Go Pro

Freegold Ventures (FVL) Competitors

Freegold Ventures logo
C$0.97 -0.02 (-2.02%)
As of 01:47 PM Eastern

FVL vs. VZLA, NDM, ODV, TMQ, and NSR

Should you buy Freegold Ventures stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Freegold Ventures with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Freegold Ventures include Vizsla Silver (VZLA), Northern Dynasty Minerals (NDM), Osisko Development (ODV), Trilogy Metals (TMQ), and Nomad Royalty (NSR). These companies are all part of the "precious metals" industry.

How does Freegold Ventures compare to Vizsla Silver?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and Vizsla Silver (TSE:VZLA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat Vizsla Silver's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.11% -0.68%
Vizsla Silver N/A -35.45%N/A

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vizsla Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
Vizsla SilverN/AN/AN/A-C$0.49N/A

8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.2% of Vizsla Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, indicating that its share price is 178% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Vizsla Silver has a beta of 1.791471, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

Vizsla Silver has a consensus target price of C$8.70, indicating a potential upside of 83.93%. Given Vizsla Silver's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vizsla Silver is more favorable than Freegold Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freegold Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Vizsla Silver
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Vizsla Silver. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Freegold Ventures and 0 mentions for Vizsla Silver. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Vizsla Silver's score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures Positive
Vizsla Silver Neutral

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Vizsla Silver on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freegold Ventures compare to Northern Dynasty Minerals?

Northern Dynasty Minerals (TSE:NDM) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

8.5% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Northern Dynasty Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Northern Dynasty Minerals and Northern Dynasty Minerals both had 1 articles in the media. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' score of 0.80 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Dynasty Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Freegold Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Dynasty Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Dynasty MineralsN/AN/A-C$17.31M-C$0.10N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

Northern Dynasty Minerals has a beta of -0.491082, indicating that its stock price is 149% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, indicating that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat Northern Dynasty Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Dynasty MineralsN/A -106.87% -8.16%
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Northern Dynasty Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freegold Ventures compare to Osisko Development?

Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) and Osisko Development (CVE:ODV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Osisko Development shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.4% of Osisko Development shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Freegold Ventures has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Osisko Development. Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Osisko Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A
Osisko DevelopmentC$37.69M28.21-C$332.96M-C$0.49N/A

In the previous week, Osisko Development had 1 more articles in the media than Freegold Ventures. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Osisko Development and 1 mentions for Freegold Ventures. Osisko Development's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Freegold Ventures' score of 0.84 indicating that Osisko Development is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Freegold Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Osisko Development
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, meaning that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Osisko Development has a beta of 2.188337, meaning that its stock price is 119% more volatile than the broader market.

Osisko Development has a consensus price target of C$9.00, indicating a potential upside of 157.88%. Given Osisko Development's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Osisko Development is more favorable than Freegold Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Freegold Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Osisko Development
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Freegold Ventures has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Osisko Development's net margin of -189.60%. Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat Osisko Development's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Freegold VenturesN/A -5.11% -0.68%
Osisko Development -189.60%-10.60%-16.19%

Summary

Osisko Development beats Freegold Ventures on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freegold Ventures compare to Trilogy Metals?

Trilogy Metals (TSE:TMQ) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trilogy Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trilogy MetalsN/AN/A-C$7.09M-C$0.28N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

Freegold Ventures' return on equity of -5.11% beat Trilogy Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trilogy MetalsN/A -36.21% -2.82%
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

Trilogy Metals currently has a consensus price target of C$7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.72%. Given Trilogy Metals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Trilogy Metals is more favorable than Freegold Ventures.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trilogy Metals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Freegold Ventures
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

9.5% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by institutional investors. 17.9% of Trilogy Metals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trilogy Metals has a beta of 1.385419, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freegold Ventures has a beta of 2.782481, meaning that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trilogy Metals and Trilogy Metals both had 1 articles in the media. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Trilogy Metals' score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trilogy Metals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freegold Ventures
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Freegold Ventures beats Trilogy Metals on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Freegold Ventures compare to Nomad Royalty?

Nomad Royalty (TSE:NSR) and Freegold Ventures (TSE:FVL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Nomad Royalty has higher revenue and earnings than Freegold Ventures. Freegold Ventures is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad RoyaltyC$31.28M0.00C$614.70KC$0.01N/A
Freegold VenturesN/AN/A-C$809.92K-C$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Freegold Ventures had 1 more articles in the media than Nomad Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Freegold Ventures and 0 mentions for Nomad Royalty. Freegold Ventures' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Nomad Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Freegold Ventures is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomad Royalty Neutral
Freegold Ventures Positive

8.0% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Freegold Ventures shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomad Royalty's return on equity of 0.00% beat Freegold Ventures' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomad RoyaltyN/A N/A N/A
Freegold Ventures N/A -5.11%-0.68%

Nomad Royalty pays an annual dividend of C$0.16 per share. Freegold Ventures pays an annual dividend of C$0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Nomad Royalty pays out 1,587.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Freegold Ventures pays out -1,300.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Freegold Ventures is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Nomad Royalty and Freegold Ventures tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Freegold Ventures News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FVL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FVL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FVL vs. The Competition

MetricFreegold VenturesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$560.37MC$1.51BC$4.56BC$12.16B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%5.02%6.19%
P/E Ratio-97.0027.0622.7535.84
Price / SalesN/A56,212.196,751.7710.16
Price / Cash41.3624.6324.1282.29
Price / Book3.345.328.774.47
Net Income-C$809.92KC$70.60MC$157.33MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-3.96%-1.39%-1.33%0.25%
1 Month Performance-17.80%-8.19%-7.50%-2.12%
1 Year Performance-22.40%83.01%48.04%37.36%

Freegold Ventures Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FVL
Freegold Ventures
N/AC$0.97
-2.0%
N/A-17.5%C$560.37MN/AN/A3
VZLA
Vizsla Silver
0.8505 of 5 stars
C$4.44
+0.7%
C$8.70
+95.9%
+19.0%C$1.55BN/AN/A10
NDM
Northern Dynasty Minerals
N/AC$2.56
-1.2%
N/A+31.6%C$1.43BN/AN/AN/A
ODV
Osisko Development
1.3838 of 5 stars
C$3.39
+0.7%
C$9.00
+165.5%
+19.4%C$1.03BC$37.69MN/A310
TMQ
Trilogy Metals
1.6301 of 5 stars
C$4.72
-0.4%
C$7.00
+48.3%
+155.4%C$814.42MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:FVL) was last updated on 6/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners