Which has higher valuation & earnings, SLS or TMQ?

Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Solaris Resources N/A N/A -C$46.49M -C$0.18 N/A Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.30 N/A

Is SLS or TMQ more profitable?

Solaris Resources' return on equity of 54.41% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Solaris Resources N/A 54.41% -51.67% Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69% -2.82%

Do analysts rate NSU or TMQ?

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nevsun Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nevsun Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trilogy Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Is NSU or TMQ more profitable?

Nevsun Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nevsun Resources N/A N/A N/A Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69% -2.82%

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TMQ or FDY?

Faraday Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.30 N/A Faraday Copper N/A N/A -C$20.29M -C$0.15 N/A

Do analysts prefer III or TMQ?

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Imperial Metals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Imperial Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Trilogy Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

C$5.47 +0.46 (+9.18%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, FDY, and III

Should you buy Trilogy Metals stock or one of its competitors? Trilogy Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Ivanhoe Electric (IE), Solaris Resources (SLS), Nevsun Resources (NSU), Faraday Copper (FDY), and Imperial Metals (III). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,143.12%. Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -7.84% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ivanhoe Electric	-1,143.12%	-7.84%	-34.41%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.481248, indicating that its share price is 148% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.507751, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Ivanhoe Electric currently has a consensus price target of C$24.75, indicating a potential upside of 56.84%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ivanhoe Electric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Ivanhoe Electric had 1 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric and 0 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ivanhoe Electric's score of -1.00 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ivanhoe Electric	Negative
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

55.7% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ivanhoe Electric	C$3.02M	833.06	-C$137.37M	-C$0.26	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric beats Trilogy Metals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Solaris Resources	Neutral
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

Solaris Resources' return on equity of 54.41% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Solaris Resources	N/A	54.41%	-51.67%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Solaris Resources currently has a consensus target price of C$19.50, indicating a potential upside of 59.44%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Solaris Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

15.9% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Solaris Resources	N/A	N/A	-C$46.49M	-C$0.18	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.747553, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.507751, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Solaris Resources beats Trilogy Metals on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Nevsun Resources (TSE:NSU) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nevsun Resources. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nevsun Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nevsun Resources	C$335.39M	0.00	-C$36.31M	-C$0.12	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

Nevsun Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nevsun Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nevsun Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nevsun Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Nevsun Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nevsun Resources	Neutral
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Nevsun Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Faraday Copper (TSE:FDY) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.507751, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Faraday Copper has a beta of 1.842882, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Faraday Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of Faraday Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Faraday Copper had 4 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Faraday Copper and 0 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Faraday Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Faraday Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	Neutral
Faraday Copper	Neutral

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.97%. Faraday Copper has a consensus price target of C$6.85, suggesting a potential upside of 18.92%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Faraday Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Faraday Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Faraday Copper's net margin of -40,035.69%. Faraday Copper's return on equity of -36.55% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%
Faraday Copper	-40,035.69%	-36.55%	-27.25%

Faraday Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A
Faraday Copper	N/A	N/A	-C$20.29M	-C$0.15	N/A

Summary

Faraday Copper beats Trilogy Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Imperial Metals (TSE:III) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Imperial Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Metals	C$660.50M	2.54	C$33.43M	C$0.59	15.93
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.97%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Imperial Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Imperial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Imperial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Imperial Metals	Neutral
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

Imperial Metals has a beta of 0.836117, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.507751, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

8.1% of Imperial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.3% of Imperial Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Metals has a net margin of 16.39% compared to Trilogy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Imperial Metals' return on equity of 10.49% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Imperial Metals	16.39%	10.49%	0.74%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Summary

Imperial Metals beats Trilogy Metals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trilogy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TMQ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trilogy Metals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$944.92M	C$4.11B	C$5.13B	C$12.56B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.19%	4.69%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	-18.23	25.69	26.64	39.07
Price / Sales	N/A	8,008.20	4,767.73	10.02
Price / Cash	32.80	29.94	27.30	82.29
Price / Book	8.18	10.57	8.96	4.79
Net Income	-C$7.09M	C$122.32M	C$154.93M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	4.99%	3.27%	2.58%	0.82%
1 Month Performance	22.92%	12.55%	10.17%	5.39%
1 Year Performance	147.51%	57.65%	45.55%	35.05%

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TMQ Trilogy Metals	1.6472 of 5 stars	C$5.47 +9.2%	C$7.00 +28.0%	+147.5%	C$944.92M	N/A	N/A	5
IE Ivanhoe Electric	1.9284 of 5 stars	C$15.00 -4.0%	C$24.75 +65.0%	+23.5%	C$2.39B	C$3.02M	N/A	244	Positive News Analyst Revision
SLS Solaris Resources	1.4605 of 5 stars	C$11.15 -0.8%	C$19.50 +74.9%	+61.6%	C$1.86B	N/A	N/A	10
NSU Nevsun Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.82B	C$335.39M	N/A	N/A
FDY Faraday Copper	1.8587 of 5 stars	C$5.79 +5.3%	C$6.81 +17.7%	+350.0%	C$1.69B	N/A	N/A	14	News Coverage Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:TMQ) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, FDY, and III

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, FDY, and III

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Is IE or TMQ more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, IE or TMQ?

Do analysts prefer IE or TMQ?

Does the media refer more to IE or TMQ?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in IE or TMQ?

Which has better valuation and earnings, IE or TMQ?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Does the media refer more to SLS or TMQ?

Is SLS or TMQ more profitable?

Do analysts rate SLS or TMQ?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SLS or TMQ?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SLS or TMQ?

Which has more volatility and risk, SLS or TMQ?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NSU or TMQ?

Is NSU or TMQ more profitable?

Do analysts rate NSU or TMQ?

Does the media refer more to NSU or TMQ?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NSU or TMQ?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Which has more volatility and risk, TMQ or FDY?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TMQ or FDY?

Does the media favor TMQ or FDY?

Do analysts recommend TMQ or FDY?

Is TMQ or FDY more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TMQ or FDY?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Which has better earnings & valuation, III or TMQ?

Do analysts prefer III or TMQ?

Does the media refer more to III or TMQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, III or TMQ?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in III or TMQ?

Is III or TMQ more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools