Go Pro
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free NEO Stock Alerts

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

Neo Performance Materials logo
C$32.50 +0.14 (+0.43%)
As of 03:10 PM Eastern
Compare

NEO vs. GRA, ECO, IPD, ARQ, and CHE.UN

Should you buy Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? Neo Performance Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include NanoXplore (GRA), EcoSynthetix (ECO), International Parkside Products (IPD), ARQ (ARQ), and Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE.UN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to NanoXplore?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NanoXploreC$115.04M2.32-C$11.17M-C$0.07N/A
Neo Performance MaterialsC$603.19M2.48-C$1.56MC$0.013,239.00

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.28%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NanoXplore-10.28% -10.72% -4.04%
Neo Performance Materials 0.15%0.21%1.87%

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 7 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for NanoXplore. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat NanoXplore's score of -0.23 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Neo Performance Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.027361, meaning that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.463469, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

6.4% of NanoXplore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NanoXplore currently has a consensus price target of C$2.65, suggesting a potential upside of 80.27%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 73.41%. Given NanoXplore's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NanoXplore
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to EcoSynthetix?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.463469, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.703233, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus target price of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 73.41%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
EcoSynthetix
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

EcoSynthetix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance MaterialsC$603.19M2.48-C$1.56MC$0.013,239.00
EcoSynthetixC$20.07M5.62-C$1.21M-C$0.02N/A

18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to EcoSynthetix's net margin of -4.72%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat EcoSynthetix's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials0.15% 0.21% 1.87%
EcoSynthetix -4.72%-2.47%-6.26%

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 4 more articles in the media than EcoSynthetix. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 4 mentions for EcoSynthetix. EcoSynthetix's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.14 indicating that EcoSynthetix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
EcoSynthetix
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats EcoSynthetix on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to International Parkside Products?

International Parkside Products (CVE:IPD) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

International Parkside Products has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials. International Parkside Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Parkside ProductsC$3.24M0.28C$21.26KC$0.0042.70
Neo Performance MaterialsC$603.19M2.48-C$1.56MC$0.013,239.00

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to International Parkside Products' net margin of -6.32%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat International Parkside Products' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
International Parkside Products-6.32% -49.33% -7.48%
Neo Performance Materials 0.15%0.21%1.87%

International Parkside Products has a beta of -2.808838, suggesting that its stock price is 381% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.463469, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.9% of International Parkside Products shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 8 more articles in the media than International Parkside Products. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for International Parkside Products. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat International Parkside Products' score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
International Parkside Products Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$56.17, indicating a potential upside of 73.41%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than International Parkside Products.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
International Parkside Products
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats International Parkside Products on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to ARQ?

ARQ (CNSX:ARQ) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 8 more articles in the media than ARQ. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for ARQ. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat ARQ's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ARQ Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 73.41%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than ARQ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ARQ
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

ARQ has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ARQN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Neo Performance MaterialsC$603.19M2.48-C$1.56MC$0.013,239.00

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to ARQ's net margin of 0.00%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat ARQ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ARQN/A N/A N/A
Neo Performance Materials 0.15%0.21%1.87%

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats ARQ on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund?

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays out 55.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out 2,870.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund presently has a consensus price target of C$19.56, suggesting a potential upside of 34.36%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 73.41%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Neo Performance Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 8 more articles in the media than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund Neutral
Neo Performance Materials Neutral

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.769829, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.463469, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

8.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.5% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of 0.15%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund7.85% 19.73% 7.26%
Neo Performance Materials 0.15%0.21%1.87%

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chemtrade Logistics Income FundC$2.12B0.77C$139.02MC$1.2711.46
Neo Performance MaterialsC$603.19M2.48-C$1.56MC$0.013,239.00

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund and Neo Performance Materials tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NEO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NEO vs. The Competition

Export
MetricNeo Performance MaterialsChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$1.50BC$11.14BC$4.82BC$12.55B
Dividend Yield1.20%2.88%4.71%6.28%
P/E Ratio3,239.0038.5025.8139.92
Price / Sales2.4849.0517,612.999.21
Price / Cash3.6815.0826.8982.29
Price / Book2.963.229.934.66
Net Income-C$1.56MC$222.40MC$158.14MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance7.64%-0.96%0.08%-0.42%
1 Month Performance-3.80%-3.20%-3.01%-2.81%
1 Year Performance58.46%17.68%24.67%19.71%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NEO
Neo Performance Materials
3.0676 of 5 stars		C$32.50
+0.4%		C$56.17
+72.8%		+61.8%C$1.50BC$603.19M3,250.001,532
GRA
NanoXplore
2.8727 of 5 stars		C$1.55
-4.3%		C$2.65
+71.0%		-48.8%C$281.31MC$115.04MN/A390
ECO
EcoSynthetix
N/AC$1.77
-7.3%		N/A-56.6%C$104.05MC$20.07MN/A25
IPD
International Parkside Products
N/AC$0.06
flat		N/A+22.2%C$908KC$3.24M42.70N/A
ARQ
ARQ
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$0.00N/AN/A140

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel