Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

C$6.11 -0.28 (-4.38%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

TMQ vs. NVA, VZLA, NDM, ODV, and FVL

Should you buy Trilogy Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trilogy Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trilogy Metals include NuVista Energy (NVA), Vizsla Silver (VZLA), Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM), Osisko Development (ODV), and Freegold Ventures (FVL). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and NuVista Energy (TSE:NVA) are both precious metals companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of NuVista Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of NuVista Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NuVista Energy has a beta of 0.2353, suggesting that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market.

NuVista Energy has a net margin of 27.85% compared to Trilogy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. NuVista Energy's return on equity of 13.56% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
NuVista Energy	27.85%	13.56%	9.79%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 3 more articles in the media than NuVista Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for NuVista Energy. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat NuVista Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	Neutral
NuVista Energy	Neutral

NuVista Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NuVista Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
NuVista Energy	C$1.18B	3.13	C$294.68M	C$1.61	11.83

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. NuVista Energy has a consensus target price of C$17.82, indicating a potential downside of 6.42%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than NuVista Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
NuVista Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

NuVista Energy beats Trilogy Metals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Vizsla Silver (TSE:VZLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.2% of Vizsla Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vizsla Silver has a beta of 1.947546, suggesting that its stock price is 95% more volatile than the broader market.

Vizsla Silver's return on equity of -31.37% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
Vizsla Silver	N/A	-31.37%	N/A

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Vizsla Silver. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Vizsla Silver. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Vizsla Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Vizsla Silver	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vizsla Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
Vizsla Silver	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.49	N/A

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Vizsla Silver has a consensus target price of C$8.70, indicating a potential upside of 68.60%. Given Vizsla Silver's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vizsla Silver is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Vizsla Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Vizsla Silver on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Northern Dynasty Minerals (TSE:NDM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals' return on equity of -36.21% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	-238.60%	-8.16%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Northern Dynasty Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 2 mentions for Northern Dynasty Minerals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' score of -1.11 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	Neutral
Northern Dynasty Minerals	Negative

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Dynasty Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$17.31M	-C$0.19	N/A

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Dynasty Minerals has a beta of -0.627063, suggesting that its stock price is 163% less volatile than the broader market.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Northern Dynasty Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Northern Dynasty Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Northern Dynasty Minerals on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

18.1% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.60% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	-189.60%	-10.60%	-16.19%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Osisko Development. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 2 mentions for Osisko Development. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.27 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trilogy Metals	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	C$35.48M	39.24	-C$332.96M	-C$0.95	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.255934, suggesting that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development currently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 96.94%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Osisko Development	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Osisko Development beats Trilogy Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Freegold Ventures.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Freegold Ventures	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.376159, suggesting that its share price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.80% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
Freegold Ventures	N/A	-5.80%	-0.68%

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 3 more articles in the media than Freegold Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Freegold Ventures. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.27 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	Neutral
Freegold Ventures	Positive

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
Freegold Ventures	N/A	N/A	-C$809.92K	-C$0.01	N/A

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Trilogy Metals and Freegold Ventures tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trilogy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TMQ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trilogy Metals	Other Industrial Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.05B	C$1.66B	C$4.96B	C$11.97B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.55%	4.97%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	-21.82	31.29	23.65	36.97
Price / Sales	N/A	61,327.50	7,251.54	12.07
Price / Cash	32.80	24.63	27.65	82.42
Price / Book	8.65	5.74	7.00	4.62
Net Income	-C$7.09M	C$70.60M	C$159.01M	C$299.62M
7 Day Performance	0.49%	2.55%	1.90%	0.84%
1 Month Performance	6.82%	4.92%	2.55%	1.26%
1 Year Performance	233.88%	132.48%	85.98%	58.29%

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TMQ Trilogy Metals	2.1141 of 5 stars	C$6.11 -4.4%	C$7.00 +14.6%	+229.4%	C$1.05B	N/A	N/A	5	News Coverage Insider Trade
NVA NuVista Energy	1.4373 of 5 stars	C$19.04 flat	C$17.82 -6.4%	N/A	C$3.69B	C$1.18B	11.83	88
VZLA Vizsla Silver	1.1188 of 5 stars	C$5.28 +0.2%	C$8.70 +64.8%	+60.1%	C$1.85B	N/A	N/A	10	News Coverage
NDM Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	C$3.05 +2.3%	N/A	+118.3%	C$1.71B	N/A	N/A	N/A	Negative News Insider Trade
ODV Osisko Development	0.9829 of 5 stars	C$4.69 +1.5%	C$9.00 +91.9%	+78.2%	C$1.43B	C$35.48M	N/A	310	News Coverage Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:TMQ) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. NVA, VZLA, NDM, ODV, and FVL

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. NVA, VZLA, NDM, ODV, and FVL

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TMQ or NVA?

Which has more risk & volatility, TMQ or NVA?

Is TMQ or NVA more profitable?

Does the media prefer TMQ or NVA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TMQ or NVA?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or NVA?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TMQ or VZLA?

Which has more risk & volatility, TMQ or VZLA?

Is TMQ or VZLA more profitable?

Does the media prefer TMQ or VZLA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TMQ or VZLA?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or VZLA?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TMQ or NDM?

Is TMQ or NDM more profitable?

Does the media prefer TMQ or NDM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TMQ or NDM?

Which has more risk & volatility, TMQ or NDM?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or NDM?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ODV or TMQ?

Is ODV or TMQ more profitable?

Does the media favor ODV or TMQ?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ODV or TMQ?

Which has more risk & volatility, ODV or TMQ?

Do analysts rate ODV or TMQ?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Do analysts recommend TMQ or FVL?

Which has more volatility and risk, TMQ or FVL?

Is TMQ or FVL more profitable?

Does the media favor TMQ or FVL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TMQ or FVL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TMQ or FVL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools