Go Pro

Fortuna Silver Mines (FVI) Competitors

Fortuna Silver Mines logo
C$16.43 -0.77 (-4.48%)
As of 09/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

FVI vs. EQX, CGG, IMG, ELD, and DPM

Should you buy Fortuna Silver Mines stock or one of its competitors? Fortuna Silver Mines's main competitors and comparable companies include Equinox Gold (EQX), China Gold International Resources (CGG), IAMGOLD (IMG), Eldorado Gold (ELD), and Dundee Precious Metals (DPM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "gold" industry.

How does Fortuna Silver Mines compare to Equinox Gold?

Fortuna Silver Mines (TSE:FVI) and Equinox Gold (TSE:EQX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 2.800612, meaning that its share price is 180% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equinox Gold has a beta of 3.350231, meaning that its share price is 235% more volatile than the broader market.

Fortuna Silver Mines presently has a consensus target price of C$15.75, suggesting a potential downside of 4.14%. Equinox Gold has a consensus target price of C$24.50, suggesting a potential upside of 44.03%. Given Equinox Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Equinox Gold is more favorable than Fortuna Silver Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Equinox Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17

Fortuna Silver Mines has a net margin of 32.02% compared to Equinox Gold's net margin of 26.36%. Fortuna Silver Mines' return on equity of 22.20% beat Equinox Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fortuna Silver Mines32.02% 22.20% 3.61%
Equinox Gold 26.36%13.85%0.47%

43.6% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.0% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.4% of Equinox Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Equinox Gold had 4 more articles in the media than Fortuna Silver Mines. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Equinox Gold and 1 mentions for Fortuna Silver Mines. Equinox Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Fortuna Silver Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Equinox Gold is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Equinox Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Equinox Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Silver Mines. Fortuna Silver Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equinox Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fortuna Silver MinesC$1.18B4.11C$17.54MC$1.1813.92
Equinox GoldC$2.90B6.85C$214.45MC$1.0815.75

Summary

Equinox Gold beats Fortuna Silver Mines on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Silver Mines compare to China Gold International Resources?

China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) and Fortuna Silver Mines (TSE:FVI) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

China Gold International Resources has a net margin of 46.95% compared to Fortuna Silver Mines' net margin of 32.02%. China Gold International Resources' return on equity of 32.43% beat Fortuna Silver Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Gold International Resources46.95% 32.43% -1.06%
Fortuna Silver Mines 32.02%22.20%3.61%

In the previous week, Fortuna Silver Mines had 1 more articles in the media than China Gold International Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fortuna Silver Mines and 0 mentions for China Gold International Resources. China Gold International Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fortuna Silver Mines'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Gold International Resources Neutral
Fortuna Silver Mines Neutral

Fortuna Silver Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than China Gold International Resources. Fortuna Silver Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Gold International ResourcesC$1.64B9.84-C$15.76MC$1.9520.90
Fortuna Silver MinesC$1.18B4.11C$17.54MC$1.1813.92

China Gold International Resources has a beta of 2.086641, meaning that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 2.800612, meaning that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the broader market.

22.1% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of China Gold International Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortuna Silver Mines has a consensus price target of C$15.75, indicating a potential downside of 4.14%. Given Fortuna Silver Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fortuna Silver Mines is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Gold International Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Fortuna Silver Mines beats China Gold International Resources on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Silver Mines compare to IAMGOLD?

IAMGOLD (TSE:IMG) and Fortuna Silver Mines (TSE:FVI) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Fortuna Silver Mines has a net margin of 32.02% compared to IAMGOLD's net margin of 31.46%. IAMGOLD's return on equity of 28.08% beat Fortuna Silver Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IAMGOLD31.46% 28.08% 2.54%
Fortuna Silver Mines 32.02%22.20%3.61%

In the previous week, IAMGOLD had 2 more articles in the media than Fortuna Silver Mines. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for IAMGOLD and 1 mentions for Fortuna Silver Mines. IAMGOLD's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Fortuna Silver Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that IAMGOLD is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IAMGOLD
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

55.7% of IAMGOLD shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of IAMGOLD shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

IAMGOLD presently has a consensus target price of C$33.42, suggesting a potential upside of 19.13%. Fortuna Silver Mines has a consensus target price of C$15.75, suggesting a potential downside of 4.14%. Given IAMGOLD's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe IAMGOLD is more favorable than Fortuna Silver Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IAMGOLD
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

IAMGOLD has a beta of 2.326624, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 2.800612, suggesting that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the broader market.

IAMGOLD has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Silver Mines. Fortuna Silver Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IAMGOLD, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IAMGOLDC$3.68B4.35C$557.06MC$1.9814.17
Fortuna Silver MinesC$1.18B4.11C$17.54MC$1.1813.92

Summary

IAMGOLD beats Fortuna Silver Mines on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Silver Mines compare to Eldorado Gold?

Eldorado Gold (TSE:ELD) and Fortuna Silver Mines (TSE:FVI) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Eldorado Gold currently has a consensus price target of C$61.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.26%. Fortuna Silver Mines has a consensus price target of C$15.75, indicating a potential downside of 4.14%. Given Eldorado Gold's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Eldorado Gold is more favorable than Fortuna Silver Mines.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eldorado Gold
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Eldorado Gold has a beta of 1.687208, suggesting that its stock price is 69% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 2.800612, suggesting that its stock price is 180% more volatile than the broader market.

Eldorado Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Silver Mines. Fortuna Silver Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eldorado Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eldorado GoldC$2.02B7.82C$194.94MC$2.8121.53
Fortuna Silver MinesC$1.18B4.11C$17.54MC$1.1813.92

Fortuna Silver Mines has a net margin of 32.02% compared to Eldorado Gold's net margin of 29.89%. Fortuna Silver Mines' return on equity of 22.20% beat Eldorado Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eldorado Gold29.89% 12.38% 3.27%
Fortuna Silver Mines 32.02%22.20%3.61%

In the previous week, Eldorado Gold had 7 more articles in the media than Fortuna Silver Mines. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Eldorado Gold and 1 mentions for Fortuna Silver Mines. Eldorado Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Fortuna Silver Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Eldorado Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eldorado Gold
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

65.2% of Eldorado Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Eldorado Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Eldorado Gold beats Fortuna Silver Mines on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fortuna Silver Mines compare to Dundee Precious Metals?

Dundee Precious Metals (TSE:DPM) and Fortuna Silver Mines (TSE:FVI) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

47.9% of Dundee Precious Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 43.6% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Dundee Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Fortuna Silver Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dundee Precious Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$56.11, suggesting a potential downside of 11.33%. Fortuna Silver Mines has a consensus price target of C$15.75, suggesting a potential downside of 4.14%. Given Fortuna Silver Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fortuna Silver Mines is more favorable than Dundee Precious Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dundee Precious Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Dundee Precious Metals and Dundee Precious Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Dundee Precious Metals' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Fortuna Silver Mines' score of 0.00 indicating that Dundee Precious Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dundee Precious Metals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fortuna Silver Mines
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Dundee Precious Metals has a net margin of 51.68% compared to Fortuna Silver Mines' net margin of 32.02%. Dundee Precious Metals' return on equity of 24.39% beat Fortuna Silver Mines' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dundee Precious Metals51.68% 24.39% 9.22%
Fortuna Silver Mines 32.02%22.20%3.61%

Dundee Precious Metals has a beta of 1.494137, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortuna Silver Mines has a beta of 2.800612, suggesting that its share price is 180% more volatile than the broader market.

Dundee Precious Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Fortuna Silver Mines. Fortuna Silver Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dundee Precious Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dundee Precious MetalsC$1.29B10.75C$139.24MC$3.0920.48
Fortuna Silver MinesC$1.18B4.11C$17.54MC$1.1813.92

Summary

Dundee Precious Metals beats Fortuna Silver Mines on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fortuna Silver Mines News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FVI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FVI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FVI vs. The Competition

MetricFortuna Silver MinesMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$5.09BC$3.96BC$4.94BC$12.84B
Dividend Yield6.25%5.21%4.71%6.27%
P/E Ratio13.9225.7526.0940.36
Price / Sales4.1130,482.1818,089.919.35
Price / Cash16.5629.4726.8982.29
Price / Book2.7212.2010.144.69
Net IncomeC$17.54MC$127.53MC$158.14MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.73%0.83%0.51%0.01%
1 Month Performance-2.78%-2.28%-2.18%-2.14%
1 Year Performance40.31%30.31%25.42%20.17%

Fortuna Silver Mines Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FVI
Fortuna Silver Mines
0.9978 of 5 stars
C$16.43
-4.5%
C$15.75
-4.1%
+39.1%C$5.09BC$1.18B13.921,232
EQX
Equinox Gold
3.4246 of 5 stars
C$16.17
-1.9%
C$24.50
+51.5%
+14.2%C$18.88BC$2.90B14.973,692
CGG
China Gold International Resources
N/AC$45.11
+1.0%
N/A+70.2%C$17.88BC$1.64B23.102,351
IMG
IAMGOLD
3.0118 of 5 stars
C$27.24
-0.1%
C$31.07
+14.1%
+68.8%C$15.55BC$3.68B13.763,800
ELD
Eldorado Gold
2.5989 of 5 stars
C$56.73
+1.4%
C$59.38
+4.7%
+52.7%C$14.80BC$2.02B20.198,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FVI) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners