Go Pro
→ Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside) (From InvestorPlace) (Ad)tc pixel Free HWO Stock Alerts

High Arctic Energy Services (HWO) Competitors

High Arctic Energy Services logo
C$0.92 -0.05 (-5.15%)
As of 08/14/2026 03:33 PM Eastern
Compare

HWO vs. SFD, CSM, SEW, WEE, and HTC

Should you buy High Arctic Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? High Arctic Energy Services's main competitors and comparable companies include NXT Energy Solutions (SFD), ClearStream Energy Services (CSM), Seaway Energy Services (SEW), Wavefront Technology Solutions (WEE), and HTC Purenergy (HTC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to NXT Energy Solutions?

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and NXT Energy Solutions (TSE:SFD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to NXT Energy Solutions' net margin of -341.83%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat NXT Energy Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services14.05% 7.22% 0.72%
NXT Energy Solutions -341.83%-62.62%-21.54%

In the previous week, High Arctic Energy Services' average media sentiment score of -1.00 beat NXT Energy Solutions' score of -1.00 indicating that High Arctic Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Arctic Energy Services Negative
NXT Energy Solutions Negative

High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.081726, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NXT Energy Solutions has a beta of -0.265241, meaning that its share price is 127% less volatile than the broader market.

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than NXT Energy Solutions. NXT Energy Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.04M1.06C$29.06MC$0.118.36
NXT Energy SolutionsC$2.34M19.93-C$6.77M-C$0.07N/A

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of NXT Energy Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.7% of NXT Energy Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats NXT Energy Solutions on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to ClearStream Energy Services?

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and ClearStream Energy Services (TSE:CSM) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

High Arctic Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ClearStream Energy Services. ClearStream Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.04M1.06C$29.06MC$0.118.36
ClearStream Energy ServicesC$556.88M0.00-C$9.46M-C$0.09N/A

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to ClearStream Energy Services' net margin of 0.00%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat ClearStream Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services14.05% 7.22% 0.72%
ClearStream Energy Services N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, ClearStream Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat High Arctic Energy Services' score of -1.00 indicating that ClearStream Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Arctic Energy Services Negative
ClearStream Energy Services Neutral

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats ClearStream Energy Services on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to Seaway Energy Services?

Seaway Energy Services (CVE:SEW) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Seaway Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat High Arctic Energy Services' score of -1.00 indicating that Seaway Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seaway Energy Services Neutral
High Arctic Energy Services Negative

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Seaway Energy Services' net margin of 0.00%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat Seaway Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seaway Energy ServicesN/A N/A N/A
High Arctic Energy Services 14.05%7.22%0.72%

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Seaway Energy Services. Seaway Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seaway Energy ServicesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.05N/A
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.04M1.06C$29.06MC$0.118.36

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Seaway Energy Services on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to Wavefront Technology Solutions?

Wavefront Technology Solutions (CVE:WEE) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Wavefront Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.081726, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wavefront Technology Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat High Arctic Energy Services' score of -1.00 indicating that Wavefront Technology Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wavefront Technology Solutions Neutral
High Arctic Energy Services Negative

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Wavefront Technology Solutions' net margin of -95.78%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat Wavefront Technology Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wavefront Technology Solutions-95.78% -152.54% -47.60%
High Arctic Energy Services 14.05%7.22%0.72%

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wavefront Technology Solutions. Wavefront Technology Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wavefront Technology SolutionsC$1.84M0.99-C$1.76M-C$0.02N/A
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.04M1.06C$29.06MC$0.118.36

0.2% of Wavefront Technology Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.0% of Wavefront Technology Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Wavefront Technology Solutions on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to HTC Purenergy?

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and HTC Purenergy (CVE:HTC) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.081726, indicating that its stock price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HTC Purenergy has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than HTC Purenergy. HTC Purenergy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.04M1.06C$29.06MC$0.118.36
HTC PurenergyC$599.26K1.73-C$1.91M-C$0.01N/A

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.2% of HTC Purenergy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HTC Purenergy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat High Arctic Energy Services' score of -1.00 indicating that HTC Purenergy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Arctic Energy Services Negative
HTC Purenergy Neutral

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to HTC Purenergy's net margin of 0.00%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat HTC Purenergy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services14.05% 7.22% 0.72%
HTC Purenergy N/A N/A -9.81%

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats HTC Purenergy on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get High Arctic Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

HWO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHigh Arctic Energy ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$11.68MC$3.66BC$9.69BC$12.58B
Dividend Yield557.80%13.38%11.59%6.20%
P/E Ratio8.3644.8220.2430.69
Price / Sales1.0631.49393.489.72
Price / Cash3.1321.0236.0782.29
Price / Book0.512.282.954.60
Net IncomeC$29.06MC$61.74MC$4.32BC$299.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/A5.72%3.54%0.93%
1 Month Performance4.55%5.84%4.81%4.00%
1 Year Performance9.52%58.68%39.22%35.63%

High Arctic Energy Services Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWO
High Arctic Energy Services
N/AC$0.92
-5.2%		N/A+13.6%C$11.68MC$11.04M8.36202
SFD
NXT Energy Solutions
N/AC$0.36
flat		N/AN/AC$43.02MC$4.00MN/A10
CSM
ClearStream Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$4.95MC$556.88MN/A3,300
SEW
Seaway Energy Services
N/AC$0.17
+6.5%		N/A+0.0%C$4.59MN/AN/AN/A
WEE
Wavefront Technology Solutions
N/AC$0.02
flat		N/A+0.0%C$1.82MC$1.84MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:HWO) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel