International Neutral

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Concordia International on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Global Water Resources?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) and Global Water Resources (TSE:GWR) are both utilities companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

41.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.0% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.2% of Global Water Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 2.120907, meaning that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Water Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Global Water Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure PartnersC$24.01B1.05-C$57MC$0.6683.18
Global Water ResourcesC$43.94M0.00C$5.03MC$0.30N/A

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Global Water Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Neutral
Global Water Resources Neutral

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 11.44% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Global Water Resources' return on equity of 13.24% beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners-0.09% 5.21% 3.18%
Global Water Resources 11.44%13.24%1.59%

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Water Resources pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Global Water Resources on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF?

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (TSE:HEP) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Brookfield Infrastructure Partners'average media sentiment score.

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Brookfield Infrastructure PartnersC$24.01B1.05-C$57MC$0.6683.18

41.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETFN/A N/A N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners -0.09%5.21%3.18%

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF pays an annual dividend of C$2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Northern Empire Resources?

Northern Empire Resources (CVE:NM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Northern Empire Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Brookfield Infrastructure Partners'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Northern Empire Resources Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Neutral

Northern Empire Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Northern Empire Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Empire ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners -0.09%5.21%3.18%

Northern Empire Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Northern Empire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Empire ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.26N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure PartnersC$24.01B1.05-C$57MC$0.6683.18

41.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Northern Empire Resources on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brookfield Infrastructure Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BIP.UN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIP.UN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BIP.UN vs. The Competition

MetricBrookfield Infrastructure PartnersUtilities IndustryUtilities SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$25.25BC$19.33BC$18.93BC$12.97B
Dividend Yield4.82%3.89%3.98%6.17%
P/E Ratio83.1846.9319.8336.11
Price / Sales1.0541.4333.849.29
Price / Cash10.2621.3419.3882.29
Price / Book5.172.852.424.39
Net Income-C$57M-C$1.31BC$785.96MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.06%-0.13%0.46%-1.02%
1 Month Performance3.96%-0.29%0.19%-1.25%
1 Year Performance22.93%25.30%13.11%30.07%

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BIP.UN
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners
N/AC$54.90
+0.8%
N/A+23.7%C$25.25BC$24.01B83.1844,000
TFII
TFI International
1.7305 of 5 stars
C$205.50
-2.2%
C$167.60
-18.4%
+79.9%C$16.89BC$7.87B57.2425,800
CXR
Concordia International
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.22BC$569.62M0.0722,500
GWR
Global Water Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$425.84MC$43.94M59.478,000
HEP
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
N/AC$48.22
-0.6%
N/A+31.3%C$351.14MN/AN/A400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BIP.UN) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners