Go Pro

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF) Competitors

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty logo
C$26.32 +0.07 (+0.27%)
As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

LIF vs. STLC, CIA, ASTL, FEO, and TSL

Should you buy Labrador Iron Ore Royalty stock or one of its competitors? Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's main competitors and comparable companies include Stelco (STLC), Champion Iron (CIA), Algoma Steel Group (ASTL), Oceanic Iron Ore (FEO), and Tree Island Steel (TSL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "steel" industry.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Stelco?

Stelco (TSE:STLC) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Stelco's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Labrador Iron Ore Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Stelco Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Neutral

Stelco has a beta of 2.69, suggesting that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.326943, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

20.5% of Stelco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.8% of Stelco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus price target of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.08%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Stelco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stelco
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stelco. Stelco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
StelcoC$2.85B0.00C$173MC$3.14N/A
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$153.03M11.01C$197.32MC$1.2021.93

Stelco pays an annual dividend of C$3.00 per share. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Stelco pays out 95.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Stelco's net margin of 6.07%. Stelco's return on equity of 12.31% beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stelco6.07% 12.31% 6.69%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 50.38%12.04%11.52%

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Stelco on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Champion Iron?

Champion Iron (TSE:CIA) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Champion Iron's net margin of 5.99%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Champion Iron's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Champion Iron5.99% 6.81% 13.11%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 50.38%12.04%11.52%

In the previous week, Champion Iron had 1 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Champion Iron and 0 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Champion Iron's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Champion Iron is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Champion Iron Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Neutral

31.3% of Champion Iron shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.3% of Champion Iron shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Champion Iron presently has a consensus target price of C$6.08, suggesting a potential upside of 75.82%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.08%. Given Champion Iron's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Champion Iron is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Champion Iron
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Champion Iron has a beta of 0.285903, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.326943, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Champion Iron pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Champion Iron pays out 60.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Champion Iron. Champion Iron is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Champion IronC$1.74B1.12C$128.81MC$0.2017.30
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$153.03M11.01C$197.32MC$1.2021.93

Summary

Champion Iron beats Labrador Iron Ore Royalty on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Algoma Steel Group?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Algoma Steel Group (TSE:ASTL) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Algoma Steel Group's net margin of -55.02%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Algoma Steel Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty50.38% 12.04% 11.52%
Algoma Steel Group -55.02%-180.34%-0.63%

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.326943, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algoma Steel Group has a beta of 1.743024, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Algoma Steel Group had 4 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Algoma Steel Group and 0 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Algoma Steel Group's score of -0.10 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Neutral
Algoma Steel Group Neutral

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.08%. Algoma Steel Group has a consensus target price of C$7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 13.29%. Given Algoma Steel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Algoma Steel Group is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Algoma Steel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Algoma Steel Group. Algoma Steel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$153.03M11.01C$197.32MC$1.2021.93
Algoma Steel GroupC$1.54B0.44-C$150.59M-C$10.16N/A

28.8% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.7% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.6% of Algoma Steel Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Algoma Steel Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Oceanic Iron Ore?

Oceanic Iron Ore (CVE:FEO) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Oceanic Iron Ore's net margin of 0.00%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Oceanic Iron Ore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oceanic Iron OreN/A -6.02% -0.79%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 50.38%12.04%11.52%

In the previous week, Oceanic Iron Ore had 2 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oceanic Iron Ore and 0 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Oceanic Iron Ore's average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Oceanic Iron Ore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oceanic Iron Ore Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Neutral

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Oceanic Iron Ore. Oceanic Iron Ore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oceanic Iron OreN/AN/A-C$2.29M-C$0.66N/A
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$153.03M11.01C$197.32MC$1.2021.93

0.0% of Oceanic Iron Ore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 9.0% of Oceanic Iron Ore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oceanic Iron Ore has a beta of 2.835585, meaning that its stock price is 184% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.326943, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Oceanic Iron Ore currently has a consensus target price of C$1.73, suggesting a potential upside of 131.11%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.08%. Given Oceanic Iron Ore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Oceanic Iron Ore is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Oceanic Iron Ore
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Oceanic Iron Ore on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Labrador Iron Ore Royalty compare to Tree Island Steel?

Tree Island Steel (TSE:TSL) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Tree Island Steel pays an annual dividend of C$0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Tree Island Steel pays out -11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 112.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tree Island Steel. Tree Island Steel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tree Island SteelC$164.63M0.44-C$2.47M-C$0.27N/A
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$153.03M11.01C$197.32MC$1.2021.93

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus price target of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.08%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Tree Island Steel.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tree Island Steel
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 50.38% compared to Tree Island Steel's net margin of -4.34%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 12.04% beat Tree Island Steel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tree Island Steel-4.34% -6.25% 1.95%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 50.38%12.04%11.52%

In the previous week, Tree Island Steel had 1 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Tree Island Steel and 0 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Tree Island Steel's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Labrador Iron Ore Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tree Island Steel Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Neutral

0.1% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Tree Island Steel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tree Island Steel has a beta of 0.48425, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.326943, indicating that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Tree Island Steel on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Labrador Iron Ore Royalty News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LIF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LIF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LIF vs. The Competition

MetricLabrador Iron Ore RoyaltyMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.68BC$4.05BC$5.07BC$12.49B
Dividend Yield5.10%5.16%4.67%6.25%
P/E Ratio21.9325.6726.1139.34
Price / Sales11.018,945.555,320.949.85
Price / Cash50.9729.7427.1382.29
Price / Book2.7612.7110.614.73
Net IncomeC$197.32MC$125.28MC$156.45MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.42%-0.39%-0.32%-0.25%
1 Month Performance-3.66%18.31%13.97%2.31%
1 Year Performance-3.20%54.19%42.73%27.86%

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LIF
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
1.7273 of 5 stars
C$26.32
+0.3%
C$29.50
+12.1%
-3.3%C$1.68BC$153.03M21.93600
STLC
Stelco
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.71BC$2.85B21.702,185
CIA
Champion Iron
3.8598 of 5 stars
C$3.44
-2.3%
C$6.08
+76.8%
-15.2%C$1.93BC$1.74B17.20220
ASTL
Algoma Steel Group
1.0837 of 5 stars
C$5.75
-1.5%
C$7.13
+23.9%
-5.1%C$605.99MC$1.54BN/A2,730
FEO
Oceanic Iron Ore
1.8198 of 5 stars
C$0.74
-2.6%
C$1.73
+134.2%
-5.1%C$192.86MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:LIF) was last updated on 9/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners