Go Pro

GoldMining (GOLD) Competitors

GoldMining logo
C$1.18 +0.01 (+0.85%)
As of 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GOLD vs. ODV, TMQ, NSR, FVL, and AU

Should you buy GoldMining stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GoldMining with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GoldMining include Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Freegold Ventures (FVL), and Aurion Resources (AU). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does GoldMining compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GoldMining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development Neutral
GoldMining Neutral

21.8% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GoldMining has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.12N/A

GoldMining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. GoldMining's return on equity of -9.94% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Osisko Development-189.60% -10.60% -16.19%
GoldMining N/A -9.94%-12.10%

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoldMining has a beta of 1.832185, suggesting that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development currently has a consensus price target of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Osisko Development beats GoldMining on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Trilogy Metals?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.12N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 63.17%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than GoldMining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GoldMining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

GoldMining has a beta of 1.832185, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.502576, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

GoldMining's return on equity of -9.94% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -9.94% -12.10%
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

9.4% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats GoldMining on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Nomad Royalty?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -9.94% -12.10%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than GoldMining. GoldMining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.12N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats GoldMining on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Freegold Ventures?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Freegold Ventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Freegold Ventures Neutral

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat GoldMining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -9.94% -12.10%
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

9.4% of GoldMining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.12N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

GoldMining has a beta of 1.832185, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.979954, suggesting that its share price is 198% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats GoldMining on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GoldMining compare to Aurion Resources?

GoldMining (TSE:GOLD) and Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

GoldMining's return on equity of -9.94% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoldMiningN/A -9.94% -12.10%
Aurion Resources N/A -15.29%-3.68%

GoldMining has a beta of 1.832185, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

9.4% of GoldMining shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of GoldMining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, GoldMining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Aurion Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
GoldMining Neutral
Aurion Resources Neutral

Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoldMining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoldMiningN/AN/A-C$24.12M-C$0.12N/A
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A

Summary

Aurion Resources beats GoldMining on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GoldMining News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GOLD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GOLD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GOLD vs. The Competition

MetricGoldMiningGold IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$251.32MC$4.77BC$4.56BC$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A5.64%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio-9.8336.3920.9536.95
Price / SalesN/A204.165,752.369.44
Price / Cash71.6022.1126.3382.29
Price / Book1.1010.688.574.39
Net Income-C$24.12MC$6.39MC$157.08MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance0.85%1.94%1.24%0.61%
1 Month Performance-7.09%-0.66%-1.23%1.06%
1 Year Performance6.31%43.32%35.93%30.89%

GoldMining Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GOLD
GoldMining
N/AC$1.18
+0.9%
N/A+7.3%C$251.32MN/AN/A21,300
ODV
Osisko Development
0.8229 of 5 stars
C$3.21
+2.2%
C$9.00
+180.4%
-1.8%C$978.15MC$37.69MN/A310
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.7222 of 5 stars
C$4.16
flat
C$7.00
+68.3%
+63.7%C$718.62MN/AN/A5
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$0.92
+2.2%
N/A-37.5%C$531.49MN/AN/A3

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GOLD) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners