Does the media refer more to NEO or SJ?

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Stella-Jones. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for Stella-Jones. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Stella-Jones' score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Neo Performance Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stella-Jones 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend NVEI or NEO?

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Nuvei. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nuvei 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer LIF or NEO?

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.50 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Labrador Iron Ore Royalty 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Neo Performance Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TIXT or NEO?

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score TELUS International (Cda) 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Neo Performance Materials 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

C$37.46 +1.38 (+3.82%)

As of 07/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, LIF, and TIXT

Should you buy Neo Performance Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Neo Performance Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Neo Performance Materials include Stella-Jones (SJ), Enerflex (EFX), Nuvei (NVEI), Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (LIF), and TELUS International (Cda) (TIXT). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Stella-Jones (TSE:SJ) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Stella-Jones has a net margin of 8.66% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Stella-Jones' return on equity of 14.85% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%
Stella-Jones	8.66%	14.85%	9.38%

18.9% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.5% of Stella-Jones shares are held by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Stella-Jones shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials presently has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Stella-Jones has a consensus price target of C$95.38, indicating a potential upside of 19.13%. Given Stella-Jones' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Stella-Jones is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Stella-Jones	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Stella-Jones. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for Stella-Jones. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Stella-Jones' score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stella-Jones	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Stella-Jones has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stella-Jones, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.36	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Stella-Jones	C$3.51B	1.24	C$321.05M	C$5.52	14.50

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Stella-Jones pays an annual dividend of C$1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Stella-Jones pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stella-Jones has a beta of 0.004174, indicating that its share price is 100% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Stella-Jones beats Neo Performance Materials on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) and Enerflex (TSE:EFX) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Enerflex has a net margin of 3.63% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Enerflex's return on equity of 7.72% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%
Enerflex	3.63%	7.72%	3.03%

Neo Performance Materials currently has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Enerflex has a consensus price target of C$35.16, indicating a potential upside of 8.61%. Given Enerflex's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enerflex is more favorable than Neo Performance Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Enerflex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Enerflex pays an annual dividend of C$0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerflex pays out 17.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Neo Performance Materials is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Neo Performance Materials has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Enerflex. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.36	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A
Enerflex	C$2.60B	1.51	-C$114.88M	C$0.68	47.60

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 2 more articles in the media than Enerflex. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Enerflex. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Enerflex's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neo Performance Materials	Positive
Enerflex	Neutral

18.9% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Enerflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Enerflex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerflex has a beta of 2.40505, indicating that its stock price is 141% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Enerflex beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Nuvei (TSE:NVEI) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Nuvei has a net margin of -0.87% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Nuvei's return on equity of -0.17% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nuvei	-0.87%	-0.17%	2.39%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Nuvei.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nuvei	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Nuvei has a beta of 3.12, suggesting that its share price is 212% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 2 more articles in the media than Nuvei. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Nuvei's score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nuvei	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Positive

Nuvei pays an annual dividend of C$0.54 per share. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Nuvei pays out -490.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

71.5% of Nuvei shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Nuvei shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Neo Performance Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nuvei. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuvei, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nuvei	C$1.31B	0.00	-C$11.38M	-C$0.11	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.36	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats Nuvei on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty (TSE:LIF) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 1 more articles in the media than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 1 mentions for Labrador Iron Ore Royalty. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Neo Performance Materials' score of 0.50 indicating that Labrador Iron Ore Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Neo Performance Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	C$165.74M	10.85	C$197.32M	C$1.45	19.38
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.36	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty presently has a consensus target price of C$29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Neo Performance Materials has a consensus target price of C$39.67, suggesting a potential upside of 5.89%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than Labrador Iron Ore Royalty.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$1.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty pays out 93.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a beta of 0.335951, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty has a net margin of 55.72% compared to Neo Performance Materials' net margin of -2.03%. Labrador Iron Ore Royalty's return on equity of 14.38% beat Neo Performance Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	55.72%	14.38%	11.52%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

28.2% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Labrador Iron Ore Royalty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Labrador Iron Ore Royalty beats Neo Performance Materials on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

TELUS International (Cda) (TSE:TIXT) and Neo Performance Materials (TSE:NEO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Neo Performance Materials has a consensus price target of C$39.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.89%. Given Neo Performance Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Neo Performance Materials is more favorable than TELUS International (Cda).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TELUS International (Cda)	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Neo Performance Materials	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

TELUS International (Cda) has a beta of 1.709333, suggesting that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neo Performance Materials has a beta of 1.446369, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Neo Performance Materials has a net margin of -2.03% compared to TELUS International (Cda)'s net margin of -21.69%. Neo Performance Materials' return on equity of -2.63% beat TELUS International (Cda)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TELUS International (Cda)	-21.69%	-16.29%	2.63%
Neo Performance Materials	-2.03%	-2.63%	1.87%

TELUS International (Cda) has higher revenue and earnings than Neo Performance Materials. Neo Performance Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELUS International (Cda), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TELUS International (Cda)	C$2.72B	0.62	C$21.68M	-C$1.38	N/A
Neo Performance Materials	C$512.15M	3.36	-C$1.56M	-C$0.24	N/A

In the previous week, Neo Performance Materials had 2 more articles in the media than TELUS International (Cda). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Neo Performance Materials and 0 mentions for TELUS International (Cda). Neo Performance Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat TELUS International (Cda)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Neo Performance Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
TELUS International (Cda)	Neutral
Neo Performance Materials	Positive

TELUS International (Cda) pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.1%. Neo Performance Materials pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. TELUS International (Cda) pays out -101.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Neo Performance Materials pays out -120.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

6.2% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.9% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.9% of TELUS International (Cda) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Neo Performance Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Neo Performance Materials beats TELUS International (Cda) on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Neo Performance Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NEO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NEO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Neo Performance Materials	Specialty Chemicals Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.72B	C$8.31B	C$4.68B	C$13.07B
Dividend Yield	1.08%	3.41%	5.02%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	-156.08	15.87	21.47	36.51
Price / Sales	3.36	117.20	6,350.67	10.34
Price / Cash	3.68	19.56	26.81	82.29
Price / Book	4.08	3.44	8.78	4.52
Net Income	-C$1.56M	C$213.62M	C$157.26M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	3.60%	0.86%	1.40%	1.85%
1 Month Performance	21.23%	-0.82%	-1.84%	1.71%
1 Year Performance	155.53%	23.35%	46.42%	36.40%

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NEO Neo Performance Materials	1.166 of 5 stars	C$37.46 +3.8%	C$39.67 +5.9%	+155.5%	C$1.72B	C$512.15M	N/A	2,100	Analyst Forecast
SJ Stella-Jones	3.9709 of 5 stars	C$78.38 -1.6%	C$95.38 +21.7%	+1.6%	C$4.28B	C$3.51B	14.20	280
EFX Enerflex	1.6749 of 5 stars	C$34.83 -1.3%	C$35.16 +0.9%	+193.7%	C$4.24B	C$2.60B	51.22	14,000
NVEI Nuvei	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$3.13B	C$1.31B	N/A	1,370
LIF Labrador Iron Ore Royalty	2.2853 of 5 stars	C$27.90 -1.2%	C$29.50 +5.7%	-0.6%	C$1.79B	C$165.74M	19.24	600

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:NEO) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, LIF, and TIXT

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Neo Performance Materials (NEO) Competitors

NEO vs. SJ, EFX, NVEI, LIF, and TIXT

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Stella-Jones?

Is NEO or SJ more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NEO or SJ?

Do analysts recommend NEO or SJ?

Does the media refer more to NEO or SJ?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NEO or SJ?

Is NEO or SJ a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, NEO or SJ?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Enerflex?

Is NEO or EFX more profitable?

Do analysts prefer NEO or EFX?

Is NEO or EFX a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, NEO or EFX?

Does the media favor NEO or EFX?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NEO or EFX?

Which has more risk & volatility, NEO or EFX?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Nuvei?

Is NVEI or NEO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend NVEI or NEO?

Which has more volatility and risk, NVEI or NEO?

Does the media favor NVEI or NEO?

Is NVEI or NEO a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NVEI or NEO?

Which has better valuation & earnings, NVEI or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to Labrador Iron Ore Royalty?

Does the media prefer LIF or NEO?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LIF or NEO?

Do analysts prefer LIF or NEO?

Is LIF or NEO a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, LIF or NEO?

Is LIF or NEO more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LIF or NEO?

Summary

How does Neo Performance Materials compare to TELUS International (Cda)?

Do analysts recommend TIXT or NEO?

Which has more risk & volatility, TIXT or NEO?

Is TIXT or NEO more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TIXT or NEO?

Does the media prefer TIXT or NEO?

Is TIXT or NEO a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TIXT or NEO?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NEO vs. The Competition

Neo Performance Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools