Go Pro

Platinum Group Metals (PTM) Competitors

Platinum Group Metals logo
C$2.09 +0.07 (+3.47%)
As of 07/3/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

PTM vs. TMQ, FVL, NSR, AU, and VGZ

Should you buy Platinum Group Metals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Platinum Group Metals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Platinum Group Metals include Trilogy Metals (TMQ), Freegold Ventures (FVL), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Aurion Resources (AU), and Vista Gold (VGZ). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Trilogy Metals?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

Platinum Group Metals' return on equity of -13.59% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -13.59% -10.89%
Trilogy Metals N/A -36.21%-2.82%

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.444747, meaning that its share price is 144% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.385419, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Trilogy Metals has a consensus target price of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.57%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Platinum Group Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Platinum Group Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

4.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.4% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.05N/A
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals had 1 more articles in the media than Platinum Group Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Trilogy Metals and 0 mentions for Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Trilogy Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Neutral
Trilogy Metals Neutral

Summary

Trilogy Metals beats Platinum Group Metals on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Freegold Ventures?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.444747, meaning that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, meaning that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Platinum Group Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.05N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Neutral
Freegold Ventures Positive

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -13.59% -10.89%
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Platinum Group Metals on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Platinum Group Metals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomad Royalty'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Neutral
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -13.59% -10.89%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.05N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

4.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Platinum Group Metals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Aurion Resources?

Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.444747, meaning that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the broader market.

Platinum Group Metals' return on equity of -13.59% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aurion ResourcesN/A -15.29% -3.68%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -13.59%-10.89%

Aurion Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Platinum Group Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.05N/A

20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Aurion Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Platinum Group Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aurion Resources Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Neutral

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Aurion Resources on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Vista Gold?

Vista Gold (TSE:VGZ) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Vista Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Platinum Group Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vista GoldN/AN/AC$7.97M-C$0.06N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.05N/A

Vista Gold has a beta of 3.651036, meaning that its share price is 265% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.444747, meaning that its share price is 144% more volatile than the broader market.

10.3% of Vista Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Vista Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vista Gold had 1 more articles in the media than Platinum Group Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Vista Gold and 0 mentions for Platinum Group Metals. Vista Gold's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Platinum Group Metals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vista Gold Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Neutral

Platinum Group Metals' return on equity of -13.59% beat Vista Gold's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vista GoldN/A -32.73% -28.08%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -13.59%-10.89%

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Vista Gold on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Platinum Group Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PTM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PTM vs. The Competition

MetricPlatinum Group MetalsOther Precious Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$265.07MC$622.17MC$4.68BC$13.07B
Dividend Yield7.58%6.10%5.02%6.18%
P/E Ratio-41.8012.8021.4736.51
Price / SalesN/A3,596.696,341.2110.34
Price / Cash19.9213.0426.8182.29
Price / Book2.6855.618.784.52
Net Income-C$3.42M-C$4.87MC$157.26MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance11.17%2.87%1.40%1.85%
1 Month Performance6.09%-2.00%-1.84%1.71%
1 Year Performance-2.79%60.42%46.42%36.40%

Platinum Group Metals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PTM
Platinum Group Metals
N/AC$2.09
+3.5%
N/A-2.8%C$265.07MN/AN/A10
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.6521 of 5 stars
C$4.91
+1.4%
C$7.00
+42.6%
+168.3%C$847.20MN/AN/A5
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$1.09
+4.8%
N/A-12.1%C$629.70MN/AN/A3
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat
N/A+265.5%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:PTM) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners