Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

C$28.49 +1.05 (+3.83%)

As of 05/5/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

Should you be buying Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Neo Performance Materials include Nuvei (NVEI), Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF), TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT), Chorus Aviation (CHR), and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment (FC). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Nuvei (TSE:NVEI) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nuvei has a beta of 3.12, indicating that its share price is 212% more volatile than the S&P 500.
: In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nuvei'saverage media sentiment score.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Nuvei Neutral
: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Nuvei shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Nuvei shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Nuvei's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nuvei is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Nuvei
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Nuvei pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nuvei pays out -490.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
: Neo Performance Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvei, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
Nuvei C$1.31B 0.00 -C$11.38M -C$0.11 N/A
: Nuvei has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Nuvei's return on equity of -0.17% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
Nuvei -0.87% -0.17% 2.39%

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Nuvei	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Nuvei	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Nuvei	C$1.31B	0.00	-C$11.38M	-C$0.11	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
Nuvei	-0.87%	-0.17%	2.39%

Summary

Nuvei beats Neo Performance Materials on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.347869, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.
: In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty had 2 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Positive
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
: 27.2% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty currently has a consensus price target of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.81%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty C$165.74M 10.67 C$197.32M C$1.57 17.59
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 60.64% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 15.70% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 60.64% 15.70% 11.52%
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%

Company	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$165.74M	10.67	C$197.32M	C$1.57	17.59
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	60.64%	15.70%	11.52%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Neo Performance Materials on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

TELUS International (Cda) (TSE:TIXT) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

: TELUS International (Cda) has a beta of 1.709333, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.
: TELUS International (Cda) has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS International (Cda), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
TELUS International (Cda) C$2.72B 0.62 C$21.68M -C$1.38 N/A
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
: Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.13% compared to TELUS International (Cda)'s net margin of -17.04%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.55% beat TELUS International (Cda)'s return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TELUS International (Cda) -17.04% -18.83% 2.63%
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
: TELUS International (Cda) pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.1%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. TELUS International (Cda) pays out -101.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
: In the previous week, TELUS International (Cda) had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TELUS International (Cda) and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. TELUS International (Cda)'s average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that TELUS International (Cda) is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
TELUS International (Cda) Positive
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
: 6.2% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 38.9% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: TELUS International (Cda) currently has a consensus price target of C$3.40, indicating a potential downside of 43.99%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda).
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TELUS International (Cda)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TELUS International (Cda)	C$2.72B	0.62	C$21.68M	-C$1.38	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TELUS International (Cda)	-17.04%	-18.83%	2.63%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%

Company	Overall Sentiment
TELUS International (Cda)	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TELUS International (Cda)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

TELUS International (Cda) and Neo Performance Materials tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Chorus Aviation (TSE:CHR) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

: Chorus Aviation has a beta of 1.603836, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.
: Neo Performance Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chorus Aviation. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chorus Aviation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Chorus Aviation C$1.32B 0.42 -C$16.59M C$3.01 7.89
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
: Chorus Aviation has a net margin of 5.98% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Chorus Aviation's return on equity of 14.89% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chorus Aviation 5.98% 14.89% 4.43%
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
: Chorus Aviation pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Chorus Aviation pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Neo Performance Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: In the previous week, Chorus Aviation had 2 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chorus Aviation and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Chorus Aviation's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Chorus Aviation is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Chorus Aviation Positive
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
: 3.1% of Chorus Aviation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 13.8% of Chorus Aviation shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: Chorus Aviation currently has a consensus price target of C$30.71, indicating a potential upside of 29.32%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Chorus Aviation's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Chorus Aviation is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chorus Aviation
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chorus Aviation	C$1.32B	0.42	-C$16.59M	C$3.01	7.89
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chorus Aviation	5.98%	14.89%	4.43%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%

Company	Overall Sentiment
Chorus Aviation	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chorus Aviation	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Chorus Aviation beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment (TSE:FC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Firm Capital Mortgage Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Firm Capital Mortgage Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
: Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Firm Capital Mortgage Investment.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
: Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firm Capital Mortgage Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment C$55.73M 8.01 C$35.48M C$1.02 11.97
: Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has a net margin of 54.96% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment's return on equity of 8.81% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment 54.96% 8.81% 5.46%
: In the previous week, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Firm Capital Mortgage Investment and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Firm Capital Mortgage Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Positive
: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment pays out 92.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.460642, meaning that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has a beta of 0.628641, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	C$55.73M	8.01	C$35.48M	C$1.02	11.97

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	54.96%	8.81%	5.46%

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	Positive

Summary

Firm Capital Mortgage Investment beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NEO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Neo Performance Materials	Specialty Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.14B	C$8.61B	C$4.71B	C$11.80B
Dividend Yield	1.46%	3.46%	4.98%	6.23%
P/E Ratio	-118.71	17.56	21.29	23.86
Price / Sales	2.48	112.26	7,361.29	13.48
Price / Cash	3.68	19.25	27.28	82.69
Price / Book	3.04	3.20	7.70	4.48
Net Income	-C$1.56M	C$213.62M	C$159.29M	C$300.68M
7 Day Performance	12.83%	5.30%	0.96%	0.71%
1 Month Performance	32.51%	10.42%	2.56%	2.45%
1 Year Performance	139.21%	32.11%	74.03%	56.12%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NEO Neo Performance Materials	0.7195 of 5 stars	C$28.49 +3.8%	C$28.00 -1.7%	+143.7%	C$1.14B	C$478.79M	N/A	2,100
NVEI Nuvei	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$3.13B	C$1.31B	N/A	1,370
LIF Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	2.1924 of 5 stars	C$28.21 -0.6%	C$29.50 +4.6%	-5.6%	C$1.81B	C$165.88M	17.97	600	News Coverage Earnings Report
TIXT TELUS International (Cda)	0.8929 of 5 stars	C$6.07 +2.4%	C$3.40 -44.0%	+73.9%	C$1.69B	C$2.72B	N/A	73,100
CHR Chorus Aviation	4.4372 of 5 stars	C$22.98 -1.7%	C$30.71 +33.7%	+24.3%	C$538.08M	C$1.32B	7.63	4,573	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 5/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools