Does the media favor SJ or NEO?

In the previous week, Stella-Jones and Stella-Jones both had 1 articles in the media. Stella-Jones' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Stella-Jones is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stella-Jones 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Neo Performance Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor EFX or NEO?

In the previous week, Enerflex and Enerflex both had 1 articles in the media. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerflex 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Neo Performance Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer NEO or NVEI?

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Nuvei. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Nuvei 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Do analysts prefer TIXT or NEO?

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$50.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TELUS International (Cda) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media favor NEO or LIF?

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials and Neo Performance Materials both had 1 articles in the media. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Neo Performance Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

C$38.20 +0.72 (+1.92%)

As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, TIXT, and LIF

Should you buy Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Neo Performance Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Neo Performance Materials include Stella-Jones (SJ), Enerflex (EFX), Nuvei (NVEI), TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT), and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Stella-Jones (TSE:SJ) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Stella-Jones and Stella-Jones both had 1 articles in the media. Stella-Jones' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Stella-Jones is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stella-Jones	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Stella-Jones pays an annual dividend of C$1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Stella-Jones pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

48.9% of Stella-Jones shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Stella-Jones shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Stella-Jones has a beta of -0.070673, suggesting that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Stella-Jones presently has a consensus target price of C$94.38, suggesting a potential upside of 22.79%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Stella-Jones.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stella-Jones	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Stella-Jones has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stella-Jones, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stella-Jones	C$3.51B	1.19	C$321.05M	C$5.52	13.92
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.43	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Stella-Jones has a net margin of 8.66% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Stella-Jones' return on equity of 14.85% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stella-Jones	8.66%	14.85%	9.38%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

Summary

Stella-Jones beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Enerflex (TSE:EFX) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Enerflex has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Enerflex's return on equity of 7.72% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerflex	3.63%	7.72%	3.03%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

Enerflex has a beta of 2.340097, indicating that its stock price is 134% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

41.9% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enerflex presently has a consensus price target of C$35.28, suggesting a potential upside of 9.67%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Enerflex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerflex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Neo Performance Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enerflex. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerflex	C$2.60B	1.51	-C$114.88M	C$0.68	47.31
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.43	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Enerflex pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enerflex pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Neo Performance Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Enerflex and Enerflex both had 1 articles in the media. Enerflex's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Enerflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerflex	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Enerflex beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Nuvei (TSE:NVEI) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Nuvei pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nuvei pays out -490.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Neo Performance Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvei, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.43	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Nuvei	C$1.31B	0.00	-C$11.38M	-C$0.11	N/A

18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Nuvei shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Nuvei shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Nuvei.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Nuvei	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuvei has a beta of 3.12, meaning that its share price is 212% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Nuvei. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Nuvei. Nuvei's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Nuvei is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Nuvei	Neutral

Nuvei has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Nuvei's return on equity of -0.17% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%
Nuvei	-0.87%	-0.17%	2.39%

Summary

Nuvei beats Neo Performance Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

TELUS International (Cda) (TSE:TIXT) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

TELUS International (Cda) pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.1%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. TELUS International (Cda) pays out -101.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$50.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.20%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TELUS International (Cda)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than TELUS International (Cda). MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for TELUS International (Cda). TELUS International (Cda)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that TELUS International (Cda) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
TELUS International (Cda)	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

TELUS International (Cda) has a beta of 1.709333, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

6.2% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.9% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.03% compared to TELUS International (Cda)'s net margin of -21.69%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.63% beat TELUS International (Cda)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TELUS International (Cda)	-21.69%	-16.29%	2.63%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

TELUS International (Cda) has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS International (Cda), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TELUS International (Cda)	C$2.72B	0.62	C$21.68M	-C$1.38	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.43	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats TELUS International (Cda) on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.440846, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.334218, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials and Neo Performance Materials both had 1 articles in the media. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.02 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus target price of C$50.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.20%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus target price of C$29.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.72%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.43	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$165.74M	10.02	C$197.32M	C$1.45	17.89

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 55.72% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 14.38% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	55.72%	14.38%	11.52%

18.7% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.2% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NEO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Neo Performance Materials	Specialty Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.72B	C$8.44B	C$4.55B	C$12.48B
Dividend Yield	1.07%	3.34%	5.02%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	-159.17	15.48	20.98	36.95
Price / Sales	3.43	125.67	5,751.76	9.44
Price / Cash	3.68	19.61	26.33	82.29
Price / Book	4.16	3.50	8.57	4.39
Net Income	-C$1.56M	C$213.62M	C$157.08M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-3.68%	0.56%	1.19%	0.61%
1 Month Performance	5.09%	1.69%	-1.28%	1.06%
1 Year Performance	133.21%	22.76%	35.80%	30.89%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NEO Neo Performance Materials	2.2647 of 5 stars	C$38.20 +1.9%	C$50.50 +32.2%	+128.6%	C$1.72B	C$512.15M	N/A	2,100	News Coverage
SJ Stella-Jones	4.4855 of 5 stars	C$76.64 -1.1%	C$94.38 +23.1%	-4.5%	C$4.23B	C$3.51B	13.88	280	News Coverage Positive News
EFX Enerflex	2.0142 of 5 stars	C$33.84 +4.2%	C$35.28 +4.3%	+188.5%	C$3.96B	C$2.60B	49.76	14,000
NVEI Nuvei	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$3.13B	C$1.31B	N/A	1,370
TIXT TELUS International (Cda)	N/A	C$6.07 +2.4%	N/A	+9.6%	C$1.69B	C$2.72B	N/A	73,100

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, TIXT, and LIF

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, TIXT, and LIF

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Does the media favor SJ or NEO?

Is SJ or NEO a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SJ or NEO?

Which has more risk & volatility, SJ or NEO?

Do analysts prefer SJ or NEO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SJ or NEO?

Is SJ or NEO more profitable?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Is EFX or NEO more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, EFX or NEO?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in EFX or NEO?

Do analysts recommend EFX or NEO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, EFX or NEO?

Is EFX or NEO a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor EFX or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Is NEO or NVEI a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, NEO or NVEI?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in NEO or NVEI?

Do analysts prefer NEO or NVEI?

Which has more risk and volatility, NEO or NVEI?

Does the media refer more to NEO or NVEI?

Is NEO or NVEI more profitable?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Is TIXT or NEO a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer TIXT or NEO?

Does the media favor TIXT or NEO?

Which has more risk and volatility, TIXT or NEO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TIXT or NEO?

Is TIXT or NEO more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TIXT or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Which has more volatility & risk, NEO or LIF?

Does the media favor NEO or LIF?

Do analysts prefer NEO or LIF?

Is NEO or LIF a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NEO or LIF?

Is NEO or LIF more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NEO or LIF?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools