Free Trial
$100 Off Ends Tonight! MarketBeat All Access Returns to $249
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Save $100 Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

GoldMining (GOLD) Competitors

GoldMining logo
C$1.57 +0.04 (+2.61%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

GOLD vs. ODV, TMQ, FVL, NSR, and VGZ

Should you buy GoldMining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GoldMining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GoldMining include Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Nomad Royalty (NSR), and Vista Gold (VGZ). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does GoldMining compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Osisko Development presently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 133.77%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.255934, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

18.2% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 3 more articles in the media than GoldMining. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Osisko Development and 2 mentions for GoldMining. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat GoldMining's score of 0.20 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

GoldMining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-189.60% -10.60% -16.19%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

GoldMining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M31.13-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Summary

Osisko Development beats GoldMining on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Trilogy Metals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trilogy MetalsN/A -36.21% -2.82%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, indicating that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GoldMining had 2 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GoldMining and 0 mentions for Trilogy Metals. GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that GoldMining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals Neutral
GoldMining Neutral

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.07%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats GoldMining on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Freegold Ventures?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.11% -0.68%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.376159, indicating that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, GoldMining had 1 more articles in the media than Freegold Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GoldMining and 1 mentions for Freegold Ventures. GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Freegold Ventures' score of 0.00 indicating that GoldMining is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

8.1% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats GoldMining on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Nomad Royalty?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than GoldMining. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -8.10% -12.10%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

9.7% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, GoldMining had 2 more articles in the media than Nomad Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GoldMining and 0 mentions for Nomad Royalty. GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Nomad Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that GoldMining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats GoldMining on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Vista Gold?

Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

6.5% of Vista Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.7% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GoldMining's return on equity of -8.10% beat Vista Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vista GoldN/A -32.73% -28.08%
GoldMining N/A -8.10%-12.10%

Vista Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vista GoldN/AN/AC$7.97M-C$0.06N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.08N/A

In the previous week, GoldMining had 1 more articles in the media than Vista Gold. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GoldMining and 1 mentions for Vista Gold. Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat GoldMining's score of 0.20 indicating that Vista Gold is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vista Gold
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GoldMining
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Vista Gold has a beta of 3.500555, meaning that its share price is 250% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.572483, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

GoldMining beats Vista Gold on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GoldMining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GOLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GOLD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldMiningGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$335.98MC$5.14BC$4.81BC$12.16B
Dividend YieldN/A5.71%5.01%6.20%
P/E Ratio-19.6338.6123.1037.64
Price / SalesN/A220.936,749.6611.68
Price / Cash71.6022.1127.2182.29
Price / Book1.3612.546.724.50
Net Income-C$24.12MC$6.39MC$157.11MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance2.61%-1.05%-0.51%1.38%
1 Month Performance-4.27%-1.92%-0.41%1.46%
1 Year Performance48.11%91.17%74.77%55.45%

GoldMining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GOLD
GoldMining
N/AC$1.57
+2.6%
N/A+44.3%C$335.98MN/AN/A21,300
ODV
Osisko Development
1.1012 of 5 stars
C$4.22
-7.7%
C$9.00
+113.3%
+44.2%C$1.29BC$37.69MN/A310
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.8243 of 5 stars
C$5.69
-6.9%
C$7.00
+23.0%
+228.7%C$981.79MN/AN/A5
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$1.09
-6.8%
N/A+5.9%C$629.70MN/AN/A3
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GOLD) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners