Does the media refer more to TMQ or SVM?

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals and Trilogy Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Silvercorp Metals' score of -0.09 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Silvercorp Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, VZLA or TMQ?

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vizsla Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vizsla Silver N/A N/A N/A -C$0.49 N/A Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.28 N/A

Is VZLA or TMQ more profitable?

Vizsla Silver's return on equity of -31.37% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vizsla Silver N/A -31.37% N/A Trilogy Metals N/A -36.21% -2.82%

Does the media prefer VZLA or TMQ?

In the previous week, Vizsla Silver and Vizsla Silver both had 1 articles in the media. Vizsla Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Vizsla Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vizsla Silver 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer TMQ or NDM?

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Northern Dynasty Minerals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trilogy Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Northern Dynasty Minerals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, TMQ or NDM?

Northern Dynasty Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.28 N/A Northern Dynasty Minerals N/A N/A -C$17.31M -C$0.10 N/A

Is TMQ or NDM more profitable?

Trilogy Metals' return on equity of -36.21% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trilogy Metals N/A -36.21% -2.82% Northern Dynasty Minerals N/A -106.87% -8.16%

Does the media refer more to TMQ or NDM?

In the previous week, Northern Dynasty Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Northern Dynasty Minerals and 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' score of -1.05 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Northern Dynasty Minerals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Does the media prefer ODV or TMQ?

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 4 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Osisko Development and 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Osisko Development 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

C$6.16 -0.45 (-6.81%)

As of 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TMQ vs. SVM, NVA, VZLA, NDM, and ODV

Should you buy Trilogy Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Trilogy Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Trilogy Metals include Silvercorp Metals (SVM), NuVista Energy (NVA), Vizsla Silver (VZLA), Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM), and Osisko Development (ODV). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Silvercorp Metals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Silvercorp Metals (TSE:SVM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.64%. Silvercorp Metals has a consensus target price of C$15.25, suggesting a potential downside of 10.35%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Silvercorp Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Silvercorp Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.7% of Silvercorp Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Silvercorp Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals and Trilogy Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Silvercorp Metals' score of -0.09 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Silvercorp Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Silvercorp Metals' net margin of -2.25%. Silvercorp Metals' return on equity of -1.27% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
Silvercorp Metals	-2.25%	-1.27%	6.54%

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Silvercorp Metals has a beta of 2.672577, meaning that its share price is 167% more volatile than the broader market.

Silvercorp Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Silvercorp Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
Silvercorp Metals	C$438.14M	8.59	C$41.86M	-C$0.05	N/A

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Silvercorp Metals on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

NuVista Energy (TSE:NVA) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both precious metals companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

20.5% of NuVista Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.3% of NuVista Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NuVista Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NuVista Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
NuVista Energy	C$1.18B	3.13	C$294.68M	C$1.61	11.83
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A

NuVista Energy currently has a consensus target price of C$17.82, suggesting a potential downside of 6.42%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than NuVista Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
NuVista Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than NuVista Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for NuVista Energy. NuVista Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
NuVista Energy	Neutral
Trilogy Metals	Neutral

NuVista Energy has a beta of 0.2353, suggesting that its share price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

NuVista Energy has a net margin of 27.85% compared to Trilogy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. NuVista Energy's return on equity of 13.56% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
NuVista Energy	27.85%	13.56%	9.79%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%

Summary

NuVista Energy beats Trilogy Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Vizsla Silver (TSE:VZLA) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Vizsla Silver and Vizsla Silver both had 1 articles in the media. Vizsla Silver's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Vizsla Silver is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vizsla Silver	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Vizsla Silver has a beta of 1.947546, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Vizsla Silver's return on equity of -31.37% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vizsla Silver	N/A	-31.37%	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%

Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vizsla Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vizsla Silver	N/A	N/A	N/A	-C$0.49	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A

35.2% of Vizsla Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vizsla Silver currently has a consensus target price of C$8.70, indicating a potential upside of 62.01%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Vizsla Silver's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Vizsla Silver is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vizsla Silver	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Vizsla Silver beats Trilogy Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Northern Dynasty Minerals (TSE:NDM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Northern Dynasty Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Northern Dynasty Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Northern Dynasty Minerals had 5 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Northern Dynasty Minerals and 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' score of -1.05 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Northern Dynasty Minerals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.5% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Northern Dynasty Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	N/A	-C$17.31M	-C$0.10	N/A

Trilogy Metals' return on equity of -36.21% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%
Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	-106.87%	-8.16%

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, suggesting that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Northern Dynasty Minerals has a beta of -0.627063, suggesting that its stock price is 163% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Northern Dynasty Minerals on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 4 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Osisko Development and 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Osisko Development	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

18.3% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.2% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Osisko Development's return on equity of -10.60% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Osisko Development	-189.60%	-10.60%	-16.19%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-36.21%	-2.82%

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Osisko Development. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Osisko Development	C$37.69M	29.10	-C$332.96M	-C$0.49	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.28	N/A

Osisko Development currently has a consensus target price of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 150.00%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Osisko Development	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	4.00
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Osisko Development has a beta of 2.255934, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.658196, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Osisko Development beats Trilogy Metals on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trilogy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TMQ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trilogy Metals	Other Industrial Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$1.06B	C$1.69B	C$4.97B	C$12.49B
Dividend Yield	N/A	6.55%	4.95%	6.21%
P/E Ratio	-22.00	30.65	23.42	37.57
Price / Sales	N/A	55,271.78	6,527.01	11.23
Price / Cash	32.80	24.63	27.43	82.29
Price / Book	8.72	5.83	9.44	4.59
Net Income	-C$7.09M	C$70.60M	C$156.62M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	1.65%	0.90%	0.07%	0.50%
1 Month Performance	1.82%	2.11%	0.81%	1.40%
1 Year Performance	250.00%	113.53%	70.03%	51.29%

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TMQ Trilogy Metals	1.4166 of 5 stars	C$6.16 -6.8%	C$7.00 +13.6%	+300.6%	C$1.06B	N/A	N/A	5	News Coverage
SVM Silvercorp Metals	0.7829 of 5 stars	C$16.75 -2.9%	C$15.25 -9.0%	+221.3%	C$3.70B	C$365.89M	N/A	1,330	Earnings Report Gap Down
NVA NuVista Energy	1.0968 of 5 stars	C$19.04 flat	C$17.82 -6.4%	N/A	C$3.69B	C$1.18B	11.83	88
VZLA Vizsla Silver	1.3612 of 5 stars	C$5.04 -1.8%	C$8.70 +72.6%	+34.8%	C$1.76B	N/A	N/A	10	News Coverage Gap Down
NDM Northern Dynasty Minerals	N/A	C$3.01 flat	N/A	+109.6%	C$1.69B	N/A	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:TMQ) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. SVM, NVA, VZLA, NDM, and ODV

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Silvercorp Metals?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. SVM, NVA, VZLA, NDM, and ODV

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Silvercorp Metals?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or SVM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of TMQ or SVM?

Does the media refer more to TMQ or SVM?

Is TMQ or SVM more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, TMQ or SVM?

Which has better earnings & valuation, TMQ or SVM?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to NuVista Energy?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NVA or TMQ?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NVA or TMQ?

Do analysts rate NVA or TMQ?

Does the media favor NVA or TMQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, NVA or TMQ?

Is NVA or TMQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Vizsla Silver?

Does the media prefer VZLA or TMQ?

Which has more volatility & risk, VZLA or TMQ?

Is VZLA or TMQ more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, VZLA or TMQ?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in VZLA or TMQ?

Do analysts prefer VZLA or TMQ?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or NDM?

Does the media refer more to TMQ or NDM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TMQ or NDM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TMQ or NDM?

Is TMQ or NDM more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, TMQ or NDM?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Does the media prefer ODV or TMQ?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ODV or TMQ?

Is ODV or TMQ more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ODV or TMQ?

Do analysts rate ODV or TMQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, ODV or TMQ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools