Go Pro

Platinum Group Metals (PTM) Competitors

Platinum Group Metals logo
C$1.91 -0.11 (-5.45%)
As of 09/23/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PTM vs. ODV, NSR, AU, LUC, and GENM

Should you buy Platinum Group Metals stock or one of its competitors? Platinum Group Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Osisko Development (ODV), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Aurion Resources (AU), Lucara Diamond (LUC), and Generation Mining (GENM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Platinum Group Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.8% of Osisko Development shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.612302, suggesting that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Platinum Group Metals and Platinum Group Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of 0.75 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Osisko Development
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Osisko Development has a consensus target price of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Platinum Group Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Platinum Group Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Osisko Development has a net margin of 149.54% compared to Platinum Group Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.45% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Osisko Development 149.54%11.45%-16.19%

Summary

Osisko Development beats Platinum Group Metals on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Platinum Group Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Platinum Group Metals and 0 mentions for Nomad Royalty. Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Nomad Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Platinum Group Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Positive
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Platinum Group Metals on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Aurion Resources?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Platinum Group Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Aurion Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Platinum Group Metals and 0 mentions for Aurion Resources. Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Aurion Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Platinum Group Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Positive
Aurion Resources Neutral

Platinum Group Metals' return on equity of -7.14% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Aurion Resources N/A -15.29%-3.68%

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.612302, suggesting that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurion Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Aurion Resources on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Lucara Diamond?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Platinum Group Metals and Platinum Group Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Lucara Diamond's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of 0.75 indicating that Lucara Diamond is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lucara Diamond
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Platinum Group Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Lucara Diamond's return on equity of 4.15% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Lucara Diamond 10.15%4.15%3.82%

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lucara Diamond. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.66-C$24.20MC$0.035.50

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.612302, indicating that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.562706, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Platinum Group Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Generation Mining?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Generation Mining had 3 more articles in the media than Platinum Group Metals. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Generation Mining and 1 mentions for Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Generation Mining's score of 0.69 indicating that Platinum Group Metals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Generation Mining
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Generation Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A

Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Generation Mining N/A 90.73%-71.47%

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Generation Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.612302, meaning that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Generation Mining has a beta of 2.36615, meaning that its stock price is 137% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Generation Mining on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Platinum Group Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PTM vs. The Competition

MetricPlatinum Group MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$258.33MC$3.96BC$4.94BC$12.84B
Dividend Yield7.58%5.21%4.71%6.27%
P/E Ratio-63.6725.7526.0940.36
Price / SalesN/A30,922.2218,350.819.35
Price / Cash19.9229.4726.8982.29
Price / Book2.4712.2010.144.69
Net Income-C$3.42MC$127.53MC$158.14MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.05%0.77%0.46%0.01%
1 Month Performance-15.86%-2.33%-2.23%-2.14%
1 Year Performance-34.36%30.24%25.36%20.17%

Platinum Group Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PTM
Platinum Group Metals
N/AC$1.91
-5.4%
N/A-35.5%C$258.33MN/AN/A12
ODV
Osisko Development
1.248 of 5 stars
C$3.21
flat
C$9.00
+180.4%
-28.5%C$978.15MC$37.69MN/A310
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat
N/A+125.7%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730
LUC
Lucara Diamond
N/AC$0.18
+2.9%
N/A-13.2%C$261.27MC$148.50M5.83324

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PTM) was last updated on 9/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners