Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

C$28.49 +1.05 (+3.83%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

Should you be buying Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Neo Performance Materials include Nuvei (NVEI), Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF), TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT), Chorus Aviation (CHR), and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment (FC). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Nuvei (TSE:NVEI) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

: In the previous week, Nuvei's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Neo Performance Materials'average media sentiment score.
Company Overall Sentiment
Nuvei Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
: Nuvei pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Nuvei pays out -490.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
: Neo Performance Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvei, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Nuvei C$1.31B 0.00 -C$11.38M -C$0.11 N/A
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
: Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Nuvei's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Nuvei is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nuvei
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
: Nuvei has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Nuvei's return on equity of -0.17% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nuvei -0.87% -0.17% 2.39%
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
: 71.5% of Nuvei shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Nuvei shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: Nuvei has a beta of 3.12, meaning that its share price is 212% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.445103, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nuvei	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nuvei	C$1.31B	0.00	-C$11.38M	-C$0.11	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nuvei	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nuvei	-0.87%	-0.17%	2.39%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%

Summary

Nuvei beats Neo Performance Materials on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

: In the previous week, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty had 2 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty Positive
: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 98.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty C$165.88M 10.66 C$197.32M C$1.57 17.59
: Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a consensus price target of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.81%. Given Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
: Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 60.64% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 15.70% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 60.64% 15.70% 11.52%
: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.2% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.445103, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.337385, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$165.88M	10.66	C$197.32M	C$1.57	17.59

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	60.64%	15.70%	11.52%

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Neo Performance Materials on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and TELUS International (Cda) (TSE:TIXT) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

: In the previous week, TELUS International (Cda) had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TELUS International (Cda) and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. TELUS International (Cda)'s average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that TELUS International (Cda) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
TELUS International (Cda) Positive
: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. TELUS International (Cda) pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.1%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TELUS International (Cda) pays out -101.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.
: TELUS International (Cda) has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS International (Cda), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
TELUS International (Cda) C$2.72B 0.62 C$21.68M -C$1.38 N/A
: Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. TELUS International (Cda) has a consensus price target of C$3.40, suggesting a potential downside of 43.99%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda).
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
TELUS International (Cda)
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
: Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.13% compared to TELUS International (Cda)'s net margin of -17.04%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.55% beat TELUS International (Cda)'s return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
TELUS International (Cda) -17.04% -18.83% 2.63%
: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.2% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.9% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.445103, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TELUS International (Cda) has a beta of 1.709333, indicating that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
TELUS International (Cda)	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
TELUS International (Cda)	C$2.72B	0.62	C$21.68M	-C$1.38	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
TELUS International (Cda)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
TELUS International (Cda)	-17.04%	-18.83%	2.63%

Summary

Neo Performance Materials and TELUS International (Cda) tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Chorus Aviation (TSE:CHR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Chorus Aviation pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chorus Aviation pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Neo Performance Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Chorus Aviation shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.8% of Chorus Aviation shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: In the previous week, Chorus Aviation had 2 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Chorus Aviation and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Chorus Aviation's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Chorus Aviation is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Chorus Aviation Positive
: Neo Performance Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chorus Aviation. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chorus Aviation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
Chorus Aviation C$1.32B 0.42 -C$16.59M C$3.01 7.89
: Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Chorus Aviation has a consensus price target of C$30.71, suggesting a potential upside of 29.32%. Given Chorus Aviation's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chorus Aviation is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Chorus Aviation
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

6 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
: Chorus Aviation has a net margin of 5.98% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Chorus Aviation's return on equity of 14.89% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
Chorus Aviation 5.98% 14.89% 4.43%
: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.445103, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chorus Aviation has a beta of 1.492706, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Chorus Aviation	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Chorus Aviation	C$1.32B	0.42	-C$16.59M	C$3.01	7.89

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Chorus Aviation	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
Chorus Aviation	5.98%	14.89%	4.43%

Summary

Chorus Aviation beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Firm Capital Mortgage Investment (TSE:FC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

: Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of C$0.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -119.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment pays out 92.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.
: 20.1% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Firm Capital Mortgage Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Firm Capital Mortgage Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: In the previous week, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Neo Performance Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Firm Capital Mortgage Investment and 0 mentions for Neo Performance Materials. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Firm Capital Mortgage Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials Neutral
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment Positive
: Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firm Capital Mortgage Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials C$478.79M 2.48 -C$1.56M -C$0.24 N/A
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment C$55.73M 8.01 C$35.48M C$1.02 11.97
: Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$28.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.72%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Firm Capital Mortgage Investment.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
: Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has a net margin of 54.96% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.13%. Firm Capital Mortgage Investment's return on equity of 8.81% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials -2.13% -2.55% 1.87%
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment 54.96% 8.81% 5.46%
: Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.445103, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Firm Capital Mortgage Investment has a beta of 0.5937, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$478.79M	2.48	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	C$55.73M	8.01	C$35.48M	C$1.02	11.97

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.13%	-2.55%	1.87%
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment	54.96%	8.81%	5.46%

Summary

Firm Capital Mortgage Investment beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NEO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Neo Performance Materials	Specialty Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.19B	C$8.02B	C$4.72B	C$11.72B
Dividend Yield	1.50%	3.46%	4.98%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-118.71	16.84	20.97	23.83
Price / Sales	2.48	112.27	7,339.14	13.46
Price / Cash	3.68	19.25	24.35	82.69
Price / Book	3.04	3.20	7.70	4.48
Net Income	-C$1.56M	C$213.62M	C$159.29M	C$300.68M
7 Day Performance	12.43%	5.62%	0.01%	0.12%
1 Month Performance	33.26%	10.94%	2.58%	2.88%
1 Year Performance	143.71%	31.98%	76.05%	57.78%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NEO Neo Performance Materials	0.7279 of 5 stars	C$28.49 +3.8%	C$28.00 -1.7%	N/A	C$1.19B	C$478.79M	N/A	2,100
NVEI Nuvei	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$3.13B	C$1.31B	N/A	1,370
LIF Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	2.1978 of 5 stars	C$28.21 -0.6%	C$29.50 +4.6%	N/A	C$1.81B	C$165.88M	17.97	600	News Coverage Earnings Report
TIXT TELUS International (Cda)	0.8929 of 5 stars	C$6.07 +2.4%	C$3.40 -44.0%	N/A	C$1.69B	C$2.72B	N/A	73,100
CHR Chorus Aviation	4.4507 of 5 stars	C$22.98 -1.7%	C$30.71 +33.7%	N/A	C$538.08M	C$1.32B	7.63	4,573	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. NVEI, LIF, TIXT, CHR, and FC

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chorus Aviation?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Firm Capital Mortgage Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools