Trilogy Metals Competitors

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Nexa Resources (TSE:NEXA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and Nexa Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%. Nexa Resources has a consensus price target of C$15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.90%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nexa Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Nexa Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trilogy Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nexa Resources. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nexa Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Nexa Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Nexa Resources on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Semafo (TSE:SMF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and Semafo, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%. Semafo has a consensus price target of C$6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.79%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Semafo.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Semafo's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Semafo has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Semafo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Semafo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Semafo beats Trilogy Metals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and SilverCrest Metals (TSE:SIL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and SilverCrest Metals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%. SilverCrest Metals has a consensus price target of C$16.44, suggesting a potential upside of 54.78%. Given SilverCrest Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SilverCrest Metals is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and SilverCrest Metals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SilverCrest Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and SilverCrest Metals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SilverCrest Metals beats Trilogy Metals on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and China Gold International Resources (TSE:CGG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and China Gold International Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%. China Gold International Resources has a consensus price target of C$3.15, suggesting a potential downside of 12.01%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than China Gold International Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and China Gold International Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Gold International Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Gold International Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and China Gold International Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

China Gold International Resources beats Trilogy Metals on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Largo Resources (TSE:LGO) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and Largo Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%. Largo Resources has a consensus price target of C$15.83, suggesting a potential downside of 20.32%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Largo Resources.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Largo Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Largo Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Largo Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and Largo Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Largo Resources beats Trilogy Metals on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and North American Palladium (TSE:PDL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Trilogy Metals and North American Palladium, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$3.83, suggesting a potential upside of 31.28%.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Trilogy Metals and North American Palladium's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

North American Palladium has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Palladium, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Trilogy Metals and North American Palladium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

North American Palladium beats Trilogy Metals on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.