Do analysts prefer ECO or NEO?

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 71.66%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than EcoSynthetix. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score EcoSynthetix 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer NEO or ARQ?

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 71.66%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than ARQ. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 ARQ 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NEO or ARQ?

ARQ has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Neo Performance Materials C$603.19M 2.51 -C$1.56M C$0.01 3,272.00 ARQ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

C$32.72 +0.27 (+0.83%)

As of 09/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NEO vs. GRA, ECO, IPD, ARQ, and CHE.UN

Should you buy Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? Neo Performance Materials's main competitors and comparable companies include NanoXplore (GRA), EcoSynthetix (ECO), International Parkside Products (IPD), ARQ (ARQ), and Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (CHE.UN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "chemicals" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to NanoXplore?

NanoXplore (TSE:GRA) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

NanoXplore presently has a consensus price target of C$4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 163.16%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 71.66%. Given NanoXplore's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe NanoXplore is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NanoXplore	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

NanoXplore has a beta of -0.042528, indicating that its share price is 104% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to NanoXplore's net margin of -10.91%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat NanoXplore's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NanoXplore	-10.91%	-11.76%	-4.04%
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%

Neo Performance Materials has higher revenue and earnings than NanoXplore. NanoXplore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NanoXplore	C$112.73M	2.45	-C$11.17M	-C$0.08	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.51	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,272.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 5 more articles in the media than NanoXplore. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for NanoXplore. NanoXplore's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.22 indicating that NanoXplore is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NanoXplore	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

6.2% of NanoXplore shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of NanoXplore shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats NanoXplore on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to EcoSynthetix?

EcoSynthetix (TSE:ECO) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

EcoSynthetix has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials. EcoSynthetix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EcoSynthetix	C$20.07M	6.62	-C$1.21M	-C$0.02	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.51	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,272.00

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to EcoSynthetix's net margin of -4.72%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat EcoSynthetix's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EcoSynthetix	-4.72%	-2.47%	-6.26%
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%

EcoSynthetix has a beta of 0.666925, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 71.66%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than EcoSynthetix.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EcoSynthetix	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

0.3% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.5% of EcoSynthetix shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 5 more articles in the media than EcoSynthetix. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for EcoSynthetix. EcoSynthetix's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.22 indicating that EcoSynthetix is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
EcoSynthetix	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats EcoSynthetix on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to International Parkside Products?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and International Parkside Products (CVE:IPD) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$56.17, indicating a potential upside of 71.66%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than International Parkside Products.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
International Parkside Products	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 5 more articles in the media than International Parkside Products. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for International Parkside Products. International Parkside Products' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.22 indicating that International Parkside Products is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
International Parkside Products	Neutral

17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 60.9% of International Parkside Products shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International Parkside Products has a beta of -2.130256, meaning that its share price is 313% less volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to International Parkside Products' net margin of -6.32%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat International Parkside Products' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%
International Parkside Products	-6.32%	-49.33%	-7.48%

International Parkside Products has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials. International Parkside Products is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.51	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,272.00
International Parkside Products	C$3.24M	0.25	C$21.26K	C$0.00	38.82

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats International Parkside Products on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to ARQ?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and ARQ (CNSX:ARQ) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

ARQ has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.51	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,272.00
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of 0.15% compared to ARQ's net margin of 0.00%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of 0.21% beat ARQ's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%
ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 5 more articles in the media than ARQ. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for ARQ. ARQ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.22 indicating that ARQ is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Neutral
ARQ	Neutral

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$56.17, suggesting a potential upside of 71.66%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than ARQ.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
ARQ	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats ARQ on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund (TSE:CHE.UN) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays an annual dividend of C$0.71 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Neo Performance Materials pays out 2,870.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund pays out 55.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

17.6% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus target price of C$56.17, indicating a potential upside of 71.66%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a consensus target price of C$19.56, indicating a potential upside of 29.47%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neo Performance Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$603.19M	2.51	-C$1.56M	C$0.01	3,272.00
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund	C$2.12B	0.80	C$139.02M	C$1.27	11.90

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.437329, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a beta of 0.867195, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund has a net margin of 7.85% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of 0.15%. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's return on equity of 19.73% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	0.15%	0.21%	1.87%
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund	7.85%	19.73%	7.26%

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 3 more articles in the media than Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 2 mentions for Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund. Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of -0.22 indicating that Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NEO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Neo Performance Materials	Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.51B	C$11.57B	C$5.06B	C$12.57B
Dividend Yield	1.27%	2.81%	4.67%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	3,272.00	39.18	26.14	39.47
Price / Sales	2.51	57.82	5,289.96	9.82
Price / Cash	3.68	15.23	27.09	82.29
Price / Book	2.99	3.59	10.63	4.71
Net Income	-C$1.56M	C$222.55M	C$156.32M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.83%	-0.08%	-0.29%	-0.31%
1 Month Performance	-8.88%	1.81%	16.21%	3.12%
1 Year Performance	95.34%	18.16%	45.06%	28.73%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NEO Neo Performance Materials	2.6662 of 5 stars	C$32.72 +0.8%	C$56.17 +71.7%	+95.9%	C$1.51B	C$603.19M	3,272.00	2,100
GRA NanoXplore	2.345 of 5 stars	C$1.56 -3.1%	C$4.00 +156.4%	-52.2%	C$292.19M	C$112.73M	N/A	450	Gap Down
ECO EcoSynthetix	N/A	C$2.26 -1.7%	N/A	-47.4%	C$132.85M	C$20.07M	N/A	25	Gap Down
IPD International Parkside Products	N/A	C$0.05 flat	N/A	+11.1%	C$825K	C$3.24M	38.82	N/A
ARQ ARQ	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$0.00	N/A	N/A	140	High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. GRA, ECO, IPD, ARQ, and CHE.UN

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to NanoXplore?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to EcoSynthetix?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to International Parkside Products?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to ARQ?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. GRA, ECO, IPD, ARQ, and CHE.UN

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to NanoXplore?

Do analysts prefer GRA or NEO?

Which has more volatility & risk, GRA or NEO?

Is GRA or NEO more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GRA or NEO?

Does the media prefer GRA or NEO?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GRA or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to EcoSynthetix?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ECO or NEO?

Is ECO or NEO more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ECO or NEO?

Do analysts prefer ECO or NEO?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ECO or NEO?

Does the media prefer ECO or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to International Parkside Products?

Do analysts prefer NEO or IPD?

Does the media refer more to NEO or IPD?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NEO or IPD?

Which has more risk & volatility, NEO or IPD?

Is NEO or IPD more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, NEO or IPD?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to ARQ?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, NEO or ARQ?

Is NEO or ARQ more profitable?

Does the media favor NEO or ARQ?

Do analysts prefer NEO or ARQ?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NEO or ARQ?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Chemtrade Logistics Income Fund?

Is NEO or CHE.UN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in NEO or CHE.UN?

Do analysts prefer NEO or CHE.UN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NEO or CHE.UN?

Which has more risk and volatility, NEO or CHE.UN?

Is NEO or CHE.UN more profitable?

Does the media favor NEO or CHE.UN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools