Does the media favor LIF or CIA?

In the previous week, Champion Iron had 2 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Champion Iron and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Champion Iron's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Champion Iron is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Champion Iron 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to LIF or ASTL?

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty both had 1 articles in the media. Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Algoma Steel Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Algoma Steel Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor LIF or FEO?

In the previous week, Oceanic Iron Ore had 3 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oceanic Iron Ore and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Oceanic Iron Ore's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Oceanic Iron Ore is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Oceanic Iron Ore 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to LIF or TSL?

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty both had 1 articles in the media. Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Tree Island Steel is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Tree Island Steel 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF) Competitors

C$23.42 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

LIF vs. STLC, CIA, ASTL, FEO, and TSL

Should you buy Labrador Iron Ore Royalty stock or one of its competitors? Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's main competitors and comparable companies include Stelco (STLC), Champion Iron (CIA), Algoma Steel Group (ASTL), Oceanic Iron Ore (FEO), and Tree Island Steel (TSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Stelco?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Stelco (TSE:STLC) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Stelco pays an annual dividend of C$3.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Stelco pays out 95.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.325461, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stelco has a beta of 2.69, meaning that its share price is 169% more volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Stelco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.8% of Stelco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Stelco's net margin of 6.07%. Stelco's return on equity of 12.31% beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	50.38%	12.04%	11.52%
Stelco	6.07%	12.31%	6.69%

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.96%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Stelco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Stelco	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty had 1 more articles in the media than Stelco. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and 0 mentions for Stelco. Stelco's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Stelco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	Negative
Stelco	Neutral

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stelco. Stelco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$153.03M	9.79	C$197.32M	C$1.20	19.52
Stelco	C$2.85B	0.00	C$173M	C$3.14	N/A

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Stelco tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Champion Iron?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Champion Iron (TSE:CIA) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and risk.

28.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of Champion Iron shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Champion Iron shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.96%. Champion Iron has a consensus price target of C$6.08, suggesting a potential upside of 99.45%. Given Champion Iron's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Champion Iron is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Champion Iron	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Champion Iron's net margin of 5.99%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Champion Iron's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	50.38%	12.04%	11.52%
Champion Iron	5.99%	6.81%	13.11%

In the previous week, Champion Iron had 2 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Champion Iron and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Champion Iron's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Champion Iron is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Champion Iron	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.325461, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Champion Iron has a beta of 0.296188, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Champion Iron pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Champion Iron pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Champion Iron. Champion Iron is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$153.03M	9.79	C$197.32M	C$1.20	19.52
Champion Iron	C$1.74B	0.98	C$128.81M	C$0.20	15.25

Summary

Champion Iron beats Labrador Iron Ore Royalty on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.325461, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.8687, indicating that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -55.02%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	50.38%	12.04%	11.52%
Algoma Steel Group	-55.02%	-180.34%	-0.63%

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty both had 1 articles in the media. Algoma Steel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Algoma Steel Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Algoma Steel Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

28.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.1% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Algoma Steel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$153.03M	9.79	C$197.32M	C$1.20	19.52
Algoma Steel Group	C$1.54B	0.42	-C$150.59M	-C$10.16	N/A

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty presently has a consensus price target of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.96%. Algoma Steel Group has a consensus price target of C$7.38, indicating a potential upside of 19.14%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Algoma Steel Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Algoma Steel Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Algoma Steel Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Oceanic Iron Ore?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Oceanic Iron Ore (CVE:FEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Oceanic Iron Ore had 3 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Oceanic Iron Ore and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Oceanic Iron Ore's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Oceanic Iron Ore is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Oceanic Iron Ore	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Oceanic Iron Ore's net margin of 0.00%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Oceanic Iron Ore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	50.38%	12.04%	11.52%
Oceanic Iron Ore	N/A	-6.02%	-0.79%

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Oceanic Iron Ore. Oceanic Iron Ore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$153.03M	9.79	C$197.32M	C$1.20	19.52
Oceanic Iron Ore	N/A	N/A	-C$2.29M	-C$0.66	N/A

28.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Oceanic Iron Ore shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Oceanic Iron Ore shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 25.96%. Oceanic Iron Ore has a consensus target price of C$1.73, suggesting a potential upside of 151.21%. Given Oceanic Iron Ore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oceanic Iron Ore is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Oceanic Iron Ore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.325461, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oceanic Iron Ore has a beta of 3.003406, meaning that its share price is 200% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Oceanic Iron Ore on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Tree Island Steel?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Tree Island Steel (TSE:TSL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.325461, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.502526, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$153.03M	9.79	C$197.32M	C$1.20	19.52
Tree Island Steel	C$164.63M	0.38	-C$2.47M	-C$0.27	N/A

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty presently has a consensus price target of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 25.96%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Tree Island Steel	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tree Island Steel pays out -11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty both had 1 articles in the media. Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.54 indicating that Tree Island Steel is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Tree Island Steel	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

28.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -4.34%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	50.38%	12.04%	11.52%
Tree Island Steel	-4.34%	-6.25%	1.95%

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Tree Island Steel on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Labrador Iron Ore Royalty News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LIF vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.50B	C$3.75B	C$4.70B	C$12.53B
Dividend Yield	5.09%	5.24%	4.76%	6.33%
P/E Ratio	19.52	25.21	24.97	39.33
Price / Sales	9.79	26,331.59	15,714.44	9.16
Price / Cash	50.97	26.38	24.39	82.29
Price / Book	2.45	12.05	10.02	4.61
Net Income	C$197.32M	C$127.14M	C$159.49M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-4.87%	-1.46%	-1.36%	-0.40%
1 Month Performance	-11.02%	-5.22%	-4.98%	-2.93%
1 Year Performance	-16.92%	20.04%	17.11%	16.25%

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LIF Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	2.8349 of 5 stars	C$23.42 flat	C$29.50 +26.0%	-16.9%	C$1.50B	C$153.03M	19.52	600
STLC Stelco	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$3.71B	C$2.85B	21.70	2,185	High Trading Volume
CIA Champion Iron	3.8687 of 5 stars	C$3.05 +0.3%	C$6.08 +99.5%	-31.6%	C$1.71B	C$1.74B	15.25	220
ASTL Algoma Steel Group	1.0954 of 5 stars	C$5.95 -3.4%	C$7.38 +23.9%	+34.0%	C$627.07M	C$1.54B	N/A	2,400
FEO Oceanic Iron Ore	2.0148 of 5 stars	C$0.73 +2.8%	C$1.73 +137.4%	-33.7%	C$190.90M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:LIF) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF) Competitors

LIF vs. STLC, CIA, ASTL, FEO, and TSL

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Stelco?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Champion Iron?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Oceanic Iron Ore?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Tree Island Steel?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

LIF vs. The Competition

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF) Competitors

LIF vs. STLC, CIA, ASTL, FEO, and TSL

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Stelco?

Is LIF or STLC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, LIF or STLC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LIF or STLC?

Is LIF or STLC more profitable?

Do analysts rate LIF or STLC?

Does the media favor LIF or STLC?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LIF or STLC?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Champion Iron?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LIF or CIA?

Do analysts prefer LIF or CIA?

Is LIF or CIA more profitable?

Does the media favor LIF or CIA?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIF or CIA?

Is LIF or CIA a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, LIF or CIA?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIF or ASTL?

Is LIF or ASTL more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LIF or ASTL?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in LIF or ASTL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, LIF or ASTL?

Do analysts prefer LIF or ASTL?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Oceanic Iron Ore?

Does the media favor LIF or FEO?

Is LIF or FEO more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LIF or FEO?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in LIF or FEO?

Do analysts rate LIF or FEO?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIF or FEO?

Summary

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Tree Island Steel?

Which has more risk and volatility, LIF or TSL?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LIF or TSL?

Do analysts rate LIF or TSL?

Is LIF or TSL a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to LIF or TSL?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LIF or TSL?

Is LIF or TSL more profitable?

Summary

Media Sentiment Over Time

LIF vs. The Competition

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools