Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free PTM Stock Alerts

Platinum Group Metals (PTM) Competitors

Platinum Group Metals logo
C$2.13 +0.01 (+0.47%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

PTM vs. ODV, NSR, AU, LUC, and GENM

Should you buy Platinum Group Metals stock or one of its competitors? Platinum Group Metals's main competitors and comparable companies include Osisko Development (ODV), Nomad Royalty (NSR), Aurion Resources (AU), Lucara Diamond (LUC), and Generation Mining (GENM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "precious metals & minerals" industry.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Osisko Development?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.8% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Platinum Group Metals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M25.95-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A

Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, suggesting that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.221719, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development has a net margin of 149.54% compared to Platinum Group Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Osisko Development's return on equity of 11.45% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Osisko Development 149.54%11.45%-16.19%

In the previous week, Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Negative
Osisko Development Neutral

Osisko Development has a consensus price target of C$9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 180.37%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Platinum Group Metals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Platinum Group Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Summary

Osisko Development beats Platinum Group Metals on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Nomad Royalty?

Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) and Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Nomad Royalty's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Nomad Royalty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Platinum Group Metals Negative
Nomad Royalty Neutral

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Platinum Group MetalsN/A -7.14% -10.89%
Nomad Royalty N/A N/A N/A

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Platinum Group Metals. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A

3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomad Royalty beats Platinum Group Metals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Aurion Resources?

Aurion Resources (CVE:AU) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Aurion Resources has a beta of 0.755643, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, indicating that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aurion Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Aurion Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aurion Resources Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Negative

Platinum Group Metals' return on equity of -7.14% beat Aurion Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aurion ResourcesN/A -15.29% -3.68%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -7.14%-10.89%

20.1% of Aurion Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 12.3% of Aurion Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aurion Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aurion ResourcesN/AN/A-C$2.59M-C$0.06N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A

Summary

Aurion Resources beats Platinum Group Metals on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Lucara Diamond?

Lucara Diamond (TSE:LUC) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Lucara Diamond has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Platinum Group Metals' net margin of 0.00%. Lucara Diamond's return on equity of 4.15% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucara Diamond10.15% 4.15% 3.82%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -7.14%-10.89%

Lucara Diamond has a beta of 0.303661, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, suggesting that its stock price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

4.8% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.5% of Lucara Diamond shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Platinum Group Metals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucara Diamond. Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucara Diamond, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucara DiamondC$148.50M1.71-C$24.20MC$0.035.67
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A

In the previous week, Lucara Diamond's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Lucara Diamond is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lucara Diamond Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Negative

Summary

Lucara Diamond beats Platinum Group Metals on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Platinum Group Metals compare to Generation Mining?

Generation Mining (TSE:GENM) and Platinum Group Metals (TSE:PTM) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Generation Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Platinum Group Metals' score of -0.57 indicating that Generation Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Generation Mining Neutral
Platinum Group Metals Negative

0.3% of Generation Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 20.4% of Generation Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 26.5% of Platinum Group Metals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Platinum Group Metals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Generation Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Generation MiningN/AN/A-C$22.19M-C$0.19N/A
Platinum Group MetalsN/AN/A-C$3.42M-C$0.03N/A

Generation Mining's return on equity of 90.73% beat Platinum Group Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Generation MiningN/A 90.73% -71.47%
Platinum Group Metals N/A -7.14%-10.89%

Generation Mining has a beta of 2.107231, suggesting that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Platinum Group Metals has a beta of 2.555208, suggesting that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Platinum Group Metals beats Generation Mining on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Platinum Group Metals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PTM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PTM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPlatinum Group MetalsMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$272.40MC$4.05BC$5.06BC$12.57B
Dividend Yield7.58%5.17%4.67%6.25%
P/E Ratio-71.0025.5926.1439.47
Price / SalesN/A8,893.195,289.969.82
Price / Cash19.9229.6827.0982.29
Price / Book2.7612.7410.634.71
Net Income-C$3.42MC$125.14MC$156.32MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-1.84%-1.20%-0.98%-1.21%
1 Month Performance18.33%24.03%18.38%4.89%
1 Year Performance-8.97%56.14%44.32%28.63%

Platinum Group Metals Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PTM
Platinum Group Metals
N/AC$2.13
+0.5%		N/A-9.8%C$272.40MN/AN/A10
ODV
Osisko Development
N/AC$3.21
flat		C$9.00
+180.4%		-15.3%C$978.15MC$37.69MN/A310
NSR
Nomad Royalty
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$594.42MC$31.28M967.006
AU
Aurion Resources
N/AC$2.60
flat		N/A+135.9%C$437.85MN/AN/A20,730
LUC
Lucara Diamond
N/AC$0.17
flat		N/A-20.9%C$253.80MC$148.50M5.67324

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:PTM) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bezos… DOOMED
A single FCC filing hints Elon Musk is planning his biggest project yet - bigger than Tesla, SpaceX, and X com...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel