Free Trial
→ Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free NEO Stock Alerts

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

Neo Performance Materials logo
C$31.35 +1.49 (+4.99%)
As of 05/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

NEO vs. EFX, SJ, NVEI, LIF, and TIXT

Should you buy Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Neo Performance Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Neo Performance Materials include Enerflex (EFX), Stella-Jones (SJ), Nuvei (NVEI), Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF), and TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Enerflex (TSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

20.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.1% of Enerflex shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Enerflex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, meaning that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 2.277053, meaning that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Enerflex. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Enerflex's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Enerflex Neutral

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerflex pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Neo Performance Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus target price of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.21%. Enerflex has a consensus target price of C$35.16, suggesting a potential downside of 3.52%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Enerflex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Enerflex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Neo Performance Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Enerflex. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M2.57-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A
EnerflexC$2.60B1.71-C$114.88MC$0.6853.59

Enerflex has a net margin of 3.31% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Enerflex's return on equity of 7.72% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials-2.03% -2.63% 1.87%
Enerflex 3.31%7.72%3.03%

Summary

Neo Performance Materials and Enerflex tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Stella-Jones (TSE:SJ) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Stella-Jones pays an annual dividend of C$1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Stella-Jones pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

48.8% of Stella-Jones shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Stella-Jones shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Stella-Jones has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stella-Jones, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stella-JonesC$3.51B1.15C$321.05MC$5.5213.42
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M2.57-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A

Stella-Jones currently has a consensus target price of C$95.38, suggesting a potential upside of 28.71%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.21%. Given Stella-Jones' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Stella-Jones is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stella-Jones
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Stella-Jones. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Stella-Jones. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Stella-Jones' score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Stella-Jones Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

Stella-Jones has a beta of -0.145181, suggesting that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Stella-Jones has a net margin of 8.66% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Stella-Jones' return on equity of 14.85% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stella-Jones8.66% 14.85% 9.38%
Neo Performance Materials -2.03%-2.63%1.87%

Summary

Stella-Jones beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Nuvei (TSE:NVEI) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

71.5% of Nuvei shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Nuvei shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nuvei has a beta of 3.12, suggesting that its stock price is 212% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$38.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Nuvei.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nuvei
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Nuvei. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Nuvei's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nuvei Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

Neo Performance Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvei, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NuveiC$1.31B0.00-C$11.38M-C$0.11N/A
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M2.57-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A

Nuvei has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Nuvei's return on equity of -0.17% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nuvei-0.87% -0.17% 2.39%
Neo Performance Materials -2.03%-2.63%1.87%

Nuvei pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Nuvei pays out -490.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats Nuvei on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials and Neo Performance Materials both had 1 articles in the media. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's score of -0.40 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.347869, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M2.57-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A
Labrador Iron Ore RoyaltyC$165.74M10.95C$197.32MC$1.4519.55

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 55.72% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 14.38% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials-2.03% -2.63% 1.87%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 55.72%14.38%11.52%

Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus price target of C$38.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus price target of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.06%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

20.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.5% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Neo Performance Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and TELUS International (Cda) (TSE:TIXT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.21%. TELUS International (Cda) has a consensus target price of C$3.40, suggesting a potential downside of 43.99%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
TELUS International (Cda)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

TELUS International (Cda) has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS International (Cda), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance MaterialsC$512.15M2.57-C$1.56M-C$0.24N/A
TELUS International (Cda)C$2.72B0.62C$21.68M-C$1.38N/A

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than TELUS International (Cda). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for TELUS International (Cda). Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat TELUS International (Cda)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
TELUS International (Cda) Neutral

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. TELUS International (Cda) pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.1%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TELUS International (Cda) pays out -101.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TELUS International (Cda) has a beta of 1.709333, meaning that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

20.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.03% compared to TELUS International (Cda)'s net margin of -17.04%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.63% beat TELUS International (Cda)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials-2.03% -2.63% 1.87%
TELUS International (Cda) -17.04%-18.83%2.63%

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats TELUS International (Cda) on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NEO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricNeo Performance MaterialsSpecialty Chemicals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.32BC$8.38BC$4.83BC$12.16B
Dividend Yield1.34%3.40%5.01%6.20%
P/E Ratio-130.6318.5923.1737.64
Price / Sales2.57117.957,306.0811.68
Price / Cash3.6819.2527.2182.29
Price / Book3.413.386.774.50
Net Income-C$1.56MC$213.62MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.16%1.70%1.56%2.48%
1 Month Performance24.95%8.66%-0.26%1.47%
1 Year Performance228.62%33.60%74.94%53.55%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NEO
Neo Performance Materials
2.2207 of 5 stars		C$31.35
+5.0%		C$38.00
+21.2%		+236.7%C$1.32BC$512.15MN/A2,100
EFX
Enerflex
1.3381 of 5 stars		C$37.05
+1.4%		C$35.16
-5.1%		+276.1%C$4.52BC$2.60B54.4914,000
SJ
Stella-Jones
4.1324 of 5 stars		C$74.24
+3.0%		C$95.38
+28.5%		-1.5%C$4.05BC$3.51B13.45280
NVEI
Nuvei
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$3.13BC$1.31BN/A1,370
LIF
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
1.7561 of 5 stars		C$28.66
-0.1%		C$29.50
+2.9%		-0.9%C$1.83BC$165.74M19.77600

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SpaceX supplier that shipped 5 billion chips to Starlink
When Nvidia surged 770%, its data center cooling supplier Vertiv climbed 1,700%. When Apple ran 2,000%, suppli...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The S-1 just dropped. 22 days left.
The SpaceX S-1 is now public - $18.7 billion in revenue, a $75 billion raise, and a June 12 Nasdaq listing con...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
My crisis of conscience
Emmet Savage - named in Irish America's Wall Street 50 as one of the most successful investors in the world - ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Better than SpaceX? Grab this ticker instead.
Larry Benedict generated $274 million for his clients by finding the trades most investors missed. Now he says...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is offering his 'Simple Options Trading For Beginners' guide at no cost - normally priced at $29.9...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Admin to Pump $1 Billion into this “Off-the-Radar” AI Stock
The U.S. government pumped more than $1 billion into Intel. The stock popped 128%. It pumped $400 million into...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Opportunity Forming in a U.S. Supply-Chain Weak Spot?
America has a supply-chain problem with graphite - demand is climbing while dependence on foreign sources rema...
i2i Marketing Group, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel