TSE:FAP

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment Competitors

C$2.90

0.00 (0.00 %)

(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

C$2.89

▼

C$2.93

50-Day Range

C$2.90

▼

C$3.05

52-Week Range

C$2.73

▼

C$3.36

Volume134,346 shs

Average Volume49,195 shs

Market CapitalizationC$147.16 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend Yield9.31%

BetaN/A

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) Vs. AGF.B, GCG.A, DFN, GS, WED, and LBS

Should you be buying FAP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "asset management" are considered alternatives and competitors to Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment, including AGF Management (AGF.B), Guardian Capital Group (GCG.A), Dividend 15 Split (DFN), Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS), The Westaim (WED), and Life & Banc Split (LBS).

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. AGF Management Stock

AGF Management (TSE:AGF.B) and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares AGF Management and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AGF Management	C$440.05 million	1.21	C$156.23 million	C$2.22	3.40
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55

AGF Management has higher revenue and earnings than Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGF Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

AGF Management pays an annual dividend of C$0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. AGF Management pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares AGF Management and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AGF Management	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for AGF Management and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AGF Management	0	2	1	1	2.75
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A

AGF Management presently has a consensus target price of C$8.30, suggesting a potential upside of 9.79%. Given AGF Management's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe AGF Management is more favorable than Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment.

Summary

AGF Management beats Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. Guardian Capital Group Stock

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) and Guardian Capital Group (TSE:GCG.A) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Guardian Capital Group pays an annual dividend of C$0.63 per share. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Guardian Capital Group pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Guardian Capital Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A
Guardian Capital Group	0	0	0	0	N/A

Guardian Capital Group has a consensus target price of C$40.00, suggesting a potential upside of ∞. Given Guardian Capital Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Guardian Capital Group is more favorable than Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Guardian Capital Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55
Guardian Capital Group	C$230.58 million	0.00	C$43.56 million	C$1.57	N/A

Guardian Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Guardian Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Guardian Capital Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A
Guardian Capital Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Guardian Capital Group beats Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. Dividend 15 Split Stock

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) and Dividend 15 Split (TSE:DFN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Dividend 15 Split pays an annual dividend of C$0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dividend 15 Split pays out -45.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Dividend 15 Split, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A
Dividend 15 Split	0	0	0	0	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Dividend 15 Split's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55
Dividend 15 Split	C$-56,835,800.00	-9.14	C$-113,892,574.00	C($1.77)	-4.56

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Dividend 15 Split. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dividend 15 Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Dividend 15 Split's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A
Dividend 15 Split	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment beats Dividend 15 Split on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. Gluskin Sheff + Associates Stock

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Gluskin Sheff + Associates, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0	0	0	0	N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Gluskin Sheff + Associates' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$113.89 million	0.00	C$25.29 million	C$0.81	N/A

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment and Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$1.00 per share. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 123.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. The Westaim Stock

The Westaim (CVE:WED) and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for The Westaim and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
The Westaim	0	0	0	0	N/A
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Westaim and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
The Westaim	C$-26,025,000.00	-14.30	C$-41,810,604.00	C($0.29)	-8.90
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment has higher revenue and earnings than The Westaim. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Westaim, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares The Westaim and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
The Westaim	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

The Westaim pays an annual dividend of C$0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. The Westaim pays out -61.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment beats The Westaim on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment vs. Life & Banc Split Stock

Life & Banc Split (TSE:LBS) and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment (TSE:FAP) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Life & Banc Split and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Life & Banc Split	0	0	0	0	N/A
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	0	0	0	0	N/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Life & Banc Split and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Life & Banc Split	C$-10,993,965.00	-25.35	C$-32,113,760.00	C($1.06)	-8.68
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	C$2.21 million	66.54	C$-11,722,095.00	C($0.23)	-12.55

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Life & Banc Split. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Life & Banc Split, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Life & Banc Split and Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Life & Banc Split	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment	N/A	N/A	N/A

Dividends

Life & Banc Split pays an annual dividend of C$0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Life & Banc Split pays out -37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment pays out -116.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Aberdeen Asia-Pacific Income Investment beats Life & Banc Split on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.