Go Pro
→ MILLIONAIRE MASTERCLASS INVITE: Altucher (From Paradigm Press) (Ad)tc pixel Free HWO Stock Alerts

High Arctic Energy Services (HWO) Competitors

High Arctic Energy Services logo
C$1.08 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/23/2026 01:57 PM Eastern
Compare

HWO vs. ESN, SFD, CSM, SEW, and WEE

Should you buy High Arctic Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? High Arctic Energy Services's main competitors and comparable companies include Essential Energy Services (ESN), NXT Energy Solutions (SFD), ClearStream Energy Services (CSM), Seaway Energy Services (SEW), and Wavefront Technology Solutions (WEE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas equipment & services" industry.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to Essential Energy Services?

Essential Energy Services (TSE:ESN) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Essential Energy Services has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.175403, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

High Arctic Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Essential Energy Services. Essential Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Essential Energy ServicesC$158.15M0.00C$4.20MC$0.01N/A
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.59M1.18C$29.06MC$0.138.31

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Essential Energy Services' net margin of 0.60%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat Essential Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Essential Energy Services0.60% 0.83% -0.17%
High Arctic Energy Services 14.05%7.22%0.72%

14.4% of Essential Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Essential Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Essential Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Arctic Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Essential Energy Services Neutral
High Arctic Energy Services Neutral

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Essential Energy Services on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to NXT Energy Solutions?

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and NXT Energy Solutions (TSE:SFD) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, NXT Energy Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than High Arctic Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NXT Energy Solutions and 0 mentions for High Arctic Energy Services. High Arctic Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat NXT Energy Solutions' score of -1.00 indicating that High Arctic Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Arctic Energy Services Neutral
NXT Energy Solutions Negative

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of NXT Energy Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.7% of NXT Energy Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.175403, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NXT Energy Solutions has a beta of -0.66343, indicating that its share price is 166% less volatile than the broader market.

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than NXT Energy Solutions. NXT Energy Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.59M1.18C$29.06MC$0.138.31
NXT Energy SolutionsC$2.34M13.55-C$6.77M-C$0.07N/A

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to NXT Energy Solutions' net margin of -341.83%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat NXT Energy Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services14.05% 7.22% 0.72%
NXT Energy Solutions -341.83%-62.62%-21.54%

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats NXT Energy Solutions on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to ClearStream Energy Services?

ClearStream Energy Services (TSE:CSM) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, ClearStream Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Arctic Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ClearStream Energy Services Neutral
High Arctic Energy Services Neutral

High Arctic Energy Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ClearStream Energy Services. ClearStream Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ClearStream Energy ServicesC$556.88M0.00-C$9.46M-C$0.09N/A
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.59M1.18C$29.06MC$0.138.31

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to ClearStream Energy Services' net margin of 0.00%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat ClearStream Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ClearStream Energy ServicesN/A N/A N/A
High Arctic Energy Services 14.05%7.22%0.72%

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats ClearStream Energy Services on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to Seaway Energy Services?

Seaway Energy Services (CVE:SEW) and High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Seaway Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled High Arctic Energy Services'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seaway Energy Services Neutral
High Arctic Energy Services Neutral

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Seaway Energy Services' net margin of 0.00%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat Seaway Energy Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seaway Energy ServicesN/A N/A N/A
High Arctic Energy Services 14.05%7.22%0.72%

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Seaway Energy Services. Seaway Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seaway Energy ServicesN/AN/AN/A-C$0.05N/A
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.59M1.18C$29.06MC$0.138.31

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Seaway Energy Services on 8 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does High Arctic Energy Services compare to Wavefront Technology Solutions?

High Arctic Energy Services (TSE:HWO) and Wavefront Technology Solutions (CVE:WEE) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

High Arctic Energy Services has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Wavefront Technology Solutions' net margin of -95.78%. High Arctic Energy Services' return on equity of 7.22% beat Wavefront Technology Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
High Arctic Energy Services14.05% 7.22% 0.72%
Wavefront Technology Solutions -95.78%-152.54%-47.60%

High Arctic Energy Services has higher revenue and earnings than Wavefront Technology Solutions. Wavefront Technology Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than High Arctic Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
High Arctic Energy ServicesC$11.59M1.18C$29.06MC$0.138.31
Wavefront Technology SolutionsC$1.84M0.99-C$1.76M-C$0.02N/A

In the previous week, High Arctic Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wavefront Technology Solutions'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
High Arctic Energy Services Neutral
Wavefront Technology Solutions Neutral

0.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Wavefront Technology Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.0% of High Arctic Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.0% of Wavefront Technology Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

High Arctic Energy Services has a beta of 0.175403, meaning that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wavefront Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

High Arctic Energy Services beats Wavefront Technology Solutions on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get High Arctic Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

HWO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHigh Arctic Energy ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services IndustryEnergy SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$13.71MC$3.57BC$9.81BC$12.53B
Dividend Yield557.80%13.42%10.67%6.27%
P/E Ratio8.3143.0620.8439.99
Price / Sales1.1830.17515.589.14
Price / Cash3.1320.8936.1582.29
Price / Book0.592.103.994.67
Net IncomeC$29.06MC$67.81MC$4.35BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-6.09%-1.08%-1.48%-0.37%
1 Month Performance4.85%-1.65%-0.11%-2.48%
1 Year Performance24.14%37.93%30.68%19.84%

High Arctic Energy Services Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HWO
High Arctic Energy Services
N/AC$1.08
flat		N/A+24.1%C$13.71MC$11.59M8.31202
ESN
Essential Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$50.20MC$158.15M40.00332
SFD
NXT Energy Solutions
N/AC$0.29
flat		N/A-53.6%C$34.08MC$2.34MN/A10
CSM
ClearStream Energy Services
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$4.95MC$556.88MN/A3,300
SEW
Seaway Energy Services
N/AC$0.17
+6.5%		N/A+0.0%C$4.59MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:HWO) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Shocking new footage just released
Gerardo Del Real is calling it the Third Convergence Event, a new catalyst hitting the uranium market that he ...
Digest Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
NASA's ISS Replacement Could Go to This Tiny Space Firm
NASA has commissioned SpaceX to decommission the $150 billion International Space Station, but the contract to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to get a stake in Anthropic — before the IPO
Anthropic, the maker of Claude AI, has reportedly filed for an IPO that could arrive as early as October. Its ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel