Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP.UN) Competitors

C$52.65 +0.16 (+0.30%)

As of 05/14/2026 04:18 PM Eastern

BIP.UN vs. TFII, CXR, HEP, GWR, and NM

Should you buy Brookfield Infrastructure Partners stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Brookfield Infrastructure Partners with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Brookfield Infrastructure Partners include TFI International (TFII), Concordia International (CXR), Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (HEP), Global Water Resources (GWR), and Northern Empire Resources (NM). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to TFI International?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) and TFI International (TSE:TFII) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

TFI International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. TFI International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	C$24.01B	1.01	-C$57M	C$0.66	79.77
TFI International	C$7.87B	2.05	C$331.18M	C$3.59	54.57

42.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.9% of TFI International shares are held by institutional investors. 6.0% of TFI International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TFI International has a net margin of 3.79% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. TFI International's return on equity of 11.18% beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	-0.09%	5.21%	3.18%
TFI International	3.79%	11.18%	7.20%

In the previous week, TFI International had 4 more articles in the media than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for TFI International and 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. TFI International's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' score of 1.34 indicating that TFI International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TFI International	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. TFI International pays an annual dividend of C$1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TFI International pays out 51.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 1.813046, meaning that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TFI International has a beta of 1.493451, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

TFI International has a consensus price target of C$177.20, suggesting a potential downside of 9.55%. Given TFI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TFI International is more favorable than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
TFI International	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

TFI International beats Brookfield Infrastructure Partners on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Concordia International?

Concordia International (TSE:CXR) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

42.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Concordia International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and 0 mentions for Concordia International. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Concordia International's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Concordia International	Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	Positive

Concordia International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Concordia International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Concordia International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	-0.09%	5.21%	3.18%

Concordia International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Concordia International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Concordia International	C$569.62M	0.00	C$17.20B	C$351.68	N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	C$24.01B	1.01	-C$57M	C$0.66	79.77

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Concordia International on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF?

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) and Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (TSE:HEP) are both transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF pays an annual dividend of C$2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

42.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	C$24.01B	1.01	-C$57M	C$0.66	79.77
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and 0 mentions for Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	Positive
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	Neutral

Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	-0.09%	5.21%	3.18%
Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Global Water Resources?

Global Water Resources (TSE:GWR) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) are both utilities companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Global Water Resources pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Global Water Resources pays out 133.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners pays out 264.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Global Water Resources has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 1.813046, indicating that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market.

30.0% of Global Water Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.5% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 53.2% of Global Water Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Water Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Global Water Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Water Resources	C$43.94M	0.00	C$5.03M	C$0.30	N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	C$24.01B	1.01	-C$57M	C$0.66	79.77

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Global Water Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and 0 mentions for Global Water Resources. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Global Water Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Global Water Resources	Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	Positive

Global Water Resources has a net margin of 11.44% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Global Water Resources' return on equity of 13.24% beat Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Water Resources	11.44%	13.24%	1.59%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	-0.09%	5.21%	3.18%

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Global Water Resources on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Northern Empire Resources?

Northern Empire Resources (CVE:NM) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (TSE:BIP.UN) are both transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Northern Empire Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Northern Empire Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Northern Empire Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.26	N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	C$24.01B	1.01	-C$57M	C$0.66	79.77

In the previous week, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners had 1 more articles in the media than Northern Empire Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners and 0 mentions for Northern Empire Resources. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Northern Empire Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Northern Empire Resources	Neutral
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	Positive

Northern Empire Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margin of -0.09%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' return on equity of 5.21% beat Northern Empire Resources' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Northern Empire Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	-0.09%	5.21%	3.18%

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Northern Empire Resources on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Brookfield Infrastructure Partners News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIP.UN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BIP.UN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	Utilities Industry	Utilities Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$24.15B	C$19.37B	C$19.16B	C$12.00B
Dividend Yield	4.72%	4.11%	3.77%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	79.77	46.63	22.57	37.27
Price / Sales	1.01	42.01	33.20	11.89
Price / Cash	10.26	24.23	19.47	82.42
Price / Book	4.96	3.10	2.35	4.62
Net Income	-C$57M	-C$1.31B	C$777.56M	C$299.62M
7 Day Performance	4.59%	-1.08%	0.00%	0.30%
1 Month Performance	3.74%	-2.57%	-1.32%	1.39%
1 Year Performance	16.10%	50.66%	21.20%	57.83%

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BIP.UN Brookfield Infrastructure Partners	N/A	C$52.65 +0.3%	N/A	+17.5%	C$24.15B	C$24.01B	79.77	44,000
TFII TFI International	2.5601 of 5 stars	C$184.11 -0.5%	C$177.20 -3.8%	+52.7%	C$15.13B	C$7.87B	51.28	25,800	News Coverage Insider Trade
CXR Concordia International	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.22B	C$569.62M	0.07	22,500	High Trading Volume
HEP Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	N/A	C$58.98 +3.1%	N/A	+83.0%	C$429.49M	N/A	N/A	400	High Trading Volume
GWR Global Water Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$425.84M	C$43.94M	59.47	8,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:BIP.UN) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP.UN) Competitors

BIP.UN vs. TFII, CXR, HEP, GWR, and NM

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to TFI International?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Concordia International?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Global Water Resources?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Northern Empire Resources?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIP.UN vs. The Competition

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (BIP.UN) Competitors

BIP.UN vs. TFII, CXR, HEP, GWR, and NM

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to TFI International?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, BIP.UN or TFII?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BIP.UN or TFII?

Is BIP.UN or TFII more profitable?

Does the media refer more to BIP.UN or TFII?

Is BIP.UN or TFII a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, BIP.UN or TFII?

Do analysts recommend BIP.UN or TFII?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Concordia International?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CXR or BIP.UN?

Does the media refer more to CXR or BIP.UN?

Is CXR or BIP.UN more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CXR or BIP.UN?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Horizons Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF?

Is BIP.UN or HEP a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in BIP.UN or HEP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BIP.UN or HEP?

Does the media favor BIP.UN or HEP?

Is BIP.UN or HEP more profitable?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Global Water Resources?

Is GWR or BIP.UN a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GWR or BIP.UN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GWR or BIP.UN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GWR or BIP.UN?

Does the media favor GWR or BIP.UN?

Is GWR or BIP.UN more profitable?

Summary

How does Brookfield Infrastructure Partners compare to Northern Empire Resources?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NM or BIP.UN?

Does the media prefer NM or BIP.UN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in NM or BIP.UN?

Is NM or BIP.UN more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BIP.UN vs. The Competition

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools