TSE:HWO

High Arctic Energy Services Competitors

C$1.23

0.00 (0.00 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 03:42 PM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

C$1.20

Now: C$1.23▼

C$1.25

50-Day Range

C$1.17

MA: C$1.36▼

C$1.55

52-Week Range

C$0.49

Now: C$1.23▼

C$1.63

Volume18,485 shs

Average Volume36,019 shs

Market CapitalizationC$59.97 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend Yield34.74%

BetaN/A

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) Vs. TOT, SDY, PSD, STEP, CWC, and ESN

Should you be buying HWO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas equipment & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to High Arctic Energy Services, including Total Energy Services (TOT), Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) (SDY), Pulse Seismic (PSD), STEP Energy Services (STEP), CWC Energy Services (CWC), and Essential Energy Services (ESN).

High Arctic Energy Services vs. Total Energy Services Stock

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and Total Energy Services (TSE:TOT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares High Arctic Energy Services and Total Energy Services' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35
Total Energy Services	C$365.75 million	0.50	C$-30,655,080.00	C($0.68)	-5.93

High Arctic Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Total Energy Services. Total Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares High Arctic Energy Services and Total Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A
Total Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for High Arctic Energy Services and Total Energy Services, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00
Total Energy Services	0	0	3	0	3.00

High Arctic Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 42.28%. Total Energy Services has a consensus price target of C$4.60, suggesting a potential upside of 14.14%. Given High Arctic Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe High Arctic Energy Services is more favorable than Total Energy Services.

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Total Energy Services on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

High Arctic Energy Services vs. Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) Stock

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) (TSE:SDY) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares High Arctic Energy Services and Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for High Arctic Energy Services and Strad Inc. (SDY.TO), as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	0	0	0	0	N/A

High Arctic Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 42.28%. Given High Arctic Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe High Arctic Energy Services is more favorable than Strad Inc. (SDY.TO).

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares High Arctic Energy Services and Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)'s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35
Strad Inc. (SDY.TO)	C$130.24 million	1.00	C$1.03 million	C$0.02	125.26

Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) has higher revenue and earnings than High Arctic Energy Services. High Arctic Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strad Inc. (SDY.TO), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Strad Inc. (SDY.TO) beats High Arctic Energy Services on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

High Arctic Energy Services vs. Pulse Seismic Stock

Pulse Seismic (TSE:PSD) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Pulse Seismic and High Arctic Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pulse Seismic	N/A	N/A	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Pulse Seismic and High Arctic Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pulse Seismic	0	0	0	0	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00

High Arctic Energy Services has a consensus target price of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 42.28%. Given High Arctic Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe High Arctic Energy Services is more favorable than Pulse Seismic.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pulse Seismic and High Arctic Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pulse Seismic	C$11.35 million	7.77	C$-6,777,918.00	C($0.13)	-13.02
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35

Pulse Seismic has higher earnings, but lower revenue than High Arctic Energy Services. Pulse Seismic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

High Arctic Energy Services vs. STEP Energy Services Stock

STEP Energy Services (TSE:STEP) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares STEP Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
STEP Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for STEP Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
STEP Energy Services	0	2	1	0	2.33
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00

STEP Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of C$0.97, suggesting a potential downside of 22.04%. High Arctic Energy Services has a consensus target price of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 42.28%. Given High Arctic Energy Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe High Arctic Energy Services is more favorable than STEP Energy Services.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares STEP Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
STEP Energy Services	C$368.94 million	0.23	C$-120,056,922.00	C($1.77)	-0.70
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35

High Arctic Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than STEP Energy Services. High Arctic Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than STEP Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

High Arctic Energy Services vs. CWC Energy Services Stock

CWC Energy Services (CVE:CWC) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares CWC Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CWC Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for CWC Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CWC Energy Services	0	0	0	0	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares CWC Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CWC Energy Services	C$67.89 million	1.04	C$-25,308,600.00	C($0.05)	-2.80
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35

CWC Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than High Arctic Energy Services. CWC Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

High Arctic Energy Services vs. Essential Energy Services Stock

Essential Energy Services (TSE:ESN) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Essential Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Essential Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A
High Arctic Energy Services	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Essential Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Essential Energy Services	0	0	1	0	3.00
High Arctic Energy Services	0	1	0	0	2.00

Essential Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of C$0.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.04%. High Arctic Energy Services has a consensus target price of C$1.75, suggesting a potential upside of 42.28%. Given Essential Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Essential Energy Services is more favorable than High Arctic Energy Services.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Essential Energy Services and High Arctic Energy Services' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Essential Energy Services	C$96.17 million	0.48	C$-16,739,126.00	C($0.12)	-2.73
High Arctic Energy Services	C$90.80 million	0.66	C$-25,501,480.00	C($0.52)	-2.35

Essential Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than High Arctic Energy Services. Essential Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Essential Energy Services beats High Arctic Energy Services on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.