Does the media refer more to IE or TMQ?

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Ivanhoe Electric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Ivanhoe Electric is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ivanhoe Electric 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TMQ or SLS?

Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.30 N/A Solaris Resources N/A N/A -C$46.49M -C$0.18 N/A

Is TMQ or SLS more profitable?

Solaris Resources' return on equity of 54.41% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69% -2.82% Solaris Resources N/A 54.41% -51.67%

Does the media favor TMQ or SLS?

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Solaris Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Solaris Resources. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solaris Resources'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Solaris Resources 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend TMQ or NSU?

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nevsun Resources. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trilogy Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Nevsun Resources 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Is TMQ or NSU more profitable?

Nevsun Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Trilogy Metals N/A -40.69% -2.82% Nevsun Resources N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer TMQ or III?

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Imperial Metals. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Trilogy Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Imperial Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer TMQ or III?

In the previous week, Imperial Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Imperial Metals and 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Imperial Metals' score of -0.29 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Imperial Metals 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, FDY or TMQ?

Faraday Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Faraday Copper N/A N/A -C$20.29M -C$0.15 N/A Trilogy Metals N/A N/A -C$7.09M -C$0.30 N/A

Does the media refer more to FDY or TMQ?

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Faraday Copper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Faraday Copper. Faraday Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Faraday Copper 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Trilogy Metals 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

C$4.55 -0.06 (-1.30%)

As of 09/11/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, III, and FDY

Should you buy Trilogy Metals stock or one of its competitors? Trilogy Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Ivanhoe Electric (IE), Solaris Resources (SLS), Nevsun Resources (NSU), Imperial Metals (III), and Faraday Copper (FDY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Ivanhoe Electric (TSE:IE) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Ivanhoe Electric presently has a consensus price target of C$24.75, indicating a potential upside of 70.93%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus price target of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Ivanhoe Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Ivanhoe Electric is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ivanhoe Electric	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 2.673206, indicating that its share price is 167% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Trilogy Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ivanhoe Electric	C$3.02M	764.43	-C$137.37M	-C$0.26	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

56.8% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.1% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 37.1% of Ivanhoe Electric shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Ivanhoe Electric. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Ivanhoe Electric. Ivanhoe Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Ivanhoe Electric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ivanhoe Electric	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ivanhoe Electric's net margin of -1,143.12%. Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -7.84% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ivanhoe Electric	-1,143.12%	-7.84%	-34.41%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Summary

Ivanhoe Electric beats Trilogy Metals on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Solaris Resources (TSE:SLS) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Solaris Resources' return on equity of 54.41% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%
Solaris Resources	N/A	54.41%	-51.67%

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solaris Resources has a beta of 1.769178, indicating that its share price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

Solaris Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A
Solaris Resources	N/A	N/A	-C$46.49M	-C$0.18	N/A

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.85%. Solaris Resources has a consensus price target of C$19.50, suggesting a potential upside of 78.41%. Given Solaris Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Solaris Resources is more favorable than Trilogy Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Solaris Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

9.1% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.5% of Solaris Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Solaris Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Solaris Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Solaris Resources. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solaris Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Solaris Resources	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Solaris Resources beats Trilogy Metals on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Nevsun Resources (TSE:NSU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Nevsun Resources.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Nevsun Resources	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

9.1% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nevsun Resources. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nevsun Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A
Nevsun Resources	C$335.39M	0.00	-C$36.31M	-C$0.12	N/A

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Nevsun Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Nevsun Resources. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nevsun Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	Neutral
Nevsun Resources	Neutral

Nevsun Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%
Nevsun Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Nevsun Resources on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Imperial Metals (TSE:III) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Imperial Metals has a net margin of 16.39% compared to Trilogy Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Imperial Metals' return on equity of 10.49% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%
Imperial Metals	16.39%	10.49%	0.74%

Trilogy Metals presently has a consensus target price of C$7.00, indicating a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Imperial Metals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Imperial Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

9.1% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.1% of Imperial Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.3% of Imperial Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Imperial Metals has a beta of 0.90624, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Imperial Metals had 2 more articles in the media than Trilogy Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Imperial Metals and 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Imperial Metals' score of -0.29 indicating that Trilogy Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Imperial Metals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Imperial Metals has higher revenue and earnings than Trilogy Metals. Trilogy Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A
Imperial Metals	C$660.50M	2.48	C$33.43M	C$0.59	15.61

Summary

Imperial Metals beats Trilogy Metals on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Faraday Copper (TSE:FDY) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

15.5% of Faraday Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.1% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of Faraday Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Faraday Copper. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 1 mentions for Faraday Copper. Faraday Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Faraday Copper	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Trilogy Metals	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Faraday Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$6.85, suggesting a potential upside of 33.01%. Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.85%. Given Trilogy Metals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Faraday Copper.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Faraday Copper	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Trilogy Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Trilogy Metals has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Faraday Copper's net margin of -40,035.69%. Faraday Copper's return on equity of -36.55% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Faraday Copper	-40,035.69%	-36.55%	-27.25%
Trilogy Metals	N/A	-40.69%	-2.82%

Faraday Copper has a beta of 1.654921, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.474641, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Faraday Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Faraday Copper	N/A	N/A	-C$20.29M	-C$0.15	N/A
Trilogy Metals	N/A	N/A	-C$7.09M	-C$0.30	N/A

Summary

Faraday Copper and Trilogy Metals tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Trilogy Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TMQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TMQ vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Trilogy Metals	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$796.36M	C$3.94B	C$4.94B	C$12.66B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.17%	4.68%	6.28%
P/E Ratio	-15.17	24.22	24.68	40.11
Price / Sales	N/A	8,053.87	4,791.72	9.50
Price / Cash	32.80	29.47	26.89	82.29
Price / Book	6.80	12.33	10.24	4.67
Net Income	-C$7.09M	C$127.55M	C$158.16M	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-1.09%	-1.43%	-1.45%	-1.33%
1 Month Performance	-13.00%	9.72%	7.08%	-1.18%
1 Year Performance	55.29%	47.16%	37.22%	23.80%

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TMQ Trilogy Metals	1.9027 of 5 stars	C$4.55 -1.3%	C$7.00 +53.8%	+56.4%	C$796.36M	N/A	N/A	5	News Coverage
IE Ivanhoe Electric	2.5973 of 5 stars	C$13.89 -0.4%	C$24.75 +78.2%	+18.7%	C$2.22B	C$3.02M	N/A	244
SLS Solaris Resources	1.4022 of 5 stars	C$11.51 +0.5%	C$19.50 +69.4%	+51.6%	C$1.92B	N/A	N/A	10	News Coverage
NSU Nevsun Resources	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	C$1.82B	C$335.39M	N/A	N/A
III Imperial Metals	N/A	C$9.19 +2.6%	N/A	+69.9%	C$1.64B	C$660.50M	15.58	1,258

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:TMQ) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, III, and FDY

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Trilogy Metals (TMQ) Competitors

TMQ vs. IE, SLS, NSU, III, and FDY

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Ivanhoe Electric?

Do analysts rate IE or TMQ?

Which has more risk and volatility, IE or TMQ?

Which has better valuation and earnings, IE or TMQ?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in IE or TMQ?

Does the media refer more to IE or TMQ?

Is IE or TMQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Solaris Resources?

Is TMQ or SLS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TMQ or SLS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TMQ or SLS?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or SLS?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TMQ or SLS?

Does the media favor TMQ or SLS?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Nevsun Resources?

Do analysts recommend TMQ or NSU?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TMQ or NSU?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TMQ or NSU?

Does the media prefer TMQ or NSU?

Is TMQ or NSU more profitable?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Imperial Metals?

Is TMQ or III more profitable?

Do analysts prefer TMQ or III?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TMQ or III?

Which has more volatility and risk, TMQ or III?

Does the media prefer TMQ or III?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TMQ or III?

Summary

How does Trilogy Metals compare to Faraday Copper?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FDY or TMQ?

Does the media refer more to FDY or TMQ?

Do analysts rate FDY or TMQ?

Is FDY or TMQ more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FDY or TMQ?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FDY or TMQ?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TMQ vs. The Competition

Trilogy Metals Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools