Go Pro

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

Trilogy Metals logo
C$4.40 +0.04 (+0.92%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

TMQ vs. IE, NSU, SLS, III, and FDY

Should you buy Trilogy Metals stock or one of its competitors? Trilogy Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Ivanhoe Electric (IE), Nevsun Resources (NSU), Solaris Resources (SLS), Imperial Metals (III), and Faraday Copper (FDY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Ivanhoe Electric had 4 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric and 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of -0.03 beat Ivanhoe Electric's score of -0.43 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Trilogy Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ivanhoe Electric currently has a consensus price target of C$23.17, suggesting a potential upside of 55.79%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.45%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Ivanhoe Electric.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ivanhoe Electric
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.673206, suggesting that its stock price is 167% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

57.6% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,143.12%. Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -7.84% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ivanhoe Electric-1,143.12% -7.84% -34.41%
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ivanhoe ElectricC$3.02M785.02-C$137.37M-C$0.26N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric beats Trilogy Metals on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Nevsun Resources (TSE:NSU) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Nevsun Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Nevsun Resources. Nevsun Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Trilogy Metals' score of -0.03 indicating that Nevsun Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nevsun Resources Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

Nevsun Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nevsun ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

9.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nevsun Resources. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nevsun Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nevsun ResourcesC$335.39M0.00-C$36.31M-C$0.12N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.45%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nevsun Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nevsun Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Nevsun Resources on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Solaris Resources' return on equity of 54.41% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trilogy MetalsN/A -40.69% -2.82%
Solaris Resources N/A 54.41%-51.67%

9.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.4% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A
Solaris ResourcesN/AN/A-C$46.49M-C$0.18N/A

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.769178, meaning that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Solaris Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Solaris Resources. Solaris Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Trilogy Metals' score of -0.03 indicating that Solaris Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals Neutral
Solaris Resources Neutral

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 59.45%. Solaris Resources has a consensus price target of C$19.50, indicating a potential upside of 95.78%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Solaris Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Solaris Resources beats Trilogy Metals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Imperial Metals (TSE:III) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Imperial Metals has a net margin of 16.39% compared to Trilogy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Imperial Metals' return on equity of 10.49% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Metals16.39% 10.49% 0.74%
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.45%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Imperial Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Imperial Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial MetalsC$660.50M2.27C$33.43MC$0.5914.24
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

9.1% of Imperial Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 49.3% of Imperial Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Metals has a beta of 0.90624, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Imperial Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Imperial Metals and 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Imperial Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Trilogy Metals' score of -0.03 indicating that Imperial Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Trilogy Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Imperial Metals beats Trilogy Metals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Faraday Copper (TSE:FDY) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

15.9% of Faraday Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Faraday Copper shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Faraday Copper presently has a consensus target price of C$6.90, suggesting a potential upside of 27.78%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 59.45%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Faraday Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Faraday Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Faraday Copper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Faraday Copper. Faraday Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Trilogy Metals' score of -0.03 indicating that Faraday Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Faraday Copper Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

Faraday Copper has a beta of 1.654921, indicating that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Faraday Copper's net margin of -40,035.69%. Faraday Copper's return on equity of -36.55% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Faraday Copper-40,035.69% -36.55% -27.25%
Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69%-2.82%

Faraday Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Faraday CopperN/AN/A-C$20.29M-C$0.15N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.30N/A

Summary

Faraday Copper beats Trilogy Metals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trilogy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TMQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TMQ vs. The Competition

MetricTrilogy MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$760.08MC$3.73BC$4.69BC$12.53B
Dividend YieldN/A5.25%4.76%6.31%
P/E Ratio-14.6725.0625.0939.33
Price / SalesN/A27,853.1316,596.589.16
Price / Cash32.8027.1024.9482.29
Price / Book6.5812.2810.204.61
Net Income-C$7.09MC$127.43MC$158.44MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.08%-3.18%-2.73%-1.15%
1 Month Performance-9.09%-4.71%-4.51%-2.15%
1 Year Performance50.68%20.92%18.00%17.09%

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
2.1334 of 5 stars
C$4.40
+0.9%
C$7.00
+59.1%
+32.5%C$760.08MN/AN/A5
IE
Ivanhoe Electric
2.0124 of 5 stars
C$14.53
-3.7%
C$24.75
+70.3%
-16.8%C$2.32BC$3.02MN/A286
NSU
Nevsun Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$1.82BC$335.39MN/AN/A
SLS
Solaris Resources
1.4251 of 5 stars
C$10.22
-5.5%
C$19.50
+90.8%
+9.5%C$1.71BN/AN/A10
III
Imperial Metals
N/AC$9.02
-4.7%
N/A+31.6%C$1.61BC$660.50M15.291,258

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:TMQ) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners